Intestinal Research

Original Articles

Clinical Features and Prognosis of Resectable Primary Colorectal Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: Ho-Su Lee, Jae Seung Soh, Seohyun Lee, Jung Ho Bae, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sun A Kim, Young Soo Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Dong-Hoon Yang; Intest Res 2015;13(4):332-338. Published online October 15, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.332

Background/Aims

We attempted to investigate the prognosis of signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRC) patients who underwent curative surgery by comparing them with age-, sex-, and stage-matched non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) patients.

Methods

Between January 2003 and December 2011, 19 patients with primary SRC of the colorectum underwent curative surgery. Four SRC patients under the age of 40 were excluded, and the clinicopathological data of 15 patients (7 men; median age, 56 years) were reviewed and compared with the data of 75 NMAC patients matched by age, sex, and pathologic stage.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 30.1 months for the SRC group and 43.7 months for the NMAC group (P=0.141). Involvement of the left side of the colon (73.3% vs. 26.7%, P=0.003) and infiltrative lesions such as Borrmann types 3 and 4 (85.7% vs. 24.0%, P=0.001) were more common in the SRC group than in the NMAC group. The five-year overall survival rate was significantly lower for patients with SRC than for those with NMAC (46.0% vs. 88.7%, hazard ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-20.95, P=0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with even resectable primary colorectal SRC had a poorer prognosis than age-, sex-, and stage-matched colorectal NMAC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Prognostic implications of T stage in different pathological types of colorectal cancer: an observational study using SEER population-based data
Nan Yao, Wenqiang Li, Jiwei Wang, Hongyuan Chu, Ning Duan, Xinyu Niu, Guoyong Yu, Jun Qu
BMJ Open.2024; 14(2): e076579. CrossRef
Systematic review of risk factors, prognosis, and management of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma
Frederiek Nuytens, Vincent Drubay, Clarisse Eveno, Florence Renaud, Guillaume Piessen
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(5): 2141. CrossRef
Modeling the survival of colorectal cancer patients based on colonoscopic features in a feature ensemble vision transformer
Chung-Ming Lo, Yi-Wen Yang, Jen-Kou Lin, Tzu-Chen Lin, Wei-Shone Chen, Shung-Haur Yang, Shih-Ching Chang, Huann-Sheng Wang, Yuan-Tzu Lan, Hung-Hsin Lin, Sheng-Chieh Huang, Hou-Hsuan Cheng, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Chun-Chi Lin
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2023; 107: 102242. CrossRef
Metastatic colorectal carcinoma with signet-ring cells: Clinical, histological and molecular description from an Association des Gastro-Entérologues Oncologues (AGEO) French multicenter retrospective cohort
Marion Allart, Florence Leroy, Stephano Kim, David Sefrioui, Mihane Nayeri, Aziz Zaanan, Benoit Rousseau, Meher Ben Abdelghani, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Wulfran Cacheux, Romain Legros, Samy Louafi, David Tougeron, Olivier Bouché, Nadim Fares, Guilla
Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(3): 391. CrossRef
The Molecular Associations of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma in Colorectum: Meta-Analysis and System Review
Xueting Liu, Litao Huang, Menghan Liu, Zhu Wang
Medicina.2022; 58(7): 836. CrossRef
Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes of signet-ring cell and mucinous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Michael G. Fadel, George Malietzis, Vasilis Constantinides, Gianluca Pellino, Paris Tekkis, Christos Kontovounisios
Discover Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Right Colon, Left Colon, and Rectum
Lili Zhu, Chunrun Ling, Tao Xu, Jinglin Zhang, Yujie Zhang, Yingjie Liu, Chao Fang, Lie Yang, Wen Zhuang, Rui Wang, Jie Ping, Mojin Wang
Pathology and Oncology Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen125 and carcino embryonic antigen expression in patients with colorectal carcinoma and its guiding significance for chemotherapy
Jie Mao, Peng Du, Han-teng Yang, Huan Hu, Shi-Yao Wang, Xia Wu, Zhi-Bin Cheng
Medicine.2020; 99(14): e19420. CrossRef
Primary signet ring cell carcinoma with tubular adenoma of the rectum
Yong-Ping Yang, Ling-Yun Yu, Jian Shi, Jian-Nan Li, Xin-Yu Wang, Tong-Jun Liu
Medicine.2020; 99(26): e20985. CrossRef
Prognosis of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum and their Distinction of Mucinous Adenocarcinoma with Signet Ring Cells. A Comparative Study
Luis I. Pozos-Ochoa, Leonardo S. Lino-Silva, Alberto M. León-Takahashi, Rosa A. Salcedo-Hernández
Pathology & Oncology Research.2018; 24(3): 609. CrossRef
Impact of histological subtype on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer
Fabio Bagante, Gaya Spolverato, Eliza Beal, Katiuscha Merath, Qinyu Chen, Ozgür Akgül, Robert A. Anders, Timothy M. Pawlik
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(7): 1355. CrossRef
Prognosis and value of preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal signet-ring cell carcinoma
Chun-Run Ling, Rui Wang, Mo-Jin Wang, Jie Ping, Wen Zhuang
Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
The Characteristics and Prognostic Effect of E-Cadherin Expression in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
Renjie Wang, Xiaoji Ma, Yaqi Li, Yiping He, Dan Huang, Sanjun Cai, Junjie Peng, Javier S Castresana
PLOS ONE.2016; 11(8): e0160527. CrossRef
Younger Age Is Associated with Poorer Survival in Patients with Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon without Distant Metastasis
Ben Huang, Mengdong Ni, Chen Chen, Yang Feng, Sanjun Cai
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2016; 2016: 1. CrossRef

