Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Hyo-Joon Yang 3 Articles
Endoscopy
Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study
Jeeyeon Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyung Wook Kim, Jongha Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sung-Wook Hwang, Hyun Deok Shin, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Seok Lee, Yunho Jung, Young-Seok Cho, Young Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Kyu Chan Huh, Eu Mi Ahn
Intest Res 2019;17(3):413-418.   Published online April 8, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00156
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS).
Methods
A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P> 0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P> 0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P> 0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008).
Conclusions
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comments on Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Ji Eun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 192.     CrossRef
  • Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Ji Min Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Ho Suk Kang, Ja Seol Koo, Hyun Seok Lee, Seok-Hoo Jeong, Jung Ho Kim, Dae Bum Kim
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(4): 591.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
    Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
    Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study
    Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young-Seok Cho
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 716.     CrossRef
  • How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
    Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Laxatives for Oral Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: from High-volume to Novel Low-volume Solutions
    Soo-Young Na, Won Moon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 75(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • No inferioridad entre dos agentes de bajo volumen (Picosulfato de Sodio/Citrato de Magnesio vs. Sulfato de Sodio/Potasio/Magnesio) en la preparación de colon para procedimientos diagnósticos: estudio observacional
    Erika D. Pérez-Riveros, Margarita Rey R., Belén Mendoza De Molano, Juan Carlos Robayo, Jaime Solano Mariño, Rafael García Duperly, Andrés Gómez, Renzo Pinto Carta, Gerardo Ardila, Jose De la Hoz-Valle, Fernando Sierra-Arango
    Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología.2020; 35(4): 436.     CrossRef
  • 7,983 View
  • 257 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Is methylation analysis of SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters suitable for colorectal cancer screening in the Korean population?
Soo-Kyung Park, Hae Lim Baek, Junghee Yu, Ji Yeon Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Hungdai Kim, Hyung Ook Kim, Kyung Uk Jeong, Ho-Kyung Chun, Kyungeun Kim, Dong Il Park
Intest Res 2017;15(4):495-501.   Published online October 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.495
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using stool DNA was recently found to yield good detection rates. A multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard®, Exact Sciences), including methylated genes has been recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this study was to validate these aberrantly methylated genes as stool-based DNA markers for detecting CRC and colorectal advanced adenoma (AA) in the Korean population.

Methods

A single-center study was conducted in 36 patients with AA; 35 patients with CRC; and 40 endoscopically diagnosed healthy controls using CRC screening colonoscopy. The methylation status of the SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters was investigated blindly using bisulfate-modified stool DNA obtained from 111 participants. Methylation status was investigated by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Methylated SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoters were detected in 60.0%, 31.4%, 68.8%, and 40.0% of CRC samples and in 27.8%, 27.8%, 27.8%, and 33.3% of AA samples, respectively. The sensitivities obtained using 4 markers to detect CRC and AA were 94.3% and 72.2%, respectively. The specificity was 55.0%.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that the SFRP2, TFPI2, NDRG4, and BMP3 promoter methylation analysis of stool sample DNA showed high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting CRC and AA. Because of the low specificity, 4 methylated markers might not be sufficient for CRC screening in the Korean population. Further large-scale studies are required to validate the methylation of these markers in the Asian population and to find new markers for the Asian population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • DNA methylation modulates epigenetic regulation in colorectal cancer diagnosis, prognosis and precision medicine
