KASID
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Articles
- Colorectal neoplasia
- A survey of current practices in post-polypectomy surveillance in Korea
- Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoon Yang, on behalf of the Intestinal Tumor Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)
- Intest Res 2024;22(2):186-207. Published online April 25, 2024
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00109
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material
PubReader
ePub - Background/Aims
We investigated the clinical practice patterns of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance among Korean endoscopists.
Methods
In a web-based survey conducted between September and November 2021, participants were asked about their preferred surveillance intervals and the patient age at which surveillance was discontinued. Adherence to the recent guidelines of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) was also analyzed.
Results
In total, 196 endoscopists completed the survey. The most preferred first surveillance intervals were: a 5-year interval after the removal of 1–2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm; a 3-year interval after the removal of 3–10 tubular adenomas < 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, ≤ 20 hyperplastic polyps < 10 mm, 1–4 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) < 10 mm, hyperplastic polyps or SSLs ≥ 10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas; and a 1-year interval after the removal of adenomas with highgrade dysplasia, >10 adenomas, 5–10 SSLs, and SSLs with dysplasia. In piecemeal resections of large polyps ( > 20 mm), surveillance colonoscopy was mostly preferred after 1 year for adenomas and 6 months for SSLs. The mean USMSTF guideline adherence rate was 30.7%. The largest proportion of respondents (40.8%–55.1%) discontinued the surveillance at the patient age of 80–84 years.
Conclusions
A significant discrepancy was observed between the preferred post-polypectomy surveillance intervals and recent international guidelines. Individualized measures are required to increase adherence to the guidelines.
- 1,637 View
- 71 Download
- Colorectal neoplasia
- The elderly population are more vulnerable for the management of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, population-based study
- Hong Sun Kang, Seung Hoon Jeon, Su Bee Park, Jin Young Youn, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
- Intest Res 2023;21(4):500-509. Published online August 29, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00004
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Background/Aims
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) may worse in elderly population, as almost all COVID-19 deaths occurred in the elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on CRC management in the elderly population.
Methods
The numbers of patients who underwent colonoscopy, who visited hospitals or operated for CRC in 2020 and 2021 (COVID-19 era) were compared with those in 2019, according to 3 age groups (≥70 years, 50–69 years, and ≤49 years), based on the nationwide, population-based database (2019–2021) in South Korea.
Results
The annual volumes of colonoscopy and hospital visits for CRC in 2020 were more significantly declined in the old age group than in the young age group (both P<0.001). In addition, the annual volume of patients operated for CRC numerically more declined in old age group than in young age group. During the first surge of COVID-19 (March and April 2020), old age patients showed statistically significant declines for the monthly number of colonoscopies (–46.5% vs. –39.3%, P<0.001), hospital visits (–15.4% vs. –7.9%, P<0.001), CRC operations (–33.8% vs. –0.7%, P<0.05), and colonoscopic polypectomies (–41.8% vs. –38.0%, P<0.001) than young age patients, compared with those of same months in 2019.
Conclusions
Elderly population are more vulnerable for the management of CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the elderly population are more carefully cared for in the management of CRC during the next pandemic. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- To overcome medical gap in screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yoo Min Han
Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 418. CrossRef
- To overcome medical gap in screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic
- 1,998 View
- 192 Download
- 1 Web of Science
- 1 Crossref
Review
- Cancer
- Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition
- Su Young Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Soon Man Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jong Wook Kim, Sun-Jin Boo, Eun Hye Oh, Seong Ran Jeon, Seung-Joo Nam, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong Hoon Baek, Mi-Young Choi, Suyeon Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyung Kil Kim, Joo Young Cho, Moon Sung Lee, Oh Young Lee, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Korean Society of Gastroenterology, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
- Intest Res 2023;21(1):20-42. Published online January 31, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2022.00096
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
- Colonoscopic polypectomy is effective in decreasing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). Premalignant polyps discovered during colonoscopy are associated with the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia. Postpolypectomy surveillance is the most important method for managing advanced metachronous neoplasia. A more efficient and evidence-based guideline for postpolypectomy surveillance is required because of the limited medical resources and concerns regarding colonoscopy complications. In these consensus guidelines, an analytic approach was used to address all reliable evidence to interpret the predictors of CRC or advanced neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy. The key recommendations state that the high-risk findings for metachronous CRC following polypectomy are as follows: adenoma ≥10 mm in size; 3 to 5 (or more) adenomas; tubulovillous or villous adenoma; adenoma containing high-grade dysplasia; traditional serrated adenoma; sessile serrated lesion containing any grade of dysplasia; serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size; and 3 to 5 (or more) sessile serrated lesions. More studies are needed to fully comprehend the patients who are most likely to benefit from surveillance colonoscopy and the ideal surveillance interval to prevent metachronous CRC.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review
Jin-Dong Wang, Guo-Shuai Xu, Xin-Long Hu, Wen-Qiang Li, Nan Yao, Fu-Zhou Han, Yin Zhang, Jun Qu
Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer
Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim
Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 119. CrossRef - Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence with Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Whole-Slide-Images of Endoscopic and Surgical Resection Specimens
Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim, Yiyu Hong, Insuk Sohn, Soomin Ahn, Seok-Hyung Kim, Kee-Taek Jang
Cancers.2024; 16(10): 1900. CrossRef - Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547. CrossRef - Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial
Yunho Jung, Hyun Gun Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Hyoun Woo Kang, Jae Jun Park, Dong Hoon Baek, Jaeyoung Chun, Tae-Geun Gweon, Hyeon Jeong Goong, Min Seob Kwak, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo-Kyung Park, Jong Hoon Lee
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revision
Su Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2023; 98(3): 102. CrossRef - Clinical characteristics and risk factors related to polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis
Jihun Jang, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 510. CrossRef - Summary and comparison of recently updated post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
Yoon Suk Jung
Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 443. CrossRef - Strategy for post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: focus on the revised Korean guidelines
Yong Soo Kwon, Su Young Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 652. CrossRef
- The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review
- 7,351 View
- 262 Download
- 9 Crossref
Original Articles
- Endoscopy
- The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea
- Jae Ho Choi, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin
- Intest Res 2019;17(1):119-126. Published online October 10, 2018
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00060
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background/Aims
Little is known for the capacity and quality of colonoscopy, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea. This study aimed to investigate the present and potential colonoscopic capacity, colonoscopic quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea.
Methods
We surveyed representative endoscopists of 72 endoscopy units from June to August 2015, using a 36-item questionnaire regarding colonoscopic capacity, quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines of each hospitals.
Results
Among the 62 respondents who answered the questionnaire, 51 respondents were analyzed after exclusion of 11 incomplete answers. Only 1 of 3 of endoscopy units can afford to perform additional colonoscopies in addition to current practice, and the potential maximum number of colonoscopies per week was only 42. The quality of colonoscopy was variable as reporting of quality indicators of colonoscopy were considerably variable (29.4%–94.1%) between endoscopy units. Furthermore, there are substantial gaps in the adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, as concordance rate for guideline recommendation was less than 50% in most scenarios.
Conclusions
The potential capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea was suboptimal. Considering suboptimal reporting of colonoscopic quality indicators and low adherence rate for colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, quality improvement of colonoscopy should be underlined in Korea. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Trends in colorectal cancer incidence according to an increase in the number of colonoscopy cases in Korea
Ga Hee Kim, Yeong Chan Lee, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Chang Mo Moon, Kyunga Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun-Ran Kim
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(1): 51. CrossRef - Factors Affecting Adherence to National Colorectal Cancer Screening: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study Using Multi-Institutional Pooled Data in Korea
Dae Sung Kim, Jeeyoung Hong, Kihyun Ryu, Sang Hyuk Lee, Hwanhyi Cho, Jehyeong Yu, Jieun Lee, Jong-Yeup Kim
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547. CrossRef - Faecal immunochemical tests can improve colonoscopy triage in patients with iron deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jennifer Pham, Geraldine Laven-Law, Erin L. Symonds, Molla M. Wassie, Charles Cock, Jean M. Winter
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 201: 104439. CrossRef - Comparison of Synergistic Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol Versus Midazolam and Pethidine in Colonoscopies: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
Jae Woong Lim, Min Jae Kim, Gang Han Lee, Dae Sol Kim, Sang Hyuk Jung, Yu Yeon Kim, Jin Won Kim, Yohan Lee, Hyun Soo Kim, Seon Young Park, Dong Hyun Kim
Chonnam Medical Journal.2024; 60(3): 192. CrossRef - Overview of the National Cancer Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in Korea over 14 Years (2004-2017)
Bomi Park, Eun Young Her, Kyeongmin Lee, Fatima Nari, Jae Kwan Jun, Kui Son Choi, Mina Suh
Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(3): 910. CrossRef - Sessile serrated lesions in patients with adenoma on index colonoscopy do not increase metachronous advanced adenoma risk
Seung Wook Hong, Jeongseok Kim, Ji Young Lee, Jong‐Soo Lee, Hye‐Sook Chang, Hye Won Park, Gwang‐Un Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Seung‐Jae Myung, Suk‐Kyun Yang, Jaewon Choe, Dong‐Hoon Yang
Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(4): 850. CrossRef - Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study
Sung Noh Hong, Chang Kyun Lee, Jong Pil Im, Chang Hwan Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Young-Seok Cho, Sung-Ae Jung, Tae Il Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 95(3): 500. CrossRef - Effect of colorectal cancer screening on long‐term survival of colorectal cancer patients: Results of the Korea National Cancer Screening Program
Xuan Quy Luu, Kyeongmin Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Kyu‐Won Jung, Kui Son Choi
International Journal of Cancer.2022; 150(12): 1958. CrossRef - A Study on Differences between Professional Endoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Endoscopic Detection and Standard Pathological Biopsy of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Dong Yang, Yuqin Li, Haibo Sun, Chuan He, Geng Chen, Zhuo Zhao, Tongyu Tang, Amosy M'Koma
