Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Kyo Sang Yoo 3 Articles
A Clinical Review of the Intussusception in Adult
Su Jin Kim, Cheol Hee Park, Yong Min Kim, Seong Yeol Kim, Seung Yeon Chun, Chin Woo Kwon, Ji Won Park, Kyoung Oh Kim, Il Hyun Baek, Kyo Sang Yoo, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park
Intest Res 2012;10(2):183-188.   Published online April 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2012.10.2.183
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background/Aims
Intussusception is uncommon in adults compared with children. The present study aimed to review our experience of adult intussusceptions and discuss the preoperative diagnosis and management. Methods: A retrospective review was performed for 25 patients, at least 18 years old. These patients were diagnosed as intestinal intussusceptions at Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital from January 1999 to October 2010. Results: There were 14 male and 11 female with a mean age of 55 years. The most common symptom was abdominal pain. The preoperative diagnostic rate was 92% because of the use of an abdominal computed tomography (CT) and an ultrasound. A total of 9 (36%) patients had enteroenteric intussusception, 8 had ileocolic, 1 had ileocecal and 7 patients had colocolic intussusception. A discrete pathologic process was present in 22 (88%) patients and the remaining 3 (12%) patients were idiopathic. There were 12 small bowel lesions and 10 colonic lesions. Neoplasms were the most common etiology of intussusceptions. Of the cases with a defined colonic cause, 8 (80%) were malignant. Overall, 12 (48%) patients underwent primary resection of the intussusception without prior reduction, 11 (44%) patients had reduction of their intussusception followed by resection. Conclusions: Adult colonic intussusception is usually associated with malignancy. All patients with obstruction of unknown cause or lead point on CT should consider surgical exploration. (Intest Res 2012;10: 0-188)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adult intussusception caused by inverted Meckel's diverticulum treated with operation
    Sung Yun Lee, Jae Yoon Jeong, Seung Hyun Hong, Seung Min Woo, Su Heui Lee, Hyun Joo You, Dong Won Kim
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2016; 33(2): 116.     CrossRef
  • Conservative Management of Adult Small Bowel Intussusception Detected at Abdominal Computed Tomography
    Ju Sun Kim, Jae Hoon Lim, Jin Ho Jeong, Wan Sung Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 65(5): 291.     CrossRef
  • Adult intussusceptions: preoperative predictive factors for malignant lead point
    Kil Hwan Kim, Hwan Namgung, Dong Guk Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 86(5): 244.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Small Bowel Intussusception Caused by Jejunal Hamartoma Confused as Hepatitis A in an Adult
    Joon Hur, Gu-Min Cho, Young Ook Eum, Ji Young Park, Mi Sung Kim, Byung Seong Ko, Hyang Mi Shin, Seung-Myoung Son
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2012; 29(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • 2,395 View
  • 19 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
A Case of Henoch-Schönlein Purpura with Suspicious Focal Bowel Necrosis in an Adult
Su Jin Kim, Cheol Hee Park, So Yeon Kim, In Joung Lee, Chul Min Park, Chang Beom Cho, Jin Woo Kwon, Ji Won Park, Kyung Rim Huh, Kyoung Oh Kim, Il Hyun Baek, Kyo Sang Yoo, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park
Intest Res 2011;9(2):148-152.   Published online August 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2011.9.2.148
AbstractAbstract PDF
Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) is a vasculitis of the small vessels of the skin, joints, gastrointestinal tract, and kidneys characterized by immunoglobulin A deposits in the involved organs. HSP is typified by the classic tetrad of purpura, arthralgia, abdominal pain, and renal involvement. It is common in childhood, but may also occur in adults and can be accompanied by severe complications. Gastrointestinal symptoms occur in up to 85% of patients, and gastrointestinal involvement can manifest as severe problems including intussusception, obstruction, and perforation. The disease course is often self-limited, but severe manifestations occasionally require surgical intervention. We report the case of a 24-year-old man with HSP who presented with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computerized tomography revealed thickening of the ileal wall and multifocal disrupted prominent mucosal enhancement. These findings suggested hemorrhagic enteritis and mucosal necrosis. After treatment with high dose corticosteroids, the lesion improved and surgical intervention was avoided. Our experience suggests that corticosteroid therapy may help in controlling HSP with suspicious small bowel necrosis. (Intest Res 2011;9:148-152)
  • 2,480 View
  • 15 Download
Close layer
The Safety of Colonoscopy Using Sedation with Propofol
Jong Pyo Kim, Cheol Hee Park, Jae One Jung, Joon Ho Moon, Woon Geon Shin, Kyoung Oh Kim, Tae Ho Han, Kyo Sang Yoo, Sang Hoon Park, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park
Intest Res 2005;3(1):11-17.   Published online June 30, 2005
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background/Aims
The usage of sedative agents like midazolam or propofol and a desire for efficient and safe endoscopy have contributed to changes in the practice of endoscopic sedation. The clinical efficacy and safety of propofol as premedication for outpatient colonoscopy is under evaluation in Korea. We compared propofol to low-dose midazolam for colonoscopy with conscious sedation. Methods: Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive either propofol or low-dose midazolam (0.05 mg/kg). Total 92 patients were divided into 2 groups (propofol group: 51, low-dose midazolam group: 41). Induction of sedation, procedure and recovery time, patient's and doctor's satisfaction, complications were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in sex ratio and mean age. The changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate and oxygen saturation were not significant in both groups. Patients receiving propofol tolerated colonoscopy much more than those with low-dose midazolam. Major complications such as hemodynamic instability or apnea did not occur in both groups. Conclusions: Propofol was safe and effective premedication for conscious sedation in colonoscopy. Propofol has several advantages over low-dose midazolam. (Intest Res 2005;3:11-17)
  • 1,326 View
  • 16 Download
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP