-
Clinical Usefulness of Centrifugal Leukapheresis in the Patients with Steroid-dependent Ulcerative Colitis: Long-term Follow-up Result
-
Hwang Choi, Kyu Yong Choi, Bo In Lee, Hyong Ju Kang, Soo Jeong Park, Byung Wook Kim, Chi Wha Han, In Sik Chung
-
Intest Res 2005;3(2):110-116. Published online December 30, 2005
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Background/Aims
Although the etiologies of ulcerative colitis have not been proven yet, activated leukocytes have a great role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. We studied to evaluate the long-term clinical usefulness and adverse effect of the leukocyte removal technique (leukapheresis) for the patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. Methods: Eight patients who had performed leukapheresis for management of steroid-dependent active ulcerative colitis were analyzed retrospectively. We used a centrifugal method (Cobe Spectra, Gambro BCT, Inc, USA) for the leukapheresis. The schedule was one session weekly for 5 weeks of intensive therapy and one session monthly of maintenance therapy. The number of leukapheresis performed was average of 9.5 cycles. The simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCI) and complete blood counts were checked before and after each sessions of leukapheresis. We observed the side effects of leukapheresis and clinical outcomes of the patients over 2 years. Results: After 5 sessions of leukapheresis, the average SCCI decreased from 8.75 to 0.5 (p<0.001). All patients could easily taper the steroid dose during leukapheresis and 7 patients stopped the use of steroid after leukapheresis. During mean follow-up of 44 months, 4 patients relapsed and started steroid and 6-mercaptopurine. Two patients complained of numbness and parasthesia on the face and fingers during leukapheresis and theses symptoms were relieved after the injection of calcium. Conclusions: Centrifugal leukapheresis was an effective and safe method for the treatment of the patients with steroid-dependent active ulcerative colitis. We expect further prospective controlled studies. (Intestinal Research 2005;3:110-116)
|