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef - Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia and Cancer in Patients With 3–4 Nonadvanced Adenomas at Index Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Min-Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Jong Wook Kim, Seung-Joo Nam, Eun Hye Oh, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sun-Jin Boo, Dong Hoon Baek, Soon Man Yoon, Jaeyoung Chun, Jooyoung Lee, Miyoun
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 117(4): 588. CrossRef - The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Jin Wook Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Dae Sung Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Seung Wook Hong, Ha Won Hwang, Jong-Soo Lee, Gwang-Un Kim, Sinwon Lee, Jaewon Choe, Jin Hwa Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 404. CrossRef - Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332. CrossRef - Intentions to undergo primary screening with colonoscopy under the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea
Kyeongmin Lee, Haejoo Seo, Sunho Choe, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ji Won Park, Mina Suh, Aesun Shin, Kui Son Choi, Filipe Prazeres
PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247252. CrossRef - Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea
Jae Gon Lee, Dong Soo Han, Young-Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Dong Il Park, Seul Ki Kim, Yunho Jung, Won Hyun Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Joon Seok Yoon, Chang Soo Eun
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(Suppl 1): S35. CrossRef - Real-World National Colonoscopy Volume in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study over 12 Years
Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Hyun-Soo Kim, Su Young Kim, Sohee Park, Geun U Park, Jung Kuk Lee, Soo Jin Kim, Hun Hee Lee, Joo Sung Kim, Won Ho Kim
Gut and Liver.2020; 14(3): 338. CrossRef
- Trends in colorectal cancer incidence according to an increase in the number of colonoscopy cases in Korea
- 12,447 View
- 169 Download
- 15 Web of Science
- 16 Crossref
- Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
- Jeong-Mi Lee, Wan Soo Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Sung-Wook Hwang, Dong-Hoon Yang, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Intest Res 2017;15(2):221-227. Published online April 27, 2017
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/> The clinical course after endoscopic management of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been clearly determined. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after endoscopic hemostasis of DPPB and evaluate risk factors for rebleeding after initial hemostasis.
Methods We reviewed medical records of 198 patients who developed DPPB and underwent endoscopic hemostasis between January 2010 and February 2015. The performance of endoscopic hemostasis was assessed. Rebleeding negative and positive patients were compared.
Results DPPB developed 1.4±1.6 days after colonoscopic polypectomy. All patients achieved initial hemostasis. Clipping was the most commonly used technique. Of 198 DPPB patients, 15 (7.6%) had rebleeding 3.3±2.5 days after initial hemostasis. The number of clips required for hemostasis was higher in the rebleeding positive group (3.2±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.9,
P =0.047). Combinations of clipping with other modalities such as injection methods were more common in the rebleeding positive group (67/291, 23.0% vs. 12/17, 70.6%;P <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a large number of clips and combination therapy were independent risk factors for rebleeding. All the rebleeding cases were successfully managed by repeat endoscopic hemostasis.Conclusions Endoscopic hemostasis is effective for the management of DPPB because of its high initial hemostasis rate and low rebleeding rate. Endoscopists should carefully observe patients in whom a large number of clips and/or combination therapy have been used to manage DPPB because these may be related to the severity of DPPB and a higher risk of rebleeding.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon
Hisham Wehbe, Aditya Gutta, Mark A. Gromski
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2024; 34(2): 363. CrossRef - The Use of Clips to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Clinical Review
Matthew A. O’Mara, Peter G. Emanuel, Aaron Tabibzadeh, Robert J. Duve, Jonathan S. Galati, Gregory Laynor, Samantha Gross, Seth A. Gross
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(8): 739. CrossRef - Endoscopic management of delayed bleeding after polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: two or more clips may be safe
Xue-Feng Guo, Xiang-An Yu, Jian-Cong Hu, De-Zheng Lin, Jia-Xin Deng, Ming-Li Su, Juan Li, Wei Liu, Jia-Wei Zhang, Qing-Hua Zhong
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Management and Outcomes of Bleeding Within 30 Days of Colonic Polypectomy in a Large, Real-Life, Multicenter Cohort Study
Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Maria Hernández-Tejero, Liseth Rivero-Sánchez, Oswaldo Ortiz, Irene García de la Filia-Molina, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Hector Miguel Marcos Prieto, Maria García-Prada, Almudena González-Cotorruelo, Miguel Angel De Jorge Tu
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 19(4): 732. CrossRef - Clinical Features of Re-Colonoscopy after Bleeding after Intestinal Polypectomy
慧敏 翟
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2021; 11(11): 5151. CrossRef - Systematic literature review of learning curves for colorectal polyp resection techniques in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
A. Rajendran, S. Pannick, S. Thomas‐Gibson, S. Oke, C. Anele, N. Sevdalis, A. Haycock
Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(9): 1085. CrossRef - Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Hosim Soh, Jaeyoung Chun, Seung Wook Hong, Seona Park, Yun Bin Lee, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jong Pil Im, Yoon Jun Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
Gut and Liver.2020; 14(6): 755. CrossRef - Post-polypectomy Visible Vessel
Matthew Woo, Robert Bechara
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2018; 1(2): 51. CrossRef - Comprehensive review of outcomes of endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding
Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2018; 7(3): 123. CrossRef
- Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon
- 5,121 View
- 70 Download
- 7 Web of Science
- 9 Crossref
- Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?