5,084 View
51 Download
21 Web of Science
14 Crossref

The Clinical Usefulness of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy for Rectal and Perirectal Lesions: Jae Seung Soh, Ho-Su Lee, Seohyun Lee, Jungho Bae, Hyo Jeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon; Intest Res 2015;13(2):135-144. Published online April 27, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.135

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and/or biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) have been used to diagnose subepithelial tumors (SETs) and extraluminal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Our group previously reported the usefulness of EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions. This study reports our expanded experience with EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions in terms of diagnostic accuracy and safety. We also included our new experience with EUS-FNB using the recently introduced ProCore needle.

Methods

From April 2009 to March 2014, EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions was performed in 30 consecutive patients. We evaluated EUS-FNA/B performance by comparing histological diagnoses with final results. We also investigated factors affecting diagnostic accuracy.

Results

Among 10 patients with SETs, EUS-FNA/B specimen results revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 4 patients and malignant lymphoma in 1 patient. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B was 50% for SETs (5/10). Among 20 patients with non-SET lesions, 8 patients were diagnosed with malignant disease and 7 were diagnosed with benign disease based on both EUS-FNA/B and the final results. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B for non-SET lesions was 75% (15/20). The size of lesions was the only factor related to diagnostic accuracy (P=0.027). Two complications of mild fever and asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum occurred after EUS-FNA/B.

Conclusions

The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions was 67% (20/30). EUS-FNA/B is a clinically useful method for cytological and histological diagnoses of rectal and perirectal lesions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Colonoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Using a Curvilinear Array Transducer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Spencer Cheng, Sergio E. Matuguma, Guilherme H. P. de Oliveira, Gustavo L.R. Silva, Henrique Cheng, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Mauricio K Minata
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(2): e80. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)
Francesco Maione, Alessia Chini, Marco Milone, Nicola Gennarelli, Michele Manigrasso, Rosa Maione, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Pagano, Francesca Paola Tropeano, Gaetano Luglio, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Diagnostics.2021; 11(5): 771. CrossRef
Long-term experience with percutaneous biopsies of pelvic lesions using CT guidance
Petr Hoffmann, Michal Balik, Martina Hoffmannova, Jiri Spacek, Jiri Vanasek, Adam Rezac, Petr Dvorak
Science Progress.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions
Nobu Nishioka, Takeshi Ogura, Yoshitaka Kurisu, Miyuki Imanishi, Saori Onda, Wataru Takagi, Tatsushi Sano, Atsushi Okuda, Akira Miyano, Mio Amano, Kazuhide Higuchi
Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(10): 4125. CrossRef
Concise review on the comparative efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration vs core biopsy in pancreatic masses, upper and lower gastrointestinal submucosal tumors
Tawfik Khoury, Wisam Sbeit, Nicholas Ludvik, Divya Nadella, Alex Wiles, Caitlin Marshall, Manoj Kumar, Gilad Shapira, Alan Schumann, Meir Mizrahi
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 10(10): 267. CrossRef
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of extra-rectal lesions
J. Lim, S. A. Norton, N. A. Wong, M. G. Thomas
Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(5): 393. CrossRef
Application of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Gastrointestinal Disease
Eun Young Kim
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 101. CrossRef
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Mimicking a Symptomatic Rectal Submucosal Tumor
Seung Wook Hong, Jaeyoung Chun, Kyu Joo Park, Cheol Kwak, Joo Sung Kim
Soonchunhyang Medical Science.2015; 21(2): 164. CrossRef

6,815 View
66 Download
11 Web of Science
8 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search