    Jingxin Ye, Jianfeng Zhang, Weifeng Ding
    Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy.2024; 5(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • Pathogenesis and biomarkers of colorectal cancer by epigenetic alteration
    Chang Kyo Oh, Young-Seok Cho
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 131.     CrossRef
  • Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI-2)—an underappreciated partaker in cancer and metastasis
    Marek Z. Wojtukiewicz, Marta Mysliwiec, Anna Tokajuk, Joanna Kruszewska, Barbara Politynska, Anmbreen Jamroze, Anna M. Wojtukiewicz, Dean G. Tang, Kenneth V. Honn
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2024; 43(4): 1185.     CrossRef
  • Detecting colorectal cancer using genetic and epigenetic biomarkers: screening and diagnosis
    Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha, Nur Syahadati Retno Panenggak, Maria Inge Lusida, Raissa Virgy Rianda, Isna Mahmudah, Aditya Doni Pradana, Tomohisa Uchida, Muhammad Miftahussurur
    Journal of Medicine and Life.2024; 17(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • In Silico Gene Prioritization Highlights the Significance of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 (BMP4) Promoter Methylation across All Methylation Clusters in Colorectal Cancer
    Daša Jevšinek Skok, Nina Hauptman
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(16): 12692.     CrossRef
  • Novel biomarkers used for early diagnosis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies in colorectal cancer
    Huafeng Jiang, Senjun Zhou, Gang Li
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A novel screening method of DNA methylation biomarkers helps to improve the detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions
    Yuan Li, Bin Li, Rou Jiang, Leen Liao, Chunting Zheng, Jie Yuan, Liuhong Zeng, Kunling Hu, Yuyu Zhang, Weijian Mei, Zhigang Hong, Binyi Xiao, Lingheng Kong, Kai Han, Jinghua Tang, Wu Jiang, Zhizhong Pan, Shenyan Zhang, Peirong Ding
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(21): 20626.     CrossRef
  • Current Research on Molecular Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer in Stool Samples
    Patricio Órdenes, Claudio Carril Pardo, Roberto Elizondo-Vega, Karina Oyarce
    Biology.2023; 13(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Beyond liquid biopsy: Toward non-invasive assays for distanced cancer diagnostics in pandemics
    Francesco Ferrara, Sofia Zoupanou, Elisabetta Primiceri, Zulfiqur Ali, Maria Serena Chiriacò
    Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2022; 196: 113698.     CrossRef
  • Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer
    Aneta L. Zygulska, Piotr Pierzchalski
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(2): 852.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roya Dolatkhah, Saeed Dastgiri, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi, Mohammad Hossein Somi
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2022; 45(10): 753.     CrossRef
  • Technical considerations in PCR-based assay design for diagnostic DNA methylation cancer biomarkers
    Maartje Massen, Kim Lommen, Kim A. D. Wouters, Johan Vandersmissen, Wim van Criekinge, James G. Herman, Veerle Melotte, Leo J. Schouten, Manon van Engeland, Kim M. Smits
    Clinical Epigenetics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DNA methylation biomarkers in colorectal cancer: Clinical applications for precision medicine
    Nayeralsadat Fatemi, Sascha Tierling, Hamidreza Aboulkheyr Es, Maryam Varkiani, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Jörn Walter, Mehdi Totonchi
    International Journal of Cancer.2022; 151(12): 2068.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roya Dolatkhah, Saeed Dastgiri, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi, Mohammad Hossein Somi
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2022; 45(10): 753.     CrossRef
  • Performance evaluation of stool DNA methylation tests in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Mahir Gachabayov, Edward Lebovics, Aram Rojas, Daniel M Felsenreich, Rifat Latifi, Roberto Bergamaschi
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(5): 1030.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Multidimensional Assay for Non-Invasive Detection of Colorectal Cancer: Fecal Immunochemical Test, Stool DNA Mutation, Methylation, and Intestinal Bacteria Analysis
    Shaobo Mo, Hui Wang, Lingyu Han, Wenqiang Xiang, Weixing Dai, Pengfei Zhao, Fengchun Pei, Zhixi Su, Chengcheng Ma, Qi Li, Zhimin Wang, Sanjun Cai, Hao Wang, Rui Liu, Guoxiang Cai
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of DNA methylation markers for early detection of CRC indicates a role for nervous system-related genes in CRC
    Glenn Rademakers, Maartje Massen, Alexander Koch, Muriel X. Draht, Nikkie Buekers, Kim A. D. Wouters, Nathalie Vaes, Tim De Meyer, Beatriz Carvalho, Gerrit A. Meijer, James G. Herman, Kim M. Smits, Manon van Engeland, Veerle Melotte
    Clinical Epigenetics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Focus on Non-invasive Biomarkers
    Nadia El Kadmiri
    Current Drug Targets.2021; 22(9): 1043.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED: Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test
    Yi-Chiao Cheng, Po-Hsien Wu, Yen-Ju Chen, Cing-Han Yang, Jhen-Li Huang, Yu-Ching Chou, Pi-Kai Chang, Chia-Cheng Wen, Shu-Wen Jao, Hsin-Hui Huang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Tun-Wen Pai
    Genes.2021; 12(10): 1539.     CrossRef
  • Plausibility of an extensive use of stool DNA test for screening advanced colorectal neoplasia
    Jiayi Mu, Yanqin Huang, Shanrong Cai, Qilong Li, Yongmao Song, Ying Yuan, Suzhan Zhang, Shu Zheng
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2020; 501: 42.     CrossRef
  • Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: biomarker and therapeutic potential
    Gerhard Jung, Eva Hernández-Illán, Leticia Moreira, Francesc Balaguer, Ajay Goel
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2020; 17(2): 111.     CrossRef
  • Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer
    Hyung-Hoon Oh, Young-Eun Joo
    Intestinal Research.2020; 18(2): 168.     CrossRef
  • Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review
    Janhavi R. Raut, Zhong Guan, Petra Schrotz-King, Hermann Brenner
    Clinical Epigenetics.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hypermethylated Promoters of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein Genes are Associated with Colorectal Cancer
    Haochang Hu, Tiangong Wang, Ranran Pan, Yong Yang, Bin Li, Cong Zhou, Jun Zhao, Yi Huang, Shiwei Duan
    Pathology & Oncology Research.2019; 25(2): 567.     CrossRef
  • BMP3 promoter hypermethylation in plasma-derived cell-free DNA in colorectal cancer patients
    Parisa Rokni, Afsaneh Mojtabanezhad Shariatpanahi, Ebrahim Sakhinia, Mohammad Amin Kerachian
    Genes & Genomics.2018; 40(4): 423.     CrossRef
  • Syndecan-2 Methylation as a New Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasm
    Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park
    Gut and Liver.2018; 12(5): 479.     CrossRef
  • 6,746 View
  • 96 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Woo Shin Jeong, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Kyuyong Choi, Dong Il Park
Intest Res 2017;15(3):411-418.   Published online June 12, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopic polypectomy is the best diagnostic and therapeutic tool to detect and prevent colorectal neoplasms. However, previous studies have reported that 17% to 28% of colorectal polyps are missed during colonoscopy. We investigated the miss rate of neoplastic polyps and the factors associated with missed polyps from quality-adjusted consecutive colonoscopies.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients who were found to have colorectal polyps at a medical examination center of the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital between March 2012 and February 2013. Patients who were referred to a single tertiary academic medical center and underwent colonoscopic polypectomy on the same day were enrolled in our study. The odds ratios (ORs) associated with polyp-related and patient-related factors were evaluated using logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 463 patients and 1,294 neoplastic polyps were analyzed. The miss rates for adenomas, advanced adenomas, and carcinomas were 24.1% (312/1,294), 1.2% (15/1,294), and 0% (0/1,294), respectively. Flat/sessile-shaped adenomas (adjusted OR, 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40–5.46) and smaller adenomas (adjusted OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 2.84– 11.15 for ≤5 mm; adjusted OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.60–6.30 for 6–9 mm, respectively) were more frequently missed than pedunculated/sub-pedunculated adenomas and larger adenomas. In patients with 2 or more polyps compared with only one detected (adjusted OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.55–3.61 for 2–4 polyps; adjusted OR, 11.52; 95% CI, 4.61–28.79 for ≥5 polyps, respectively) during the first endoscopy, the risk of missing an additional polyp was significantly higher.

