Intestinal Research

Jeong-Seon Ji

2 Articles

Endoscopy

Three-year colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in Korea: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter prospective study: Won Seok Choi, Dong Soo Han, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung-Ae Jung, Sang Kil Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Cheol Hee Park, Suck-Ho Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Sung Jae Shin, Bora Keum, Hyun Soo Kim, Jung Hye Choi, Sin-Ho Jung; Intest Res 2018;16(1):126-133. Published online January 18, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.126

<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopic surveillance is currently recommended after polypectomy owing to the risk of newly developed colonic neoplasia. However, few studies have investigated colonoscopy surveillance in Asia. This multicenter and prospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of advanced adenoma based on baseline adenoma findings at 3 years after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Methods

A total of 1,323 patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively assigned to 3-year colonoscopy surveillance at 11 tertiary endoscopic centers. Relative risks for advanced adenoma after 3 years were calculated according to baseline adenoma characteristics.

Results

Among 1,323 patients enrolled, 387 patients (29.3%) were followed up, and the mean follow-up interval was 31.0±9.8 months. The percentage of patients with advanced adenoma on baseline colonoscopy was higher in the surveillance group compared to the non-surveillance group (34.4% vs. 25.7%). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed in 17 patients (4.4%) at follow-up. The risk of advanced adenoma recurrence was 2 times greater in patients with baseline advanced adenoma than in those with baseline non-advanced adenoma, though the difference was not statistically significant (6.8% [9/133] vs. 3.1% [8/254], P=0.09). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed only in males and in subjects aged ≥50 years. In contrast, adenoma recurrence was observed in 187 patients (48.3%) at follow-up. Male sex, older age (≥50 years), and multiple adenomas (≥3) at baseline were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence.

Conclusions

A colonoscopy surveillance interval of 3 years in patients with baseline advanced adenoma can be considered appropriate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis
Shi-Yi Zhang, Ying-Chun Wang, Lei-Lei Liu, Zhi-Heng Wang, Xue-Mei Guan
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
When should patients take simethicone orally before colonoscopy for avoiding bubbles: A single-blind, randomized controlled study
Woohyuk Jung, Gyu Man Oh, Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Min Young Son, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33728. CrossRef
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884. CrossRef
Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings
Chan Hyuk Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 974. CrossRef
Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239. CrossRef
Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after resection of low-risk diminutive versus small adenomas
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(3): 622. CrossRef
Optimal Colonoscopic Surveillance Interval After Normal Baseline Screening Colonoscopy
Jian Dong, Minman Wu, Jiarong Miao, Rana Sami Ullah Khan, Tao Zhi, Tianmei Zhang, Xue Li, Yashi Peng, Gang Yang, Qiong Nan
Gastroenterology Nursing.2020; 43(3): 225. CrossRef
Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of 1- to 5-mm versus 6- to 9-mm adenomas on the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia
Yoon Suk Jung, Tae Jun Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Chan Hyuk Park
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(3): 692. CrossRef
Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504. CrossRef
What Is Appropriate Upper Endoscopic Interval Among Dyspeptic Patients With Previously Normal Endoscopy? A Multicenter Study With Bayesian Change Point Analysis
Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Joong Goo Kwon, Jung Bok Lee, Jong Kyu Park, Ki Bae Bang, Chung Hyun Tae, Jung Hwan Oh
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(4): 544. CrossRef
Risk of Developing Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia After Polypectomy in Patients With Multiple Diminutive or Small Adenomas
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(10): 1657. CrossRef

9,876 View
86 Download
13 Web of Science
12 Crossref

Removal of Rectal Foreign Bodies Using Tenaculum Forceps Under Endoscopic Assistance: Keun Joon Lim, Joon Sung Kim, Boo Gyoung Kim, Sung Min Park, Jeong-Seon Ji, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi; Intest Res 2015;13(4):355-359. Published online October 15, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.355

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

The incidence of rectal foreign bodies is increasing by the day, though not as common as that of upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Various methods for removal of foreign bodies have been reported. Removal during endoscopy using endoscopic devices is simple and safe, but if the foreign body is too large to be removed by this method, other methods are required. We report two cases of rectal foreign body removal by a relatively simple and inexpensive technique. A 42-year-old man with a vibrator in the rectum was admitted due to inability to remove it by himself and various endoscopic methods failed. Finally, the vibrator was removed successfully by using tenaculum forceps under endoscopic assistance. Similarly, a 59-year-old man with a carrot in the rectum was admitted. The carrot was removed easily by using the same method as that in the previous case. The use of tenaculum forceps under endoscopic guidance may be a useful method for removal of rectal foreign bodies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Characteristics and Outcomes Associated With Emergent Rectal Foreign Body Management: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
Eric Frendt, Momin Masroor, Arman Saied, Arianna Neeki, Santana Youssoffi, Aldin Malkoc, Fanglong Dong, Louis Tran, Rodney Borger, David T Wong, Michael Neeki
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of unusual rectal foreign body – Case report and literature review
Ana Elisa de Landa Moraes Teixeira Grossi, Juan Eduardo Rios Rodriguez, Alexia Aina de Freitas Sousa, Danielle Alcântara Barbosa Machado, Victor Vinícius Monteiro Lins de Albuquerque, Frank Pinheiro Pessoa Coelho de Macedo
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 94: 107051. CrossRef
Novel Bedside Utilization of Foley Catheter in the Emergent Removal of Colorectal Foreign Body: A Case Report and Literature Review
Terry Lefcourt, Andrew Ku, Leo Issagholian, Arianna S Neeki, Milton Retamozo, Fanglong Dong, Michael M Neeki
Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopy-assisted Removal of a Large Rectal Foreign Body by the Valsalva Maneuver
Min Young Son, Seun Ja Park, Won Moon, Gyu Man Oh, Moo In Park, Sung Eun Kim, Jae Hyun Kim, Kyoungwon Jung
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 76(1): 42. CrossRef
Rectal Foreign Body Removal in the Emergency Department: A Case Report
Samuel Nesemann, Kimberly Hubbard, Mehdi Siddiqui, William Fernandez
Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine.2020; 4(3): 450. CrossRef
Pfählungsverletzungen und rektale Fremdkörper
M. Roblick, S. Farke
coloproctology.2019; 41(1): 49. CrossRef
Pfählungsverletzungen und rektale Fremdkörper
M. Roblick, S. Farke
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin.2019; 22(5): 449. CrossRef
New endoscopic technique for retrieval of large colonic foreign bodies and an endoscopy-oriented review of the literature
Alberto Tringali, Giulia Bonato, Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Massimiliano Mutignani
BMJ Case Reports.2018; 2018: bcr-2018-226348. CrossRef
Rectal Foreign Body of Eggplant Treated Successfully by Endoscopic Transanal Removal
Hiroo Sei, Toshihiko Tomita, Keisuke Nakai, Kumiko Nakamura, Akio Tamura, Yoshio Ohda, Tadayuki Oshima, Hirokazu Fukui, Jiro Watari, Hiroto Miwa
Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2018; 12(1): 189. CrossRef
Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: a 10-year single-center experience
Pia Kokemohr, Lars Haeder, Fabian Joachim Frömling, Peter Landwehr, Joachim Jähne
Innovative Surgical Sciences.2017; 2(2): 89. CrossRef
Successful Transanal Removal of a Rectal Foreign Body by Abdominal Compression under Endoscopic and X-Ray Fluoroscopic Observation: A Case Report
Hironobu Mikami, Norihisa Ishimura, Akihiko Oka, Ichiro Moriyama, Takafumi Yuki, Kousaku Kawashima, Shuichi Sato, Shunji Ishihara, Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2016; 10(3): 646. CrossRef

6,648 View
58 Download
9 Web of Science
11 Crossref

Author index