Intestinal Research

Original Articles

Endoscopy

Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study: Jeeyeon Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyung Wook Kim, Jongha Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sung-Wook Hwang, Hyun Deok Shin, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Seok Lee, Yunho Jung, Young-Seok Cho, Young Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Kyu Chan Huh, Eu Mi Ahn; Intest Res 2019;17(3):413-418. Published online April 8, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00156

Background/Aims
This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS).
Methods
A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P> 0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P> 0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P> 0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008).
Conclusions
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comments on Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
Ji Eun Kim
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 192. CrossRef
Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
Ji Min Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Ho Suk Kang, Ja Seol Koo, Hyun Seok Lee, Seok-Hoo Jeong, Jung Ho Kim, Dae Bum Kim
Gut and Liver.2023; 17(4): 591. CrossRef
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332. CrossRef
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884. CrossRef
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706. CrossRef
Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85. CrossRef
Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study
Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young-Seok Cho
Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 716. CrossRef
How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122. CrossRef
Optimal Laxatives for Oral Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: from High-volume to Novel Low-volume Solutions
Soo-Young Na, Won Moon
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 75(2): 65. CrossRef
No inferioridad entre dos agentes de bajo volumen (Picosulfato de Sodio/Citrato de Magnesio vs. Sulfato de Sodio/Potasio/Magnesio) en la preparación de colon para procedimientos diagnósticos: estudio observacional
Erika D. Pérez-Riveros, Margarita Rey R., Belén Mendoza De Molano, Juan Carlos Robayo, Jaime Solano Mariño, Rafael García Duperly, Andrés Gómez, Renzo Pinto Carta, Gerardo Ardila, Jose De la Hoz-Valle, Fernando Sierra-Arango
Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología.2020; 35(4): 436. CrossRef

8,239 View
257 Download
9 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Endoscopy

Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice: Dae Hyung Woo, Kyeong Ok Kim, Da Eun Jeong, Yoon Jeong Nam, Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Tae Nyeun Kim; Intest Res 2018;16(2):293-298. Published online April 30, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.293

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

Inadequate bowel preparation can result in prolonged procedure time and increased missed lesion and complication rates. This prospective study aimed to evaluate bowel preparation quality and identify the predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation in actual clinical practice.

Methods

We included 399 patients who underwent colonoscopy between June 2015 and July 2016. Using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale, we defined a score ≤2 as adequate preparation and a score >2 as inadequate preparation.

Results

Mean patient age was 58.38±12.97 years; 60.6% were male. Indications for colonoscopy included screening (69.7%) and surveillance after polyp removal (21.3%). A split-dose regimen was prescribed to 55.4% of patients. The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Overall, the median time between the last bowel preparation agent dose and start of colonoscopy was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); that of the adequate group was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); and that of the inadequate group was 5 hours (range, 2–23 hours). The mean bowel preparation scale score of the ascending colon (1.94±0.25) was significantly higher than that of other colon segments. On multivariate analysis, elderly age, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of gastrectomy or appendectomy, and total preparation solution uptake <2 L were the independent predictors of inadequate bowel preparation.

Conclusions

The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Risk factors included elderly age and history of cerebrovascular disease or abdominal surgery. Patients with these risk factors require special care and education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547. CrossRef
A study on the related influencing factors of the quality of bowel preparation and the compliance of middle-aged and elderly patients for colonoscopy
Shanshan Chen, Tingting Zhang, Saie Zhu, Yi Zhou
Current Medical Research and Opinion.2024; 40(9): 1545. CrossRef
Performance of Computer-Aided Detection and Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Colonoscopy Outcomes
Dalton A. Norwood, Shyam Thakkar, Amanda Cartee, Fayez Sarkis, Tatiana Torres-Herman, Eleazar E. Montalvan-Sanchez, Kirk Russ, Patricia Ajayi-Fox, Anam Hameed, Ramzi Mulki, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Douglas R. Morgan, Shajan Peter
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(10): 3681. CrossRef
Optimization of colonoscopy quality: Comprehensive review of the literature and future perspectives
Wen‐Feng Hsu, Han‐Mo Chiu
Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 35(7): 822. CrossRef
Risk Factors Associated with Painful Colonoscopy and Prolonged Cecal Intubation Time in Female Patients
Yasuhiko Hamada, Kyosuke Tanaka, Yohei Ikenoyama, Noriyuki Horiki, Junya Tsuboi, Reiko Yamada, Misaki Nakamura, Hayato Nakagawa
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(3): 168. CrossRef
The effect of educational compilation through video tutorials and visual AIDS on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy
Jahanbakhsh Amirarsalani, Leyla Alilu, Masoumeh Hemmati-Maslakpak, Javad Rasouli
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis.2023; 40(3): 307. CrossRef
A predictive model for early death in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study
Qi Wang, Kexin Shen, Bingyuan Fei, Hai Luo, Ruiqi Li, Zeming Wang, Mengqiang Wei, Zhongshi Xie
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Regression and Random Forest Machine Learning Have Limited Performance in Predicting Bowel Preparation in Veteran Population
Jacob E. Kurlander, Akbar K. Waljee, Stacy B. Menees, Rachel Lipson, Alex N. Kokaly, Andrew J. Read, Karmel S. Shehadeh, Amy Cohn, Sameer D. Saini
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(7): 2827. CrossRef
Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841. CrossRef
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332. CrossRef
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706. CrossRef
Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85. CrossRef
Comparative Effectiveness of Commercial Bowel Preparations in Ambulatory Patients Presenting for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Carol A. Burke, Niyati Gupta, Mounir Ibrahim, John McMichael, Gareth Morris-Stiff, Amit Bhatt, John Vargo, Maged Rizk, Michael B. Rothberg
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(6): 2059. CrossRef
Quality Improvement of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopies: A Study of Hospital Team Resource Management in Taiwan
Chen-Shuan Chung, Chih-Ming Lin, Ming-Shu Chen
Quality Management in Health Care.2021; 30(2): 127. CrossRef
Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239. CrossRef
How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122. CrossRef
Factors related to Bowel Cleanliness of Colonoscopy Examinees
Yohan Lee, Haejung Lee
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2021; 33(6): 545. CrossRef
Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim, Seung-Man Park
Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(10): 4413. CrossRef
Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non‐inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid
Sun Hwa Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Kyunga Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 600. CrossRef
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286. CrossRef
Educational virtual reality videos in improving bowel preparation quality and satisfaction of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
Yi Zhao, Feng Xie, Xiaoyin Bai, Aiming Yang, Dong Wu
BMJ Open.2019; 9(8): e029483. CrossRef
Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645. CrossRef

5,874 View
92 Download
24 Web of Science
22 Crossref

Colon Transit Time May Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation: Hong Jun Park, Myeong Hun Chae, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae Woo Kim, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Hee Man Kim, Kyong Joo Lee; Intest Res 2015;13(4):339-345. Published online October 15, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.339

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

We evaluated whether colonic transit time (CTT) can predict the degree of bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation undergoing scheduled colonoscopy in order to assist in the development of better bowel preparation strategies for these patients.

Methods

We analyzed the records of 160 patients with chronic constipation from March 2007 to November 2012. We enrolled patients who had undergone a CTT test followed by colonoscopy. We defined patients with a CTT ≥30 hours as the slow transit time (STT) group, and patients with a CTT <30 hours as the normal transit time (NTT) group. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores were compared between the STT and NTT groups.

Results

Of 160 patients with chronic constipation, 82 (51%) were included in the STT group and 78 (49%) were included in the NTT group. Patients with a BBPS score of <6 were more prevalent in the STT group than in the NTT group (31.7% vs. 10.3%, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that slow CTT was an independent predictor of inadequate bowel preparation (odds ratio, 0.261; 95% confidence interval, 0.107-0.634; P=0.003). The best CTT cut-off value for predicting inadequate bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation was 37 hours, as determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve: 0.676, specificity: 0.735, sensitivity: 0.643).

Conclusions

Patients with chronic constipation and a CTT >30 hours were at risk for inadequate bowel preparation. CTT measured prior to colonoscopy could be useful for developing individualized strategies for bowel preparation in patients with slow CTT, as these patients are likely to have inadequate bowel preparation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Advanced intestinal regulation improves bowel preparation quality in patients with constipation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Liang Ding, JinNan Duan, Tao Yang, ChaoQiong Jin, Jun Luo, Ahuo Ma
Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors affecting cecal intubation time during colonoscopy
Ke Wang, Wen-Tao Xu, Wen-Jing Kou, Xing-Shun Qi
World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2023; 31(3): 105. CrossRef
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature
Endrit Shahini, Emanuele Sinagra, Alessandro Vitello, Rocco Ranaldo, Antonella Contaldo, Antonio Facciorusso, Marcello Maida
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(11): 1685. CrossRef
The effect of kiwi berry (Actinidia arguta) on preventing and alleviating loperamide-induced constipation
Jiyue Zhang, Dongnan Li, Qilin Tian, Yumeng Ding, Hanqian Jiang, Guang Xin, Shunchang Cheng, Siyi Tang, Chenyu Jin, Jinlong Tian, Bin Li
Food Innovation and Advances.2023; 2(1): 1. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Exercise Therapy for Bowel Preparation
Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Ramoo Vimala, Ping Lei Chui, Ida Normiha Hilmi
Gastroenterology Nursing.2023; 46(5): 393. CrossRef
2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation
Young Sin Cho, Yoo Jin Lee, Jeong Eun Shin, Hye-Kyung Jung, Seon-Young Park, Seung Joo Kang, Kyung Ho Song, Jung-Wook Kim, Hyun Chul Lim, Hee Sun Park, Seong-Jung Kim, Ra Ri Cha, Ki Bae Bang, Chang Seok Bang, Sung Kyun Yim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Bong Hyeon Kye,
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2023; 29(3): 271. CrossRef
Taking a Long and Hard Look at Quality Predictors of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
Yunho Jung
Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(11): 4069. CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Quality of Intestinal Preparation before Colonoscopy in Special Population
瑶童
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(11): 17129. CrossRef
Rectal Evacuation Disorders are Associated With Poor Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation
Mythili P. Pathipati, Casey J. Silvernale, Kenneth G. Barshop, Jasmine B. Ha, James M. Richter, Kyle D. Staller
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(5): 438. CrossRef
Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non‐inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid
Sun Hwa Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Kyunga Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 600. CrossRef
Modelling characteristics of inadequate bowel preparations for colonoscopy
Scott L. Cornella, Brian J. Wentworth, Charles Orton, Bethany J. Horton, Steven M. Powell
GastroHep.2020; 2(2): 72. CrossRef
Usefulness of Personal Bowel Habits as a Predictive Factor for Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Observational Study
Namyoung Paik, Eun Ran Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim
Gut and Liver.2019; 13(2): 169. CrossRef
Prediction of Inadequate Bowel Preparation Using Total and Segmental Colon Transit Time in Patients with Chronic Constipation: Some Different Outcomes
Chunying Zhai, Qiyang Huang, Ningli Chai, Wengang Zhang, Enqiang Linghu
Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Gut microbiota alterations from different Lactobacillus probiotic-fermented yoghurt treatments in slow-transit constipation
Chen-Jian Liu, Xiao-Dan Tang, Jie Yu, Hai-Yan Zhang, Xiao-Ran Li
Journal of Functional Foods.2017; 38: 110. CrossRef
The management of ‘hard-to-prepare’ colonoscopy patients
Daniele Mandolesi, Leonardo Frazzoni, Franco Bazzoli, Lorenzo Fuccio
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2017; 11(8): 731. CrossRef
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Theodor Voiosu, Andrei Voiosu, Radu Voiosu
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2016; 32(5): 385. CrossRef

7,937 View
50 Download
14 Web of Science
16 Crossref

Patient Descriptions of Rectal Effluents May Help to Predict the Quality of Bowel Preparation With Photographic Examples: Hoonsub So, Sun-Jin Boo, Hyungil Seo, Ho-Su Lee, Hyojeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Seungbong Han, Dong-Hoon Yang; Intest Res 2015;13(2):153-159. Published online April 27, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.153

Abstract PDF PubReader

Background/Aims

Previous studies have suggested a weak correlation between self-reported rectal effluent status and bowel preparation quality. We aim to evaluate whether photographic examples of rectal effluents could improve the correlation between patient descriptions of rectal effluents and bowel preparation quality.