Conclusions

One-quarter of neoplastic polyps was missed during colonoscopy. We encourage endoscopists to detect smaller and flat or sessile polyps by using the optimal withdrawal technique.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • UM-Net: Rethinking ICGNet for polyp segmentation with uncertainty modeling
    Xiuquan Du, Xuebin Xu, Jiajia Chen, Xuejun Zhang, Lei Li, Heng Liu, Shuo Li
    Medical Image Analysis.2025; 99: 103347.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs
    M. Maida, G. Marasco, M.H.J. Maas, D. Ramai, M. Spadaccini, E. Sinagra, A. Facciorusso, P.D. Siersema, C. Hassan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2025; 57(1): 169.     CrossRef
  • The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy
    Abhinav K. Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C. Rockey
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: A dynamic loss function for improved semantic segmentation
    Haroon Haider Khan, Majid Iqbal Khan
    Soft Computing.2024; 28(S2): 731.     CrossRef
  • Additional 30-Second Observation of the Right-Sided Colon for Missed Polyp Detection With Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Compared with Narrow Band Imaging: A Randomized Trial
    Naohisa Yoshida, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Reo Kobayashi, Yuri Tomita, Hikaru Hashimoto, Osamu Dohi, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Takaaki Murakami, Yasutaka Morimoto, Yusuke Okuyama, Yukiko Morinaga, Yoshito Itoh
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(3): 539.     CrossRef
  • Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education
    Forrest Bohler, Nikhil Aggarwal, Garrett Peters, Varna Taranikanti
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation Using a Hybrid Vision Transformer and a Hybrid Loss Function
    Evgin Goceri
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 37(2): 851.     CrossRef
  • SAEFormer: stepwise attention emphasis transformer for polyp segmentation
    Yicai Tan, Lei Chen, Chudong Zheng, Hui Ling, Xinshan Lai
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2024; 83(30): 74833.     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation With the FCB-SwinV2 Transformer
    Kerr Fitzgerald, Jorge Bernal, Aymeric Histace, Bogdan J. Matuszewski
    IEEE Access.2024; 12: 38927.     CrossRef
  • Leveraging a realistic synthetic database to learn Shape-from-Shading for estimating the colon depth in colonoscopy images
    Josué Ruano, Martín Gómez, Eduardo Romero, Antoine Manzanera
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2024; 115: 102390.     CrossRef
  • DHAFormer: Dual-channel hybrid attention network with transformer for polyp segmentation
    Xuejie Huang, Liejun Wang, Shaochen Jiang, Lianghui Xu, Chung-Ming Lo
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0306596.     CrossRef
  • The Findings of Index Colonoscopy in Patients with Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer (PCCRC)
    Seiji Kimura
    Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2024; 77(8): 457.     CrossRef
  • Detection of various gastrointestinal tract diseases through a deep learning method with ensemble ELM and explainable AI
    Md. Faysal Ahamed, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Md. Rabiul Islam, Mansura Naznine, Mohamed Arselene Ayari, Amith Khandakar, Julfikar Haider
    Expert Systems with Applications.2024; 256: 124908.     CrossRef
  • A Hessian-Based Technique for Specular Reflection Detection and Inpainting in Colonoscopy Images
    Khaled ELKarazle, Valliappan Raman, Caslon Chua, Patrick Then
    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.2024; 28(8): 4724.     CrossRef
  • Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy
    Manuel Zorzi, Lucia Calciano, Nicola Gennaro, Laura Memo, Silvia Rizzato, Carmen Stocco, Emanuele D L Urso, Silvia Negro, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Marta Sbaraglia, Stefano Guzzinati
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2024; 11(1): e001434.     CrossRef
  • The Interplay among Wnt/β-catenin Family Members in Colorectal Adenomas and Surrounding Tissues
    Domenica Lucia D’Antonio, Fabiana Fantini, Carmelo Moscatello, Alessio Ferrone, Stefano Scaringi, Rosa Valanzano, Ferdinando Ficari, Konstantinos Efthymakis, Matteo Neri, Gitana Maria Aceto, Maria Cristina Curia
