Background/Aims Ulcerative colitis undergoes periods of exacerbation and remission. Fecal calprotectin levels increase with gut inflammation and correlate with endoscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Intestinal blood loss and fecal immunochemical test levels also correlate with endoscopic disease activity. This study statistically evaluated the usefulness of fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as markers of disease activity.
Methods A total 106 ulcerative colitis patients who underwent endoscopy and fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test, and CRP testing, from March 2015 to August 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Disease activity was assessed using a partial Mayo score and Mayo endoscopic score. The ability of fecal and serologic tests to reflect endoscopic disease severity was statistically evaluated.
Results Among 106 patients, 68 underwent endoscopy and stool study within 2 weeks. In patients with mild to severe activity, fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin were superior to CRP at Mayo endoscopic score detection rate. The area under the curves of fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin for the detection of Mayo endoscopic score ≥1 were 0.956 and 0.942, respectively, and were superior to that of CRP (0.756). At Mayo endoscopic score, the effects of combination of fecal immunochemical test and CRP or fecal calprotectin and CRP were found to be higher than those of the independent fecal immunochemical test or fecal calprotectin.
Conclusions Fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin can effectively detect active ulcerative colitis better than remission. As these markers reflect the status of mucosal inflammation, they may reduce the requirement for invasive endoscopic examination.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Predicting mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission using biomarkers: A single-center prospective pilot study Naohiro Kato, Ryusaku Kusunoki, Hiroki Kamada, Shigeaki Semba, Yuji Teraoka, Takeshi Mizumoto, Yuzuru Tamaru, Tsuyoshi Hatakeyama, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Hirotaka Kouno, Shigeto Yoshida, Toshio Kuwai Medicine.2026; 105(7): e47536. CrossRef
Rapid and convenient electrochemical hemoglobin detection in mouse feces employing a DNA aptamer to evaluate the severity of colitis in a mouse model Mizuki Nakashima, Daimei Miura, Erika Komiya, Nanami Watanabe, Kaori Tsukakoshi, Tsutomu Omatsu, Wakako Tsugawa, Koji Sode, Kazunori Ikebukuro, Toshinori Yoshida, Ryutaro Asano Analytical Methods.2026; 18(19): 3924. CrossRef
Comparison of Changes in Biomarkers With Changes in Endoscopic Scores in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Single‐Center, Retrospective, Observational Study Yosuke Yamada, Natsuki Ishida, Tomohiro Takebe, Kenichi Takahashi, Yusuke Asai, Mihoko Yamade, Moriya Iwaizumi, Yasushi Hamaya, Takanori Yamada, Satoshi Osawa, Ken Sugimoto JGH Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Histologic features and predicting prognosis in ulcerative colitis patients with mild endoscopic activity Seung Yong Shin, Hee Sung Kim, Kisung Kim, Chang Won Choi, Jung Min Moon, Jeong Wook Kim, Hyun Jin Joo, Jeongkuk Seo, Muhyeon Sung, Chang Hwan Choi The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(1): 68. CrossRef
Alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised quantitative faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients Mark S Johnstone, Gillian Miller, Grace Pang, Paul Burton, Georgios Kourounis, Jack Winter, Emilia Crighton, David Mansouri, Paul Witherspoon, Karen Smith, Stephen T McSorley Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 59(4): 277. CrossRef
Correlation of fecal calprotectin and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with ulcerative colitis Nagesh Kamat, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Saurabh Kedia, Pabitra Sahu, Bhaskar Kante, Peeyush Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Ranjan, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Sambuddha Kumar, Vikas Sachdev, Govind Makharia, Vineet Ahuja Intestinal Research.2022; 20(2): 269. CrossRef
Determining the usefulness of Capsule Scoring of Ulcerative Colitis in predicting relapse of inactive ulcerative colitis Mao Matsubayashi, Taku Kobayashi, Shinji Okabayashi, Masaru Nakano, Shintaro Sagami, Ryo Ozaki, Hiroki Kiyohara, Hiromu Morikubo, Kunio Asonuma, Yusuke Miyatani, Shin Maeda, Toshifumi Hibi Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 943. CrossRef
Biomarkers of Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Long before Abandoning Single-Marker Approaches? Gabriele Dragoni, Tommaso Innocenti, Andrea Galli Digestive Diseases.2021; 39(3): 190. CrossRef
Biomarkers Predictive of Response to Thiopurine Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Jack S. Cornish, Elisa Wirthgen, Jan Däbritz Frontiers in Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive values of stool-based tests for mucosal healing among Taiwanese patients with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort analysis Hsu-Heng Yen, Mei-Wen Chen, Yu-Yao Chang, Hsuan-Yuan Huang, Tsui-Chun Hsu, Yang-Yuan Chen PeerJ.2020; 8: e9537. CrossRef
What is the appropriate cut-off value of CRP to predict endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission? Jongbeom Shin, Sung Min Kong, Gyeol Seong, Young-Ho Kim International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2249. CrossRef
Prostaglandin E-Major Urinary Metabolite Predicts Relapse in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Remission Natsuki Ishida, Kiichi Sugiura, Takahiro Miyazu, Satoshi Tamura, Satoshi Suzuki, Shinya Tani, Mihoko Yamade, Moriya Iwaizumi, Yasushi Hamaya, Satoshi Osawa, Takahisa Furuta, Ken Sugimoto Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(12): e00289. CrossRef
Approaches to Integrating Biomarkers Into Clinical Trials and Care Pathways as Targets for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Parambir S. Dulai, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Bruce E. Sands, Axel Dignass, Dan Turner, Gerassimos Mantzaris, Juergen Schölmerich, Jean-Yves Mary, Walter Reinisch, William J. Sandborn Gastroenterology.2019; 157(4): 1032. CrossRef