- Jung Lok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hye Min Lee, Jung Won Jeon, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee, Dong Il Park
- Intest Res 2017;15(1):109-117. Published online January 31, 2017
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/> Western surveillance strategies cannot be directly adapted to the Korean population. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of metachronous neoplasia and the optimal surveillance interval in the Korean population.
Methods Clinical and pathological data from index colonoscopy performed between June 2006 and July 2008 and who had surveillance colonoscopies up to May 2015 were compared between low- and high-risk adenoma (LRA and HRA) groups. The 3- and 5-year cumulative risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia in both groups were compared.
Results Among 895 eligible patients, surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 399 (44.6%). Most (83.3%) patients with LRA had a surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years and 70.2% of patients with HRA had a surveillance colonoscopy within 3 years. The cumulative risk of metachronous advanced adenoma was 3.2% within 5 years in the LRA group and only 1.7% within 3 years in the HRA group. The risk of metachronous neoplasia was similar between the surveillance interval of <5 and ≥5 years in the LRA group; however, it was slightly higher at surveillance interval of ≥3 than <3 years in the HRA group (9.4% vs. 2.4%). In multivariate analysis, age and the ≥3-year surveillance interval were significant independent risk factors for metachronous advanced adenoma (
P =0.024 andP =0.030, respectively).Conclusions Patients had a surveillance colonoscopy before the recommended guidelines despite a low risk of metachronous neoplasia. However, the risk of metachronous advanced adenoma was increased in elderly patients and those with a ≥3-year surveillance interval.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas
Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Youngwoo Kim, Dong Il Park
Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(4): 537. CrossRef - Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study
Amanda J. Cross, Emma C. Robbins, Kevin Pack, Iain Stenson, Matthew D. Rutter, Andrew M. Veitch, Brian P. Saunders, Stephen W. Duffy, Kate Wooldrage
Endoscopy.2022; 54(10): 948. CrossRef - Comparison of Risk of Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with Sporadic Adenomas Aged < 50 Versus ≥ 50 years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Chan Hyuk Park
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 120. CrossRef - British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines
Matthew D Rutter, James East, Colin J Rees, Neil Cripps, James Docherty, Sunil Dolwani, Philip V Kaye, Kevin J Monahan, Marco R Novelli, Andrew Plumb, Brian P Saunders, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Damian J M Tolan, Sophie Whyte, Stewart Bonnington, Alison Scope,
Gut.2020; 69(2): 201. CrossRef - Urine-NMR metabolomics for screening of advanced colorectal adenoma and early stage colorectal cancer
Eun Ran Kim, Hyuk Nam Kwon, Hoonsik Nam, Jae J. Kim, Sunghyouk Park, Young-Ho Kim
Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - A Comparison of the Cumulative Incidences of Metachronous Colorectal Adenoma and Cancer According to the Initial FindingsAmong Colonoscopically Followed-up Patients
Seiji Kimura, Masanori Tanaka, Shinsaku Fukuda
Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2019; 72(6): 395. CrossRef - Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504. CrossRef - Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(4): 715. CrossRef - Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 50. CrossRef - Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice
Moon Joo Hwang, Kyeong Ok Kim, A Lim Kim, Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Tae Nyeun Kim
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 475. CrossRef - Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening
Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 48. CrossRef
- Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas
- 5,905 View
- 59 Download
- 11 Web of Science
- 11 Crossref
First
Prev