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(8): 1730.     CrossRef
  • Review: Risk assessment of liver and biliary cancer mortality through detection of high risk polyps at colonoscopies
    Abeera Tariq, Fnu Hafeezullah, Abdul Basit Khan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(12): 2168.     CrossRef
  • Trivariate Joint Modeling for Family Data with Longitudinal Counts, Recurrent Events and a Terminal Event with Application to Lynch Syndrome
    Jingwei Lu, Grace Y. Yi, Denis Rustand, Patrick Parfrey, Laurent Briollais, Yun‐hee Choi
    Statistics in Medicine.2024; 43(26): 5000.     CrossRef
  • A complete benchmark for polyp detection, segmentation and classification in colonoscopy images
    Yael Tudela, Mireia Majó, Neil de la Fuente, Adrian Galdran, Adrian Krenzer, Frank Puppe, Amine Yamlahi, Thuy Nuong Tran, Bogdan J. Matuszewski, Kerr Fitzgerald, Cheng Bian, Junwen Pan, Shijle Liu, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Aymeric Histace, Jorge Bernal
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CafeNet: A Novel Multi‐Scale Context Aggregation and Multi‐Level Foreground Enhancement Network for Polyp Segmentation
    Zhanlin Ji, Xiaoyu Li, Zhiwu Wang, Haiyang Zhang, Na Yuan, Xueji Zhang, Ivan Ganchev
    International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An optimized deep focused U-Net model for image segmentation
    Haroon Haider Khan, Majid Iqbal Khan
    Neural Computing and Applications.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of colonoscopic re-examination across the entire colon: a randomized controlled trial
    Dong Seok Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Tae-Geun Gweon, Myeongsook Seo, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(11): 6711.     CrossRef
  • A lighter hybrid feature fusion framework for polyp segmentation
    He Xue, Luo Yonggang, Liu Min, Li Lin
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significant Missed Polyps in the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP): A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Contributing Factors
    Anita Golash, Kevin Yoong, Ramasamy Saravanan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided tumor visualization of colorectal cancer using tumor-initiating probe yellow in preclinical models
    Sun Young Kim, Jinhyeon Kim, Hajung Kim, Young-Tae Chang, Hwa-Young Kwon, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Jin-ho Shin, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byung Ho Son, Seung-Jae Myun
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colonic Polyp Study: Differences in Adenoma Characteristics Based on Colonoscopy History over 5-Year Follow-Up Period
    Sang Hyun Park, Kwang Il Hong, Hyun Chul Park, Young Sun Kim, Gene Hyun Bok, Kyung Ho Kim, Dong Suk Shin, Jae Yong Han, Young Kwan Kim, Yeun Jong Choi, Soo Hoon Eun, Byung Hoon Lim, Kyeong Kun Kwack
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 194.     CrossRef
  • An ensemble framework of deep neural networks for colorectal polyp classification
    Farah Younas, Muhammad Usman, Wei Qi Yan
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2023; 82(12): 18925.     CrossRef
  • Effect of computer‐aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Sagar Shah, Nathan Park, Nabil El Hage Chehade, Anastasia Chahine, Marc Monachese, Amelie Tiritilli, Zain Moosvi, Ronald Ortizo, Jason Samarasena
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 38(2): 162.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of missed adenomas in deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy: A multicenter retrospective study
    Yue Sui, Yanhua Zheng, Qing Wang, Jieping Lv, Hongjin Wang, Qing Wen, Zhenzhen Wang, Guanfeng Wang, Hui Jia, Fengzhen Cao, Naping Wang, Junlian Hao, Yiping Zhang, Xiaopeng Wu, Haihua Chen, Junhui Lu, Xing Chen
    European Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 110: 48.     CrossRef
  • A Real-Time Polyp-Detection System with Clinical Application in Colonoscopy Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
    Adrian Krenzer, Michael Banck, Kevin Makowski, Amar Hekalo, Daniel Fitting, Joel Troya, Boban Sudarevic, Wolfgang G. Zoller, Alexander Hann, Frank Puppe
    Journal of Imaging.2023; 9(2): 26.     CrossRef
  • Robust real-time polyp detection system design based on YOLO algorithms by optimizing activation functions and hyper-parameters with artificial bee colony (ABC)
