Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoon Yang, on behalf of the Intestinal Tumor Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)
Intest Res 2024;22(2):186-207. Published online April 25, 2024
Background/Aims We investigated the clinical practice patterns of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance among Korean endoscopists.
Methods In a web-based survey conducted between September and November 2021, participants were asked about their preferred surveillance intervals and the patient age at which surveillance was discontinued. Adherence to the recent guidelines of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) was also analyzed.
Results In total, 196 endoscopists completed the survey. The most preferred first surveillance intervals were: a 5-year interval after the removal of 1–2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm; a 3-year interval after the removal of 3–10 tubular adenomas < 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, ≤ 20 hyperplastic polyps < 10 mm, 1–4 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) < 10 mm, hyperplastic polyps or SSLs ≥ 10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas; and a 1-year interval after the removal of adenomas with highgrade dysplasia, >10 adenomas, 5–10 SSLs, and SSLs with dysplasia. In piecemeal resections of large polyps ( > 20 mm), surveillance colonoscopy was mostly preferred after 1 year for adenomas and 6 months for SSLs. The mean USMSTF guideline adherence rate was 30.7%. The largest proportion of respondents (40.8%–55.1%) discontinued the surveillance at the patient age of 80–84 years.
Conclusions A significant discrepancy was observed between the preferred post-polypectomy surveillance intervals and recent international guidelines. Individualized measures are required to increase adherence to the guidelines.
Seung Yong Shin, Soo Jung Park, Young Kim, Jong Pil Im, Hyo Jong Kim, Kang-Moon Lee, Ji Won Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Jun Lee, Sang-Bum Kang, Sung Jae Shin, Eun Sun Kim, You Sun Kim, Tae Oh Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Dong Il Park, Hyung Kil Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Young-Ho Kim, Do Hyun Kim, Dennis Teng, Jong-Hwa Kim, Wonyong Kim, Chang Hwan Choi, on behalf of the IBD Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
Intest Res 2022;20(3):350-360. Published online July 23, 2021
Background/Aims This study assessed the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and explored predictors of response in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted over 56 weeks in adult patients with moderately to severely active UC who received ADA. Clinical response, remission, and mucosal healing were assessed using the Mayo score.
Results A total of 146 patients were enrolled from 17 academic hospitals. Clinical response rates were 52.1% and 37.7% and clinical remission rates were 24.0% and 22.0% at weeks 8 and 56, respectively. Mucosal healing rates were 39.0% and 30.1% at weeks 8 and 56, respectively. Prior use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) did not affect clinical and endoscopic responses. The ADA drug level was significantly higher in patients with better outcomes at week 8 (P<0.05). In patients with lower endoscopic activity, higher body mass index, and higher serum albumin levels at baseline, the clinical response rate was higher at week 8. In patients with lower Mayo scores and C-reactive protein levels, clinical responses, and mucosal healing at week 8, the clinical response rate was higher at week 56. Serious adverse drug reactions were identified in 2.8% of patients.
Conclusions ADA is effective and safe for induction and maintenance in Korean patients with UC, regardless of prior anti-TNF-α therapy. The ADA drug level is associated with the efficacy of induction therapy. Patients with better short-term outcomes were predictive of those with an improved long-term response.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prospective Observational Evaluation of the Time-Dependency of Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Drug Concentration in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: the POETIC II Study Sivan Harnik, Chaya M Abitbol, Ola Haj Natour, Miri Yavzori, Ella Fudim, Orit Picard, Timna Naftali, Efrat Broide, Ayal Hirsch, Limor Selinger, Eyal Shachar, Doron Yablecovitch, Ahmad Albshesh, Daniel Coscas, Uri Kopylov, Rami Eliakim, Shomron Ben-Horin, Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2024; 18(3): 341. CrossRef
Rapidly achieving clinical remission in ulcerative colitis indicates better endoscopic and histological outcomes Rirong Chen, Yizhe Tie, Yongle Huang, Xi Zhang, Zhirong Zeng, Minhu Chen, Li Li, Shenghong Zhang United European Gastroenterology Journal.2024; 12(4): 459. CrossRef
Effectiveness of adalimumab in severe ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and a meta‐analysis Saleh Azadbakht, Masomeh Seighali, Salehe Azadbakht, Morteza Azadbakht Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Dynamic changes in the gut microbiota composition during adalimumab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis: implications for treatment response prediction and therapeutic targets Han Na Oh, Seung Yong Shin, Jong-Hwa Kim, Jihye Baek, Hyo Jong Kim, Kang-Moon Lee, Soo Jung Park, Seok-Young Kim, Hyung-Kyoon Choi, Wonyong Kim, Woo Jun Sul, Chang Hwan Choi Gut Pathogens.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Real-world effectiveness and safety of advanced therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: Evidence from a systematic literature review Peter M. Irving, Peter Hur, Raju Gautam, Xiang Guo, Severine Vermeire Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy.2024; 30(9): 1026. CrossRef
Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics and small molecules for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis Soo-Young Na, Chang Hwan Choi, Eun Mi Song, Ki Bae Bang, Sang Hyoung Park, Eun Soo Kim, Jae Jun Park, Bora Keum, Chang Kyun Lee, Bo-In Lee, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seong-Joon Koh, Miyoung Choi, Joo Sung Kim Intestinal Research.2023; 21(1): 61. CrossRef
Changes in fecal metabolic and lipidomic features by anti-TNF treatment and prediction of clinical remission in patients with ulcerative colitis Seok-Young Kim, Seung Yong Shin, Soo Jung Park, Jong Pil Im, Hyo Jong Kim, Kang-Moon Lee, Ji Won Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Jun Lee, Sang-Bum Kang, Sung Jae Shin, Eun Sun Kim, You Sun Kim, Tae Oh Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Dong Il Park, Hyung Kil Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Young- Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2023; 16: 175628482311681. CrossRef
Reviewing not Homer’s Iliad, but “Kai Bao Ben Cao”: indigo dye—the past, present, and future Yusuke Yoshimatsu, Tomohisa Sujino, Takanori Kanai Intestinal Research.2023; 21(2): 174. CrossRef
Precision medicine and drug optimization in adult inflammatory bowel disease patients Sophie Vieujean, Edouard Louis Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2023; 16: 175628482311733. CrossRef
Real-world effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in Korean patients with intestinal Behcet’s disease: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter study Seung Bum Lee, Hee Seung Hong, Chang Kyun Lee, Bo-In Lee, Sol Kim, Seong-Joon Koh, Hosun Yu, Jung-Bin Park, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sang Hyoung Park The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 38(5): 661. CrossRef
Advancements in the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Revised 2023 Korean Treatment Guidelines Soo-Young Na The Korean Journal of Medicine.2023; 98(5): 223. CrossRef
Prediction of Clinical Remission with Adalimumab Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis by Fourier Transform–Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Algorithms Seok-Young Kim, Seung Yong Shin, Maham Saeed, Ji Eun Ryu, Jung-Seop Kim, Junyoung Ahn, Youngmi Jung, Jung Min Moon, Chang Hwan Choi, Hyung-Kyoon Choi Metabolites.2023; 14(1): 2. CrossRef
Association of C-reactive Protein and Partial Mayo Score With Response to Tofacitinib Induction Therapy: Results From the Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program Marla C Dubinsky, Fernando Magro, Flavio Steinwurz, David P Hudesman, Jami A Kinnucan, Ryan C Ungaro, Markus F Neurath, Nicole Kulisek, Jerome Paulissen, Chinyu Su, Dario Ponce de Leon, Miguel Regueiro Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness and Safety of Golimumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Postmarketing Surveillance Study Jongwook Yu, Soo Jung Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Yun Jeong Lim, Jihye Park, Jae Myung Cha, Byong Duk Ye, Tae Oh Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hyun Seok Lee, Su Young Jung, Youngdoe Kim, Chang Hwan Choi Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 764. CrossRef
Pharmacogenetics-based personalized treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A review Ji Young Chang, Jae Hee Cheon Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 151. CrossRef
Soo-Kyung Park, Chang Hwan Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Heeyoung Lee, Eun Sun Kim, Jae Jun Park, Chan Hyuk Park, Bo-In Lee, Yunho Jung, Dong-Il Park, Do Young Kim, Hana Park, Yoon Tae Jeen, IBD Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
Intest Res 2020;18(1):18-33. Published online January 30, 2020
The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been revolutionized for the last 10 years by the increasing use of immunomodulators and biologics. With immunosuppression of this kind, opportunistic infection is an important safety concern for patients with IBD. In particular, viral hepatitis is determined by the interaction between the virus and the host’s immunity, and the risk of reactivation increases if immunity is compromised by immunosuppression therapy. Parts of Asia, including Korea, still show intermediate endemicity for the hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus compared with the United States and Western Europe. Thus, members of IBD research group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases have produced a guideline on the prevention and management of viral hepatitis in IBD.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Iranian Consensus Guideline for Pharmacotherapy with Biologics and Small Molecules Drugs in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Niloofar Khoshnam-Rad, Homayoon Vahedi, Anahita Sadeghi, Mansoor Rastegarpanah, Soha Namazi, Amir Anushiravani, Ali Reza Sima, Shabnam Shahrokh, Sudabeh Alatab, Reza Malekzadeh Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2023; 15(2): 83. CrossRef
Protective role of flavonoids quercetin and silymarin in the viral-associated inflammatory bowel disease: an updated review Elham Zarenezhad, Hussein T. Abdulabbas, Ahmed Shayaa Kareem, Seyed Amin Kouhpayeh, Silvia Barbaresi, Sohrab Najafipour, Abdulbaset Mazarzaei, Mitra Sotoudeh, Abdolmajid Ghasemian Archives of Microbiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The impact of medication belief on adherence to infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease Shuyan Li, Yan Ma, Hongling Sun, Zijun Ni, Shurong Hu, Yan Chen, Meijuan Lan Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: expert consensus statement by KASID Yoo Jin Lee, Seong-Eun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Ji Young Chang, Hyun Joo Song, Duk Hwan Kim, Young Joo Yang, Byung Chang Kim, Jae Gon Lee, Hee Chan Yang, Miyoung Choi, Seung-Jae Myung Intestinal Research.2022; 20(2): 171. CrossRef