Methods

Before colonoscopy, patients were asked to describe the nature of their last three rectal effluents. Photographic examples of rectal effluents were provided as a reference for scoring. Bowel preparation was subsequently assessed by a single endoscopist using a global preparation assessment scale. Preparation outcomes were grouped into two levels (excellent to good vs. fair to inadequate). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to find any association between bowel preparation quality and patient characteristics.

Results

A total of 138 patients completed the questionnaires. The mean age was 56.5±10.4 years. The mean sum of the last three rectal effluent scores was 5.9±2.0. Higher rectal effluent scores (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; P=0.043) and the presence of diverticula (OR, 0.16; P<0.001) were risk factors for suboptimal preparation.

Conclusions

Photographic example-guided patient descriptions of rectal effluents showed a statistically significant association with bowel preparation quality. However, clinical significance seemed to be low. The presence of diverticula was an independent predictive factor for suboptimal bowel preparation quality.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Individualized intervention based on a preparation-related prediction model improves adequacy of bowel preparation: A prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled study
Long Chen, Xiaoyu Kang, Gui Ren, Hui Luo, Linhui Zhang, Limei Wang, Jianghai Zhao, Rongchun Zhang, Xiaoying Zhang, Lina Zhao, Yanglin Pan
Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(3): 436. CrossRef
Comparison of Objectively Assessed Versus Patient-Reported Clarity of Last Rectal Effluent for the Prediction of Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Case-Control Study
Ajay Patwa, Satish Kumar, Deepak Bhagchandani, Amit Kumar, Virendra Atam, Navneet Anil, Priya Mishra, Abhishek Singh, Archana Devi, Ajay K Pal
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation
Xiaxia Zhao, Yanglin Pan, Jinyong Hao, Jie Feng, Zhongyuan Cui, Huimin Ma, Xiaojun Huang
Clinical and Translational Oncology.2024; 26(9): 2262. CrossRef
Patients' Description of Rectal Effluents Help Predict the Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation
Manuel Antonio Lescano Lescano, Rodrigo Strehl Machado, Maria Rachel Rohr, Sender Jankiel Miszputen
Journal of Coloproctology.2024; 44(02): e106. CrossRef
Superiority of a preparation‐related model for predicting inadequate bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A multicenter prospective study
Long Chen, Gui Ren, Hui Luo, Linhui Zhang, Limei Wang, Jianghai Zhao, Rongchun Zhang, Xiaoying Zhang, Xiaoyu Kang, Yanglin Pan
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(12): 2297. CrossRef
Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim, Seung-Man Park
Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(10): 4413. CrossRef
Evaluating the practice of canceling colonoscopies for presumed inadequate bowel preparation
Reid L. Hopkins, David Parsons, Leonie Hoyo, Brian C. Jacobson
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(2): 382. CrossRef
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Colonoscopic Enema With Additional Oral Preparation as a Salvage for Inadequate Bowel Cleansing Before Colonoscopy
Hyo-Joon Yang, Dong Il Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Sunyong Kim, Taeheon Lee, Yunho Jung, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Soo Han
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2019; 53(8): e308. CrossRef
Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study
Myeongsook Seo, Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1518. CrossRef
Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4‐L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy
Hyo‐Joon Yang, Soo‐Kyung Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Jong Pil Im, Dong Han Yeom, Geom Seog Seo, Dong Il Park
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(1): 12. CrossRef
Patient Description of Rectal Effluents With Photographic Examples as a Predictive Indicator for the Quality of Bowel Preparation
Hyoun Woo Kang
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 362. CrossRef
Author's Reply
Hoonsub So, Seungbong Han, Dong-Hoon Yang
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 364. CrossRef

24,332 View
77 Download
12 Web of Science
12 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search