    Ahmet Karaman, Ishak Pacal, Alper Basturk, Bahriye Akay, Ufuk Nalbantoglu, Seymanur Coskun, Omur Sahin, Dervis Karaboga
    Expert Systems with Applications.2023; 221: 119741.     CrossRef
  • Efficient Gastrointestinal Disease Classification Using Pretrained Deep Convolutional Neural Network
    Muhammad Nouman Noor, Muhammad Nazir, Sajid Ali Khan, Oh-Young Song, Imran Ashraf
    Electronics.2023; 12(7): 1557.     CrossRef
  • The basis and implications of diverging approaches to colorectal adenoma surveillance in the West
    Tsai‐Wing Ow, Edmund Tse, Guru Iyngkaran, Finlay Macrae
    Internal Medicine Journal.2023; 53(4): 635.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of artificial intelligence integrated fluorescence endoscopy image analysis with indocyanine green for interpretation of precancerous lesions in colon cancer
    Jinhyeon Kim, Hajung Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Sungjee Kim, Doowon Choi, Jihyun Chun, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sun Young Kim, Seung-Jae Myung,
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(5): e0286189.     CrossRef
  • Linked color imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Jun Watanabe, Takeshi Kanno, Eiichi Kakehi, Kazuma Rifu, Takehiro Kagaya, Kazuhiko Kotani, Yuki Kataoka
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improved Colorectal Polyp Segmentation Using Enhanced MA-NET and Modified Mix-ViT Transformer
    Khaled Elkarazle, Valliappan Raman, Patrick Then, Caslon Chua
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 69295.     CrossRef
  • Localization and Classification of Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders Using Explainable AI from Endoscopic Images
    Muhammad Nouman Noor, Muhammad Nazir, Sajid Ali Khan, Imran Ashraf, Oh-Young Song
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(15): 9031.     CrossRef
  • Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection
    Xiaoli Wu, Chun-Wei Chen, Sangeeta Jaiswal, Tse-Shao Chang, Ruoliu Zhang, Michael K. Dame, Yuting Duan, Hui Jiang, Jason R. Spence, Sen-Yung Hsieh, Thomas D. Wang
    Cancers.2023; 15(19): 4795.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
    Adriel Abraham, Rejath Jose, Jawad Ahmad, Jai Joshi, Thomas Jacob, Aziz-ur-rahman Khalid, Hassam Ali, Pratik Patel, Jaspreet Singh, Milan Toma
    Journal of Imaging.2023; 9(10): 215.     CrossRef
  • Wide-field endoscope accessory for multiplexed fluorescence imaging
    Gaoming Li, Miki Lee, Tse-Shao Chang, Joonyoung Yu, Haijun Li, Xiyu Duan, Xiaoli Wu, Sangeeta Jaiswal, Shuo Feng, Kenn R. Oldham, Thomas D. Wang
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis and research on intelligent manufacturing medical product design and intelligent hospital system dynamics based on machine learning under big data
    Zongxin Liu, Jiaozi Pu
    Enterprise Information Systems.2022; 16(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Application of multimedia network english listening model based on confidence learning algorithm for speech recognition
    Yingting Zhang, Zewei Huang
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management.2022; 13(S3): 1091.     CrossRef
  • Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation
    Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2022; 95: 102026.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic image synthesis with generative adversarial network for enhanced detection of sessile serrated lesions using convolutional neural network
    Dan Yoon, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Byeong Soo Kim, Woo Sang Cho, Jung Chan Lee, Minwoo Cho, Min Hyuk Lim, Sun Young Yang, Seon Hee Lim, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Hyun Song, Goh Eun Chung, Ji Min Choi, Hae Yeon Kang, Jung Ho Bae, Sungwan Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endo‐wing versus transparent hood‐assisted colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial
    Kazuya Miyaguchi, Yoshikazu Tsuzuki, Nobutaka Hirooka, Rie Shiomi, Hideki Ohgo, Hidetomo Nakamoto, Hiroyuki Imaeda
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(4): 766.     CrossRef
  • AI and Clinical Decision Making: The Limitations and Risks of Computational Reductionism in Bowel Cancer Screening
    Saleem Ameen, Ming-Chao Wong, Kwang-Chien Yee, Paul Turner