Clinical Course of Hepatitis B Viral Infection in Patients Undergoing Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ji Min Lee, Shu-Chen Wei, Kang-Moon Lee, Byong Duk Ye, Ren Mao, Hyun-Soo Kim, Soo Jung Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Eun Hye Oh, Jong Pil Im, Byung Ik Jang, Dae Bum Kim, Ken Takeuchi Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 396. CrossRef
Antiviral Prophylaxis Against Hepatitis B Virus in Patients Treated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Agents for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Eun Ae Kang, Jae Hee Cheon Gut and Liver.2022; 16(4): 501. CrossRef
Risk of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Receiving Biologics: Focus on the Timing of Biologics after Anti-HBV Treatment Soo Min Ahn, Jonggi Choi, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Ji Seon Oh, Yong‑Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Sang Hyoung Park, Seokchan Hong Gut and Liver.2022; 16(4): 567. CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel disease in Korea: epidemiology and pathophysiology Jung Won Lee, Chang Soo Eun The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(5): 885. CrossRef
Viral Hepatitis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Seung Hwan Shin, Sang Hyoung Park The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 51. CrossRef
Vaccination strategies for Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease Yoo Jin Lee, Eun Soo Kim The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(5): 920. CrossRef
Current Status of Opportunistic Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in Asia: A Questionnaire-Based Multicenter Study Hong Yang, Zhihua Ran, Meng Jin, Jia-Ming Qian Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 726. CrossRef
Do We Have an Opportunity to Avoid Opportunistic Infections in Asian Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? Suhyun Park, Sang Hyoung Park Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 663. CrossRef
Natural history of inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison between the East and the West Eun Mi Song, Suk-Kyun Yang Intestinal Research.2022; 20(4): 418. CrossRef
Hepatobiliary Impairments in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Current Approach Vlad Alexandru Ionescu, Gina Gheorghe, Valentin Nicolae Varlas, Ana Maria Alexandra Stanescu, Camelia Cristina Diaconu Gastroenterology Insights.2022; 14(1): 13. CrossRef
Viral infections in inflammatory bowel disease: Tips and tricks for correct management Vincenzo Craviotto, Federica Furfaro, Laura Loy, Alessandra Zilli, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Gionata Fiorino, Silvio Danese, Mariangela Allocca World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(27): 4276. CrossRef
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination for Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Consensus Statements by KASID Yoo Jin Lee, Seong-Eun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Ji Young Chang, Hyun Joo Song, Duk Hwan Kim, Young Joo Yang, Byung Chang Kim, Jae Gon Lee, Hee Chan Yang, Miyoung Choi, Seung-Jae Myung The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(2): 117. CrossRef
Current status of inflammatory bowel diseases in Korea Suk-Kyun Yang Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(9): 572. CrossRef
A clinical case of ulcerative colitis in a patient with viral hepatitis E. D. Kosmachova, M. S. Iakovenko, K. A. Yumukian South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice.2020; 1(3): 95. CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel disease in Korea: epidemiology and pathophysiology Jung Won Lee, Chang Soo Eun The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2022; 37(5): 885. CrossRef
Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis (N Engl J Med 2013;369:699-710) Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease (N Engl J Med 2013;369:711-721)
Sung Chul Park, Yoon Tae Jeen, Kwang Gyun Lee, Juhyung Kim, Jong Jin Hyun, Eun Sun Kim, Sanghoon Park, Bora Keum, Yeon Seok Seo, Yong Sik Kim, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Jai Hyun Choi, Chang Duck Kim, Ho Sang Ryu
Intest Res 2009;7(2):93-99. Published online December 30, 2009
Background/Aims C-reactive protein (CRP) is a general marker of inflammation and increased CRP level is reported in several cancers. It has been reported that CRP is an independent factor predicting survival in colorectal cancer patients, although this claim is still under debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between CRP and the characteristics of colorectal cancer patients. Methods: One hundred eighty-four patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between January 2007 and January 2009 were included. The patients with active infectious diseases, other tumors, cardiovascular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The CRP levels of colorectal cancer patients were compared with the control group comprised of 175 healthy adults with a normal colonoscopy. Results: The median CRP in the colorectal cancer patients (3.36 mg/L) was higher than the control group (0.48 mg/L). There was a significant correlation between CRP and the stage of colorectal cancer (p<0.001). CRP was increased significantly in Dukes' stage D. CRP had a significant correlations with the CEA and CA 19-9 levels, the ESR, and the white blood cell count, and an inverse correlation with albumin. The CRP level in colon cancer patients was higher than rectal cancer patients (p=0.032). There were no significant difference in the CRP according to metastatic sites, such as the liver and peritoneum. Conclusions: Serum CRP levels were higher in patients with colorectal cancer and high CRP level is a predictor of advanced disease. (Intest Res 2009;7:93-99)