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(7): 3341.     CrossRef
  • BlazeNeo: Blazing Fast Polyp Segmentation and Neoplasm Detection
    Nguyen S. An, Phan N. Lan, Dao V. Hang, Dao V. Long, Tran Q. Trung, Nguyen T. Thuy, Dinh V. Sang
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 43669.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
    Xiaobo Wang, Haiyang Guo, Yong Tang, Lin Chen, Xianfei Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial
    Jung Hun Woo, Hoon Sup Koo, Dae Sung Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Yunho Jung, Kyu Chan Huh
    Medicine.2022; 101(35): e30355.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study
    Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young-Seok Cho
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 716.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy Lifetime Systems Architecture: Scoping Out the Past to Diagnose the Future Technology
    Craig M. Browning, Robert Cloutier, Thomas C. Rich, Silas J. Leavesley
    Systems.2022; 10(5): 189.     CrossRef
  • A stacking-based artificial intelligence framework for an effective detection and localization of colon polyps
    Carina Albuquerque, Roberto Henriques, Mauro Castelli
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of water exchange method on adenoma miss rate of patients undergoing selective polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Gui Ren, Xiangping Wang, Hui Luo, Shaowei Yao, Shuhui Liang, Linhui Zhang, Tao Dong, Long Chen, Qin Tao, Xuegang Guo, Ying Han, Yanglin Pan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2021; 53(5): 625.     CrossRef
  • Feature Point Tracking-Based Localization of Colon Capsule Endoscope
    Jürgen Herp, Ulrik Deding, Maria M. Buijs, Rasmus Kroijer, Gunnar Baatrup, Esmaeil S. Nadimi
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors associated with missed colorectal lesions in colonoscopy and impact of colonoscopy with anesthesia on miss rate
    Haibin Dong, Yutang Ren, Bo Jiang
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Scarlet Nazarian, Ben Glover, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Julian Teare
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(7): e27370.     CrossRef
  • Focus U-Net: A novel dual attention-gated CNN for polyp segmentation during colonoscopy
    Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2021; 137: 104815.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Seung-Woo Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Jeong Rok Lee, Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(12): 5461.     CrossRef
  • Water Exchange (WE) and Quality Improvement—Enhanced Advanced Adenoma Detection
    Felix W. Leung, Malcolm Koo, Hui Jia, Joseph W. Leung, Sergio Cadoni, Premysl Falt, Yu-Hsi Hsieh, Chi-Tan Hu, Yanglin Pan, Franco Radaelli
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 54(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Tubular Locomotion and Positioning Using Tip Eversion for Endoscopy
    Ankit Saxena, Eric M. Pauli, Randy S. Haluck, Barry Fell, Jason Moore
    Journal of Medical Devices.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Aspects of Colorectal Adenomas: The Interplay among Microenvironment, Oxidative Stress, and Predisposition
    Gitana Maria Aceto, Teresa Catalano, Maria Cristina Curia, Qiang Tong
    BioMed Research International.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing on Colonoscopic Findings in Routine Screening Practice
    Tobias Niedermaier, Efrat L. Amitay, Anton Gies, Korbinian Weigl, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(4): e00169.     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation with Fully Convolutional Deep Neural Networks—Extended Evaluation Study
    Yunbo Guo, Jorge Bernal, Bogdan J. Matuszewski
    Journal of Imaging.2020; 6(7): 69.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review of deep learning in colon cancer
    Ishak Pacal, Dervis Karaboga, Alper Basturk, Bahriye Akay, Ufuk Nalbantoglu
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2020; 126: 104003.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence technologies for the detection of colorectal lesions: The future is now
    Simona Attardo, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Marco Spadaccini, Roberta Maselli, Harsh K Patel, Madhav Desai, Antonio Capogreco, Matteo Badalamenti, Piera Alessia Galtieri, Gaia Pellegatta, Alessandro Fugazza, Silvia Carrara, Andrea Anderloni, Piet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(37): 5606.     CrossRef
  • Training a computer-aided polyp detection system to detect sessile serrated adenomas using public domain colonoscopy videos
    Taibo Li, Jeremy R. Glissen Brown, Kelovoulos Tsourides, Nadim Mahmud, Jonah M. Cohen, Tyler M. Berzin
    Endoscopy International Open.2020; 08(10): E1448.     CrossRef
  • PICCOLO White-Light and Narrow-Band Imaging Colonoscopic Dataset: A Performance Comparative of Models and Datasets
    Luisa F. Sánchez-Peralta, J. Blas Pagador, Artzai Picón, Ángel José Calderón, Francisco Polo, Nagore Andraka, Roberto Bilbao, Ben Glover, Cristina L. Saratxaga, Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo
    Applied Sciences.2020; 10(23): 8501.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations
    Hiroyuki Tamaki, Teruyo Noda, Masahiro Morita, Akina Omura, Atsushi Kubo, Chikara Ogawa, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Mitsushige Shibatoge
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal endoscopic system based on multispectral and photometric stereo imaging and analysis
    Jihun Kim, Hasan Al Faruque, Sewoong Kim, Eunjoo Kim, Jae Youn Hwang
    Biomedical Optics Express.2019; 10(5): 2289.     CrossRef
  • Blue Laser Imaging, Blue Light Imaging, and Linked Color Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Tumors
    Naohisa Yoshida, Osamu Dohi, Ken Inoue, Ritsu Yasuda, Takaaki Murakami, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Yuji Naito, Yutaka Inada, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Rafiz Abdul Rani, Yoshito Itoh
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(2): 140.     CrossRef
  • Application of OCT in the Gastrointestinal Tract
    Nicholas S. Samel, Hiroshi Mashimo
    Applied Sciences.2019; 9(15): 2991.     CrossRef
  • Near-Infrared Fluorescent Activated Polymeric Probe for Imaging Intraluminal Colorectal Cancer Tumors
    Eva Kopansky-Groisman, Inga Kogan-Zviagin, Osnat Sella-Tavor, Mor Oron-Herman, Ayelet David
    Biomacromolecules.2019; 20(9): 3547.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study
    Ji Young Chang, Chang Mo Moon, Hyun Jung Lee, Hyo-Joon Yang, Yunho Jung, Sang Wook Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Frank T. Kolligs
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(4): e0195709.     CrossRef
  • Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal
    Peel Jung, Su B. Park, Hyung W. Kim, Dae H. Kang, Cheol W. Choi, Su J. Kim, Hyeong S. Nam, Dae G. Ryu, Joung B. Hong, Dong J. Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(25): e11253.     CrossRef
  • Dielectric properties of colon polyps, cancer, and normal mucosa: Ex vivo measurements from 0.5 to 20 GHz
    Marta Guardiola, Santiago Buitrago, Glòria Fernández‐Esparrach, Joan M. O'Callaghan, Jordi Romeu, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Henry Córdova, Miguel Ángel González Ballester, Oscar Camara
    Medical Physics.2018; 45(8): 3768.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study
    Naohisa Yoshida, Ken Inoue, Ritsu Yasuda, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yuji Naito, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Rafiz Abdul Rani, Yoshito Itoh
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2018; 63(12): 3457.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Additional Thirty Seconds Observation with Linked Color Imaging Improves Detection of Missed Polyps in the Right-Sided Colon
    Naohisa Yoshida, Yutaka Inada, Ritsu Yasuda, Takaaki Murakami, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yuji Naito, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Eiichi Konishi, Yoshito Itoh
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Imaging of Colorectal Tumors by Targeting Colon Cancer Secreted Protein-2 (CCSP-2)
    Jaeil Kim, Eun-ju Do, Helen Moinova, Sang Mun Bae, Ja Young Kang, Seung-Mo Hong, Stephen P. Fink, Jinmyoung Joo, Young-Ah Suh, Se Jin Jang, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Jaewon Choe, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sanfo
    Neoplasia.2017; 19(10): 805.     CrossRef
  • 11,340 View
  • 103 Download
  • 94 Web of Science
  • 80 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP