Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
65 "Colon"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Tumor
Does the size of the cold snare affect the outcome of cold snare polypectomy in the colon? A KASID prospective multicenter study
Seongwoo Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Geunhyuk Choi, Yoojin Lee, Taegeun Gweon, Yunho Jung
Intest Res 2026;24(1):76-83.   Published online January 28, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00189
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is recommended for colorectal polyps <10 mm; however, the impact of snare size on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 10-mm and 15-mm snares for CSP of small colorectal polyps.
Methods
In this prospective multicenter study, patients with 4–10 mm non-pedunculated polyps underwent CSP with either a 10-mm or 15-mm snare. Both snares had identical wire thickness and hexagonal loop design. The primary outcome was histological complete resection rate (CRR). Secondary outcomes included adverse events and technical parameters.
Results
In total, 182 patients were enrolled (10-mm group: n = 92; 15-mm group: n = 90). Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, polyp size, morphology, location, and pathology, were comparable between groups. Histological CRRs were 90.2% in the 10-mm group and 91.1% in the 15-mm group (P= 0.483). No significant differences were observed in the presence of submucosal tissue within specimens (P= 0.523), iatrogenic ulcer size (P= 0.532), hematoma occurrence (P= 0.391), or intraprocedural bleeding requiring hemostasis (6.5% vs. 5.6%; P= 0.974). No cases of delayed bleeding or perforation were reported. Logistic regression analysis identified iatrogenic ulcer size > 8 mm as an independent predictor of complete resection (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–13.21; P= 0.029); snare size was not significantly associated with CRR (P= 0.519).
Conclusions
CSP using either a 10-mm or a 15-mm snare for 4–10 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps showed no significant difference in complete resection or safety outcomes within this size range. (Clinical Research Information Service [CRIS], KCT0005031)
  • 191 View
  • 9 Download
Close layer
Reviews
Population-based screening colonoscopy in Korea: balancing benefits and limitations
Hyoung Il Choi, Jae Myung Cha
Received August 22, 2025  Accepted September 28, 2025  Published online January 2, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00188    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Population-based colonoscopy screening is considered one of the most effective strategies for reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Its major strength lies in its dual benefits: early detection of colorectal cancer and prevention via the removal of precancerous lesions. Colonoscopy has a high sensitivity and provides a full colonic evaluation in a single session, thereby reducing the need for frequent testing. However, this approach has notable limitations. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure associated with rare but serious complications such as perforation and bleeding. Participation rates tend to be lower than those of noninvasive methods like fecal immunochemical tests. Additionally, implementing colonoscopy as a populationbased tool requires significant resources, including trained endoscopists, endoscopy facilities, and financial investments. The quality of colonoscopy may also vary depending on the operator’s skill and adherence to guidelines. Given these trade-offs, population-based colonoscopy screening must be carefully evaluated in terms of cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and public acceptance within each country’s healthcare system. Therefore, population-based colonoscopy screening should be approached with a balanced understanding of its benefits and limitations to ensure cost-effectiveness, feasibility, alignment with each country’s healthcare infrastructure, and integration with existing screening programs.
  • 408 View
  • 64 Download
Close layer
Recent updates on the endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumor
Sunghyeok Ryou, Kwangwoo Nam
Received July 18, 2025  Accepted September 8, 2025  Published online November 27, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00141    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The incidence of rectal neuroendocrine tumors has been gradually increasing, primarily due to the widespread use of screening colonoscopy and growing awareness of the disease. Most rectal neuroendocrine tumors are small ( < 10 mm), well-differentiated, and low-grade lesions at the time of diagnosis, and they are usually asymptomatic. Given these characteristics, endoscopic resection is considered a feasible treatment option for early-stage lesions. However, due to their inherent malignant potential, a comprehensive initial diagnostic evaluation is essential. Lymph node or distal metastasis can be present at diagnosis or may develop long after apparently successful primary treatment. Therefore, achieving complete resection using the most optimal resection method is crucial. Modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are recommended over conventional forceps or snare polypectomy, which are associated with high incomplete resection rates. In case of incomplete resection, additional endoscopic resection can be a feasible option in selected cases. Furthermore, regular post-resection surveillance is needed, especially in patients with high-risk of recurrence such as poor pathologic result or incomplete resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pathologic Risk Stratification and Surveillance Strategies
    Ji Eun Kim
    Journal of Digestive Cancer Research.2025; 13(3): 228.     CrossRef
  • 511 View
  • 81 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Balancing safety and effectiveness in colonoscopy for older adults: a narrative review
Min-Jae Kim, Yuna Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Jaeyoung Chun
Intest Res 2025;23(4):443-454.   Published online October 2, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00092
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Colonoscopy is becoming more widely used in older adults for screening and diagnostic evaluation of colorectal cancer. While advanced age itself is not a contraindication, elderly patients often present unique challenges, including frailty, comorbidities and polypharmacy, which increase the risk of complications during the procedure. Rather than chronological age alone, frailty is important in risk assessment and clinical decision-making before performing a colonoscopy. This review summarizes recent evidence, particularly from large cohort studies and clinical guidelines, to provide a balanced evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of performing colonoscopies on older adults. Ultimately, we emphasize the importance of judicious patient selection, customized bowel preparation and tailored sedation management to optimize the safety and effectiveness of colonoscopy in this vulnerable group.
  • 2,170 View
  • 85 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
Tumor
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practices related to colorectal cancer and colonoscopy in South Korea: a nationwide population-based study
Jin Young Yoon, Moon Hyung Lee, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
Intest Res 2025;23(1):85-95.   Published online November 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00066
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Despite of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is little data regarding its impact on colorectal cancer (CRC)-related clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the changes in its impact during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
This was a retrospective national population-based study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database from January 2019 to December 2021. The number of patients in 2020 and 2021 was compared with those in 2019 for the diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy, CRC-related operation, and any treatment for CRC.
Results
The annual number of patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopies decreased by 6.9% in 2020 but increased 8.1% in 2021, compared to those in 2019; number of patients undergoing therapeutic colonoscopies increased by 6.0% and 37.7% in 2020 and 2021, respectively; number of patients operated for CRC decreased by 4.2% in 2020 and increased by 2.3% in 2021. The number of patients treated for CRC decreased by 2.8% in 2020 and increased by 4.4% in 2021. Diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies and any CRC-related treatment decreased by 43.8%, 37.5%, and 11.3% in March 2020, during the first surge of COVID-19, but increased by 26.0%, 58.1%, and 9.5% in June 2021, respectively. CRC-related operations decreased by 24.1% in April 2020 and increased by 12.6% in August 2021.
Conclusions
Negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practices related to CRC completely recovered within second year. It could be considered for the development of an optimal strategy on CRC management in response to the pandemic-driven crisis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of COVID-19 on clinical practices of colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Kwang Woo Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • 4,864 View
  • 49 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Colorectal neoplasia
A survey of current practices in post-polypectomy surveillance in Korea
Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoon Yang, on behalf of the Intestinal Tumor Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)
Intest Res 2024;22(2):186-207.   Published online April 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00109
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
We investigated the clinical practice patterns of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance among Korean endoscopists.
Methods
In a web-based survey conducted between September and November 2021, participants were asked about their preferred surveillance intervals and the patient age at which surveillance was discontinued. Adherence to the recent guidelines of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) was also analyzed.
Results
In total, 196 endoscopists completed the survey. The most preferred first surveillance intervals were: a 5-year interval after the removal of 1–2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm; a 3-year interval after the removal of 3–10 tubular adenomas < 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, ≤ 20 hyperplastic polyps < 10 mm, 1–4 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) < 10 mm, hyperplastic polyps or SSLs ≥ 10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas; and a 1-year interval after the removal of adenomas with highgrade dysplasia, >10 adenomas, 5–10 SSLs, and SSLs with dysplasia. In piecemeal resections of large polyps ( > 20 mm), surveillance colonoscopy was mostly preferred after 1 year for adenomas and 6 months for SSLs. The mean USMSTF guideline adherence rate was 30.7%. The largest proportion of respondents (40.8%–55.1%) discontinued the surveillance at the patient age of 80–84 years.
Conclusions
A significant discrepancy was observed between the preferred post-polypectomy surveillance intervals and recent international guidelines. Individualized measures are required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison between endoscopic resection and transanal surgery for treatment of rectal tumors: a systematic review and meta‑analysis
    Chan Hyuk Park, Byung Wook Jung, Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2026; 24(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Is cap still useful for colon adenoma detection rate improvement in the artificial intelligence era?
    Tae-Woo Kim, Soo-Young Na
    Clinical Endoscopy.2026; 59(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Lifestyles on Polyp Burden and Cancer Development in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Ji Soo Park, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(2): 433.     CrossRef
  • Chronic Kidney Disease Increases Risk of Delayed Post‐Polypectomy Bleeding: A Large‐Scale Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Nak‐Hoon Son, So Hyeon Gwon, Hyun Chul Lim, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Tae‐Hyun Yoo, Shin‐Wook Kang, Hae‐Ryong Yun, Cheal Wung Huh
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2025; 13(5): 759.     CrossRef
  • Minimum Platelet Count Threshold for Safe Colonoscopic Polypectomy: A Large-Scale Propensity Scored-Matched Analysis
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Nak-Hoon Son, Cheal Wung Huh, Hyun Chul Lim, So Hyeon Gwon, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 120(12): 2918.     CrossRef
  • Determinants of Shorter Surveillance Colonoscopy Intervals: A Nationwide Real‐World Study in Japan
    Munenori Honda, Ryosuke Gushima, Kotaro Waki, Kenshi Matsuno, Yoki Furuta, Hideaki Miyamoto, Katsuya Nagaoka, Hideaki Naoe, Yasuhito Tanaka
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(12): 2944.     CrossRef
  • 8,376 View
  • 110 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Colorectal neoplasia
Summary and comparison of recently updated post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
Yoon Suk Jung
Intest Res 2023;21(4):443-451.   Published online October 26, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00107
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Recently, updated guidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance have been published by the U.S. Multi‐Society Task Force (USMSTF), the British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England (BSG/ACPGBI/PHE), the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES), and the Korean Multi-Society Taskforce Committee. This review summarizes and compares the updated recommendations of these 5 guidelines. There are some differences between the guidelines for the recommended post-polypectomy surveillance intervals. In particular, there are prominent differences between the guidelines for 1–4 tubular adenomas < 10 mm with low-grade dysplasia (nonadvanced adenomas [NAAs]) and tubulovillous or villous adenomas. The USMSTF, JGES, and Korean guidelines recommend colonoscopic surveillance for patients with 1–4 NAAs and those with tubulovillous or villous adenomas, whereas the BSG/ACPGBI/PHE and ESGE guidelines do not recommend endoscopic surveillance for such patients. Surveillance recommendations for patients with serrated polyps (SPs) are limited. Although the USMSTF guidelines provide specific recommendations for patients who have undergone SPs removal, these are weak and based on very lowquality evidence. Future studies should examine this topic to better guide the surveillance recommendations for patients with SPs. For countries that do not have separate guidelines, we hope that this review article will help select the most appropriate guidelines as per each country’s healthcare environment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Lifestyles on Polyp Burden and Cancer Development in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Ji Soo Park, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(2): 433.     CrossRef
  • Frequency and Risk Factors of Advanced Neoplasia in Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Low-grade Dysplasia
    Yong Eun Park, Kyeong Ok Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Soo-Kyung Park, Yoo Jin Lee, Chang Kyun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 85(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • The impact of COVID-19 on clinical practices of colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Kwang Woo Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Annual Blood Tests Are an Acceptable form of Surveillance to Supplement Colonoscopies for Colorectal Cancer
    Rishabh Goyal, Carlene J. Wilson, Ingrid H. Flight, Charles Cock, Graeme P. Young, Molla M. Wassie, Sarah Cohen-Woods, Erin L. Symonds, Maddison Dix
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(4): 1486.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Patient Preferences and Response to Extended Colonoscopy Intervals in a Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Program
    Maddison Dix, Syme Aftab, Graeme P. Young, Carlene J. Wilson, Kalindra Simpson, Charles Cock, Erin L. Symonds
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(4): 1328.     CrossRef
  • Developing a Strategy for Prevention of Avoidable Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancers: Current and Future Perspectives
    Nanette S. Van roermund, Joep E.G. Ijspeert, Evelien Dekker
    Gastroenterology.2025; 168(5): 854.     CrossRef
  • Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps
    Samantha Pang, Pedram Tavakoli, Neal Shahidi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of recurrent colorectal polyps post initial polypectomy: a review of the current evidence
    Giovanna McGinty, Zeino Zeino
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2025; : flgastro-2024-103016.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of a New D-sorbitol, Ascorbic Acid, and Picosulfate Bowel Cleansing Solution for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study
    Seung Yong Shin, Yoo Jin Lee, Yunho Jung, Jun Lee, Chang Hwan Choi, Jae Jun Park
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2025; 57(12): 2441.     CrossRef
  • Causal association between telomere length and colorectal polyps: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Yin Zhang, Jiaying Wang, Mingyu Zheng, Huanwei Qu, Shuya Yang, Fuzhou Han, Nan Yao, Wenqiang Li, Jun Qu
    Medicine.2024; 103(1): e36867.     CrossRef
  • Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer
    Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature
    Marcello Maida, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Yash R. Shah, Angad Tiwari, Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Aqsa Khan, Fouad Jaber, Daryl Ramai, Antonio Facciorusso
    Cancers.2024; 16(15): 2746.     CrossRef
  • 19,211 View
  • 257 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Colorectal neoplasia
The elderly population are more vulnerable for the management of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, population-based study
Hong Sun Kang, Seung Hoon Jeon, Su Bee Park, Jin Young Youn, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
Intest Res 2023;21(4):500-509.   Published online August 29, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00004
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) may worse in elderly population, as almost all COVID-19 deaths occurred in the elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on CRC management in the elderly population.
Methods
The numbers of patients who underwent colonoscopy, who visited hospitals or operated for CRC in 2020 and 2021 (COVID-19 era) were compared with those in 2019, according to 3 age groups (≥70 years, 50–69 years, and ≤49 years), based on the nationwide, population-based database (2019–2021) in South Korea.
Results
The annual volumes of colonoscopy and hospital visits for CRC in 2020 were more significantly declined in the old age group than in the young age group (both P<0.001). In addition, the annual volume of patients operated for CRC numerically more declined in old age group than in young age group. During the first surge of COVID-19 (March and April 2020), old age patients showed statistically significant declines for the monthly number of colonoscopies (–46.5% vs. –39.3%, P<0.001), hospital visits (–15.4% vs. –7.9%, P<0.001), CRC operations (–33.8% vs. –0.7%, P<0.05), and colonoscopic polypectomies (–41.8% vs. –38.0%, P<0.001) than young age patients, compared with those of same months in 2019.
Conclusions
Elderly population are more vulnerable for the management of CRC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the elderly population are more carefully cared for in the management of CRC during the next pandemic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of COVID-19 on clinical practices of colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Kwang Woo Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • To overcome medical gap in screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Yoo Min Han
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 418.     CrossRef
  • 5,323 View
  • 205 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Review
IBD
Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease: novel experiments for revealing pathogenesis of colitis, fibrosis, and colitis-associated colon cancer
Chan Hyung Lee, Seong-Joon Koh, Zaher A Radi, Aida Habtezion
Intest Res 2023;21(3):295-305.   Published online May 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00029
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a lifelong disease that manifests with chronic intestinal inflammation, sequential fibrosis, and an increased risk of colitis-associated colon cancer (CAC). The combined effects of genetic, immunological, environmental, and microbial factors render it difficult to determine the specific mechanism underlying the induction and perpetuation of IBD. Various animal models of IBD have contributed enormously to the understanding of IBD pathogenesis in terms of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, microbiome, and drug development of novel therapeutics. Although comprehensive research on IBD has been enabled by advanced technologies, such as genetically engineered models, there is a great need to develop relevant in vivo models of colitis and fibrosis. Here, we review 4 categories of animal models of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation, fibrosis, and CAC: chemically induced, genetically engineered, T cell transfer, and spontaneous gene mutation models.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Refined photobiomodulation therapy ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease via modulation of immune pathways and gut microbiota
    Lee So Maeng, Jung Hwan Yoon, Bom Yee Chung, Kyung Jin Seo, Hae Kyung Lee, Moon Gyu Chung, Won Sang Park, Hiun Suk Chae
    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology.2026; 274: 113330.     CrossRef
  • COVID-19 Infection in a Patient With Sigmoid Diverticulitis: Viral Diverticulitis or Incidental Association?
    Maria J Araujo, Victor A Sato, Precil D Neves, Erico S Oliveira, Leonardo V Pereira, Sara Mohrbacher, Alessandra M Bales, Luciana L Nardotto, Marcella M Frediani, Andrea Santos Galvão, Wares F Medeiros, Américo L Cuvello-Neto, Pedro R Chocair
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Estrogen Receptor β Activation Mitigates Colitis-associated Intestinal Fibrosis via Inhibition of TGF-β/Smad and TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling Pathways
    Fangmei Ling, Yidong Chen, Junrong Li, Mingyang Xu, Gengqing Song, Lei Tu, Huan Wang, Shuang Li, Liangru Zhu
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025; 31(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Leveraging Organ‐on‐Chip Models to Investigate Host–Microbiota Dynamics and Targeted Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Tim Kaden, Raquel Alonso‐Román, Johannes Stallhofer, Mark S. Gresnigt, Bernhard Hube, Alexander S. Mosig
    Advanced Healthcare Materials.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adiponectin deficiency prevents chronic colitis-associated colonic fibrosis via inhibiting CXCL13 production
    Haitao Xiao, Tianhang Xing, Miao Qiu, Guangtao Zhang, Gongli Yang, Wenke Chen, Die Hu, Deao Xue, Jiao Peng, Bin Du
    Journal of Advanced Research.2025; 76: 639.     CrossRef
  • Fructosyl-mangiferin ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice via the STAT3/M1/Th17 axis
    Penghong Xu, Yuping Qian, Guo Xu, Jianlin Chu, Bingfang He
    Phytomedicine.2025; 139: 156475.     CrossRef
  • S1PR1-biased activation drives the resolution of endothelial dysfunction-associated inflammatory diseases by maintaining endothelial integrity
    Huaping Zheng, Jingjing Yu, Luhua Gao, Kexin Wang, Zheng Xu, Zhen Zeng, Kun Zheng, Xiaoju Tang, Xiaowen Tian, Qing Zhao, Jie Zhao, Huajing Wan, Zhongwei Cao, Kang Zhang, Jingqiu Cheng, Jürgen Brosius, Hu Zhang, Wei Li, Wei Yan, Zhenhua Shao, Fengming Luo,
    Nature Communications.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Groundwater Nitrate Contamination and its Effect on Human Health: A Review
    Indra Jeet Chaudhary, Ratna Chauhan, Sanjay Sarjerao Kale, Suresh Gosavi, Dheeraj Rathore, Vinay Dwivedi, Sunita Singh, Virendra Kumar Yadav
    Water Conservation Science and Engineering.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Standardization of a Preclinical Colon Cancer Model in Male and Female BALB/c Mice: Macroscopic and Microscopic Characterization from Pre-Neoplastic to Tumoral Lesions
    Elizabeth Correa, Juan Pablo Rendón, Vanesa Bedoya-Betancur, Juliana Montoya, Julian Muñoz Duque, Tonny W. Naranjo
    Biomedicines.2025; 13(4): 939.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Disorders and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Jae Hee Cheon
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • A review on ulcerative colitis induction models and the protective mechanism of carbon quantum dots as a novel anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer agent
    Mohammad Beiranvand, Gholamreza Dehghan
    Discover Pharmaceutical Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oral–gut microbiome axis in a Korean cohort with inflammatory bowel disease and ankylosing spondylitis (INTEGRATE): a prospective and observational study protocol
    Hyun Sik Kim, Bo-Hyung Kim, Bora Nam, Shin Ju Oh, Soo-Kyung Park, Sang Won Lee, Jae-Yun Lee, Sungsin Jo, Yeon-Ah Lee, June-Young Lee, Dong Il Park, Tae-Hwan Kim, Chang Kyun Lee
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(8): e092075.     CrossRef
  • Role of physical exercise, vagal nerve stimulation, and vagotomy in inflammatory bowel disease
    Alda Cassia Alves da Silva, Juliana Soares Severo, Brenda Lois Barros dos Santos, Heron Silva Soares, Jorddam Almondes Martins, Rodrigo Soares Pereira Lima, Kalinne Kelly Lima Gadelha, Francisco Leonardo Torres-Leal, Paulo Correia-de-Sá, Pedro Jorge Calda
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From AI-Assisted In Silico Computational Design to Preclinical In Vivo Models: A Multi-Platform Approach to Small Molecule Anti-IBD Drug Discovery
    Joya Datta Ripa, Sarfaraz Ali, Matt Field, John Smithson, Phurpa Wangchuk
    Pharmaceuticals.2025; 18(10): 1536.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Potential Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects From Micro(nano) Plastic Exposure
    Priyata Dutta, Sana Rabeeah, Alejandra Vargas, Edward C. Oldfield, David A. Johnson
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Gut Microbiota Alteration on Colorectal Cancer Progression in an In Vivo Model: Histopathological and Immunological Evaluation
    Juliana Montoya Montoya, Elizabeth Correa Gómez, Jorge Humberto Tabares Guevara, Julián Camilo Arango Rincón, Tonny Williams Naranjo Preciado
    Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2025; 48(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Approaches, Strategies and Procedures for Identifying Anti-Inflammatory Drug Lead Molecules from Natural Products
    Tenzin Jamtsho, Karma Yeshi, Matthew J. Perry, Alex Loukas, Phurpa Wangchuk
    Pharmaceuticals.2024; 17(3): 283.     CrossRef
  • Strategies for targeting cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease
    Markus F. Neurath
    Nature Reviews Immunology.2024; 24(8): 559.     CrossRef
  • Inhibiting the cGAS-STING Pathway in Ulcerative Colitis with Programmable Micelles
    Saji Uthaman, Shadi Parvinroo, Ansuja Pulickal Mathew, Xinglin Jia, Belen Hernandez, Alexandra Proctor, Karuna Anna Sajeevan, Ariel Nenninger, Mary-Jane Long, In-Kyu Park, Ratul Chowdhury, Gregory J. Phillips, Michael J. Wannemuehler, Rizia Bardhan
    ACS Nano.2024; 18(19): 12117.     CrossRef
  • Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 for chemoprevention of inflammation-associated intestinal carcinogenesis: An update
    Kyung-Soo Chun, Eun-Hee Kim, Do-Hee Kim, Na-Young Song, Wonki Kim, Hye-Kyung Na, Young-Joon Surh
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2024; 228: 116259.     CrossRef
  • Lactobacillus paracasei Jlus66 relieves DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in a murine model by maintaining intestinal barrier integrity, inhibiting inflammation, and improving intestinal microbiota structure
    Fazheng Yu, Xiaoxu Wang, Honglin Ren, Jiang Chang, Jian Guo, Zhaoqi He, Ruoran Shi, Xueyu Hu, Yuanyuan Jin, Shiying Lu, Yansong Li, Zengshan Liu, Pan Hu
    European Journal of Nutrition.2024; 63(6): 2185.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of histologic remission in patients with biologic-naïve, moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis treated with first-line biologic agents and small-molecule drugs: a single-center, retrospective cohort study
    Kijae Jo, Kwang Woo Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Seong-Joon Koh
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(4): 453.     CrossRef
  • Interventional Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum Hfy04 Isolated from Naturally Fermented Yak Yogurt on Oxazolone-Induced Colitis in BALB/c Mice
    Haitao Zheng, Xiaoli Ping, Ruizi Wu, Cen Lei, Huijia Mao, Yanni Pan, Yongpeng He, Xin Zhao
    International Journal of Pharmacology.2024; 20(5): 817.     CrossRef
  • Inhibition of myeloperoxidase by food-derived peptides: A review of current research and future prospects
    Fai-Chu Wong, Yit-Lai Chow, Sheri-Ann Tan, Lingmin Tian, Weibin Bai, Tsun-Thai Chai
    Food Bioscience.2024; 60: 104458.     CrossRef
  • Deciphering Microbial Composition in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Implications for Therapeutic Response to Biologic Agents
    Orazio Palmieri, Fabrizio Bossa, Stefano Castellana, Tiziana Latiano, Sonia Carparelli, Giuseppina Martino, Manuel Mangoni, Giuseppe Corritore, Marianna Nardella, Maria Guerra, Giuseppe Biscaglia, Francesco Perri, Tommaso Mazza, Anna Latiano
    Microorganisms.2024; 12(7): 1260.     CrossRef
  • Protective effect of freeze-dried extract of Persicaria bistorta Samp. on acetic acid-induced colitis model in rats: Involvement of nitric oxide and opioid system
    Niusha Esmaealzadeh, Amirhossein Abdolghaffari, Maryam Baeeri, Maede Hasanpour, Mehrdad Iranshahi, Cristina Santarcangelo, Mahdi Gholami, Roodabeh Bahramsoltani
    Inflammopharmacology.2024; 32(6): 3845.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Vascular Diagnostics using Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) for Blood Circulation Assessment
    Marisa O Pacheco, Isabelle K Gerzenshtein, Whitney L Stoppel, Carlos M Rinaldi‐Ramos
    Advanced Healthcare Materials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immunomodulatory Effects of a Probiotic Mixture: Alleviating Colitis in a Mouse Model through Modulation of Cell Activation Markers and the Gut Microbiota
    Hye-Myung Ryu, S. M. Shamsul Islam, Bushra Riaz, Hasan M. Sayeed, Bunsoon Choi, Seonghyang Sohn
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(16): 8571.     CrossRef
  • Immuno-therapeutic and prophylactic potential of Trichinella spiralis antigens for inflammatory bowel diseases
    Majed H. Wakid, Walaa A. El Kholy, Muslimah N. Alsulami, Eman S. El-Wakil
    Food and Waterborne Parasitology.2024; 37: e00248.     CrossRef
  • Development of a novel complex inflammatory bowel disease mouse model: Reproducing human inflammatory bowel disease etiologies in mice
    Sun-Min Seo, Na-Won Kim, Eun-Seon Yoo, Ji-Hun Lee, Ah-Reum Kang, Han-Bi Jeong, Won-Yong Shim, Dong-Hyun Kim, Young-Jun Park, Kieun Bae, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Yang-Kyu Choi, Pradeep Dudeja
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(11): e0311310.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
    Tae-Geun Gweon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 56.     CrossRef
  • Mitochondrial dysfunctions in T cells: focus on inflammatory bowel disease
    Hoyul Lee, Jae-Han Jeon, Eun Soo Kim
    Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 21,944 View
  • 566 Download
  • 32 Web of Science
  • 32 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Infection
Comparative outcomes of acute colonic diverticulitis in immunocompromised versus immunocompetent patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jae Gon Lee, Yong Eun Park, Ji Young Chang, Hyun Joo Song, Duk Hwan Kim, Young Joo Yang, Byung Chang Kim, Shin Hee Lee, Myung-Won You, Seong-Eun Kim
Intest Res 2023;21(4):481-492.   Published online May 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00005
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Immunocompromised patients with acute colonic diverticulitis are at high risk for complications and failure of non-surgical treatment. However, evidence on the comparative outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the outcomes of medical treatment in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing the clinical outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis were included.
Results
A total of 10 studies with 1,946,461 subjects were included in the quantitative synthesis. The risk of emergency surgery and postoperative mortality after emergency surgery was significantly higher in immunocompromised patients than in immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis (risk ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–2.38 and RR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.70–5.45, respectively). Overall risk of complications associated with diverticulitis was non-significantly higher in immunocompromised than in immunocompetent patients (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95–1.63). Overall mortality irrespective of surgery was significantly higher in immunocompromised than in immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis (RR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.73–7.69). By contrast, postoperative mortality after elective surgery was not significantly different between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with diverticulitis. In subgroup analysis, the risk of emergency surgery and recurrence was significantly higher in immunocompromised patients with complicated diverticulitis, whereas no significant difference was shown in mild disease.
Conclusions
Immunocompromised patients with diverticulitis should be given the best medical treatment with multidisciplinary approach because they had increased risks of surgery, postoperative morbidity, and mortality than immunocompetent patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of Outcomes Following Surgery for Diverticulitis Among Immunocompetent and Immunosuppressed Patients
    Usama Waqar, Christina Gozza, Courtney L. Devin, Terrah J. Paul Olson, Seth A. Rosen
    The American Surgeon™.2025; 91(7): 1093.     CrossRef
  • Global guidelines on diverticular disease of the colon: the Fiesole Consensus report
    Antonio Tursi, Giovanni Brandimarte, Francesco Di Mario, Wenjie Ma, Juozas Kupcinskas, Jaroslaw Regula, Giovanni Maconi, Peter Malfertheiner, Giovanni Barbara, Neil Stollman, Savvas Papagrigoriadis, Thomas Golda, Antonio Amato, Mauro Bafutto, Gabrio Basso
    Gut.2025; : gutjnl-2025-336902.     CrossRef
  • Does type II diabetes mellitus increase the morbidity of patients with diverticulitis?
    Marei H. Alshandeer, Walid M. Abd El Maksoud, Khaled S. Abbas, Fahad S. Al Amri, Maha A. Alghamdi, Hassan A. Alzahrani, Abdullah Dalboh, Mohammed A. Bawahab, Aisha J. Asiri, Yahia Assiri
    Medicine.2024; 103(46): e40567.     CrossRef
  • Not all acute colonic diverticulitis follows the same course: a potential risk for immunocompromised individuals
    Yehyun Park
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 415.     CrossRef
  • 6,773 View
  • 375 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Colorectal neoplasia
Clinical characteristics and risk factors related to polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis
Jihun Jang, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
Intest Res 2023;21(4):510-517.   Published online May 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2022.00139
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Patients with more than 10 cumulative polyps might involve a greater genetic risk of colorectal neoplasia development. However, few studies have investigated the risk factors of polyposis recurrence and development of advanced neoplasms among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis.
Methods
This study included patients (n=855) with 10 or more cumulative polyps diagnosed at Severance Hospital from January 2012 to September 2021. Patients with known genetic mutations related to polyposis, known hereditary polyposis syndromes, insufficient information, total colectomy, and less than 3 years of follow-up were excluded. Finally, 169 patients were included for analysis. We collected clinical data, including colonoscopy surveillance results, and performed Cox regression analyses of risk factors for polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development.
Results
The 169 patients were predominantly male (84.02%), with a mean age of 64.19±9.92 years. The mean number of adenomas on index colonoscopy was 15.33±8.47. Multivariable analysis revealed history of cancer except colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–4.01), current smoking (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.17–4.87), and detection of many polyps (≥15) on index colonoscopy (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.21–3.50) were significant risk factors for recurrence of polyposis. We found no statistically significant risk factors for advanced neoplasm development during surveillance among our cohort.
Conclusions
The presence of many polyps (≥15) on index colonoscopy, history of cancer except colon cancer, and current smoking state were significant risk factors for polyposis recurrence among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Lifestyles on Polyp Burden and Cancer Development in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes
    Hye Kyung Hyun, Ji Soo Park, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(2): 433.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Genetic Factors Related With Nonhereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Its Recurrence Through Genome‐Wide Association Study
    Jung Hyun Ji, Su Hyun Lee, Chan Il Jeon, Jihun Jang, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Sun Ha Jee, Tae Il Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(2): 482.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning in colorectal polyp surveillance: A paradigm shift in post-endoscopic mucosal resection follow-up
    Vasily Isakov
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer
    Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • 5,026 View
  • 318 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Cancer
Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition
Su Young Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Soon Man Yoon, Yunho Jung, Jong Wook Kim, Sun-Jin Boo, Eun Hye Oh, Seong Ran Jeon, Seung-Joo Nam, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong Hoon Baek, Mi-Young Choi, Suyeon Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyung Kil Kim, Joo Young Cho, Moon Sung Lee, Oh Young Lee, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Korean Society of Gastroenterology, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
Intest Res 2023;21(1):20-42.   Published online January 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2022.00096
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Colonoscopic polypectomy is effective in decreasing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). Premalignant polyps discovered during colonoscopy are associated with the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia. Postpolypectomy surveillance is the most important method for managing advanced metachronous neoplasia. A more efficient and evidence-based guideline for postpolypectomy surveillance is required because of the limited medical resources and concerns regarding colonoscopy complications. In these consensus guidelines, an analytic approach was used to address all reliable evidence to interpret the predictors of CRC or advanced neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy. The key recommendations state that the high-risk findings for metachronous CRC following polypectomy are as follows: adenoma ≥10 mm in size; 3 to 5 (or more) adenomas; tubulovillous or villous adenoma; adenoma containing high-grade dysplasia; traditional serrated adenoma; sessile serrated lesion containing any grade of dysplasia; serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size; and 3 to 5 (or more) sessile serrated lesions. More studies are needed to fully comprehend the patients who are most likely to benefit from surveillance colonoscopy and the ideal surveillance interval to prevent metachronous CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Efficacy of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Han Jo Jeon, Bora Keum, Eui Sun Jeong, Seong-Eun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Bomee Lee, Sanghyun Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Jae Min Lee, Eun Sun Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Gut and Liver.2026; 20(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between endoscopic resection and transanal surgery for treatment of rectal tumors: a systematic review and meta‑analysis
    Chan Hyuk Park, Byung Wook Jung, Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2026; 24(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines
    Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong-Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoon Yang, Eun R
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • The impact of COVID-19 on clinical practices of colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Kwang Woo Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer after Colonoscopy: Causes and Prevention Strategies
    Seongwoo Choi, Yunho Jung
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2025; 100(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review
    Jin-Dong Wang, Guo-Shuai Xu, Xin-Long Hu, Wen-Qiang Li, Nan Yao, Fu-Zhou Han, Yin Zhang, Jun Qu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer
    Hee Man Kim, Tae Il Kim
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence with Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Whole-Slide-Images of Endoscopic and Surgical Resection Specimens
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim, Yiyu Hong, Insuk Sohn, Soomin Ahn, Seok-Hyung Kim, Kee-Taek Jang
    Cancers.2024; 16(10): 1900.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial
    Yunho Jung, Hyun Gun Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Hyoun Woo Kang, Jae Jun Park, Dong Hoon Baek, Jaeyoung Chun, Tae-Geun Gweon, Hyeon Jeong Goong, Min Seob Kwak, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo-Kyung Park, Jong Hoon Lee
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Causes and Prevention
    Jong Yoon Lee
    Journal of Digestive Cancer Research.2024; 12(3): 160.     CrossRef
  • Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revision
    Su Young Kim
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2023; 98(3): 102.     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics and risk factors related to polyposis recurrence and advanced neoplasm development among patients with non-hereditary colorectal polyposis
    Jihun Jang, Jihye Park, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 510.     CrossRef
  • Summary and comparison of recently updated post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Strategy for post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: focus on the revised Korean guidelines
    Yong Soo Kwon, Su Young Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(11): 652.     CrossRef
  • 13,753 View
  • 310 Download
  • 15 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Miscellaneous
Characteristics and usefulness of transabdominal ultrasonography in immune-mediated colitis
Kensuke Sakurai, Takehiko Katsurada, Mutsumi Nishida, Satomi Omotehara, Shinya Fukushima, Shinsuke Otagiri, Kazunori Nagashima, Reizo Onishi, Ryo Takagi, Yoshito Komatsu, Naoya Sakamoto
Intest Res 2023;21(1):126-136.   Published online July 22, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00166
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
The usefulness of ultrasonography (US) in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract has been reported recently. This prospective study aimed to determine the features of US findings in immune-mediated colitis (IMC), an adverse event induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor, and examine the correlation between US findings, colonoscopy (CS) findings, and severity of colitis.
Methods
We studied patients examined using CS and US upon suspicion of IMC in Hokkaido University Hospital between April 2018 and February 2021. Endoscopic findings of IMC were assessed using the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). The severity of US findings in IMC was evaluated using US grade, which is the ultrasonographic grading scale in ulcerative colitis. Bowel wall thickness and the intensity of the color Doppler signal were also analyzed. Severity of colitis was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade version 5.
Results
Fourteen patients with IMC were enrolled. The US findings were bowel wall thickening, loss of stratification, ulceration and increased blood flow signal. The US grade was moderately correlated with the UCEIS (r=0.687, p=0.009) and CTCAE grade (r=0.628, p=0.035). Bowel wall thickness and UCEIS (r=0.628, p=0.020), as well as color Doppler signal grade and CTCAE grade (r=0.724, p=0.008), were significantly correlated.
Conclusions
US findings in IMC were mainly similar to those of ulcerative colitis, but there were some findings that were characteristic only of IMC. Significant correlation was found between US findings, CS findings, and severity of colitis. Hence, US could be useful for the evaluation of IMC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Symptomatic and Sonographic Improvement of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Enterocolitis With Risankizumab
    Rena Mei, Emily Pepe, David Y Oh, Katy K Tsai, Rishika Chugh, Michael G Kattah
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2025; 31(4): 1182.     CrossRef
  • Response
    Malek Shatila, Yinghong Wang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 100(2): 349.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound's echo in the endoscopic realm: navigating checkpoint colitis
    Steven Nicolaides, Zaid Ardalan, Alex Boussioutas
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 100(2): 349.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic adverse events
    Malek Shatila, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Shirwaikar Thomas, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Sidra Naz, Nitish Mittal, Christine Catinis, Krishnavathana Varatharajalu, Carolina Colli Cruz, Eric Lu, Deanna Wu, Julie R Brahmer, Franck Carbonnel, Stephen B Hanauer, Bre
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2024; 12(11): e009742.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic findings of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related gastrointestinal adverse events
    Min Kyu Kim, Sung Wook Hwang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(6): 725.     CrossRef
  • Gut microbiome on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and consequent immune-related colitis: a review
    Sung Wook Hwang, Min Kyu Kim, Mi-Na Kweon
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 433.     CrossRef
  • 7,232 View
  • 395 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Perspective
IBD
Endoscopy for assessment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: time bound or response guided?
Ajit Sood, Ramit Mahajan, Arshdeep Singh, Vandana Midha, Varun Mehta
Intest Res 2022;20(3):297-302.   Published online February 8, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00099
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The timing of colonoscopy in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) lacks coherence. The published guidelines and recommendations advocate time-bound colonoscopy in patients with active UC to assess for mucosal healing. However, the practice of performing colonoscopies at fixed time frames lacks reasoning. The time to achieve mucosal healing in UC is not uniform across the patient populations and is influenced by the disease severity and efficacy and time to therapeutic response of the drugs being used. Additionally, with the availability of sensitive noninvasive inflammatory biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin, that parallel the disease activity and correlate with mucosal healing, the notion of performing colonoscopy at fixed intervals sounds unjustifiable. The authors express their view that a response-guided colonoscopy (driven by normalization of clinical symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers), rather than a time-bound colonoscopy, would be more logical, apart from being cost-effective and patient-friendly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Beyond conventional endoscopy: Image-enhanced techniques in quiescent ulcerative colitis assessment
    Vedran Tomašić, Petra Ćaćić, Neven Baršić, Alen Bišćanin
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Applicability of colon capsule endoscopy for monitoring ulcerative colitis: a systematic review
    Mathilde Simone Rasmussen, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Ulrik Deding, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk, Jens Kjeldsen, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 60(4): 336.     CrossRef
  • Seeing Is Believing: Does Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) Predict Histological Remission and Clinical Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis Patients?
    Vedran Tomašić
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(7): 2254.     CrossRef
  • Comments on Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Ji Eun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 192.     CrossRef
  • Ischemia-modified albumin: a novel blood marker of endoscopic mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease
    Seung Bum Lee, Hyun-Ki Kim, Sang Hyuk Park, Ji-Hun Lim, Sang Hyoung Park
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • A novel serum biomarker of endoscopic mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease
    Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023
    Hsu-Heng Yen, Jia-Feng Wu, Horng-Yuan Wang, Ting-An Chang, Chung-Hsin Chang, Chen-Wang Chang, Te-Hsin Chao, Jen-Wei Chou, Yenn-Hwei Chou, Chiao-Hsiung Chuang, Wen-Hung Hsu, Tzu-Chi Hsu, Tien-Yu Huang, Tsung-I Hung, Puo-Hsien Le, Chun-Che Lin, Chun-Chi Lin
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(3): 213.     CrossRef
  • Histologic improvement predicts endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Ji Eun Kim, Minjee Kim, Min-Ji Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Sang Yun Ha, Young-Ho Kim
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Practical management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: an international expert consensus
    Ferdinando D’Amico, Fernando Magro, Axel Dignass, Sameer Al Awadhi, Ana Gutierrez Casbas, Natália Sousa Freitas Queiroz, Grażyna Rydzewska, Byong Duk Ye, Zhihua Ran, Ailsa Hart, Vipul Jairath, Gionata Fiorino, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2024; 18(8): 421.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Value of PHRI for Recurrence within One Year after UC Treatment: A Retrospective Study
    Kun Zhang, Jianlan Xie, Jianmin Zhao, Mei Jia
    British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Activity of Inflammation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in the Microenvironment of Ulcerative Colitis
    Yu Kyung Jun, Nayoung Kim, Hyuk Yoon, Ji Hyun Park, Hyung Kyung Kim, Yonghoon Choi, Ji Ae Lee, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(6): 1037.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • 10,885 View
  • 411 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
IBD
Fecal microbiota transplantation for induction of remission, maintenance and rescue in patients with corticosteroid-dependent ulcerative colitis: a long-term follow-up real-world cohort study
Avnish Kumar Seth, Priti Jain
Intest Res 2022;20(2):251-259.   Published online February 8, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00069
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
To study role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in induction, maintenance, and rescue in patients with corticosteroid-dependent ulcerative colitis (CDUC).
Methods
Patients with active CDUC received 3 fortnightly sessions of colonoscopic induction FMT (iFMT) in addition to standard of care. In patients who achieved clinical remission (CR) or response, prednisolone was tapered from week 4 and azathioprine from week 12. Responders were advised maintenance FMT (mFMT) every 6 months. Those with relapse were offered rescue FMT (rFMT), and low dose prednisolone was added if there was no improvement in 2 weeks.
Results
All 27 patients enrolled completed iFMT and were followed up for 39 months (range, 9–71 months). The mean Mayo score decreased from 6.4±2.5 at baseline to 2.6±3.7 at week 4, 2.6±3.4 at week 12, and 2.8±3.8 at week 24 (P<0.05). Corticosteroid-free CR and clinical response at week 12 were seen in 13 patients (48%) and 1 patient (3.7%), respectively. Corticosteroid and azathioprine-free CR at week 24 was seen in 13 patients (48%) and in them histological response was seen in 2 patients (15.2%) at week 4, 5 patients (38.4%) at week 12, and 10 patients (76.9%) at week 24. First relapse was seen in 10 of 13 responders (76.9%) at a median of 14.8 months (range, 6–34 months) after iFMT and was less frequent in patients on mFMT. Relapse was treated successfully with rFMT alone in 4 patients (40%) and rFMT with low dose steroids in 5 patients (50%).
Conclusions
iFMT, mFMT, and rFMT may have a role in treatment of selected patients with CDUC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Improvement of the inflammation-damaged intestinal barrier and modulation of the gut microbiota in ulcerative colitis after FMT in the SHIME® model
    Anna Kamlárová, Monika Kvaková, Ľuboš Ambro, René Link, Izabela Bertková, Zdenka Hertelyová, Martin Janíčko, Emília Hijová, Jana Štofilová
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The practice of fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease
    Umang Arora, Saurabh Kedia, Vineet Ahuja
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Microbiome Interventions on the Progression and Severity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review
    Malik Kasapoglu, Rajesh Yadavalli, Sarosh Nawaz, Abdulaziz Althwanay, Esraa M AlEdani, Harleen Kaur, Samia Butt
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
    Suranjana Banik, Balamurugan Ramadass
    Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy Practice.2023; 3(2): 44.     CrossRef
  • Single-Donor and Pooling Strategies for Fecal Microbiota Transfer Product Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Benoît Levast, Mathieu Fontaine, Stéphane Nancey, Pierre Dechelotte, Joël Doré, Philippe Lehert
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2023; 14(5): e00568.     CrossRef
  • The Relationship Between Rosacea and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yu Kyung Jun, Da-Ae Yu, Yoo Min Han, Soo Ran Lee, Seong-Joon Koh, Hyunsun Park
    Dermatology and Therapy.2023; 13(7): 1465.     CrossRef
  • Faecal microbiota transplantation with anti-inflammatory diet (FMT-AID) followed by anti-inflammatory diet alone is effective in inducing and maintaining remission over 1 year in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled trial
    Saurabh Kedia, Shubi Virmani, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Peeyush Kumar, Bhaskar Kante, Pabitra Sahu, Kanav Kaushal, Mariyam Farooqui, Mukesh Singh, Mahak Verma, Aditya Bajaj, Manasvini Markandey, Karan Sachdeva, Prasenjit Das, Govind K Makharia, Vineet Ahuja
    Gut.2022; 71(12): 2401.     CrossRef
  • 8,079 View
  • 323 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
IBD
Factors associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor effectiveness to prevent postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease
Anthony Buisson, Lisa Cannon, Konstantin Umanskiy, Roger D. Hurst, Neil H. Hyman, Atsushi Sakuraba, Joel Pekow, Sushila Dalal, Russell D. Cohen, Bruno Pereira, David T. Rubin
Intest Res 2022;20(3):303-312.   Published online August 4, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00018
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
We assessed the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents and its associated factors to prevent endoscopic and clinical postoperative recurrence (POR) in Crohn’s disease (CD).
Methods
From a prospectively-maintained database, we retrieved 316 CD patients who underwent intestinal resection (2011–2017). Endoscopic (Rutgeerts index ≥ i2 at 6 months) and clinical (recurrence of symptoms leading to hospitalization or therapeutic escalation) POR were assessed.
Results
In 117 anti-TNF-naïve patients, anti-TNF therapy was more effective than immunosuppressive agents (odds ratio [OR], 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–43.9; P= 0.008) and no medication/5-aminosalicylates (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.0–27.9; P= 0.05) to prevent endoscopic POR. In 199 patients exposed to anti-TNF prior to the surgery, combination with anti-TNF and immunosuppressive agents was more effective than anti-TNF monotherapy (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.02–5.31; P= 0.046) to prevent endoscopic POR. Primary failure to anti-TNF agent prior to surgery was predictive of anti-TNF failure to prevent endoscopic POR (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.10–5.32; P= 0.03). When endoscopic POR despite anti-TNF prophylactic medication (n = 55), optimizing anti-TNF and adding an immunosuppressive drug was the most effective option to prevent clinical POR (hazard ratio, 7.38; 95% CI, 1.54–35.30; P= 0.012). Anti-TNF therapy was the best option to prevent clinical POR (hazard ratio, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.09–8.83; P= 0.034) in patients with endoscopic POR who did not receive any biologic to prevent endoscopic POR (n = 55).
Conclusions
Anti-TNF was the most effective medication to prevent endoscopic and clinical POR. Combination with anti-TNF and immunosuppressive agents should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNF.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of conventional therapy and biologics to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn’s disease
    Marianne Hupé, Bruno Pereira, Anthony Buisson
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of age at diagnosis on long‐term prognosis in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease
    Ji Young Chang, Soo Jung Park, Jae Jun Park, Tae Il Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Jihye Park
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(3): 519.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative small bowel Crohn's disease: how to diagnose, manage and treat
    Chak Lam Ip, Ray Boyapati, Rahul Kalla
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2024; 40(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • Stapled End-To-Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn’s Disease: Old Dog, Reliable Tricks? A Retrospective Two-Center Cohort Study
    Volkan Doğru, Jean H. Ashburn, Umut Akova, Alton G. Sutter, Eren Esen, Emily M. Gardner, Andre da Luz Moreira, Arman Erkan, John Kirat, Michael J. Grieco, Feza H. Remzi
    Annals of Surgery Open.2024; 5(1): e374.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Prognostic Nutrition Index in Patients with Crohn’s Disease after Primary Bowel Resection
    Hyeon Woo Bae, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Jae Hee Cheon, Joseph C. Carmichael, Byung Soh Min
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(7): 380.     CrossRef
  • How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, Vittoria Bellato, Marjolijn Duijvestein, Susan van Dieren, Silvio Danese, Pierpaolo Sileri, Christianne J. Buskens, Andrea Vignali, Willem A. Bemelman
    Annals of Surgery Open.2024; 5(1): e397.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review: Patient‐related, microbial, surgical, and histopathological risk factors for endoscopic post‐operative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease
    Michiel T. J. Bak, Karlijn Demers, Nassim Hammoudi, Matthieu Allez, Mark S. Silverberg, Gwenny M. Fuhler, Kaushal Parikh, Marieke J. Pierik, Laurents P. S. Stassen, C. Janneke van der Woude, Michail Doukas, Oddeke van Ruler, Annemarie C. de Vries
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2024; 60(3): 310.     CrossRef
  • Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Javier P. Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(16): 4795.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Recurrence of Crohn’s Disease Post-Ileocaecal Surgery in Paediatric Patients: A Therapy Guide Based on Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Jiri Bronsky, Kristyna Zarubova, Michal Kubat, Vojtech Dotlacil
    Pediatric Drugs.2024; 26(6): 659.     CrossRef
  • Anti-TNF Agents and New Biological Agents (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence After Surgery in Crohn’s Disease
    Javier P. Gisbert, María Chaparro
    Drugs.2023; 83(13): 1179.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: the never-ending story
    Jung-Bin Park, Sang Hyoung Park
    Intestinal Research.2022; 20(3): 279.     CrossRef
  • Timing of individualized surgical intervention in Crohn’s disease
    Kai Xia, Ren-Yuan Gao, Xiao-Cai Wu, Lu Yin, Chun-Qiu Chen
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2022; 14(12): 1320.     CrossRef
  • 6,841 View
  • 538 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Microbiota
The role of microbiome in colorectal carcinogenesis and its clinical potential as a target for cancer treatment
Sang Hoon Kim, Yun Jeong Lim
Intest Res 2022;20(1):31-42.   Published online May 21, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2021.00034
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The role of gut microbiome-intestinal immune complex in the development of colorectal cancer and its progression is well recognized. Accordingly, certain microbial strains tend to colonize or vanish in patients with colorectal cancer. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are expected to exhibit both anti-tumor effects and chemopreventive effects during cancer treatment through mechanisms such as xenometabolism, immune interactions, and altered eco-community. Microbial modulation can also be safely used to prevent complications during peri-operational periods of colorectal surgery. A deeper understanding of the role of intestinal microbiota as a target for colorectal cancer treatment will lead the way to a better prognosis for colorectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Gut microbiota and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and emerging insights
    Zhiwei Wu, Zihan Yang, Chengzhen Lyu, Bo Sun, Ruikai Zhang, Hongbo Li, Jian Chen
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Probiotics on Improving Intestinal Mucosal Permeability and Inflammation after Surgery
    Min-Jae Kim, Young Ju Lee, Zahid Hussain, Hyojin Park
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(2): 207.     CrossRef
  • Omega-3 fatty acids and the gut microbiome: a new frontier in cardiovascular disease prevention
    Vikram Kumar, Alka Rohilla, Jayesh J. Ahire
    Discover Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A critical review on the impacts of β-glucans on gut microbiota and human health
    Great Iruoghene Edo, Alice Njolke Mafe, Ali B.M. Ali, Patrick Othuke Akpoghelie, Emad Yousif, Endurance Fegor Isoje, Ufuoma Augustina Igbuku, Khalid Zainulabdeen, Joseph Oghenewogaga Owheruo, Arthur Efeoghene Athan Essaghah, Huzaifa Umar, Dina S. Ahmed, A
    The Microbe.2025; 7: 100394.     CrossRef
  • Role of gut microbiome in colorectal cancer: a comprehensive umbrella review protocol
    Maheeka Seneviwickrama, Kamani M Gunasekera, Kumindu Gamage, Madhusha Gonapaladeniya, Sriyani Ranasinghe
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(8): e104450.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology and in-vitro models: A “quick” reference guide to translational studies
    Kristijan Skok, Boštjan Vihar, Uroš Maver, Lidija Gradišnik, Konstantin Bräutigam, Martin Trapecar, Pavel Skok
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the clinical value of probiotics in the perioperative management of colorectal cancer: Meta‑analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Yang Zhang, Jiepin Hu, Qiong Xu, Youjie Yu, Haozhe Yan, Wei Shao, Feng Zhang
    Oncology Letters.2025; 30(5): 1.     CrossRef
  • Benchmarking and optimizing microbiome-based bioinformatics workflow for non-invasive detection of intestinal tumors
    Yangyang Sun, Yongxiang Huang, Ruichen Li, Junhui Zhang, Xiaoqian Fan, Xiaoquan Su
    Microbiome Research Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preliminary data on cytotoxicity and functional group assessment of a herb–mineral combination against colorectal carcinoma cell line
    Remya Jayakumar, Manoj Kumar Dash, Saumya Gulati, Akanksha Pandey, Surendra Kumar Trigun, Namrata Joshi
    Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine.2024; 21(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • Forces at play: exploring factors affecting the cancer metastasis
    Farooq Riaz, Jing Zhang, Fan Pan
    Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of microbiomes in gastrointestinal cancers: new insights
    Aref Yarahmadi, Hamed Afkhami
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Insomnia and Gut Microbiota
    Nazime Mercan Doğan, Naime Nur Bozbeyoğlu Kart
    Journal of Turkish Sleep Medicine.2024; 11(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Species-level identification of enterotype-specific microbial markers for colorectal cancer and adenoma
    Ünzile Güven Gülhan, Emrah Nikerel, Tunahan Çakır, Fatih Erdoğan Sevilgen, Saliha Durmuş
    Molecular Omics.2024; 20(6): 397.     CrossRef
  • Fermented African Locust Bean (Iru), a Potential Dietary Prebiotic and Probiotic
    Paulina Adeniyi
    International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences.2024; 13(3): 114.     CrossRef
  • Gut microbiota and epigenetic choreography: Implications for human health: A review
    Bailee Kim, Angel Song, Andrew Son, Yonghwan Shin
    Medicine.2024; 103(29): e39051.     CrossRef
  • Immunomodulation aspects of gut microbiome-related interventional strategies in colorectal cancer
    Makan Cheraghpour, Nayeralsadat Fatemi, Mahdi Shadnoush, Ghazaleh Talebi, Sascha Tierling, Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán
    Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Update Review of the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Yefeng Wang, Jing Guo, Yu Fu, Yuying Li, Chongming Wu
    Diseases & Research.2024; 4(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • A New Combination of Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactococcus lactis Strains with Synergistic Effects Alleviates Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer
    Jiacui Shang, Lijun Liu, Shuo Yang, Bofan Duan, Shuiqi Xie, Xiangchen Meng
    Foods.2024; 13(19): 3054.     CrossRef
  • THE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA IN COLORECTAL CANCER TREATMENT: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Jéssica Rosa Thiesen Cunha, Elissandra Maria Faiz, Elizete Maria de Souza Bueno, Eliana Rosa da Fonseca, Thais Ortiz Hammes, Adriana Serdotte Freitas Cardoso, Leticia Becker Vieira, Isabel Cristina Echer
    Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • O PAPEL PROTETIVO DA MICROBIOTA INTESTINAL NO TRATAMENTO DO CÂNCER COLORRETAL: REVISÃO DE ESCOPO
    Jéssica Rosa Thiesen Cunha, Elissandra Maria Faiz, Elizete Maria de Souza Bueno, Eliana Rosa da Fonseca, Thais Ortiz Hammes, Adriana Serdotte Freitas Cardoso, Leticia Becker Vieira, Isabel Cristina Echer
    Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comment on " Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality"
    Yong Eun Park
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 38(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • Olfactomedin 4 produces dysplasia but suppresses metastasis of colon cancer
    Hyun Woo Ma, Jung Min Kim, Da Hye Kim, I Seul Park, Ji Hyung Kim, Ki Cheong Park, Dong Hyuk Seo, Jae Hyeon Kim, Xiumei Che, Tae Il Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Seung Won Kim
    Cancer Gene Therapy.2023; 30(5): 694.     CrossRef
  • Pterostilbene and Probiotic Complex in Chemoprevention of Putative Precursor Lesions for Colorectal Cancer in an Experimental Model of Intestinal Carcinogenesis with 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine
    Márcio Alencar Barreira, Márcio Wilker Soares Campelo, Conceição da Silva Martins Rebouças, Antoniella Souza Gomes Duarte, Maria Lucianny Lima Barbosa, Said Gonçalves da Cruz Fonseca, Raphaela Ribeiro Queiroz, Érica Uchoa Holanda, Ana Beatriz Aragão de Va
    Cancers.2023; 15(8): 2401.     CrossRef
  • Probiotic-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Colorectal Cancer Treatment
    Christina Thoda, Maria Touraki
    Microorganisms.2023; 11(8): 1898.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Diet on Colorectal Cancer Progression and Prevention: From Nutrients to Neoplasms
    Sang Hoon Kim, Dong Hwan Park, Yun Jeong Lim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
    Tae-Geun Gweon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 56.     CrossRef
  • Calcium, Vitamin D, and Colorectal Cancer
    Young-Jo Wi, Soo-Young Na
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 47.     CrossRef
  • Comments on Efficacy of a Synbiotic Containing Lactobacillus paracasei DKGF1 and Opuntia humifusa in Elderly Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Kwang Woo Kim
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(6): 954.     CrossRef
  • Differential microbiota network according to colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis stages
    Yeuni Yu, Donghyun Han, Hyomin Kim, Yun Hak Kim, Dongjun Lee
    Journal of Genetic Medicine.2023; 20(2): 52.     CrossRef
  • The gut microbiome as a target for adjuvant therapy in insomnia disorder
    Yongbo Kang, Xing Kang, Yue Cai
    Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2022; 46(1): 101834.     CrossRef
  • How to Improve Health with Biological Agents—Narrative Review
    Anna Zawistowska-Rojek, Stefan Tyski
    Nutrients.2022; 14(9): 1700.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiota Alteration Influences Colorectal Cancer Metastasis to the Liver by Remodeling the Liver Immune Microenvironment
    Na Yuan, Xiaoyan Li, Meng Wang, Zhilin Zhang, Lu Qiao, Yamei Gao, Xinjian Xu, Jie Zhi, Yang Li, Zhongxin Li, Yitao Jia
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(4): 575.     CrossRef
  • Crosstalk between mucosal microbiota, host gene expression, and sociomedical factors in the progression of colorectal cancer
    Namjoo Kim, Jeong-An Gim, Beom Jae Lee, Byung il Choi, Hee Sook Yoon, Seung Han Kim, Moon Kyung Joo, Jong-Jae Park, Chungyeul Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer Immunotherapy: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Brings Light
    Jie Zhang, Kanghui Wu, Cuicui Shi, Guangming Li
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2022; 23(12): 1777.     CrossRef
  • The microbiome of diverticulitis
    Nimalan Arjun Jeganathan, Emily R Davenport, Gregory S Yochum, Walter A Koltun
    Current Opinion in Physiology.2021; 22: 100452.     CrossRef
  • The Interaction Between the Microbiome and Tumors
    Yawen Zong, Yujie Zhou, Binyou Liao, Min Liao, Yangyang Shi, Yu Wei, Yuyao Huang, Xuedong Zhou, Lei Cheng, Biao Ren
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anti-inflammatory properties of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 in a murine colitis model
    Jihye Park, Da Hye Kim, Soochan Kim, Hyun Woo Ma, I Seul Park, Mijeong Son, Ji Hyung Kim, Yoojin Shin, Seung Won Kim, Jae Hee Cheon
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(4): 478.     CrossRef
  • Microbial-Driven Immunological Memory and Its Potential Role in Microbiome Editing for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer
    Laure Campillo-Gimenez, David Rios-Covian, Jesus Rivera-Nieves, Hiroshi Kiyono, Hiutung Chu, Peter B. Ernst
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 16,913 View
  • 496 Download
  • 35 Web of Science
  • 38 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Colorectal neoplasia
Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
Intest Res 2021;19(2):239-246.   Published online November 13, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2020.00009
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Several studies have shown that colorectal neoplasms (CRN) including colorectal cancer (CRC) may be prevalent in patients with gastric cancer. However, in most of these studies, colonoscopy to investigate the prevalence of CRN was performed prior to surgery. We aimed to investigate whether CRN was more prevalent in postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients than in healthy individuals.
Methods
We reviewed the medical records of those patients within a cohort of gastric cancer patients with gastrectomy who underwent colonoscopy between 2016 and 2017. Controls age- and sex-matched with gastric cancer patients at a 2:1 ratio were identified among those who underwent colonoscopy at a health-promotion center. The frequencies of CRN, advanced CRN (ACRN), and CRC among patients with gastrectomy were compared with those in the control subjects. A total of 744 individuals (gastric cancer, 248; control, 496) were included.
Results
The rates of CRN and ACRN in the gastric cancer group were higher than those in the healthy individuals (CRN, 47.6% vs. 34.7%, P< 0.001; ACRN, 16.9% vs. 10.9%, P= 0.020). The rate of CRC was comparable between the 2 groups (2.0% vs. 0.6%, P= 0.125). Multivariate analysis identified previous gastrectomy for gastric cancer and male sex as significant risk factors for (A)CRN.
Conclusions
CRN and ACRN were more prevalent in patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer than in the control group. Regular surveillance colonoscopy at appropriate intervals is indicated after gastrectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Safety of cold snare resection techniques for removal of polyps in the small colon in patients taking clopidogrel and aspirin: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases prospective multicenter study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Seong Ran Jeon, Soo-Young Na, Yoo Jin Lee, Tae Ho Kim
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 101(4): 866.     CrossRef
  • Gastric Cancer and Microbiota: Exploring the Microbiome’s Role in Carcinogenesis and Treatment Strategies
    Daniela-Cornelia Lazăr, Sorin-Dan Chiriac, George-Andrei Drăghici, Elena-Alina Moacă, Alexandra Corina Faur, Mihaela-Flavia Avram, Vladiana-Romina Turi, Mihaela-Roxana Nicolin, Adrian Goldiș, Matin Asad Salehi, Radu Jipa
    Life.2025; 15(7): 999.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and long-term prognosis in patients following gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Jun He, Bixian Luo, Hongming Liu, Dong Cao, Weihua Gong
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of bowel preparation completion time on bowel cleansing efficacy: Prospective randomized controlled trial of different bowel preparation completion times precolonoscopy
    Hye Min Kim, Hyo Suk Kim, Young Eun An, Jae Hyuck Chang, Tae Ho Kim, Chang Whan Kim, Tae‐Geun Gweon
    Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(12): 1347.     CrossRef
  • Calcium, Vitamin D, and Colorectal Cancer
    Young-Jo Wi, Soo-Young Na
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 47.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?
    Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Hye Jung Kwon, Gyu Man Oh, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(9): 4533.     CrossRef
  • Early gastric neoplasms are significant risk factor for colorectal adenoma: A prospective case-control study
    Seong-Jung Kim, Jun Lee, Dae Youb Baek, Jun Hyung Lee, Ran Hong
    Medicine.2022; 101(32): e29956.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Neoplasia in CDH1 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Multicenter Analysis
    Peter P. Stanich, Dareen Elgindi, Elena Stoffel, Erika Koeppe, Ajay Bansal, Rachel Stetson, Debra L. Collins, Dana Farengo Clark, Eve Karloski, Beth Dudley, Randall E. Brand, Michael J. Hall, Yana Chertock, Brian A. Sullivan, Charles Muller, Alice Hinton,
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 117(11): 1877.     CrossRef
  • 7,173 View
  • 117 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Effect of gut microbiome on minor complications after a colonoscopy
Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Hye Jung Kwon, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
Intest Res 2021;19(3):341-348.   Published online November 10, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2020.00057
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Minor complications that might occur after colonoscopy, including abdominal discomfort, bloating, diarrhea, and constipation, could a barrier for patients to undergo a screening colonoscopy. In this study, we aimed to identify the effect of gut microbial diversity and composition on minor complications after colonoscopy.
Methods
A total of 24 healthy subjects provided their stools before bowel preparation and on the 7th and 28th day after colonoscopy. On the 7th day after colonoscopy, the presence of minor complications was investigated using a questionnaire. We divided patients into 2 groups, the no complication group and complications group. The fecal microbial diversity, distribution, and composition were then compared between the groups.
Results
Five of the 24 subjects reported that they had undergone minor complications after colonoscopy. Most of the symptoms were mild and self-limited, but 1 patient needed medication. Interestingly, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the initial stool samples before bowel preparation in the complication group was significantly higher than that in no complication group. After bowel preparation, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the complication group decreased, but not in the no complication group. The microbial diversity of the no complication group decreased after bowel preparation, but not in the complication group.
Conclusions
The gut microbial composition and diversity before and after bowel preparation could be considered as one of the causes of minor complications after colonoscopy. Further studies are needed to delineate the role of gut microbiota in the occurrence of minor complications after colonoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Alteration in gut microbiota after colonoscopy: proposed mechanisms and the role of probiotic interventions
    Hyeong Ho Jo, Moon Young Lee, Se Eun Ha, Dong Han Yeom, Yong Sung Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Brown Rice, Meal Replacements, and Anti-Obesity Drugs on Mitochondria in Obese Rats
    Dian Handayani, Anisa Handayani, Achmad Rudijanto, Puspita Nuraissa, Widya Rahmawati, Xu-Feng Huang
    Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.2025; Volume 18: 3151.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Where We Stand and What Is Next
    Dai Ishikawa, Xiaochen Zhang, Kei Nomura, Akihito Nagahara
    Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2025; 10(1): 371.     CrossRef
  • Depressive Symptoms and Gut Microbiota after Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy: A Pre–Post Intervention Study
    Amelia J. McGuinness, Martin O’Hely, Douglas Stupart, David Watters, Samantha L. Dawson, Christopher Hair, Michael Berk, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Amy Loughman, Glenn Guest, Felice N. Jacka
    Microorganisms.2024; 12(10): 1960.     CrossRef
  • Benefits of Probiotic Pretreatment on the Gut Microbiota and Minor Complications after Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial
    Dooheon Son, Youn Jung Choi, Min Young Son, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park, Sanghyun Lim, Jae Hyun Kim
    Nutrients.2023; 15(5): 1141.     CrossRef
  • Key determinants of success in fecal microbiota transplantation: From microbiome to clinic
    Serena Porcari, Nicolas Benech, Mireia Valles-Colomer, Nicola Segata, Antonio Gasbarrini, Giovanni Cammarota, Harry Sokol, Gianluca Ianiro
    Cell Host & Microbe.2023; 31(5): 712.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy: body and psyche. Can psychiatry contribute to the quality of the examination?
    Adam Zaczek, Robert Pudlo
    Current Problems of Psychiatry.2023; 24: 253.     CrossRef
  • CO2 Is Beneficial to Gut Microbiota Homeostasis during Colonoscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xue Yang, Wen-Bo Xiu, Jin-Xia Wang, Liang-Ping Li, Chong He, Cai-Ping Gao
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(18): 5281.     CrossRef
  • Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy
    Milena Di Leo, Andrea Iannone, Monica Arena, Giuseppe Losurdo, Maria Angela Palamara, Giuseppe Iabichino, Pierluigi Consolo, Maria Rendina, Carmelo Luigiano, Alfredo Di Leo
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(45): 7748.     CrossRef
  • 11,536 View
  • 206 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Cancer
Two intertwined compartments coexisting in sporadic conventional colon adenomas
Carlos A. Rubio
Intest Res 2021;19(1):12-20.   Published online February 24, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00133
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Sporadic conventional colon adenomas are microscopically built of 2 intertwined compartments: one on top, harboring the dysplastic tissue that defines their histo-biomolecular attributes, and the other below, composed of non-dysplastic crypts with corrupted shapes (CCS). The CCS of 306 colon adenomas revealed asymmetric, haphazardly-distributed proliferating cell-domains (PC). In contrast, the PC-domains in normal controls were symmetric, being limited to the lower thirds of the crypts. In 28% out of 501 sporadic conventional adenomas, foci of p53-upregulated dysplastic tissue were found. The CCS in 30% of 108 sporadic adenomas showed p53-upregulated single cells, suggesting mounting somatic mutations. No p53-upregulated cells were found in the crypts of controls. In polypoid adenomas, the mucosa of the stalk without dysplastic tissue on top disclosed CCS with asymmetrical PC-domains and single p53-upregulated cells. The latter observations suggested that CCS had developed prior to and not after the growth of the dysplastic tissue on top. CCS were also found below colon adenomas in carcinogen-treated rats. It is concluded that the 2 intertwined histo-biological compartments of sporadic conventional colon adenomas are probably interdependent components. These findings may open new directions aimed to uncover the link between the normal colonic mucosa and the histogenesis of, conventional adenomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Calcium, Vitamin D, and Colorectal Cancer
    Young-Jo Wi, Soo-Young Na
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 47.     CrossRef
  • Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
    Tae-Geun Gweon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 82(2): 56.     CrossRef
  • Summary and comparison of recently updated post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2023; 21(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Asymmetric crypt fission in colectomy specimens in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Carlos A Rubio, Peter T Schmidt
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2020; : jclinpath-2020-206694.     CrossRef
  • 7,740 View
  • 146 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Colorectal neoplasia
Microvascular density under magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy in colorectal epithelial neoplasms
Takahiro Gonai, Keisuke Kawasaki, Shotaro Nakamura, Shunichi Yanai, Risaburo Akasaka, Kunihiko Sato, Yousuke Toya, Kensuke Asakura, Jun Urushikubo, Yasuko Fujita, Makoto Eizuka, Noriyuki Uesugi, Tamotsu Sugai, Takayuki Matsumoto
Intest Res 2020;18(1):107-114.   Published online November 4, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00061
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Magnifying endoscopic classification systems, such as the Japan narrow-band imaging (NBI) Expert Team (JNET) classification, have been widely used for predicting the histologic diagnosis and invasion depth of colorectal epithelial tumors. However, disagreement exists among observers regarding magnifying endoscopic diagnosis, because these classification systems are subjective. We herein investigated the utility of endoscopic microvascular density (eMVD) calculated from magnifying NBI endoscopic images in colorectal tumors.
Methods
We reviewed magnifying NBI endoscopic images from 169 colorectal epithelial tumors (97 adenomas, 72 carcinomas/high-grade dysplasias) resected endoscopically or surgically. The eMVD on magnifying NBI endoscopic images was evaluated using image-editing software, and relationships between eMVD and clinical, endoscopic, and pathological findings were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
The eMVD in carcinomas (0.152 ± 0.079) was significantly higher than that in adenomas (0.119 ± 0.059, P< 0.05). The best cutoff value for distinguishing carcinoma from adenoma was 0.133. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 56.9%, 67.0%, and 62.7%, respectively. In addition, JNET type 2B tumors showed significantly higher eMVD (0.162 ± 0.079) compared to type 2A tumors (0.111 ± 0.050, P< 0.05).
Conclusions
The eMVD as determined by magnifying NBI endoscopy is considered to be a possible objective indicator for differentiating colorectal carcinomas from adenomas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel physiological analysis using blood flow velocity for colonic polyps: Pilot study
    Eiji Kamba, Takashi Murakami, Naoki Tsugawa, Kei Nomura, Keiichi Haga, Yoichi Akazawa, Hirofumi Fukushima, Hiroya Ueyama, Kenshi Matsumoto, Tomoyoshi Shibuya, Takeshi Terai, Takashi Yao, Akihito Nagahara
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(06): E781.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of moxifloxacin and proflavine dual fluorescence imaging for detecting gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions: A prospective study
    Kwangwoo Nam, Noseong Park, Seunghun Lee, Suil Jeon, Jungbin Lee, Seung‐Mo Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong‐Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Suk‐Kyun Yang, Jeong Hoon Lee, Do Hoon Kim, Ki Hean Kim, Seung‐Jae Myung
    Lasers in Surgery and Medicine.2023; 55(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: A novel Prospect
    Zugang Yin, Chenhui Yao, Limin Zhang, Shaohua Qi
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chicken skin mucosa surrounding small colorectal cancer could be an endoscopic predictive marker of submucosal invasion
    Ying-Jie Zhang, Wu Wen, Fan Li, Yi Jian, Chuan-Ming Zhang, Meng-Xia Yuan, Ye Yang, Feng-Lin Chen
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2023; 15(6): 1062.     CrossRef
  • A review on self-healing featured soft robotics
    Md. Ariful Islam, Labanya Talukder, Md. Firoj Al, Subrata K. Sarker, S. M. Muyeen, Prangon Das, Md. Mehedi Hasan, Sajal K. Das, Md. Manirul Islam, Md. Robiul Islam, Sumaya Ishrat Moyeen, Faisal R. Badal, Md. Hafiz Ahamed, Sarafat Hussain Abhi
    Frontiers in Robotics and AI.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emergence of a New Optical Marker for Colorectal Neoplasms: To What Extent Should We Accept It?
    Han Hee Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 315.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer
    Seung Wook Hong, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Intestinal Research.2022; 20(3): 281.     CrossRef
  • Colonic Chicken Skin Mucosa Surrounding Colon Polyps Is an Endoscopic Predictive Marker for Colonic Neoplastic Polyps
    Yu Mi Lee, Kyung Ho Song, Hoon Sup Koo, Choong-Sik Lee, Inseok Ko, Sang Hyuk Lee, Kyu Chan Huh
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 754.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-based colorectal polyp histology prediction using narrow-band image-magnifying colonoscopy: a stepping stone for clinical practice
    Ji Young Chang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 699.     CrossRef
  • Response to Artificial intelligence-based colorectal polyp histology prediction using narrow-band image-magnifying colonoscopy: a stepping stone for clinical practice
    Istvan Racz, Andras Horvath, Zoltán Horvath
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 701.     CrossRef
  • Photoacoustic endoscopy: A progress review
    Heng Guo, Ying Li, Weizhi Qi, Lei Xi
    Journal of Biophotonics.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis
    Yu Zhang, Hui-Yan Chen, Xiao-Lu Zhou, Wen-Sheng Pan, Xin-Xin Zhou, Hang-Hai Pan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(40): 6279.     CrossRef
  • 9,328 View
  • 122 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Miscellaneous
Primary epiploic appendagitis: compared with diverticulitis and focused on obesity and recurrence
Youn I Choi, Hyun Sun Woo, Jun-Won Chung, Young Sup Shim, Kwang An Kwon, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Dong Kyun Park
Intest Res 2019;17(4):554-560.   Published online October 14, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00148
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
There is limited data to compare the clinical characteristics and recurrence rates between left-sided primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA) versus left-sided acute colonic diverticulitis (ACD), and right-sided PEA versus right-sided ACD, respectively.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiologic images of the patients who presented with left-sided or right-sided acute abdominal pain and had computer tomography performed at the time of presentation showing radiological signs of PEA or ACD between January 2004 and December 2014. We compared the clinical characteristics of left PEA versus left ACD and right PEA versus right ACD, respectively.
Results
Fifty-six patients (left:right = 27:29) and 308 patients (left:right = 24:284) were diagnosed with symptomatic PEA and ACD, respectively. Left-sided PEA were statistically significantly younger (50.2 ± 15.4 years vs. 62.1 ± 15.8 years, P= 0.009), more obese (body mass index [BMI]: 26.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2 vs. 22.3 ± 3.1 kg/m2 , P< 0.001), and had more tendencies with normal or mildly elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (1.2 ± 1.3 mg/dL vs. 8.4 ± 7.9 mg/dL, P< 0.001) than patients with left-sided ACD. The discriminative function of age, BMI and CRP between left-sided PEA versus left-sided ACD was 0.71 (cutoff: age ≤ 59 years, sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 77.8%), 0.83 (cutoff: BMI > 24.5 kg/m2 , sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 80.0%) and 0.80 (cutoff: CRP < 1.8 mg/dL, sensitivity of 72.2%, specificity of 85.7%).
Conclusions
If patients with left lower quadrant abdominal pain are less than 60 years, obese (BMI > 24.5 kg/m2 ) with or without normal to mild elevated CRP levels (CRP < 1.8 mg/dL), it might be necessary for clinicians to suspect the diagnosis of PEA rather than ACD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Epiploic Appendagitis Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Case Report with Literature Review
    Ayah Obeid, Douglas Degler
    ASIDE Case Reports.2025; 1(2): 6.     CrossRef
  • From CT to Cytokines: Evaluating the Role of Systemic Inflammation and Metabolic Markers in Epiploic Appendagitis
    Şeref Barbaros Arik, İrfan Esen, Oğuzhan Özdemir
    Bratislava Medical Journal.2025; 126(12): 3709.     CrossRef
  • Characteristic CT Imaging Features of Atraumatic Peritoneal and Subperitoneal Pathologies in Emergency Settings: A Pictorial Review
    Christopher D Louviere, Jennifer L Wen, Neal M Hall, Ruben G Ortiz, Dheeraj R Gopireddy, Grit A Adler, Renato Abu Hana
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of epiploic appendagitis in a Middle Eastern country: An observational retrospective analysis of 156 cases
    Ayman El‐Menyar, Syed G. A. Naqvi, Omer Al‐Yahri, Abdelaziz MA Abusal, Abdulwahhab Al‐Shaikhli, Sadia Sajid, Husham Abdelrahman, Ahmad G. Kloub, Muhamed Ibnas, Rifat Latifi, Yasser M. R. Toble, Hassan Al‐Thani
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1363.     CrossRef
  • Epiploic Adipose Tissue (EPAT) in Obese Individuals Promotes Colonic Tumorigenesis: A Novel Model for EPAT-Dependent Colorectal Cancer Progression
    Rida Iftikhar, Patricia Snarski, Angelle N. King, Jenisha Ghimire, Emmanuelle Ruiz, Frank Lau, Suzana D. Savkovic
    Cancers.2023; 15(3): 977.     CrossRef
  • Recurrencia en pacientes con apendagitis epiploica: un reporte de caso
    Mía Alejandra Gómez Corrales, Fabian Andrés Chávez Ecos, Jackeline Alexandra Espinoza Utani, Carlos Alberto Dávila Hernández
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2023; 38(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • 10,297 View
  • 127 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Colorectal neoplasia
Primary malignant melanoma without melanosis of the colon
Nam Hee Yi, Sang Heon Lee, Sang Heon Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Yong Seol
Intest Res 2019;17(4):561-564.   Published online August 5, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.00020
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Primary malignant melanoma (PMM) of the gastrointestinal tract is rare. Reported cases of PMM of the lower gastrointestinal tract typically describe anal and rectal involvement rather than colonic lesions. This report describes a rare case of a 50-year-old woman with PMM originating in the colon. The patient presented to Inje University Busan Paik Hospital with a 3-day history of blood-tinged stools. She underwent colonoscopy for a diagnosis of hematochezia. The colonoscopic examination revealed a large-sized semi-pedunculated sigmoid colon polyp with a reddish-colored mucosal surface. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed, and the final histopathological findings were consistent with a diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Systemic work-up was performed for assessment of metastasis and to identify the primary tumor considering the high metastatic rate of gastrointestinal malignant melanoma; however, no other malignant lesion was detected. Thus, she was diagnosed with colonic PMM. She underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection and lymph node dissection and has been recurrence-free for > 2 years.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Malignant primary melanoma of the colon: a case report
    Claire K Foley, Marybeth S Hughes, Charles T Hehman
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,046 View
  • 187 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Colorectal neoplasia
Clinical outcomes of positive resection margin after endoscopic mucosal resection of early colon cancers
Junseok Park, Hyun Gun Kim, Shin Ok Jeong, Hoon gil Jo, Hyo Yeop Song, Jeeyeon Kim, Seri Ryu, Youngyun Cho, Hyun Jin Youn, Seong Ran Jeon, Jin-Oh Kim, Bong Min Ko, Yoon Mi Jeen, So-Young Jin
Intest Res 2019;17(4):516-526.   Published online May 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00169
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
When determining the subsequent management after endoscopic resection of the early colon cancer (ECC), various factors including the margin status should be considered. This study assessed the subsequent management and outcomes of ECCs according to margin status.
Methods
We examined the data of 223 ECCs treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) from 215 patients during 2004 to 2014, and all patients were followed-up at least for 2 years.
Results
According to histological analyses, the margin statuses of all lesions after EMR were as follows: 138 cases (61.9%) were negative, 65 cases (29.1%) were positive for dysplastic cells on the resection margins, and 20 cases (8.9%) were uncertain. The decision regarding subsequent management was affected not only by pathologic outcomes but also by the endoscopist’s opinion on whether complete resection was obtained. Surgery was preferred if the lesion extended to the submucosa (odds ratio [OR], 25.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.09–91.42), the endoscopic resection was presumed incomplete (OR, 15.55; 95% CI, 4.28–56.56), or the lymph system was invaded (OR, 13.69; 95% CI, 1.76–106.57). Fourteen patients (6.2%) had residual or recurrent malignancies at the site of the previous ECC resection and were significantly associated with presumed incomplete endoscopic resection (OR, 4.59; 95% CI, 1.21–17.39) and submucosal invasion (OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 1.18–22.34).
Conclusions
Subsequent surgery was associated with submucosa invasion, lymphatic invasion, and cancer-positive margins. Presumed completeness of the resection may be helpful for guiding the subsequent management of patients who undergo endoscopic resection of ECC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
    Ik Hyun Jo, Hyun Gun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ran Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Sung Wook Hwang, Kyeong-Ok Kim, Jun Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon
    Gut and Liver.2025; 19(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma
    Hyun Jin Bae, Hoyeon Ju, Han Hee Lee, Jinsu Kim, Bo-In Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Daeyoun David Won, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Young-Seok Cho
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(2): 1231.     CrossRef
  • Emergence of a New Optical Marker for Colorectal Neoplasms: To What Extent Should We Accept It?
    Han Hee Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 315.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of long-term recurrence-free survival between primary surgery and endoscopic resection followed by secondary surgery in T1 colorectal cancer
    Eun Hye Oh, Nayoung Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 94(2): 394.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of submucosal colorectal cancer diagnosed after endoscopic resection: a focus on the need for surgery
    Yun Sik Choi, Wan Soo Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Intestinal Research.2020; 18(1): 96.     CrossRef
  • 10,426 View
  • 174 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study
Jeeyeon Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyung Wook Kim, Jongha Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sung-Wook Hwang, Hyun Deok Shin, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Seok Lee, Yunho Jung, Young-Seok Cho, Young Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Kyu Chan Huh, Eu Mi Ahn
Intest Res 2019;17(3):413-418.   Published online April 8, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00156
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS).
Methods
A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups.
Results
This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P> 0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P> 0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P> 0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008).
Conclusions
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comments on Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Ji Eun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2024; 18(1): 192.     CrossRef
  • Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial
    Ji Min Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Ho Suk Kang, Ja Seol Koo, Hyun Seok Lee, Seok-Hoo Jeong, Jung Ho Kim, Dae Bum Kim
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(4): 591.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
    Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
    Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study
    Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young-Seok Cho
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 716.     CrossRef
  • How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
    Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Laxatives for Oral Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: from High-volume to Novel Low-volume Solutions
    Soo-Young Na, Won Moon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 75(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • No inferioridad entre dos agentes de bajo volumen (Picosulfato de Sodio/Citrato de Magnesio vs. Sulfato de Sodio/Potasio/Magnesio) en la preparación de colon para procedimientos diagnósticos: estudio observacional
    Erika D. Pérez-Riveros, Margarita Rey R., Belén Mendoza De Molano, Juan Carlos Robayo, Jaime Solano Mariño, Rafael García Duperly, Andrés Gómez, Renzo Pinto Carta, Gerardo Ardila, Jose De la Hoz-Valle, Fernando Sierra-Arango
    Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología.2020; 35(4): 436.     CrossRef
  • 13,086 View
  • 266 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Clinicopathological feature and treatment outcome of patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection
Young-Hoon Jeong, Jun Lee, Sang-Wook Kim, Geom-Seog Seo, Hyun-Soo Kim, Young-Eun Joo
Intest Res 2019;17(1):127-134.   Published online October 10, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00075
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced technique that can be used to treat precancerous and early colorectal neoplasms by facilitating en bloc resection regardless of tumor size. In our study, we investigated the clinicopathological feature and the treatment outcome of patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) that were treated by ESD.
Methods
The study enrolled all of 210 patients with colorectal LSTs who underwent ESD. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing medical records.
Results
A cancerous pit pattern (Vi/Vn) was more common in pseudo-depressed (PD) subtype than in flat elevated (FE) subtype. The incidence of adenocarcinoma in the PD subtype and nodular mixed (NM) subtypes was significantly higher than in the homogenous (HG) subtype and FE subtype. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 89.0% and 85.7%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 5.2% and 1.9%, respectively. The mean procedure time was much longer in the PD subtype than in the FE subtype. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the NM subtype than in the HG subtype. However, there were no statistically significant differences in mean procedure time, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, bleeding rate, or perforation rate between LST-granular and LST-nongranular types.
Conclusions
These results indicate that ESD is acceptable for treating colorectal LSTs concerning en bloc resection, curative resection, and risk of complications. Careful consideration is required for complete resection of the PD subtype and NM subtype because of their higher malignant potential.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic resection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: Clinicopathologic characteristics and risk factors for treatment outcomes
    Li-Hua Guo, Ke-Feng Hu, Min Miao, Yong Ding, Xin-Jun Zhang, Guo-Liang Ye
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for unsuccessful colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng Gu, Wei Jiang, Jingyi Zhu, Lei Ma, Boyuan He, Huihong Zhai
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(8): 1288.     CrossRef
  • Prognosis and risk factors of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum. Large cohort study
    Seong-Jung Kim, Su Young Kim, Jun Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(8): 6243.     CrossRef
  • Blue laser imaging combined with JNET (Japan NBI Expert Team) classification for pathological prediction of colorectal laterally spreading tumors
    Si-lin Huang, Wen-xin Tan, Qun Peng, Wen-hua Zhang, Hai-tao Qing, Qiang Zhang, Jun Wu, Liang-dou Lin, Zhi-bin Lu, Yu Chen, Wei-guang Qiao
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(10): 5430.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of long-term recurrence-free survival between primary surgery and endoscopic resection followed by secondary surgery in T1 colorectal cancer
    Eun Hye Oh, Nayoung Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 94(2): 394.     CrossRef
  • Second-look endoscopy findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms
    Soo-kyung Park, Hyeon Jeong Goong, Bong Min Ko, Haewon Kim, Hyo Sun Seok, Moon Sung Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(5): 1063.     CrossRef
  • 9,359 View
  • 212 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea
Jae Ho Choi, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin
Intest Res 2019;17(1):119-126.   Published online October 10, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00060
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Little is known for the capacity and quality of colonoscopy, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea. This study aimed to investigate the present and potential colonoscopic capacity, colonoscopic quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea.
Methods
We surveyed representative endoscopists of 72 endoscopy units from June to August 2015, using a 36-item questionnaire regarding colonoscopic capacity, quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines of each hospitals.
Results
Among the 62 respondents who answered the questionnaire, 51 respondents were analyzed after exclusion of 11 incomplete answers. Only 1 of 3 of endoscopy units can afford to perform additional colonoscopies in addition to current practice, and the potential maximum number of colonoscopies per week was only 42. The quality of colonoscopy was variable as reporting of quality indicators of colonoscopy were considerably variable (29.4%–94.1%) between endoscopy units. Furthermore, there are substantial gaps in the adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, as concordance rate for guideline recommendation was less than 50% in most scenarios.
Conclusions
The potential capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea was suboptimal. Considering suboptimal reporting of colonoscopic quality indicators and low adherence rate for colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, quality improvement of colonoscopy should be underlined in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trends in colorectal cancer incidence according to an increase in the number of colonoscopy cases in Korea
    Ga Hee Kim, Yeong Chan Lee, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Chang Mo Moon, Kyunga Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun-Ran Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting Adherence to National Colorectal Cancer Screening: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study Using Multi-Institutional Pooled Data in Korea
    Dae Sung Kim, Jeeyoung Hong, Kihyun Ryu, Sang Hyuk Lee, Hwanhyi Cho, Jehyeong Yu, Jieun Lee, Jong-Yeup Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547.     CrossRef
  • Faecal immunochemical tests can improve colonoscopy triage in patients with iron deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jennifer Pham, Geraldine Laven-Law, Erin L. Symonds, Molla M. Wassie, Charles Cock, Jean M. Winter
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 201: 104439.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Synergistic Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol Versus Midazolam and Pethidine in Colonoscopies: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
    Jae Woong Lim, Min Jae Kim, Gang Han Lee, Dae Sol Kim, Sang Hyuk Jung, Yu Yeon Kim, Jin Won Kim, Yohan Lee, Hyun Soo Kim, Seon Young Park, Dong Hyun Kim
    Chonnam Medical Journal.2024; 60(3): 192.     CrossRef
  • Overview of the National Cancer Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in Korea over 14 Years (2004-2017)
    Bomi Park, Eun Young Her, Kyeongmin Lee, Fatima Nari, Jae Kwan Jun, Kui Son Choi, Mina Suh
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(3): 910.     CrossRef
  • Sessile serrated lesions in patients with adenoma on index colonoscopy do not increase metachronous advanced adenoma risk
    Seung Wook Hong, Jeongseok Kim, Ji Young Lee, Jong‐Soo Lee, Hye‐Sook Chang, Hye Won Park, Gwang‐Un Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Seung‐Jae Myung, Suk‐Kyun Yang, Jaewon Choe, Dong‐Hoon Yang
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(4): 850.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study
    Sung Noh Hong, Chang Kyun Lee, Jong Pil Im, Chang Hwan Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Young-Seok Cho, Sung-Ae Jung, Tae Il Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 95(3): 500.     CrossRef
  • Effect of colorectal cancer screening on long‐term survival of colorectal cancer patients: Results of the Korea National Cancer Screening Program
    Xuan Quy Luu, Kyeongmin Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Kyu‐Won Jung, Kui Son Choi
    International Journal of Cancer.2022; 150(12): 1958.     CrossRef
  • A Study on Differences between Professional Endoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Endoscopic Detection and Standard Pathological Biopsy of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
    Dong Yang, Yuqin Li, Haibo Sun, Chuan He, Geng Chen, Zhuo Zhao, Tongyu Tang, Amosy M'Koma
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia and Cancer in Patients With 3–4 Nonadvanced Adenomas at Index Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Min-Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Jong Wook Kim, Seung-Joo Nam, Eun Hye Oh, Seon-Young Park, Soo-Kyung Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Sun-Jin Boo, Dong Hoon Baek, Soon Man Yoon, Jaeyoung Chun, Jooyoung Lee, Miyoun
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 117(4): 588.     CrossRef
  • The Influence of Face Shields on the Quality of Colonoscopy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Jin Wook Lee, Hyo Jeong Lee, Dae Sung Kim, Jiyoung Yoon, Seung Wook Hong, Ha Won Hwang, Jong-Soo Lee, Gwang-Un Kim, Sinwon Lee, Jaewon Choe, Jin Hwa Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(3): 404.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Intentions to undergo primary screening with colonoscopy under the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea
    Kyeongmin Lee, Haejoo Seo, Sunho Choe, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ji Won Park, Mina Suh, Aesun Shin, Kui Son Choi, Filipe Prazeres
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247252.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea
    Jae Gon Lee, Dong Soo Han, Young-Eun Joo, Dae-Seong Myung, Dong Il Park, Seul Ki Kim, Yunho Jung, Won Hyun Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Joon Seok Yoon, Chang Soo Eun
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(Suppl 1): S35.     CrossRef
  • Real-World National Colonoscopy Volume in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study over 12 Years
    Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Hyun-Soo Kim, Su Young Kim, Sohee Park, Geun U Park, Jung Kuk Lee, Soo Jin Kim, Hun Hee Lee, Joo Sung Kim, Won Ho Kim
    Gut and Liver.2020; 14(3): 338.     CrossRef
  • 16,210 View
  • 177 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Colorectal neoplasia
Rates of metachronous adenoma after curative resection for left-sided or right-sided colon cancer
Yuk Fai Lam, Wai Kay Seto, Teresa Tong, Ka Shing Cheung, Oswens Lo, Ivan FN Hung, Wai Lun Law, Wai K Leung
Intest Res 2018;16(4):619-627.   Published online October 10, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00013
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
We determined the rates of metachronous colorectal neoplasm in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after resection for right (R)-sided or left (L)-sided cancer.
Methods
Consecutive CRC patients who had undergone surgical resection for curative intent in our hospital between 2001 and 2004 were identified. R-sided colonic cancers refer to cancer proximal to splenic flexure whereas L-sided cancers include rectal cancers. Patients were included only if they had a clearing colonoscopy performed either before or within 6 months after the operation. Findings of surveillance colonoscopy performed up to 5 years after colonic resection were included in the analysis.
Results
Eight hundred and sixty-three CRC patients underwent curative surgical resection during the study period. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients (107 R-sided and 220 L-sided) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and had at least 1 postoperative surveillance colonoscopy performed. The proportion of patients who had polyp and adenoma on surveillance colonoscopy was significantly higher among patients with L-sided than R-sided cancers (polyps: 30.9% vs. 19.6%, P=0.03; adenomas: 25.5% vs. 13.1%, P=0.01). The mean number of adenoma per patient on surveillance colonoscopy was also higher for patients with L-sided than R-sided tumors (0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.68 vs. 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–0.35; P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that L-sided cancers, age, male gender and longer follow-up were independent predictors of adenoma detection on surveillance colonoscopy.
Conclusions
Patients with Lsided cancer had a higher rate of metachronous polyps and adenoma than those with R-sided cancer on surveillance colonoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Delineation of gastrointestinal tumors biopsies using a fluorescence lifetime imaging optical fiber probe
    D. Suraci, E. Baria, L. Tirloni, J. L. Lagarto, S. Buccianti, C. Agostini, S. Pillozzi, L. Antonuzzo, A. Taddei, R. Cicchi
    Journal of Biophotonics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DMMR status and synchronous lesions predicts metachronous lesions after curative resection for rectal cancer
    Xijie Chen, Junguo Chen, Liang Xu, Dezheng Lin, Xiaoling Hong, Junsheng Peng, Xiaowen He, Jiancong Hu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The absolute number of small and diminutive adenomas with high-grade dysplasia is substantially higher compared with large adenomas: a retrospective pooled study
    Jiancheng Zhang, Huajun Sun, Fei Xiong, Shan Lei, Guanyu Zhou, Xun Xiao, Lin Liu, Pu Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A survey of current practices in post-polypectomy surveillance in Korea
    Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoo
    Intestinal Research.2024; 22(2): 186.     CrossRef
  • IMMUNOREACT 9 metachronous rectal cancers have high HLA-ABC expression on healthy epithelium but a lower infiltration of CD3+ T cells than primary lesions
    Beatrice Salmaso, Melania Scarpa, Valerio Pellegrini, Astghik Stepanyan, Roberta Salmaso, Andromachi Kotsafti, Federico Scognamiglio, Dario Gregori, Giorgio Rivella, Ottavia De Simoni, Giulia Becherucci, Silvia Negro, Chiara Vignotto, Gaya Spolverato, Ces
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of advanced metachronous neoplasms in surveillance after colon cancer resection
    Kwangwoo Nam, Jeong Eun Shin
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(2): 305.     CrossRef
  • 8,928 View
  • 119 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Miscellaneous
Risk factors for severity of colonic diverticular hemorrhage
Ken Kinjo, Toshiyuki Matsui, Takashi Hisabe, Hiroshi Ishihara, Toshiki Kojima, Kenta Chuman, Shigeyoshi Yasukawa, Tsuyoshi Beppu, Akihiro Koga, Satoshi Ishikawa, Masahiro Kishi, Noritaka Takatsu, Fumihito Hirai, Kenshi Yao, Toshiharu Ueki, Masakazu Washio
Intest Res 2018;16(3):458-466.   Published online July 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.3.458
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonic diverticular hemorrhage (DH) was a rare disease until the 1990s, and its incidence has increased rapidly since 2000 in Japan. In recent years, colonic DH has been the most frequent cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Nearly all cases of DH are mild, with the bleeding often stopping spontaneously. Some cases, however, require surgery or arterial embolization. In this study, using a cohort at Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, we investigated factors associated with severe colonic DH.

Methods

Among patients with LGIB who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital between 1995 and 2013, DH was identified in 273 patients. Among them, 62 patients (22.7%) were defined as having severe colonic DH according to recurrence of bleeding in a short period, and/or the necessity of transfusion, arterial embolization, or surgery. We then evaluated risk factors for severe DH among DH patients in this retrospective cohort.

Results

Among the 273 patients with DH, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (odds ratio [OR], 2.801; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.164–6.742), Charlson Risk Index (CRI) ≥2 (OR, 3.336; 95% CI, 1.154–7.353), right-sided colonic DH (OR, 3.873; 95% CI, 1.554–9.653), and symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion (such as light-headedness, dizziness, or syncope) (OR, 2.926; 95% CI, 1.310–6.535) showed an increased risk of severe DH even after controlling for other factors.

Conclusions

Severe DH occurred in 23% of DH patients, and NSAID use, CRI ≥2, right-sided colonic DH, and symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion are suggested to be predictors of severe DH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of Colonic Diverticular Disease in the Older Adult
    Hiep S. Phan, Lisa L. Strate
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Factors Associated with Severity of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding and Impact of Bleeding Site
    Hirohito Amano, Takatsugu Yamamoto, Ken Ikusaka, Naoaki Aoki, Miyoko Sakurai, Taku Honda, Kyohei Maruyama, Hitoshi Aoyagi, Akari Isono, Koichiro Abe, Yoshinari Asaoka, Shinya Kodashima, Atsushi Tanaka
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(5): 1826.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasm in Patients with High Charlson Comorbidity Index Score: A HASID Multicenter Study
    Dong-Hyun Kim, Yong-Wook Jung, Byung-Chul Jin, Hyung-Hoon Oh, Hyo-Yeop Song, Seong-Jung Kim, Dae-Seong Myung, Sang-Wook Kim, Jun Lee, Geom-Seog Seo, Young-Eun Joo, Hyun-Soo Kim
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(19): 6255.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for patients hospitalized with recurrent colon diverticular bleeding: a single center experience
    Hye-Su You, Dong Hyun Kim, Seo-Yeon Cho, Seon-Young Park, Chang Hwan Park, Hyun-Soo Kim, Sung Kyu Choi
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Construction of a Model for Predicting the Severity of Diverticular Bleeding in an Elderly Population
    Tomoyuki Okada, Tsuyoshi Mikamo, Ayana Nakashima, Atsushi Yanagitani, Kiwamu Tanaka, Hajime Isomoto
    Internal Medicine.2022; 61(15): 2247.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Colonic Diverticular Disease
    You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 79(6): 233.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Predictive Assessment of Complicated Diverticulitis Score
    Marcello Covino, Valerio Papa, Antonio Tursi, Benedetta Simeoni, Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Lorenzo Maria Vetrone, Francesco Franceschi, Gianludovico Rapaccini, Antonio Gasbarrini, Alfredo Papa
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • Risk of Rebleeding in Patients with Small Bowel Vascular Lesions
    Akira Harada, Takehiro Torisu, Shin Fujioka, Yuichiro Yoshida, Yasuharu Okamoto, Yuta Fuyuno, Atsushi Hirano, Junji Umeno, Kumiko Torisu, Tomohiko Moriyama, Motohiro Esaki, Takanari Kitazono
    Internal Medicine.2021; 60(23): 3663.     CrossRef
  • Vegetarianism as a protective factor for asymptomatic colonic diverticulosis in Asians: a retrospective cross-sectional and case-control study
    Jihun Bong, Hyoun Woo Kang, Hyeki Cho, Ji Hyung Nam, Dong Kee Jang, Jae Hak Kim, Jun Kyu Lee, Yun Jeong Lim, Moon-Soo Koh, Jin Ho Lee
    Intestinal Research.2020; 18(1): 121.     CrossRef
  • 11,294 View
  • 133 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?
Alisha Chaubal, Vikas Pandey, Ruchir Patel, Prateik Poddar, Aniruddha Phadke, Meghraj Ingle, Prabha Sawant
Intest Res 2018;16(2):299-305.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation).

Methods

Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m2 or more than 30 kg/m2, or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation.

Results

The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups.

Conclusions

Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m2 and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m2.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Retrograde colon imaging through colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing helps to confirm the cause of difficult colonoscopy: a case report
    Xiaomeng Jiang, Runqing Wang, Haibo Sun, Faming Zhang
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Causes of intraprocedural discomfort in colonoscopy: a review and practical tips
    Jabed F. Ahmed, Ara Darzi, Lakshmana Ayaru, Nisha Patel
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research on driving force of capsule endoscope in fluid
    Zhifan Teng, Jianhua Liu, Hongbo Sun, Quanyue Liu, Yujia Zhai, Qiuliang Wang
    Archive of Applied Mechanics.2023; 93(12): 4387.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted magnetic capsule endoscopy; navigating colorectal inclinations
    Salman Mahmood, Sebastian Schostek, Marc O. Schurr, Jacob Bergsland, Ilangko Balasingham, Erik Fosse
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2022; 31(6): 930.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic endoscopic imaging as a rational investment for specific colonoscopies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiangzhou Tan, Weimin Yang, Doerte Wichmann, Changhao Huang, Benedikt Mothes, K.E. Grund, Zhikang Chen, Zihua Chen
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 15(4): 447.     CrossRef
  • Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future
    Chelsea V Hayman, Dinesh Vyas
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(3): 233.     CrossRef
  • Transparent cap‐assisted, water‐exchange colonoscopy in previous incomplete difficult colonoscopy patients: A retrospective study
    Lien‐Fu Lin, Pi‐Teh Huang
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2020; 7(3): 118.     CrossRef
  • Can water insufflation and carbon dioxide overcome the difficulties of colonoscope insertion?
    Choong-Kyun Noh, Kee Myung Lee
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • 9,415 View
  • 94 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopy
Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice
Dae Hyung Woo, Kyeong Ok Kim, Da Eun Jeong, Yoon Jeong Nam, Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Tae Nyeun Kim
Intest Res 2018;16(2):293-298.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.293
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Inadequate bowel preparation can result in prolonged procedure time and increased missed lesion and complication rates. This prospective study aimed to evaluate bowel preparation quality and identify the predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation in actual clinical practice.

Methods

We included 399 patients who underwent colonoscopy between June 2015 and July 2016. Using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale, we defined a score ≤2 as adequate preparation and a score >2 as inadequate preparation.

Results

Mean patient age was 58.38±12.97 years; 60.6% were male. Indications for colonoscopy included screening (69.7%) and surveillance after polyp removal (21.3%). A split-dose regimen was prescribed to 55.4% of patients. The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Overall, the median time between the last bowel preparation agent dose and start of colonoscopy was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); that of the adequate group was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); and that of the inadequate group was 5 hours (range, 2–23 hours). The mean bowel preparation scale score of the ascending colon (1.94±0.25) was significantly higher than that of other colon segments. On multivariate analysis, elderly age, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of gastrectomy or appendectomy, and total preparation solution uptake <2 L were the independent predictors of inadequate bowel preparation.

Conclusions

The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Risk factors included elderly age and history of cerebrovascular disease or abdominal surgery. Patients with these risk factors require special care and education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An Examination of Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis
    Meng Yu, Bin Cao, Hongyun Wei, Keyu Ren, Shanwei Rong, Min Li
    AJN, American Journal of Nursing.2026; 126(2): e1.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547.     CrossRef
  • A study on the related influencing factors of the quality of bowel preparation and the compliance of middle-aged and elderly patients for colonoscopy
    Shanshan Chen, Tingting Zhang, Saie Zhu, Yi Zhou
    Current Medical Research and Opinion.2024; 40(9): 1545.     CrossRef
  • Performance of Computer-Aided Detection and Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Colonoscopy Outcomes
    Dalton A. Norwood, Shyam Thakkar, Amanda Cartee, Fayez Sarkis, Tatiana Torres-Herman, Eleazar E. Montalvan-Sanchez, Kirk Russ, Patricia Ajayi-Fox, Anam Hameed, Ramzi Mulki, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Douglas R. Morgan, Shajan Peter
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(10): 3681.     CrossRef
  • Optimization of colonoscopy quality: Comprehensive review of the literature and future perspectives
    Wen‐Feng Hsu, Han‐Mo Chiu
    Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 35(7): 822.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors Associated with Painful Colonoscopy and Prolonged Cecal Intubation Time in Female Patients
    Yasuhiko Hamada, Kyosuke Tanaka, Yohei Ikenoyama, Noriyuki Horiki, Junya Tsuboi, Reiko Yamada, Misaki Nakamura, Hayato Nakagawa
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(3): 168.     CrossRef
  • The effect of educational compilation through video tutorials and visual AIDS on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy
    Jahanbakhsh Amirarsalani, Leyla Alilu, Masoumeh Hemmati-Maslakpak, Javad Rasouli
    AFMN Biomedicine.2023; 40(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • A predictive model for early death in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study
    Qi Wang, Kexin Shen, Bingyuan Fei, Hai Luo, Ruiqi Li, Zeming Wang, Mengqiang Wei, Zhongshi Xie
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Regression and Random Forest Machine Learning Have Limited Performance in Predicting Bowel Preparation in Veteran Population
    Jacob E. Kurlander, Akbar K. Waljee, Stacy B. Menees, Rachel Lipson, Alex N. Kokaly, Andrew J. Read, Karmel S. Shehadeh, Amy Cohn, Sameer D. Saini
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(7): 2827.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
    Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Commercial Bowel Preparations in Ambulatory Patients Presenting for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Carol A. Burke, Niyati Gupta, Mounir Ibrahim, John McMichael, Gareth Morris-Stiff, Amit Bhatt, John Vargo, Maged Rizk, Michael B. Rothberg
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(6): 2059.     CrossRef
  • Quality Improvement of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopies: A Study of Hospital Team Resource Management in Taiwan
    Chen-Shuan Chung, Chih-Ming Lin, Ming-Shu Chen
    Quality Management in Health Care.2021; 30(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
    Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122.     CrossRef
  • Factors related to Bowel Cleanliness of Colonoscopy Examinees
    Yohan Lee, Haejung Lee
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2021; 33(6): 545.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim, Seung-Man Park
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(10): 4413.     CrossRef
  • Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non‐inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid
    Sun Hwa Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Kyunga Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 600.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286.     CrossRef
  • Educational virtual reality videos in improving bowel preparation quality and satisfaction of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Yi Zhao, Feng Xie, Xiaoyin Bai, Aiming Yang, Dong Wu
    BMJ Open.2019; 9(8): e029483.     CrossRef
  • Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645.     CrossRef
  • 8,258 View
  • 96 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Endoscopy
Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening
Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
Intest Res 2018;16(1):48-54.   Published online January 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.48
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Colonoscopy is currently regarded as the gold standard and preferred method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the benefit of colonoscopy screening may be blunted by low participation rates in population-based screening programs. Harmful effects of population-based colonoscopy screening may include complications induced by colonoscopy itself and by sedation, psychosocial distress, potential over-diagnosis, and socioeconomic burden. In addition, harmful effects of colonoscopy may increase with age and comorbidities. As the risk of adverse events in population-based colonoscopy screening may offset the benefit, the adverse events should be managed and monitored. To adopt population-based colonoscopy screening, consensus on the risks and benefits should be developed, focusing on potential harm, patient preference, socioeconomic considerations, and quality improvement of colonoscopy, as well as efficacy for CRC prevention. As suboptimal colonoscopy quality is a major pitfall of population-based screening, adequate training and regulation of screening colonoscopists should be the first step in minimizing variations in quality. Gastroenterologists should promote quality improvement, auditing, and training for colonoscopy in a population-based screening program.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mixed lesions in premalignant colorectal polyps
    Toru Arano, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Hidenobu Watanabe, Mari Mizutani, Teppei Akimoto, Masaya Sano, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Hidekazu Suzuki, Keisuke Hata, Osamu Toyoshima
    Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition.2026; 78(1): 83.     CrossRef
  • Glycoproteomics of Gastrointestinal Cancers and Its Use in Clinical Diagnostics
    Tomas Bertok, Andrea Pinkeova, Lenka Lorencova, Anna Datkova, Michal Hires, Eduard Jane, Jan Tkac
    Journal of Proteome Research.2025; 24(6): 2584.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the “Burgenland PREvention trial of colorectal cancer Disease with ImmunologiCal Testing” (B-PREDICT)—a population-based colorectal cancer screening program
    Stefanie BREZINA, Gernot LEEB, Andreas BAIERL, Evelyn GRÄF, Monika HACKL, Philipp HOFER, Harald LANG, Michaela KLEIN, Karl MACH, Remy SCHWARZER, Wilhelm WLASSITS, Andreas PÜSPÖK, Andrea GSUR
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547.     CrossRef
  • The adult large bowel: describing environment morphology for effective biomedical device development
    Joseph C Norton, James W Martin, Conchubhair Winters, Bruno Scaglioni, Keith L Obstein, Venkataraman Subramanian, Pietro Valdastri
    Progress in Biomedical Engineering.2024; 6(3): 032003.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of colonoscopic re-examination across the entire colon: a randomized controlled trial
    Dong Seok Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Tae-Geun Gweon, Myeongsook Seo, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(11): 6711.     CrossRef
  • Comment on " Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality"
    Yong Eun Park
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 38(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • Challenges and Suggestions in the Management of Stomach and Colorectal Cancer in Uzbekistan: The Third Report of the Uzbekistan–Korea Oncology Consortium
    Chai Hong Rim, Won Jae Lee, Odiljon Akhmedov, Ulugbek Sabirov, Yakov Ten, Yakhyo Ziyayev, Mirzagaleb Tillyashaykhov, Jae Suk Rim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(8): 5477.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention Policies: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis
    Neda Kabiri, Rahim Khodayari-zarnaq, Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Ali Janati
    International Journal of Preventive Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Effect of prophylactic clip application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding of large pedunculated colonic polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Kang-Moon Lee, Seung-Woo Lee, Dae Bum Kim, Jeong-Seon Ji, Ji Min Lee, Woo Chul Chung, Chang-Nyol Paik, Hwang Choi
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 94(1): 148.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Seung-Woo Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Jeong Rok Lee, Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(12): 5461.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to Increase the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Gut and Liver.2020; 14(3): 277.     CrossRef
  • UEG Week 2018 Poster Presentations

    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,578 View
  • 72 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Endoscopy
Three-year colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in Korea: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter prospective study
Won Seok Choi, Dong Soo Han, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Il Park, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Dong-Hoon Yang, Sung-Ae Jung, Sang Kil Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Cheol Hee Park, Suck-Ho Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Sung Jae Shin, Bora Keum, Hyun Soo Kim, Jung Hye Choi, Sin-Ho Jung
Intest Res 2018;16(1):126-133.   Published online January 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.126
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopic surveillance is currently recommended after polypectomy owing to the risk of newly developed colonic neoplasia. However, few studies have investigated colonoscopy surveillance in Asia. This multicenter and prospective study was undertaken to assess the incidence of advanced adenoma based on baseline adenoma findings at 3 years after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Methods

A total of 1,323 patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy were prospectively assigned to 3-year colonoscopy surveillance at 11 tertiary endoscopic centers. Relative risks for advanced adenoma after 3 years were calculated according to baseline adenoma characteristics.

Results

Among 1,323 patients enrolled, 387 patients (29.3%) were followed up, and the mean follow-up interval was 31.0±9.8 months. The percentage of patients with advanced adenoma on baseline colonoscopy was higher in the surveillance group compared to the non-surveillance group (34.4% vs. 25.7%). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed in 17 patients (4.4%) at follow-up. The risk of advanced adenoma recurrence was 2 times greater in patients with baseline advanced adenoma than in those with baseline non-advanced adenoma, though the difference was not statistically significant (6.8% [9/133] vs. 3.1% [8/254], P=0.09). Advanced adenoma recurrence was observed only in males and in subjects aged ≥50 years. In contrast, adenoma recurrence was observed in 187 patients (48.3%) at follow-up. Male sex, older age (≥50 years), and multiple adenomas (≥3) at baseline were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence.

Conclusions

A colonoscopy surveillance interval of 3 years in patients with baseline advanced adenoma can be considered appropriate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy-cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis
    Shi-Yi Zhang, Ying-Chun Wang, Lei-Lei Liu, Zhi-Heng Wang, Xue-Mei Guan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • When should patients take simethicone orally before colonoscopy for avoiding bubbles: A single-blind, randomized controlled study
    Woohyuk Jung, Gyu Man Oh, Jae Hyun Kim, Youn Jung Choi, Min Young Son, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33728.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age
    Jae Hyun Kim, Yong Eun Park, Tae Oh Kim, Jongha Park, Gyu Man Oh, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29884.     CrossRef
  • Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings
    Chan Hyuk Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 974.     CrossRef
  • Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after resection of low-risk diminutive versus small adenomas
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(3): 622.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Colonoscopic Surveillance Interval After Normal Baseline Screening Colonoscopy
    Jian Dong, Minman Wu, Jiarong Miao, Rana Sami Ullah Khan, Tao Zhi, Tianmei Zhang, Xue Li, Yashi Peng, Gang Yang, Qiong Nan
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2020; 43(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of 1- to 5-mm versus 6- to 9-mm adenomas on the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia
    Yoon Suk Jung, Tae Jun Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Chan Hyuk Park
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(3): 692.     CrossRef
  • Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504.     CrossRef
  • What Is Appropriate Upper Endoscopic Interval Among Dyspeptic Patients With Previously Normal Endoscopy? A Multicenter Study With Bayesian Change Point Analysis
    Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Joong Goo Kwon, Jung Bok Lee, Jong Kyu Park, Ki Bae Bang, Chung Hyun Tae, Jung Hwan Oh
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(4): 544.     CrossRef
  • Risk of Developing Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia After Polypectomy in Patients With Multiple Diminutive or Small Adenomas
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Mi Yeon Lee, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(10): 1657.     CrossRef
  • 12,943 View
  • 87 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
High C-reactive protein level is associated with high-risk adenoma
Hyae Min Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Jung Lok Lee, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Jin Young Yoon, Joung Il Lee
Intest Res 2017;15(4):511-517.   Published online October 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.511
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

There is substantial evidence supporting a role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer; however, little is known about the association between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and the risk of colorectal adenoma. This study was conducted to investigate the association between serum CRP and colorectal adenoma risk.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on first-time screening colonoscopies in asymptomatic subjects who also had their serum CRP level measured during a routine health check-up between September 2006 and September 2009 in Korea. Serum CRP level was compared between high-risk and low-risk adenoma groups and independent predictors of high-risk adenoma were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Among the 3,309 eligible patients, the high-risk adenoma group had higher serum CRP levels than the low-risk adenoma group (P=0.000). In addition, patients with a high-risk adenoma were more frequently included in the high CRP group than in the low CRP group (8.6% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001). The prevalence of high-risk adenoma was 3.5 times higher in the highest quartile of CRP level (P=0.000) compared with that in the lowest quartile. In logistic regression analysis, a higher quartile CRP level was found to be an independent risk factor for high-risk adenoma (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–2.5; P=0.000).

Conclusions

High CRP level is associated with high-risk adenoma in both men and women. Our data may support the association between chronic inflammation and colorectal neoplasia, which warrants further investigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Knowledge graph and bibliometric analysis of inflammatory indicators in ovarian cancer
    Liyan Zhang, Linlin Guo, Haiyan Wang, Huan Yang, Jiarui Dong
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short-term and residential exposure to air pollution: Associations with inflammatory biomarker levels in adults living in northern France
    Marion Darras-Hostens, Djamal Achour, Manon Muntaner, Céline Grare, Gianni Zarcone, Guillaume Garçon, Philippe Amouyel, Farid Zerimech, Régis Matran, Jean-Marc Lo Guidice, Luc Dauchet
    Science of The Total Environment.2022; 833: 154985.     CrossRef
  • Functional Plasmon-Activated Water Increases Akkermansia muciniphila Abundance in Gut Microbiota to Ameliorate Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Chun-Chao Chang, Chih-Yi Liu, I-Chia Su, Yuarn-Jang Lee, Hsing-Jung Yeh, Wen-Chao Chen, Chih-Jui Yu, Wei-Yu Kao, Yu-Chuan Liu, Chi-Jung Huang
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(19): 11422.     CrossRef
  • Self-reported Metabolic Risk Factor Associations with Adenomatous, Sessile Serrated, and Synchronous Adenomatous and Sessile Serrated Polyps
    Celina N. Santiago, Samara Rifkin, Julia Drewes, Gerard Mullin, Emma Spence, Linda M. Hylind, Joell J. Gills, David Kafonek, David M. Cromwell, Louis La Luna, Francis Giardello, Cynthia L. Sears
    Cancer Prevention Research.2021; 14(7): 697.     CrossRef
  • Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy for ascending colon tumor with relapsing polychondritis
    Ryugo Teranishi, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Kansuke Kido, Masayuki Nishide, Shiki Fujino, Takayuki Ogino, Hidekazu Takahashi, Mamoru Uemura, Chu Matsuda, Tsunekazu Mizusima, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2020; 13(4): 569.     CrossRef
  • Increased Th17-Related Cytokine Serum Levels in Patients With Multiple Polyps of Unexplained Origin
    Miren Alustiza, Eva Hernández-Illán, Miriam Juárez, Mar Giner-Calabuig, Cristina Mira, Alejandro Martínez-Roca, Luis Bujanda, Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta, Joaquín Cubiella, Luisa de-Castro, José-Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Fernando F
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(3): e00143.     CrossRef
  • 8,828 View
  • 60 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum
Myeongsook Seo, Eun Mi Song, Gwang Un Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Intest Res 2017;15(4):502-510.   Published online October 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases.

Methods

The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded.

Results

Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection.

Conclusions

The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The efficacy and safety of precutting-endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yi Chen, Zhengjie Wu
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2025; 34(3): 177.     CrossRef
  • A systematic literature review of real-world evidence (RWE) on post-market assessment of medical devices
    Stefania Manetti, Elisa Guidotti, Federico Vola, Milena Vainieri
    Health Economics, Policy and Law.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Snare-Tip and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Knife for Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chang Kyo Oh, Young Wook Cho, Young-Seok Cho
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Precut mucosectomy versus endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal lesions sized 10–30 mm: meta-analysis and systematic review
    Miriam Chinzon, Mateus Bond Boghossian, Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Evellin Souza Valentim dos Santos, Daryl Ramai, Larissa Mercadante de Assis, Vitor Hernandes Lopes, Nelson Miyajima, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(9): 5506.     CrossRef
  • Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm
    Talia F. Malik, Babu P. Mohan, Smit Deliwala, Lena L. Kassab, Saurabh Chandan, Neil R. Sharma, Douglas G. Adler
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(9): 889.     CrossRef
  • Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cong Ding, Jian-feng Yang, Xia Wang, Yi-feng Zhou, Hayat Khizar, Zheng Jin, Xiao-feng Zhang
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hybrid Versus Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Tumors (LSTs): A Retrospective Multicenter Study
    Hongxia Li, Yiping Hong, Linhua Yao, Xia Ji, Dan Chen, Maogen Tao, Huihui Yan, Jiamin Chen, Lingling Wang, Liyi Xu, Leilei Wang, Erfei Luo, Jianting Cai, Wei Wei
    JGH Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does precutting prior to endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal neoplasias reduce local recurrence? A KASID multicenter study
    Hong Jin Yoon, Dae Kyung Sohn, Yunho Jung, Hyun Seok Lee, Hoon Sup Koo, Kyeong Ok Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Gun Kim, Il Kwun Chung, Young Hwangbo
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(5): 3433.     CrossRef
  • Adenoma Recurrence after Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection of Colorectal Flat Lesions: Applicability of the Sydney EMR Recurrence Tool in a Non-Tertiary Centre
    Maria Azevedo Silva, Carina Leal, André Ruge, Alexandra Fernandes, Liliana Eliseu, Helena Vasconcelos
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 29(4): 247.     CrossRef
  • Management of the malignant colorectal polyp
    Matthew Symer, James Connolly, Heather Yeo
    Current Problems in Surgery.2022; 59(5): 101124.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for local recurrence of large gastrointestinal lesions after endoscopic mucosal resection
    Yasar Colak, Badar Hasan, Walid Hassaballa, Mamoon Ur Rashid, Victor Strassmann, Giovanna DaSilva, Steven D. Wexner, Tolga Erim
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(7): 545.     CrossRef
  • Cost of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection in the Colorectum
    Nam Seok Ham, Jeongseok Kim, Eun Hye Oh, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(4): 969.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of submucosal colorectal cancer diagnosed after endoscopic resection: a focus on the need for surgery
    Yun Sik Choi, Wan Soo Kim, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Intestinal Research.2020; 18(1): 96.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Muhammad Aziz, Harsh K. Patel, Naaz Sidhu, Abhiram Duvvuri, ChandraShekhar Dasari, Kevin F. Kennedy, Ashwini Ashwath, Marco Spadaccini, Madhav Desai, Ramprasad Jegadeesan, Anjana Sathyamurthy, Prashanth Vennalaganti, D
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 18(11): 2448.     CrossRef
  • Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video)
    Dileep Mangira, Karla Cameron, Koen Simons, Simon Zanati, Richard LaNauze, Spiro Raftopoulos, Gregor Brown, Alan Moss
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(6): 1343.     CrossRef
  • 9,433 View
  • 91 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction
Otto S. Lin
Intest Res 2017;15(4):456-466.   Published online October 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.456
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Most gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are now performed with sedation. Moderate sedation using benzodiazepines and opioids continue to be widely used, but propofol sedation is becoming more popular because its unique pharmacokinetic properties make endoscopy almost painless, with a very predictable and rapid recovery process. There is controversy as to whether propofol should be administered only by anesthesia professionals (monitored anesthesia care) or whether properly trained non-anesthesia personnel can use propofol safely via the modalities of nurse-administered propofol sedation, computer-assisted propofol sedation or nurse-administered continuous propofol sedation. The deployment of non-anesthesia administered propofol sedation for low-risk procedures allows for optimal allocation of scarce anesthesia resources, which can be more appropriately used for more complex cases. This can address some of the current shortages in anesthesia provider supply, and can potentially reduce overall health care costs without sacrificing sedation quality. This review will discuss efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction issues with various modes of sedation for non-advanced, non-emergent endoscopic procedures, mainly esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Reduce Hypoxia in Patients With Obesity Undergoing Sedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Karlo Hünerbein, Christian Sprenger, Christian Zöllner, Jocelyn de Heer, Moritz von Wulffen, Katharina Zimmermann, Thomas Rösch, Malte Issleib
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026; 24(1): 113.     CrossRef
  • International survey of endoscopic nasojejunal tube insertion practices
    Kartik Bhargava, Paranjay Dahiya, Karim Hamesch, Oscar Cahyadi, Stavros Dimitriadis
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2026; : flgastro-2025-103251.     CrossRef
  • Propofol Versus Remimazolam in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ahmed L. Youseif, Ziad W. Elmezayen, Noha Hammad, Ahmed F. Younis, Aya M. Ramadan, Basma M. El-Khalifa, Amr R. Saleh, Karim A. Khalil, Mohamed Nabil Hamouda, Belal hamed, Alaa Ashraf Mohamed, Youssef Narouz, Doaa A. Elmarzouky, Amira A. Albawri, Yara M. H
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of anaesthesia‐directed sedation with unplanned discharge to a nursing home following non‐ambulatory interventional radiology and endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study*
    Annika Eyth, Felix Borngaesser, Osamah M. Zmily, Maíra I. Rudolph, Ling Zhang, Vilma A. Joseph, Oleg V. Evgenov, Jason Oliveira, Nicholas Kolmel, Seena Dehkharghani, Irene Osborn, Michael E. Kiyatkin, Andrew D. Racine, Peter P. Semczuk, Shweta Garg, Karun
    Anaesthesia.2025; 80(3): 288.     CrossRef
  • Noninferiority Study of the Effects of Remimazolam Tosylate Versus Propofol on Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Outpatient Colonoscopy
    Hang Li, Ze-yu Duan, Ye-Ping Mo, Wei-Feng Yu, Yong-Ming Chen
    American Journal of Therapeutics.2025; 32(1): e40.     CrossRef
  • Pre-endoscopy Anesthesiology Clinic Evaluation Does Not Reduce Adverse Event Rates for High-risk for Sedation Patients
    Tamar Thurm, Niv Zmora, Rafael Bruck, Nir Bar, Adam Philips, Oren Shibolet, Liat Deutsch
    Journal of Patient Safety.2025; 21(5): 324.     CrossRef
  • Engineered Living Systems Based on Gelatin: Design, Manufacturing, and Applications
    Zhenwu Wang, Zeng Lin, Xuan Mei, Ling Cai, Ko‐Chih Lin, Jimena Flores Rodríguez, Zixin Ye, Ximena Salazar Parraguez, Emilio Mireles Guajardo, Pedro Cortés García Luna, Jun Yi Joey Zhang, Yu Shrike Zhang
    Advanced Materials.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for gastroscopy in patients with obesity: a randomised clinical controlled trial using different weight-based dosing scales
    Danru Xie, Yanjing Zhang, Feifei Li, Yaoheng Yang, Mengjiao Che, Geng Li, Yiwen Zhang
    BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ketamine/Midazolam versus Fentanyl/Midazolam Sedation for Interventional Radiology Procedures: A Prospective Registry
    Gaspareantonio Fabio Greco, Zayd Al-Asadi, Adam M. Belcher, Elaine Mattox, Michael V. Korona, Amy R. Deipolyi
    Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.2025; 36(6): 1002.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy and safety of nalbuphine and hydromorphone in painless colonoscopy techniques: a randomized controlled trial
    Chunliu Hou, Siming Zhang, Yuqing Zhu, Guochun Wen, Guoran Wang, Jinxiang Dai, Fei Xu, Chunjie Li, Huiyi Chen, Di Wang, Qingqing Han, Xuesen Su, Wenjie Zhang, Shouyuan Tian, Yan Li
    BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A thin cryobiopsy device compatible with transnasal endoscopy for the gastrointestinal tract
    David O. Otuya, Hamid Farrokhi, Yogesh Verma, Jing Dong, Peter Choy, Aditya Kumar, Rachel E. Shore, Sarah K. Zemlok, Evan Sevieri, Mason Schellenberg, Graham Spicer, Dan Rolando Lopez, Hany A. Osman, Joseph A. Gardecki, Alfred A. F. Kyrollos Kelada, Anna
    Science Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Examining the Validity of An Endoscopist-patient Co-participative Virtual Reality Method (EPC-VR) in Pain Relief during Colonoscopy
    Yulong Bian, Juan Liu, Yongjiu Lin, Weiying Liu, Yang Zhang, Tangjun Qu, Sheng Li, Zhaojie Pan, Wenming Liu, Wei Huang, Ying Shi
    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.2025; 31(5): 3656.     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam, a novel drug, for safe and effective endoscopic sedation
    Jae Min Lee, Yehyun Park, Dong Won Ahn, Jun Kyu Lee, Kwang Hyuck Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 370.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia during Gastrointestinal endoscopy: a retrospective cohort study
    Fengli Liu, Chaojin Zhang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Bo Qi, Li Zheng, Yanhua Zhao, Weifeng Yu
    BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fentanyl may not be necessary for adequate endoscopic moderate sedation
    Greg S Cohen, Kwang-Youn A Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pharmacological agents for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Jiaxin Li, Yue Liu, Siyu Chen, Xiaowen Dai, Jiang Wang
    eClinicalMedicine.2025; 85: 103307.     CrossRef
  • Xuebijing Promotes HMGB1-Mediated Autophagy to Alleviate Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Heat Stroke-Induced Brain Damage
    Hongbo Li, Chunhe Li, Jun Li, Yongrui Liu, Minyong Wen, Lin Wang
    Molecular Neurobiology.2025; 62(10): 13601.     CrossRef
  • Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in a Chinese Population
    Hongyu Yang, Ping Lai, Xiaoyu Qin, Yiyang Cui, Xiaojia Zhang, Haiqing Zhang, Yichen Ding, Ersheng Ye, Yaping Wu, Bingxu Ren
    Drug Design, Development and Therapy.2025; Volume 19: 5369.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatoscopy in the evaluation and management of pancreatic disorders
    Rodrigo Mansilla-Vivar, Eduardo Segovia-Vergara, Vicente Pons-Beltrán
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of nasal mask oxygenation on incidence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol sedation in patients at risk of hypoxemia: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Wenlong Yan, Liang Yan, Wenjun Meng, Jianyue Cai, Meiping Qian, Yan Zhang, Juan Li, Shuhua Shu, Fang Kang
    BMC Anesthesiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New Trends in Airway Management During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Narrative Review
    Federica Maiellare, Fabio Sbaraglia, Miryam Del Vicario, Riccardo Fattore, Giuliano Ferrone, Monica Lucente, Alessandra Piersanti, Domenico Posa, Giorgia Spinazzola, Daniele De Padova, Caterina Malatesta, Carmela Memoli, Marco Rossi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(16): 5905.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive systematic review of randomized controlled trials on anesthetic agents in children’s upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: highlighting safety concerns and efficacy
    Amr Elrosasy, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Mohamed Abo Zeid, Abdelaziz A. Awad, Ahmed W. Abbas, Mohammad Al Diab Al Azzawi, Eslam Afifi, Ahmed Amgad, Mohamed Yasser, Khalid Sarhan, Sara Chikh Aissa
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effects of Flurbiprofen—Lidocaine Spray Versus Lidocaine Spray Alone as Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia Before Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Ciocîrlan Mihai, Busuioc Denisa, Pasăre Mihaela, Bilous Dana, Buză Bogdan, Vlăduț Cătălina
    Gastroenterology Insights.2025; 16(3): 31.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of virtual reality in alleviating anxiety and pain during colonoscopy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Mingqi Zhang, Panpan Zhuang, Weijie Wang, Siyue Fan, Kun Zhang, Yafang Ye, Dandan Kang, Lichun Xu
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(9): e093253.     CrossRef
  • A Pilot Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation With Remimazolam in Japanese Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Shuhei Shintani, Takayoshi Mizuno, Jun Matsubayashi, Takuya Okamoto, Kosuke Hiroe, Atsushi Nishida, Hirotoshi Kitagawa, Osamu Inatomi, Takuji Iwashita
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2025; 32(12): 938.     CrossRef
  • The effect of music and distraction on pain and anxiety during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jabed F. Ahmed, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Ferdinando R. Baena, Nisha Patel
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Design and Computational Analysis of Hemoclips for Effective Tissue Approximation during Endoscopic Procedures
    Kothwala Dr. Deveshkumar, Lodha Dikshita, Shukla Dhananjaya
    Ag Publishing House.2025; : 10.     CrossRef
  • Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy
    Garrett Johnson, George N Okoli, Nicole Askin, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Harminder Singh
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy based on machine learning
    Yongchao Yao, Yanna Li, Fei Xing, Zhihu Yang, Xiaoyu Li, Mingzhu Jing, Huixin Li, Xihua Lu, Qinjun Chu, Wei Zhang, Yulong Ma, Na Xing
    Annals of Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Risk Factors of Orthostatic Hypotension and Postural Tachycardia Following Sedated Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study
    Gülencan Yumuşak Ergin, Mustafa Ergin, Menekşe Özçelik
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(23): 3009.     CrossRef
  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Ketamine and Moderate Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopy in Adults
    Jerome C Edelson, Cyrus V Edelson, Don C Rockey, Amilcar L Morales, Kevin K Chung, Matthew J Robles, Johanna H Marowske, Anish A Patel, Scott F. D Edelson, Stalin R Subramanian, John G Gancayco
    Military Medicine.2024; 189(1-2): 313.     CrossRef
  • Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation Training Curricula and Propofol Administration in Digestive Endoscopy Procedures
    Andrea Minciullo, Lucia Filomeno
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2024; 47(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Effect of moderate versus deep sedation on recovery following outpatient gastroscopy in older patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Bing Chen, Lin Lu, Jie Zhai, Zhen Hua
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(3): 1273.     CrossRef
  • Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
    Catarina Correia, Nuno Almeida, Raquel Andrade, Mariana Sant’Anna, Cláudia Macedo, David Perdigoto, Carlos Gregório, Pedro Narra Figueiredo
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 31(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wania Ahmer, Sahar Imtiaz, Daniyal Muhammad Alam, Khadija Ahmed, Barka Sajid, Juvairia Yousuf, Sunny Asnani, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Rahmeen Ali, Marium Mansoor, Muhammad Talha Safdar, Muhammad Umair Anjum, Muhammad Hasanain, Muhammad Omar Larik
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2024; 80(4): 493.     CrossRef
  • Providing Safe Anesthetic Care and Sedation for GI Endoscopy
    Sheetal Kedar, Ryan M. Chadha
    Current Anesthesiology Reports.2024; 14(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • The effective dose of remimazolam in adult gastroscopy
    Rongyan Zhang, Gang Zhao, Zhangjun Yan, Hongmei Xuan, Yan Chen
    Indian Journal of Pharmacology.2024; 56(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation of acupuncture points improves tolerance in adults undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Jun Sen Chuah, Jih Huei Tan, Mohamad Adam Bujang, Koon Khee Chan, Nik Ritza Kosai
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3279.     CrossRef
  • Marijuana and endoscopy: the effects of marijuana on sedation
    Justin Kosirog, Christopher Bouvette, Jiteshwar Pannu, Jalal Gondal, Mohammad Madhoun
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 100(2): 177.     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review
    Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ganesh Kumar, Syeda Parsa, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Hassam Ali, Amir Humza Sohail, Saqr Alsakarneh, Umar Hayat, Sheza Malik, Yash R Shah, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Sahib Singh, Islam Mohamed, Adishwar Rao, Saurabh Chandan, Mohammad Al-
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 16(7): 385.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between demographics and reactions during endoscopy under moderate sedation.
    İsmail Çalıkoğlu, Alaaddin Aydın, Şeref Oray, Sercan Yüksel, Uğur Topal, Erdal Karaköse, Zafer Teke, Hasan Bektaş
    Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi.2024; 7(2): 94.     CrossRef
  • Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia
    Matthew Brohan, Janette Brohan, Basavana Goudra
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4362.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Sampling of Mediastinal Lesions
    Alberto Fantin, Nadia Castaldo, Ernesto Crisafulli, Giulia Sartori, Alice Villa, Elide Felici, Stefano Kette, Filippo Patrucco, Erik H. F. M. van der Heijden, Paolo Vailati, Giuseppe Morana, Vincenzo Patruno
    Life.2024; 14(10): 1291.     CrossRef
  • EVALUATION OF THE PROMETHAZINE EFFECT ON SEDATION AND QUALITY OF THE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL GASTRO ENDOSCOPY
    Mohammad Reza Pashaei, Shahram Hoseinlou, Parvin Ayremlou
    Studies in Medical Sciences.2024; 35(5): 418.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of painful situations during unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Sakiko Kuraoka, Takuya Satomi, Shotaro Okanoue, Kenta Hamada, Yoshiyasu Kono, Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Yoshiro Kawahara, Hiroyuki Okada, Motoyuki Otsuka
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(11): E1267.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting patient satisfaction during endoscopic procedures
    Ghazala Maryam, Rashk E-Hinna, Saman Sardar, Jahangir Khan, Javaria Isram, Fayyaz Hassan
    Scripta Medica.2024; 55(6): 749.     CrossRef
  • Effect of visual distraction on pain in adults undergoing colonoscopy: a meta-analysis
    Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Ramoo Vimala, Ping Lei Chui, Ida Normiha Hilmi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(4): 2633.     CrossRef
  • Use of Dexmedetomidine in Conscious Sedation for Oesophageal Stent Placement in a High-Risk Patient
    Prashant Sirohiya, Smita Reddy, Jasmeet Gill, Naveen Kumar
    Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy.2023; 37(2): 114.     CrossRef
  • The Emerging Role of Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Procedural Sedation and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review
    Rita Hitching, Hunter G. Hoffman, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Maheen M. Adamson, Esmeralda Madrigal, Wadee Alhalabi, Ahad Alhudali, Mariana Sampaio, Barry Peterson, Miles R. Fontenot, Keira P. Mason
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(3): 843.     CrossRef
  • A framework for the assessment and treatment of patients for failed sedation in non-operating room settings
    George Tewfik, Daniel Rodriguez, Erica Spano
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2023; 86: 111078.     CrossRef
  • Time and Motion at the Endoscopy Unit—A University Hospital Experience
    Simon Söderberg, Nils Nyhlin, Axelina Moro, Christina Figaro, Emelie Fransson, Jennie Stefansdotter, Malin Schagerström, Maria Lindblad, Martin Ahlzén, Olga Zukovets, Sofia Borell, Viktoria Johansson, Marianne Axman, Anette Wendt, Hanna Falck, Michiel A.
    Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gelatin‐Based Ingestible Impedance Sensor to Evaluate Gastrointestinal Epithelial Barriers
    Gaurav Balakrishnan, Arnav Bhat, Durva Naik, Julie Shin Kim, Sona Marukyan, Lily Gido, Mia Ritter, Aditya S. Khair, Christopher J. Bettinger
    Advanced Materials.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoyu Qin, Xiaoting Lu, Lu Tang, Chunai Wang, Jianjun Xue
    BMJ Open.2023; 13(5): e071438.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Ketamine, Magnesium Sulfate, and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Hamed Shafiee, Farahnaz Riahipour, Ahmad Hormati, Sajjad Ahmadpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mostafa Vahedian, Reza Aminnejad, Mohammad Saeidi
    CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets.2023; 22(8): 1259.     CrossRef
  • Nebulised dexmedetomidine for patient’s comfort and satisfaction during diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A double-blind randomised controlled study
    Bhavna Sriramka, Shikha Awal, Diptimayee Mallik, Jimmy Narayan
    Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.2023; 67(9): 825.     CrossRef
  • Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center
    Andrew L. Mariotti, Jack Pattee, Steven A. Edmundowicz, Terran D. Hardesty, Savita M. Sharma, M. G. Lemley, Scott D. Rist, Nathaen Weitzel, Adeel A. Faruki, Stefano Turi
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294418.     CrossRef
  • Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation on the Prevention of Hypoxia During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Man-Jong Lee, Boram Cha, Jin-Seok Park, Jung Soo Kim, Sang Yong Cho, Joung-Ho Han, Mi Hwa Park, Chunwoo Yang, Seok Jeong
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(8): 4154.     CrossRef
  • Anesthesiological support during gastroscopy and colonoscopy: availability, effectiveness and safety of applied methods
    A. M. Dolgunov, D. A. Dolgunov, T. V. Balashova, N. A. Andreeva
    Pacific Medical Journal.2022; (4): 34.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of high flow nasal oxygenation against hypoxemia in sedated patients receiving gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ying-Jen Chang, I-Wen Chen, Tien-Chou Soong, Chun-Ning Ho, Chung-Hsi Hsing, Chin-Chen Chu, Jen-Yin Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2022; 77: 110651.     CrossRef
  • Comparing performance of Wei nasal jet tube and nasal cannula during flexible bronchoscopy with sedation
    Xing Tao, Fu-Shan Xue, Bin Hu, Tian Tian
    European Journal of Anaesthesiology.2022; 39(3): 297.     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated with Withdrawal Time in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group
    Cristiano Spada, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Cesare Hassan, Pedro Amaro, Anurag Agrawal, Lene Brink, Wolfgang Fischbach, Matthias Hünger, Rodrigo Jover, Urpo Kinnunen, Akiko Ono, Árpád Patai, Silvia Pecere, Lucio Petruzziello, Jürgen F. Riemann, Harry Staine
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(2): 503.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of anesthesia quality with three methods: “propofol + fentanyl” vs. “propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine” vs. “propofol + fentanyl + lidocaine + ketamine” in patients referred to the scoping ward
    Sepehr Edalatkhah, Ebrahim Hazrati, Mahmoodreza Hashemi, Alireza Golaghaei, Behroz Kheradmand, Mohamadreza Rafiei
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2022; 11(2): 672.     CrossRef
  • Post-procedure Rhinitis After Use of Sedatives and Supplemental Nasal Oxygen
    Sharmela Brijmohan, Tanganyika Barnes
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis comparing the efficiency of high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Mohamed Gamal, Manar Ahmed Kamal, Mohamed Abuelazm, Amman Yousaf, Basel Abdelazeem
    Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2022; 35(4): 485.     CrossRef
  • High flow nasal oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy in gastrointestinal endoscopy with conscious sedation: Systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Wan‐Jie Gu, Hao‐Tian Wang, Jiao Huang, Jun‐Peng Pei, Kazuhiro Nishiyama, Masanobu Abe, Zhe‐Ming Zhao, Chun‐Dong Zhang
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(6): 1136.     CrossRef
  • Illicit Drug Use and Endoscopy: When Do We Say No?
    John P. Gallagher, Patrick A. Twohig, Agnes Crnic, Fedja A. Rochling
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(12): 5371.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Exploring Deeper Sections of the Infrapapillary Area of the Duodenum by Using Sedative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    Ming-Tse Hsu, Chi-Yi Chen, Kai-Sheng Liao, Wei-Sheng Chung, Tatsuya Toyokawa
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Ketamine as the main analgesic agent during analgesia-based sedation for elective colonoscopy – A randomised, double-blind, control study
    Mirza Kovačević, Nermina Rizvanović, Adisa Šabanović Adilović, Jasmina Smajić, Selma Sijerčić
    Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia.2022; 16(4): 423.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of midazolam combined with dezocine for sedation and analgesia in digestive endoscopy: A prospective open single-center study
    Yongpeng Chen, Jiachen Sun, Yi Lu, Liping Fu, Xueyuan Xiang, Yanan Liu, Xianhua Zhuo, Mirigul Kurban, Chujun Li
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nurse-Administered Propofol Continuous Infusion Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients Who Are Difficult to Sedate
    Hyun Seok Lee, Navroop Nagra, Danielle La Selva, Richard A. Kozarek, Andrew Ross, Wade Weigel, Ryan Beecher, Michael Chiorean, Michael Gluck, Elisa Boden, Nanda Venu, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Michael Larsen, Otto S. Lin
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 19(1): 180.     CrossRef
  • Estimation of effective dose of propofol mono‐sedation for successful insertion of upper gastrointestinal endoscope in healthy, non‐obese Chinese adults
    Fu K. Liu, Lei Wan, Liu J. Z. Shao, Yi Zou, Shao H. Liu, Fu S. Xue
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2021; 46(2): 484.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intravenous administration of lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients: A randomized, controlled study
    Haoran Liu, Mengmeng Chen, Chaohui Lian, Junzheng Wu, Wangning Shangguan
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2021; 46(3): 711.     CrossRef
  • Leitlinien in der Praxis: Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie
    Peter H. Tonner
    AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie.2021; 56(03): 201.     CrossRef
  • Nurse-Administered Propofol Continuous Infusion Sedation: A New Paradigm for Gastrointestinal Procedural Sedation
    Otto S. Lin, Danielle La Selva, Richard A. Kozarek, Wade Weigel, Ryan Beecher, Michael Gluck, Michael Chiorean, Elisa Boden, Nanda Venu, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 116(4): 710.     CrossRef
  • The importance of preoperative instructions and their role in patient safety in the provision of conscious sedation for dental care
    Thomas Flavell, Katherine Wilson, Nicholas Girdler
    Faculty Dental Journal.2021; 12(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • High-flow nasal oxygenation or standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation in patients at risk of hypoxaemia: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ODEPHI trial)
    Mai-Anh Nay, Lucie Fromont, Axelle Eugene, Jean-Louis Marcueyz, Willy-Serge Mfam, Olivier Baert, Francis Remerand, Céline Ravry, Adrien Auvet, Thierry Boulain
    British Journal of Anaesthesia.2021; 127(1): 133.     CrossRef
  • Propofol Combined with Fentanyl Is Superior to Propofol Alone in Sedation Protocols for Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Jie Chang, Chun Yang, Songwen Tan
    Journal of Nanomaterials.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Oxygen supplementation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation
    Bin Hu, Tian Tian, Fu-Shan Xue
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.2021; 68(9): 1444.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Lidocaine Spray and Lidocaine Ice Popsicle in Patients Undergoing Unsedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Prasit Mahawongkajit, Nantawat Talalak, Neranchala Soonthornkes
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2021; Volume 14: 209.     CrossRef
  • Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction
    Alexander Hann, Sascha Gruss, Sebastian Goetze, Niklas Mehlhase, Stephan Frisch, Benjamin Walter, Steffen Walter
    Frontiers in Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative Safety Profiles of Sedatives Commonly Used in Clinical Practice: A 10-Year Nationwide Pharmacovigilance Study in Korea
    Yeo-Jin Choi, Seung-Won Yang, Won-Gun Kwack, Jun-Kyu Lee, Tae-Hee Lee, Jae-Yong Jang, Eun-Kyoung Chung
    Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(8): 783.     CrossRef
  • Thoughts on factors related to colonoscopy quality
    Jing-Zhai Wang, Yu Zhang, Qiang Guo
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2021; 29(17): 977.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Endoscopy
    Toshihiro Nishizawa, Shuntaro Yoshida, Osamu Toyoshima, Tatsuya Matsuno, Masataka Irokawa, Toru Arano, Hirotoshi Ebinuma, Hidekazu Suzuki, Takanori Kanai, Kazuhiko Koike
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(6): 851.     CrossRef
  • Safety of endoscopist-administered deep sedation with propofol in patients ASA III
    Lucía Medina-Prado, Juan Martínez, Maryana Bozhychko, Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan, Luis Compañy Catal�, Francisco Ruiz Gómez, José Ramón Aparicio Tormo, Juan Antonio Casellas Valde
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does propofol mode of administration influence psychomotor recovery time after sedation for colonoscopy
    Philippe J. Van der Linden, Hans Verdoodt, Etienne Métallo, Chantal Plasman, Jean-François Fils, Denis Schmartz
    Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia.2021; 15(4): 390.     CrossRef
  • Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events
    Jerome Edelson, Alejandro L. Suarez, Jingwen Zhang, Don C. Rockey
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(4): 1258.     CrossRef
  • Are Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures Performed by Anesthesiologists Safer Than When Sedation is Given by the Endoscopist?
    Richard Kozarek
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 18(9): 1935.     CrossRef
  • Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study
    Antonello Trecca, Filippo Catalano, Antonino Bella, Raffaele Borghini
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(3): 1442.     CrossRef
  • A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval
    Shui Fan Lai, Mei Ting Lam, Hang Wun Raymond Li, Ernest Hung Yu Ng
    Reproductive BioMedicine Online.2020; 40(5): 653.     CrossRef
  • Effects of remifentanil on awakening of propofol sedated patients submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
    Gustavo Nadal Uliana, Elizabeth Milla Tambara, Renato Tambara Filho, Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta
    Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition).2020; 70(3): 262.     CrossRef
  • Efeitos do remifentanil sobre despertar de pacientes sedados com propofol para endoscopia digestiva alta: estudo clínico randomizado
    Gustavo Nadal Uliana, Elizabeth Milla Tambara, Renato Tambara Filho, Giorgio Alfredo Pedroso Baretta
    Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology.2020; 70(3): 262.     CrossRef
  • Medical, Political, and Economic Considerations for the Use of MAC for Endoscopic Sedation: Big Price, Little Justification?
    Basavana Goudra, Preet Mohinder Singh, Gary R. Lichtenstein
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(9): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study
    María E. García Guzzo, María S. Fernandez, Delfina Sanchez Novas, Sandra S. Salgado, Sergio A. Terrasa, Gonzalo Domenech, Carlos A. Teijido
    BMC Anesthesiology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Predicting Hypoxia in Adult Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy under Sedation
    Ji Soo Choi, Eun Hye Lee, Sang Hoon Lee, Ah Young Leem, Kyung Soo Chung, Song Yee Kim, Ji Ye Jung, Young Ae Kang, Moo Suk Park, Joon Chang, Young Sam Kim
    Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2020; 83(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate in Comparison with Propofol or Midazolam as Sedative for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Jae Hyun Kim, Sanghwan Byun, Youn Jung Choi, Hye Jung Kwon, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Moo In Park, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(5): 555.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of a transmucosal sublingual fentanyl tablet as a procedural pain treatment in colonoscopy patients: a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study
    Mari Fihlman, E. Karru, P. Varpe, H. Huhtinen, N. Hagelberg, T. I. Saari, K. T. Olkkola
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Discharge following sedation for endoscopic procedures: a best practice implementation project
    Xianli Cai, Alexa McArthur
    JBI Evidence Synthesis.2020; 18(2): 348.     CrossRef
  • Acute abdominal obstruction: Colon stent or emergency surgery? An evidence-based review
    Igor Braga Ribeiro, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Christopher C Thompson, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2019; 11(3): 193.     CrossRef
  • Factors related to paradoxical reactions during propofol-induced sedated endoscopy
    Seung Hwa Lee, Gyu Min Lee, Dong Ryul Lee, Jung Un Lee
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(3): 371.     CrossRef
  • The rise, fall, and future direction of computer-assisted personalized sedation
    James F. Martin, Paul J. Niklewski, Jeffrey D. White
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2019; 32(4): 480.     CrossRef
  • Efficiency and scheduling in the nonoperating room anesthesia suite
    Bijan Navidi, Kianusch Kiai
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2019; 32(4): 498.     CrossRef
  • High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and hypoxia during gastroscopy with propofol sedation: a randomized multicenter clinical trial
    Yuxuan Lin, Xiaoqing Zhang, Lizhi Li, Mengyun Wei, Bin Zhao, Xiaojing Wang, Zhiying Pan, Jie Tian, Weifeng Yu, Diansan Su
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2019; 90(4): 591.     CrossRef
  • Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aureo Augusto de Almeida Delgado, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
    World J Gastrointest Endosc.2019; 11(11): 573.     CrossRef
  • Propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Toshihiro Nishizawa, Hidekazu Suzuki
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018; 6(6): 801.     CrossRef
  • Safety of applying midazolam-ketamine-propofol sedation combination under the supervision of endoscopy nurse with patient-controlled analgesia pump in colonoscopy
    Selda Kayaaltı, Ömer Kayaaltı
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2018; 6(16): 1146.     CrossRef
  • 27,072 View
  • 361 Download
  • 107 Web of Science
  • 105 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies
Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Woo Shin Jeong, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Kyuyong Choi, Dong Il Park
Intest Res 2017;15(3):411-418.   Published online June 12, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopic polypectomy is the best diagnostic and therapeutic tool to detect and prevent colorectal neoplasms. However, previous studies have reported that 17% to 28% of colorectal polyps are missed during colonoscopy. We investigated the miss rate of neoplastic polyps and the factors associated with missed polyps from quality-adjusted consecutive colonoscopies.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients who were found to have colorectal polyps at a medical examination center of the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital between March 2012 and February 2013. Patients who were referred to a single tertiary academic medical center and underwent colonoscopic polypectomy on the same day were enrolled in our study. The odds ratios (ORs) associated with polyp-related and patient-related factors were evaluated using logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 463 patients and 1,294 neoplastic polyps were analyzed. The miss rates for adenomas, advanced adenomas, and carcinomas were 24.1% (312/1,294), 1.2% (15/1,294), and 0% (0/1,294), respectively. Flat/sessile-shaped adenomas (adjusted OR, 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40–5.46) and smaller adenomas (adjusted OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 2.84– 11.15 for ≤5 mm; adjusted OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.60–6.30 for 6–9 mm, respectively) were more frequently missed than pedunculated/sub-pedunculated adenomas and larger adenomas. In patients with 2 or more polyps compared with only one detected (adjusted OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.55–3.61 for 2–4 polyps; adjusted OR, 11.52; 95% CI, 4.61–28.79 for ≥5 polyps, respectively) during the first endoscopy, the risk of missing an additional polyp was significantly higher.

Conclusions

One-quarter of neoplastic polyps was missed during colonoscopy. We encourage endoscopists to detect smaller and flat or sessile polyps by using the optimal withdrawal technique.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Polyp segmentation for colonoscopy images via Hierarchical Interworking Decoding
    Chengang Dong, Guodong Du
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2026; 112: 108737.     CrossRef
  • ADL-UNet: adaptive dilated learning U-Net architecture for advanced colorectal polyp segmentation
    Megha Dey Sarkar, Binayak Kar, Satyajit Padhy, Shashank
    Research on Biomedical Engineering.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual pathway attention over attention network with multi-scale supervision for colonoscopy polyp segmentation
    Inam Ullah, Khaled Alomar, Leila Jamel, Maha M. Althobaiti, Kamal M. Othman, Abdulfattah Noorwali
    Neurocomputing.2026; 674: 132448.     CrossRef
  • Robust colonoscopy polyp segmentation using dynamic-Nu T-Loss with multi-scale and uncertainty-aware adaptation
    Alireza Norouziazad, Mahan Najafpour Ghazvini Fardshad, Fatemeh Esmaeildoost, Mehrdad Najafpour Ghazvini Fardshad, Razieh Salahandish
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hierarchical contextual information aggregation for polyp segmentation
    Lin Li, Haichen Yang, Jialing Zhang, Cuijuan Zheng, Xiaoyu Chen, Xue He
    Scientific Reports.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • UM-Net: Rethinking ICGNet for polyp segmentation with uncertainty modeling
    Xiuquan Du, Xuebin Xu, Jiajia Chen, Xuejun Zhang, Lei Li, Heng Liu, Shuo Li
    Medical Image Analysis.2025; 99: 103347.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted colonoscopy on adenoma and polyp miss rate: A meta-analysis of tandem RCTs
    M. Maida, G. Marasco, M.H.J. Maas, D. Ramai, M. Spadaccini, E. Sinagra, A. Facciorusso, P.D. Siersema, C. Hassan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2025; 57(1): 169.     CrossRef
  • An optimized deep focused U-Net model for image segmentation
    Haroon Haider Khan, Majid Iqbal Khan
    Neural Computing and Applications.2025; 37(16): 9245.     CrossRef
  • MSEANet: Multi-Scale Selective Edge Aware Network for Polyp Segmentation
    Botao Liu, Changqi Shi, Ming Zhao
    Algorithms.2025; 18(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy
    Abhinav K. Rao, Shivam Kalra, Brett Van Leer-Greenberg, Don C. Rockey
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dynamic spectrum-driven hierarchical learning network for polyp segmentation
    Haolin Wang, Kai-Ni Wang, Jie Hua, Yi Tang, Yang Chen, Guang-Quan Zhou, Shuo Li
    Medical Image Analysis.2025; 101: 103449.     CrossRef
  • Advantages of 3D Endoscopy for Decreasing the Miss Rates of Pre-malignant Colonic Polyps
    Kaiqi Yang, Qian Zhang, Yang Zhang, Shengtao Zhu, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang, Xiujing Sun
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(2): 445.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing colorectal polyp detection and localization: Impact of RGB color adjustment on CNN performance
    Jirakorn Jamrasnarodom, Pharuj Rajborirug, Pises Pisespongsa, Kitsuchart Pasupa
    MethodsX.2025; 14: 103187.     CrossRef
  • CE-YOLO: A channel-efficient YOLO algorithm for colorectal polyp detection
    Chao Xu, Zhiwei Fan, Yaoyao Ma, Yuling Huang, Jing Wang, Yishen Xu, Di Wu
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2025; 104: 107529.     CrossRef
  • SCABNet: A Novel Polyp Segmentation Network With Spatial‐Gradient Attention and Channel Prioritization
    Khaled ELKarazle, Valliappan Raman, Caslon Chua, Patrick Then
    International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EMFF-Net: Edge-Enhancement Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Network
    Xuhui Guan, Jiwang Zhou, Jian Chen, Xiaodan Xu, Yizhang Jiang, Kaijian Xia
    IEEE Access.2025; 13: 25598.     CrossRef
  • Privacy-preserving polyp segmentation using federated learning with differential privacy
    Md. Mahmodul Hasan, Mohammad Motiur Rahman
    Smart Health.2025; 36: 100551.     CrossRef
  • One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy – findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beate Jahn, Marvin Bundo, Marjan Arvandi, Monika Schaffner, Jovan Todorovic, Gaby Sroczynski, Amy Knudsen, Timo Fischer, Irmgard Schiller-Fruehwirth, Dietmar Öfner, Friedrich Renner, Michael Jonas, Igor Kuchin, Julia Kruse, Júlia Santamaria, Monika Ferlit
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MSD-EMA: Multiscale Decoupled Expectation–Maximization Attention for Polyp Segmentation
    Xiaogang Du, Yibin Zou, Tao Lei, Dongxin Gu, Xuejun Zhang, Asoke K. Nandi
    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.2025; 74: 1.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sheng-Yu Wang, Jia-Cheng Gao, Shuo-Dong Wu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Detection, localization, segmentation, and classification in colorectal cancer screening using deep learning: A systematic review
    Md. Rakibul Islam, Md. Faysal Ahamed, Md.Rabiul Islam, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Mominul Ahsan
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2025; 110: 108202.     CrossRef
  • An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon Using a Novel Endoscopic System with Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Decreases Polyp Miss Rates: A Multicenter Study
    Yoshikazu Inagaki, Naohisa Yoshida, Hikaru Hashimoto, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Takahito Shimomura, Kyoichi Kassai, Yuri Tomita, Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yoshito Itoh
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(14): 1759.     CrossRef
  • XPolypNet: A U-Net-Based Model for Semantic Segmentation of Gastrointestinal Polyps With Explainable AI
    Arjun Kumar Bose Arnob, Muhammad Mostafa Monowar, Md. Abdul Hamid, M. F. Mridha
    IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society.2025; 6: 1283.     CrossRef
  • Linked color imaging versus conventional white-light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Jun Watanabe, Takeshi Kanno, Eiichi Kakehi, Kazuma Rifu, Takehiro Kagaya, Kazuhiko Kotani, Yuki Kataoka
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DBCM-net:dual backbone cascaded multi-convolutional segmentation network for medical image segmentation
    Xiuwei Wang, Biyuan Li, Jinying Ma, Lianhao Huo, Xiao Tian
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2025; 11(5): 055040.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral collaborative streams with multi-modal attention network for accurate polyp segmentation
    Rahim Khan, Nada Alzaben, Yousef Ibrahim Daradkeh, Mi Young Lee, Inam Ullah
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Vision language models versus machine learning models performance on polyp detection and classification in colonoscopy images
    Mohammad Amin Khalafi, Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini, Ameneh Salehi, Nariman Naderi, Dorsa Alijanzadeh, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Kaveh Kavousi, Negar Golestani, Shabnam Shahrokh, Soltanali Fallah, Jamil S. Samaan, Nicholas P. Tatonetti, Nicholas Hoerter, G
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of linked-color imaging endoscopy combined with CAD EYE for the detection and characterization of right-sided colon polyps
    Phuoc Huu Tran, Thi Huyen Thuong Nguyen, Van Huy Tran
    Arab Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 26(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence computer-assisted diagnosis (computer assisted-diagnosis eye function) for colorectal polyps
    Hendra Asputra, Hasan Maulahela, Achmad Fauzi, Cleopas M Rumende, Amanda Pitarini, Nina Kemala Sari, Hamzah Shatri
    Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Computer-Aided Polyps Classification from Colonoscopy Using Stacking-Based Deep Learning Model
    Shweta Gangrade, Prakash Chandra Sharma, Akhilesh Kumar Sharma, Jayesh Gangrade
    Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: A dynamic loss function for improved semantic segmentation
    Haroon Haider Khan, Majid Iqbal Khan
    Soft Computing.2024; 28(S2): 731.     CrossRef
  • Additional 30-Second Observation of the Right-Sided Colon for Missed Polyp Detection With Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Compared with Narrow Band Imaging: A Randomized Trial
    Naohisa Yoshida, Yoshikazu Inagaki, Yutaka Inada, Reo Kobayashi, Yuri Tomita, Hikaru Hashimoto, Osamu Dohi, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Takaaki Murakami, Yasutaka Morimoto, Yusuke Okuyama, Yukiko Morinaga, Yoshito Itoh
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 119(3): 539.     CrossRef
  • Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education
    Forrest Bohler, Nikhil Aggarwal, Garrett Peters, Varna Taranikanti
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation Using a Hybrid Vision Transformer and a Hybrid Loss Function
    Evgin Goceri
    Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 37(2): 851.     CrossRef
  • SAEFormer: stepwise attention emphasis transformer for polyp segmentation
    Yicai Tan, Lei Chen, Chudong Zheng, Hui Ling, Xinshan Lai
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2024; 83(30): 74833.     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation With the FCB-SwinV2 Transformer
    Kerr Fitzgerald, Jorge Bernal, Aymeric Histace, Bogdan J. Matuszewski
    IEEE Access.2024; 12: 38927.     CrossRef
  • Leveraging a realistic synthetic database to learn Shape-from-Shading for estimating the colon depth in colonoscopy images
    Josué Ruano, Martín Gómez, Eduardo Romero, Antoine Manzanera
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2024; 115: 102390.     CrossRef
  • DHAFormer: Dual-channel hybrid attention network with transformer for polyp segmentation
    Xuejie Huang, Liejun Wang, Shaochen Jiang, Lianghui Xu, Chung-Ming Lo
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0306596.     CrossRef
  • The Findings of Index Colonoscopy in Patients with Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer (PCCRC)
    Seiji Kimura
    Nihon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2024; 77(8): 457.     CrossRef
  • Detection of various gastrointestinal tract diseases through a deep learning method with ensemble ELM and explainable AI
    Md. Faysal Ahamed, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Md. Rabiul Islam, Mansura Naznine, Mohamed Arselene Ayari, Amith Khandakar, Julfikar Haider
    Expert Systems with Applications.2024; 256: 124908.     CrossRef
  • A Hessian-Based Technique for Specular Reflection Detection and Inpainting in Colonoscopy Images
    Khaled ELKarazle, Valliappan Raman, Caslon Chua, Patrick Then
    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.2024; 28(8): 4724.     CrossRef
  • Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy
    Manuel Zorzi, Lucia Calciano, Nicola Gennaro, Laura Memo, Silvia Rizzato, Carmen Stocco, Emanuele D L Urso, Silvia Negro, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Marta Sbaraglia, Stefano Guzzinati
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2024; 11(1): e001434.     CrossRef
  • The Interplay among Wnt/β-catenin Family Members in Colorectal Adenomas and Surrounding Tissues
    Domenica Lucia D’Antonio, Fabiana Fantini, Carmelo Moscatello, Alessio Ferrone, Stefano Scaringi, Rosa Valanzano, Ferdinando Ficari, Konstantinos Efthymakis, Matteo Neri, Gitana Maria Aceto, Maria Cristina Curia
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(8): 1730.     CrossRef
  • Review: Risk assessment of liver and biliary cancer mortality through detection of high risk polyps at colonoscopies
    Abeera Tariq, Fnu Hafeezullah, Abdul Basit Khan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(12): 2168.     CrossRef
  • Trivariate Joint Modeling for Family Data with Longitudinal Counts, Recurrent Events and a Terminal Event with Application to Lynch Syndrome
    Jingwei Lu, Grace Y. Yi, Denis Rustand, Patrick Parfrey, Laurent Briollais, Yun‐hee Choi
    Statistics in Medicine.2024; 43(26): 5000.     CrossRef
  • A complete benchmark for polyp detection, segmentation and classification in colonoscopy images
    Yael Tudela, Mireia Majó, Neil de la Fuente, Adrian Galdran, Adrian Krenzer, Frank Puppe, Amine Yamlahi, Thuy Nuong Tran, Bogdan J. Matuszewski, Kerr Fitzgerald, Cheng Bian, Junwen Pan, Shijle Liu, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Aymeric Histace, Jorge Bernal
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CafeNet: A Novel Multi‐Scale Context Aggregation and Multi‐Level Foreground Enhancement Network for Polyp Segmentation
    Zhanlin Ji, Xiaoyu Li, Zhiwu Wang, Haiyang Zhang, Na Yuan, Xueji Zhang, Ivan Ganchev
    International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of colonoscopic re-examination across the entire colon: a randomized controlled trial
    Dong Seok Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Tae-Geun Gweon, Myeongsook Seo, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(11): 6711.     CrossRef
  • A lighter hybrid feature fusion framework for polyp segmentation
    He Xue, Luo Yonggang, Liu Min, Li Lin
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significant Missed Polyps in the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP): A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Contributing Factors
    Anita Golash, Kevin Yoong, Ramasamy Saravanan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided tumor visualization of colorectal cancer using tumor-initiating probe yellow in preclinical models
    Sun Young Kim, Jinhyeon Kim, Hajung Kim, Young-Tae Chang, Hwa-Young Kwon, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Jin-ho Shin, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byung Ho Son, Seung-Jae Myun
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colonic Polyp Study: Differences in Adenoma Characteristics Based on Colonoscopy History over 5-Year Follow-Up Period
    Sang Hyun Park, Kwang Il Hong, Hyun Chul Park, Young Sun Kim, Gene Hyun Bok, Kyung Ho Kim, Dong Suk Shin, Jae Yong Han, Young Kwan Kim, Yeun Jong Choi, Soo Hoon Eun, Byung Hoon Lim, Kyeong Kun Kwack
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 194.     CrossRef
  • Significant Missed Polyps in Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Patients in the Cheshire Region of the UK
    A. Golash, K. Yoong, A. Murray, C. Chesters, L. Findler, R. saravanan
    Endoscopy.2024; 56(S 02): S41.     CrossRef
  • An ensemble framework of deep neural networks for colorectal polyp classification
    Farah Younas, Muhammad Usman, Wei Qi Yan
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2023; 82(12): 18925.     CrossRef
  • Effect of computer‐aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Sagar Shah, Nathan Park, Nabil El Hage Chehade, Anastasia Chahine, Marc Monachese, Amelie Tiritilli, Zain Moosvi, Ronald Ortizo, Jason Samarasena
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 38(2): 162.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of missed adenomas in deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy: A multicenter retrospective study
    Yue Sui, Yanhua Zheng, Qing Wang, Jieping Lv, Hongjin Wang, Qing Wen, Zhenzhen Wang, Guanfeng Wang, Hui Jia, Fengzhen Cao, Naping Wang, Junlian Hao, Yiping Zhang, Xiaopeng Wu, Haihua Chen, Junhui Lu, Xing Chen
    European Journal of Internal Medicine.2023; 110: 48.     CrossRef
  • A Real-Time Polyp-Detection System with Clinical Application in Colonoscopy Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
    Adrian Krenzer, Michael Banck, Kevin Makowski, Amar Hekalo, Daniel Fitting, Joel Troya, Boban Sudarevic, Wolfgang G. Zoller, Alexander Hann, Frank Puppe
    Journal of Imaging.2023; 9(2): 26.     CrossRef
  • Robust real-time polyp detection system design based on YOLO algorithms by optimizing activation functions and hyper-parameters with artificial bee colony (ABC)
    Ahmet Karaman, Ishak Pacal, Alper Basturk, Bahriye Akay, Ufuk Nalbantoglu, Seymanur Coskun, Omur Sahin, Dervis Karaboga
    Expert Systems with Applications.2023; 221: 119741.     CrossRef
  • Efficient Gastrointestinal Disease Classification Using Pretrained Deep Convolutional Neural Network
    Muhammad Nouman Noor, Muhammad Nazir, Sajid Ali Khan, Oh-Young Song, Imran Ashraf
    Electronics.2023; 12(7): 1557.     CrossRef
  • The basis and implications of diverging approaches to colorectal adenoma surveillance in the West
    Tsai‐Wing Ow, Edmund Tse, Guru Iyngkaran, Finlay Macrae
    Internal Medicine Journal.2023; 53(4): 635.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of artificial intelligence integrated fluorescence endoscopy image analysis with indocyanine green for interpretation of precancerous lesions in colon cancer
    Jinhyeon Kim, Hajung Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Sungjee Kim, Doowon Choi, Jihyun Chun, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sun Young Kim, Seung-Jae Myung,
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(5): e0286189.     CrossRef
  • Linked color imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Jun Watanabe, Takeshi Kanno, Eiichi Kakehi, Kazuma Rifu, Takehiro Kagaya, Kazuhiko Kotani, Yuki Kataoka
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improved Colorectal Polyp Segmentation Using Enhanced MA-NET and Modified Mix-ViT Transformer
    Khaled Elkarazle, Valliappan Raman, Patrick Then, Caslon Chua
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 69295.     CrossRef
  • Localization and Classification of Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders Using Explainable AI from Endoscopic Images
    Muhammad Nouman Noor, Muhammad Nazir, Sajid Ali Khan, Imran Ashraf, Oh-Young Song
    Applied Sciences.2023; 13(15): 9031.     CrossRef
  • Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection
    Xiaoli Wu, Chun-Wei Chen, Sangeeta Jaiswal, Tse-Shao Chang, Ruoliu Zhang, Michael K. Dame, Yuting Duan, Hui Jiang, Jason R. Spence, Sen-Yung Hsieh, Thomas D. Wang
    Cancers.2023; 15(19): 4795.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
    Adriel Abraham, Rejath Jose, Jawad Ahmad, Jai Joshi, Thomas Jacob, Aziz-ur-rahman Khalid, Hassam Ali, Pratik Patel, Jaspreet Singh, Milan Toma
    Journal of Imaging.2023; 9(10): 215.     CrossRef
  • Wide-field endoscope accessory for multiplexed fluorescence imaging
    Gaoming Li, Miki Lee, Tse-Shao Chang, Joonyoung Yu, Haijun Li, Xiyu Duan, Xiaoli Wu, Sangeeta Jaiswal, Shuo Feng, Kenn R. Oldham, Thomas D. Wang
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis and research on intelligent manufacturing medical product design and intelligent hospital system dynamics based on machine learning under big data
    Zongxin Liu, Jiaozi Pu
    Enterprise Information Systems.2022; 16(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Application of multimedia network english listening model based on confidence learning algorithm for speech recognition
    Yingting Zhang, Zewei Huang
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management.2022; 13(S3): 1091.     CrossRef
  • Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation
    Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo
    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.2022; 95: 102026.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic image synthesis with generative adversarial network for enhanced detection of sessile serrated lesions using convolutional neural network
    Dan Yoon, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Byeong Soo Kim, Woo Sang Cho, Jung Chan Lee, Minwoo Cho, Min Hyuk Lim, Sun Young Yang, Seon Hee Lim, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Hyun Song, Goh Eun Chung, Ji Min Choi, Hae Yeon Kang, Jung Ho Bae, Sungwan Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endo‐wing versus transparent hood‐assisted colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial
    Kazuya Miyaguchi, Yoshikazu Tsuzuki, Nobutaka Hirooka, Rie Shiomi, Hideki Ohgo, Hidetomo Nakamoto, Hiroyuki Imaeda
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(4): 766.     CrossRef
  • AI and Clinical Decision Making: The Limitations and Risks of Computational Reductionism in Bowel Cancer Screening
    Saleem Ameen, Ming-Chao Wong, Kwang-Chien Yee, Paul Turner
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(7): 3341.     CrossRef
  • BlazeNeo: Blazing Fast Polyp Segmentation and Neoplasm Detection
    Nguyen S. An, Phan N. Lan, Dao V. Hang, Dao V. Long, Tran Q. Trung, Nguyen T. Thuy, Dinh V. Sang
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 43669.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps
    Xiaobo Wang, Haiyang Guo, Yong Tang, Lin Chen, Xianfei Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial
    Jung Hun Woo, Hoon Sup Koo, Dae Sung Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Yunho Jung, Kyu Chan Huh
    Medicine.2022; 101(35): e30355.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study
    Jae Hee Han, Hyun Gun Kim, Eu Mi Ahn, Suyeon Park, Seong Ran Jeon, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Yunho Jung, Jeong Eun Shin, Hyun Deok Shin, Young-Seok Cho
    Gut and Liver.2022; 16(5): 716.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy Lifetime Systems Architecture: Scoping Out the Past to Diagnose the Future Technology
    Craig M. Browning, Robert Cloutier, Thomas C. Rich, Silas J. Leavesley
    Systems.2022; 10(5): 189.     CrossRef
  • A stacking-based artificial intelligence framework for an effective detection and localization of colon polyps
    Carina Albuquerque, Roberto Henriques, Mauro Castelli
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of water exchange method on adenoma miss rate of patients undergoing selective polypectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Gui Ren, Xiangping Wang, Hui Luo, Shaowei Yao, Shuhui Liang, Linhui Zhang, Tao Dong, Long Chen, Qin Tao, Xuegang Guo, Ying Han, Yanglin Pan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2021; 53(5): 625.     CrossRef
  • Feature Point Tracking-Based Localization of Colon Capsule Endoscope
    Jürgen Herp, Ulrik Deding, Maria M. Buijs, Rasmus Kroijer, Gunnar Baatrup, Esmaeil S. Nadimi
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors associated with missed colorectal lesions in colonoscopy and impact of colonoscopy with anesthesia on miss rate
    Haibin Dong, Yutang Ren, Bo Jiang
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Scarlet Nazarian, Ben Glover, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Julian Teare
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(7): e27370.     CrossRef
  • Focus U-Net: A novel dual attention-gated CNN for polyp segmentation during colonoscopy
    Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2021; 137: 104815.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Seung-Woo Lee, Jeong-Seon Ji, Jeong Rok Lee, Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(12): 5461.     CrossRef
  • Water Exchange (WE) and Quality Improvement—Enhanced Advanced Adenoma Detection
    Felix W. Leung, Malcolm Koo, Hui Jia, Joseph W. Leung, Sergio Cadoni, Premysl Falt, Yu-Hsi Hsieh, Chi-Tan Hu, Yanglin Pan, Franco Radaelli
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 54(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Tubular Locomotion and Positioning Using Tip Eversion for Endoscopy
    Ankit Saxena, Eric M. Pauli, Randy S. Haluck, Barry Fell, Jason Moore
    Journal of Medical Devices.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Aspects of Colorectal Adenomas: The Interplay among Microenvironment, Oxidative Stress, and Predisposition
    Gitana Maria Aceto, Teresa Catalano, Maria Cristina Curia, Qiang Tong
    BioMed Research International.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing on Colonoscopic Findings in Routine Screening Practice
    Tobias Niedermaier, Efrat L. Amitay, Anton Gies, Korbinian Weigl, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2020; 11(4): e00169.     CrossRef
  • Polyp Segmentation with Fully Convolutional Deep Neural Networks—Extended Evaluation Study
    Yunbo Guo, Jorge Bernal, Bogdan J. Matuszewski
    Journal of Imaging.2020; 6(7): 69.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review of deep learning in colon cancer
    Ishak Pacal, Dervis Karaboga, Alper Basturk, Bahriye Akay, Ufuk Nalbantoglu
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2020; 126: 104003.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence technologies for the detection of colorectal lesions: The future is now
    Simona Attardo, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Marco Spadaccini, Roberta Maselli, Harsh K Patel, Madhav Desai, Antonio Capogreco, Matteo Badalamenti, Piera Alessia Galtieri, Gaia Pellegatta, Alessandro Fugazza, Silvia Carrara, Andrea Anderloni, Piet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(37): 5606.     CrossRef
  • Training a computer-aided polyp detection system to detect sessile serrated adenomas using public domain colonoscopy videos
    Taibo Li, Jeremy R. Glissen Brown, Kelovoulos Tsourides, Nadim Mahmud, Jonah M. Cohen, Tyler M. Berzin
    Endoscopy International Open.2020; 08(10): E1448.     CrossRef
  • PICCOLO White-Light and Narrow-Band Imaging Colonoscopic Dataset: A Performance Comparative of Models and Datasets
    Luisa F. Sánchez-Peralta, J. Blas Pagador, Artzai Picón, Ángel José Calderón, Francisco Polo, Nagore Andraka, Roberto Bilbao, Ben Glover, Cristina L. Saratxaga, Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo
    Applied Sciences.2020; 10(23): 8501.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations
    Hiroyuki Tamaki, Teruyo Noda, Masahiro Morita, Akina Omura, Atsushi Kubo, Chikara Ogawa, Toshihiro Matsunaka, Mitsushige Shibatoge
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal endoscopic system based on multispectral and photometric stereo imaging and analysis
    Jihun Kim, Hasan Al Faruque, Sewoong Kim, Eunjoo Kim, Jae Youn Hwang
    Biomedical Optics Express.2019; 10(5): 2289.     CrossRef
  • Blue Laser Imaging, Blue Light Imaging, and Linked Color Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Tumors
    Naohisa Yoshida, Osamu Dohi, Ken Inoue, Ritsu Yasuda, Takaaki Murakami, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Yuji Naito, Yutaka Inada, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Rafiz Abdul Rani, Yoshito Itoh
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(2): 140.     CrossRef
  • Application of OCT in the Gastrointestinal Tract
    Nicholas S. Samel, Hiroshi Mashimo
    Applied Sciences.2019; 9(15): 2991.     CrossRef
  • Near-Infrared Fluorescent Activated Polymeric Probe for Imaging Intraluminal Colorectal Cancer Tumors
    Eva Kopansky-Groisman, Inga Kogan-Zviagin, Osnat Sella-Tavor, Mor Oron-Herman, Ayelet David
    Biomacromolecules.2019; 20(9): 3547.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study
    Ji Young Chang, Chang Mo Moon, Hyun Jung Lee, Hyo-Joon Yang, Yunho Jung, Sang Wook Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Frank T. Kolligs
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(4): e0195709.     CrossRef
  • Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal
    Peel Jung, Su B. Park, Hyung W. Kim, Dae H. Kang, Cheol W. Choi, Su J. Kim, Hyeong S. Nam, Dae G. Ryu, Joung B. Hong, Dong J. Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(25): e11253.     CrossRef
  • Dielectric properties of colon polyps, cancer, and normal mucosa: Ex vivo measurements from 0.5 to 20 GHz
    Marta Guardiola, Santiago Buitrago, Glòria Fernández‐Esparrach, Joan M. O'Callaghan, Jordi Romeu, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Henry Córdova, Miguel Ángel González Ballester, Oscar Camara
    Medical Physics.2018; 45(8): 3768.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study
    Naohisa Yoshida, Ken Inoue, Ritsu Yasuda, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yuji Naito, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Rafiz Abdul Rani, Yoshito Itoh
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2018; 63(12): 3457.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Additional Thirty Seconds Observation with Linked Color Imaging Improves Detection of Missed Polyps in the Right-Sided Colon
    Naohisa Yoshida, Yutaka Inada, Ritsu Yasuda, Takaaki Murakami, Ryohei Hirose, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Yuji Naito, Kiyoshi Ogiso, Yukiko Morinaga, Mitsuo Kishimoto, Eiichi Konishi, Yoshito Itoh
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Imaging of Colorectal Tumors by Targeting Colon Cancer Secreted Protein-2 (CCSP-2)
    Jaeil Kim, Eun-ju Do, Helen Moinova, Sang Mun Bae, Ja Young Kang, Seung-Mo Hong, Stephen P. Fink, Jinmyoung Joo, Young-Ah Suh, Se Jin Jang, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Jaewon Choe, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sanfo
    Neoplasia.2017; 19(10): 805.     CrossRef
  • 16,480 View
  • 123 Download
  • 119 Web of Science
  • 107 Crossref
Close layer
Colonic dysmotility and morphological abnormality frequently detected in Japanese patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Takeshi Mizukami, Shinya Sugimoto, Tatsuhiro Masaoka, Hidekazu Suzuki, Takanori Kanai
Intest Res 2017;15(2):236-243.   Published online April 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.236
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Colonoscopy and computed tomography (CT) are used primarily to exclude organic diseases in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), rather than to assess the pathophysiology of IBS. We aimed to evaluate colonic dysmotility and morphology in Japanese patients with IBS.

Methods

One hundred eighty-four patients with IBS and 49 asymptomatic controls who underwent colonoscopy in combination with CT colonography or barium enema were retrospectively reviewed between 2008 and 2012. Water-aided colonoscopy was performed without sedation by a single endoscopist. The duration and pattern of colonic movement and cecal intubation time were recorded. To assess colonic morphology, barium enema or CT colonography were performed immediately after colonoscopy.

Results

Colonic dysmotility was more frequent in the IBS group (28.8% vs. 2.0% in controls, P<0.001), especially in cases of IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D) (IBS with constipation [IBS-C] 28.8% vs. IBS-D 60.0% vs. mixed IBS [IBS-M] 5.1%, P<0.001). Colonic morphological abnormality was more frequent in the IBS group than in the control group (77.7% vs. 24.5%, P<0.001), especially in IBS-M and IBS-C groups (IBS-C 77.5% vs. IBS-D 48.9% vs. IBS-M 100%, P<0.001). Most patients with IBS with colonic dysmotility had experienced stress related to their symptoms. Cecal intubation time was significantly longer in the IBS group than in the control group (12.1±6.9 minutes vs. 4.6±1.9 minutes, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Unsedated colonoscopy, combined with radiographic findings, can detect colonic dysmotility and morphological abnormality. Technical difficulties observed during cecal intubation may partially explain the pathophysiology of IBS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ultrasound Imaging Equipment for Evaluating Chronic Constipation in Home Healthcare: A Review Article
    Yohei Okawa
    Gastrointestinal Disorders.2025; 7(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Glycicumarin and Isoliquiritigenin in Suppressing Colonic Peristalsis in Both an Animal Model and a Clinical Trial
    Reo Kobayashi, Ken Inoue, Satoshi Sugino, Ryohei Hirose, Toshifumi Doi, Akihito Harusato, Osamu Dohi, Naohisa Yoshida, Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomohisa Takagi, Hideyuki Konishi, Yasuko Hirai, Katsura Mizushima, Yuji Naito, Yoshito Itoh
    Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin.2024; 47(2): 373.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Ability of Ultrasonography Compared with Computed Tomography for Assessing Rectal Feces
    Noboru Misawa, Masaru Matsumoto, Momoko Tsuda, Shigeki Tamura, Tsutomu Yoshihara, Keiichi Ashikari, Takaomi Kessoku, Hidenori Ohkubo, Takuma Higurashi, Hiromi Sanada, Mototsugu Kato, Atsushi Nakajima
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Chronic Constipation 2023
    Eikichi Ihara, Noriaki Manabe, Hidenori Ohkubo, Naotaka Ogasawara, Haruei Ogino, Kazuki Kakimoto, Motoyori Kanazawa, Hidejiro Kawahara, Chika Kusano, Shiko Kuribayashi, Akinari Sawada, Tomohisa Takagi, Shota Takano, Toshihiko Tomita, Toshihiro Noake, Mari
    Digestion.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • The effect of alverine citrate plus simethicone (Meteospazmyl ) on effectiveness and tolerability of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    S.V. Kashin, D.V. Zavyalov, A.V. Sidneva
    Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology.2023; 12(2): 34.     CrossRef
  • Current Management of Chronic Constipation in Japan
    Tatsuhiro Masaoka
    The Keio Journal of Medicine.2023; 72(4): 95.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for irritable bowel syndrome 2020
    Shin Fukudo, Toshikatsu Okumura, Masahiko Inamori, Yusuke Okuyama, Motoyori Kanazawa, Takeshi Kamiya, Ken Sato, Akiko Shiotani, Yuji Naito, Yoshiko Fujikawa, Ryota Hokari, Tastuhiro Masaoka, Kazuma Fujimoto, Hiroshi Kaneko, Akira Torii, Kei Matsueda, Hiro
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(3): 193.     CrossRef
  • NUTRITIONAL STATUS, QUALITY OF LIFE AND LIFE HABITS OF WOMEN WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    Ana Paula Monteiro de MENDONÇA, Luciana Miyuki YAMASHITA, Esther Dantas SILVA, Isabela SOLAR, Larissa Ariel Oliveira SANTOS, Ana Carolina Junqueira VASQUES
    Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2020; 57(2): 114.     CrossRef
  • 37,570 View
  • 103 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
Jeong-Mi Lee, Wan Soo Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Sung-Wook Hwang, Dong-Hoon Yang, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Intest Res 2017;15(2):221-227.   Published online April 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

The clinical course after endoscopic management of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been clearly determined. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after endoscopic hemostasis of DPPB and evaluate risk factors for rebleeding after initial hemostasis.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 198 patients who developed DPPB and underwent endoscopic hemostasis between January 2010 and February 2015. The performance of endoscopic hemostasis was assessed. Rebleeding negative and positive patients were compared.

Results

DPPB developed 1.4±1.6 days after colonoscopic polypectomy. All patients achieved initial hemostasis. Clipping was the most commonly used technique. Of 198 DPPB patients, 15 (7.6%) had rebleeding 3.3±2.5 days after initial hemostasis. The number of clips required for hemostasis was higher in the rebleeding positive group (3.2±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.9, P=0.047). Combinations of clipping with other modalities such as injection methods were more common in the rebleeding positive group (67/291, 23.0% vs. 12/17, 70.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a large number of clips and combination therapy were independent risk factors for rebleeding. All the rebleeding cases were successfully managed by repeat endoscopic hemostasis.

Conclusions

Endoscopic hemostasis is effective for the management of DPPB because of its high initial hemostasis rate and low rebleeding rate. Endoscopists should carefully observe patients in whom a large number of clips and/or combination therapy have been used to manage DPPB because these may be related to the severity of DPPB and a higher risk of rebleeding.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Delphi consensus statement for the management of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding
    Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Sandra Pérez de la Iglesia, Diego de Frutos, José Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Carolina Mangas-SanJuan, Raúl Honrubia López, Hugo Uchima, Marta Aicart-Ramos, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Gandía, Eduardo Valdivielso Cortázar, Felipe Ramos
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon
    Hisham Wehbe, Aditya Gutta, Mark A. Gromski
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2024; 34(2): 363.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Clips to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Clinical Review
    Matthew A. O’Mara, Peter G. Emanuel, Aaron Tabibzadeh, Robert J. Duve, Jonathan S. Galati, Gregory Laynor, Samantha Gross, Seth A. Gross
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(8): 739.     CrossRef
  • Is endoscopic hemostasis safe and effective for delayed post-polypectomy bleeding?
    Jae-Yong Cho, Yunho Jung, Han Hee Lee, Jung-Wook Kim, Kee Myung Lee, Hyun Lim, Geun-Hyuk Choi, Seong Woo Choi, Bo-In Lee
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2024; 13(4): 122.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of delayed bleeding after polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: two or more clips may be safe
    Xue-Feng Guo, Xiang-An Yu, Jian-Cong Hu, De-Zheng Lin, Jia-Xin Deng, Ming-Li Su, Juan Li, Wei Liu, Jia-Wei Zhang, Qing-Hua Zhong
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management and Outcomes of Bleeding Within 30 Days of Colonic Polypectomy in a Large, Real-Life, Multicenter Cohort Study
    Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Maria Hernández-Tejero, Liseth Rivero-Sánchez, Oswaldo Ortiz, Irene García de la Filia-Molina, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Hector Miguel Marcos Prieto, Maria García-Prada, Almudena González-Cotorruelo, Miguel Angel De Jorge Tu
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 19(4): 732.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Features of Re-Colonoscopy after Bleeding after Intestinal Polypectomy
    慧敏 翟
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2021; 11(11): 5151.     CrossRef
  • Systematic literature review of learning curves for colorectal polyp resection techniques in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
    A. Rajendran, S. Pannick, S. Thomas‐Gibson, S. Oke, C. Anele, N. Sevdalis, A. Haycock
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(9): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy
    Hosim Soh, Jaeyoung Chun, Seung Wook Hong, Seona Park, Yun Bin Lee, Hyun Jung Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jong Pil Im, Yoon Jun Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
    Gut and Liver.2020; 14(6): 755.     CrossRef
  • Post-polypectomy Visible Vessel
    Matthew Woo, Robert Bechara
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2018; 1(2): 51.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive review of outcomes of endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2018; 7(3): 123.     CrossRef
  • 7,931 View
  • 74 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical outcomes of sigmoid colon volvulus: identification of the factors associated with successful endoscopic detorsion
Tomoya Iida, Suguru Nakagaki, Shuji Satoh, Haruo Shimizu, Hiroyuki Kaneto, Hiroshi Nakase
Intest Res 2017;15(2):215-220.   Published online April 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.215
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Although multiple treatment options exist for the management of sigmoid colon volvulus, no study has examined the factors associated with successful endoscopic detorsion. This study aimed to examine the clinical course of patients with sigmoid colon volvulus and to identify factors related to successful endoscopic detorsion.

Methods

This study included 30 cases (21 patients) of sigmoid volvulus from among 545 cases of intestinal obstruction at a single center. We retrospectively examined the clinical course and the factors associated with the possibility of endoscopic detorsion of sigmoid colon volvulus.

Results

The rate of laxative use among the study participants was 76.2%; the rate of comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders was 61.9%; and 57.1% of patients had a history of open abdominal surgery. All patients were initially treated with endoscopic detorsion, and this procedure had a 61.9% success rate. The recurrence rate after detorsion was as high as 46.2%, but detorsion during revision endoscopy was possible in all cases. Statistical analysis revealed that the absence of abdominal tenderness (P=0.027), the use of laxatives (P=0.027), and a history of open abdominal surgery (P=0.032) were factors predictive of successful endoscopic detorsion.

Conclusions

The results of our study are consistent with previous reports with respect to the success rate of endoscopic detorsion, the subsequent recurrence rate, and the proportion of patients requiring surgical treatment. In addition, we identified the absence of abdominal tenderness, the use of laxatives, and history of open abdominal surgery as factors predicting successful endoscopic detorsion of sigmoid colon volvulus.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Epidemiology and Recurrence of Sigmoid Volvulus: Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data in Japan
    Masaaki Yamada, Michikazu Sekine, Haruka Fujinami, Yuchi Motofuji, Eiji Shinno
    DEN Open.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating Racial Disparities in 30-day Outcomes for African Americans Following Colectomy for Volvulus
    Renxi Li, Susan Kartiko
    The American Surgeon™.2025; 91(2): 266.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the timing of endoscopic detorsion on clinical outcomes in patients with sigmoid volvulus
    Refael Aminov, Anton Bermont, Vered Richter, Haim Shirin, Daniel L. Cohen
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 102(2): 254.     CrossRef
  • Should we adopt a “laparoscopy first” strategy? A comparison of 30-day outcomes between converted open from laparoscopic and planned open colectomy for volvulus
    Renxi Li
    Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(3): 749.     CrossRef
  • Two decades of endoscopic detorsion in sigmoid volvulus: prognostic factors for failure
    Thanat Tantinam, Suradet Buakhrun, Punnawat Chandrachamnong, Kullawat Bhatanaprabhabhan, Rangsima Thiengthiantham, Pawit Sutharat, Suwan Sanmee, Ekkarin Supatrakul, Boonchai Ngamsirimas, Nataphon Santrakul
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(9): 5689.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcome of patients treated with endoscopic decompression after failure of detorsion for uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus
    Dai Nakamatsu, Tsutomu Nishida, Aya Sugimoto, Kengo Matsumoto, Masashi Yamamoto
    DEN Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Percutaneous Endoscopic Sigmoidopexy: Still a Way to Go”
    Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 31(3): 151.     CrossRef
  • Dependent functional status is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality and morbidities following colectomy for volvulus: An ACS-NSQIP study from the United States
    Renxi Li
    Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2024; 48(7): 102391.     CrossRef
  • Sigmoid volvulus as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in the pediatric population: case series and literature review
    Isabel C. Brito Rojas, Mayra A. Hernández Peñuela, Vanessa Medina Gaviria, Martin La Rotta, John M. Escobar Echeverri
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Decompression Tube Placement for Treatment of Sigmoid Volvulus
    Sakurako Hattori, Osamu Aramaki, Yoshihiro Watanabe, Tomohisa Kamo, Tadashi Furihata, Takafumi Ushiku, Ryuugaku Kaneshiro, Yuichi Kasakura, Isao Murayama, Hiroharu Yamashita, Yukiyasu Okamura
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(4): 305.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Decompression of Sigmoid Volvulus: Review of 748 Patients
    Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2022; 32(7): 763.     CrossRef
  • Initial Computed Tomography Findings of Long and Distended Colon Are Risk Factors for the Recurrence of Sigmoid Volvulus
    Ryusaku Kusunoki, Hirofumi Fujishiro, Tatsuya Miyake, Shinsuke Suemitsu, Masatoshi Kataoka, Aya Fujiwara, Kosuke Tsukano, Satoshi Kotani, Satoshi Yamanouchi, Masahito Aimi, Masaki Tanaka, Youichi Miyaoka, Naruaki Kohge, Tomonori Imaoka, Kouji Yuasa, Kouji
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(4): 1162.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors affecting failure of colonoscopic detorsion for sigmoid colon volvulus: a single center experience
    Ahmet Surek, Cevher Akarsu, Eyup Gemici, Sina Ferahman, Ahmet Cem Dural, Mehmet Abdussamet Bozkurt, Turgut Donmez, Mehmet Karabulut, Halil Alis
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(6): 1221.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery
    Andrew S. Miller, Kathryn Boyce, Benjamin Box, Matthew D. Clarke, Sarah E. Duff, Niamh M. Foley, Richard J. Guy, Lisa H. Massey, George Ramsay, Dominic A. J. Slade, James A. Stephenson, Phil J. Tozer, Danette Wright
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 476.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Detorsion for Early Postoperative Roux Limb Torsion after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Nobuyuki Sakurazawa, Hiroki Arai, Tomohiko Yasuda, Komei Kuge, Shou Kuriyama, Hideyuki Suzuki, Hiroshi Yoshida
    Journal of Nippon Medical School.2021; 88(6): 544.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality After Surgery for Sigmoid Volvulus
    Anthony Easterday, Sarah Aurit, Rebecca Driessen, Austin Person, Devi Mukkai Krishnamurty
    Journal of Surgical Research.2020; 245: 119.     CrossRef
  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction and colonic volvulus
    Mariam Naveed, Laith H. Jamil, Larissa L. Fujii-Lau, Mohammad Al-Haddad, James L. Buxbaum, Douglas S. Fishman, Terry L. Jue, Joanna K. Law, Jeffrey K. Lee, Bashar J. Qumseya, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Nirav Thosani, Andrew C. Storm, Audrey H. Calderwood, Mouen
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(2): 228.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Decompression of Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus in Pregnancy
    Nathaly Cortez, Manuel Berzosa, Kiranmayi Muddasani, Kfir Ben-David
    Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Management of Sigmoid Volvulus in a Debilitated Population: What Relevance?
    Manuel Coelho da Rocha, Tiago Capela, Mário Jorge Silva, Gonçalo Ramos, João Coimbra
    GE - Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 27(3): 160.     CrossRef
  • Author's Reply
    Tomoya Iida, Hiroyuki Kaneto, Hiroshi Nakase
    Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 554.     CrossRef
  • Comments on clinical outcomes of sigmoid colon volvulus: identification of the factors associated with successful endoscopic detorsion
    Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
    Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 552.     CrossRef
  • 10,022 View
  • 121 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease
Fumihito Hirai
Intest Res 2017;15(2):166-173.   Published online April 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.166
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD) has been raised to the achievement of mucosal healing. Although effective treatments that target cytokines and other molecules has been widely used for CD, intestinal strictures are still a major cause of surgery. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is known to be an effective and safe intervention for intestinal strictures in CD. Since frequent intestinal resection often results in short bowel syndrome and can decrease the quality of life, EBD can help avoid surgery. EBD with a conventional colonoscope for Crohn's strictures of the colon and ileo-colonic anastomosis has established efficacy and safety. In addition, EBD using balloon-assisted enteroscopy has recently been applied for small bowel Crohn's strictures. Although the evidence is not strong, EBD may become an alternative to surgery in small bowel strictures in CD. EBD and other new methods such as self-expanding stent implantation for Crohn's strictures may be useful and safe; however, it is important to address several issues regarding these interventions and to establish a protocol for combined therapies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Safety and effectiveness of additional triamcinolone acetonide with endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: A pilot study
    Rintaro Moroi, Kotaro Nochioka, Satoshi Miyata, Hideya Iwaki, Hirofumi Chiba, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
    DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic radial incision and cutting using balloon-assisted enteroscopy for small intestinal stenosis related to Crohn’s disease: a pilot study
    Rintaro Moroi, Kotaro Nochioka, Satoshi Miyata, Hideya Iwaki, Hirofumi Chiba, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
    Intestinal Research.2025; 23(3): 302.     CrossRef
  • Enteroscopic Balloon Dilation in Small Bowel Stricturing Crohn’s Disease: Long‐Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Surgery in a Single‐Center Prospective Observational Study
    Sung Noh Hong, Ji Eun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2025; 13(6): 958.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of endoscopic restenosis after endoscopic balloon dilation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a machine learning approach
    Tao Su, Yi Lu, Nan Lan, Hongzhen Wu, Luying Wu, Min Zhang, Xiaoling Wang, Jiachen Sun, Jiayin Yao, Min Zhi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(6): 3896.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Budesonide after Endoscopic Balloon Dilation in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Intervention Study
    Yuriko Otake-Kasamoto, Takeo Yoshihara, Shinichiro Shinzaki, Takuya Yamada, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Yuko Sakakibara, Satoshi Hiyama, Yuri Tsujii, Akiko Asakura, Taku Tashiro, Takahiro Amano, Mizuki Tani, Ryotaro Uema, Yoshiki Tsujii, Takahiro Inoue, Hideki Iijima
    Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2025; 10(1): 254.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a national analysis
    Russyan Mark Mabeza, Amulya Vadlakonda, Nikhil Chervu, Shayan Ebrahimian, Sara Sakowitz, Amy Yetasook, Peyman Benharash
    Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases.2024; 20(2): 146.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Stricturotomy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fouad Jaber, Laith Numan, Mohammed Ayyad, Mohamed Abuelazm, Muhammad Imran, Majd M. AlBarakat, Aya M. Aboutaleb, Ubaid Khan, Saqr Alsakarneh, Mohammad Bilal
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(11): 4152.     CrossRef
  • Advanced Techniques in Therapeutic and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colonoscopy
    Alexander Worix, Rajesh N. Keswani
    Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2024; 53(4): 587.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Crohn’s Disease–Related Strictures: A Nationwide Claim Database Analysis in Japan
    Rintaro Moroi, Kunio Tarasawa, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Shin Hamada, Yoichi Kakuta, Kiyohide Fushimi, Kenji Fujimori, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune, Eiji Sakai
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoskopische und chirurgische Behandlung intestinaler Stenosen im Zusammenhang mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen
    Tabea Pfister, Jonas Zbinden, Benjamin Misselwitz, Emanuel Burri, Florian Rieder, Lukas Brügger, Reiner Wiest
    Schweizer Gastroenterologie.2024; 5(4): 103.     CrossRef
  • Factors associated with the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatation of symptomatic strictures in Crohn’s disease: a retrospective cohort study
    Pierre Dandoy, Edouard Louis, Pierrette Gast, Maxime Poncin, Laurence Seidel, Jean-Philippe Loly
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(6): 671.     CrossRef
  • Approach to Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Pediatric Stricturing Crohn Disease
    Oren Ledder, Matjaž Homan, Raoul Furlano, Alexandra Papadopoulou, Salvatore Oliva, Jorge Amil Dias, Luigi Dall’oglio, Simona Faraci, Priya Narula, Dominique Schluckebier, Bruno Hauser, Andreia Nita, Claudio Romano, Christos Tzivinikos, Patrick Bontems, Mi
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2023; 76(6): 799.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Configuration and Temporary Diverting Ileostomy Do Not Increase Risk of Anastomotic Stricture in Postoperative Crohn's Disease
    Salam P. Bachour, Muhammad Z. Khan, Ravi S. Shah, Abel Joseph, Hareem Syed, Adel Hajj Ali, Florian Rieder, Stefan D. Holubar, Edward L. Barnes, Jordan Axelrad, Miguel Regueiro, Benjamin L. Cohen, Benjamin H. Click
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2212.     CrossRef
  • Novel deformable self-assembled magnetic anastomosis ring for endoscopic treatment of colonic stenosis via natural orifice
    Miao-Miao Zhang, Guang-Bin Zhao, Han-Zhi Zhang, Shu-Qin Xu, Ai-Hua Shi, Jian-Qi Mao, Jing-Ci Gai, Yu-Han Zhang, Jia Ma, Yun Li, Yi Lyu, Xiao-Peng Yan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(33): 5005.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic compression anastomosis for sigmoid stenosis treatment: A case report
    Miao-Miao Zhang, Yi Gao, Xiao-Yang Ren, Huan-Chen Sha, Yi Lyu, Fang-Fang Dong, Xiao-Peng Yan
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(12): 745.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Clinical Trial to Study the Safety of Triamcinolone after Endoscopic Radial Incision and Cutting Dilatation for Benign Stenosis of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract: A Study Protocol
    RINTARO MOROI, HISASHI SHIGA, KOTARO NOCHIOKA, HIROFUMI CHIBA, YUSUKE SHIMOYAMA, MOTOYUKI ONODERA, TAKEO NAITO, MASAKI TOSA, YOICHI KAKUTA, YUICHIRO SATO, SHOICHI KAYABA, SEICHI TAKAHASHI, SATOSHI MIYATA, YOSHITAKA KINOUCHI, ATSUSHI MASAMUNE
    The Kurume Medical Journal.2023; 70(1.2): 53.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Fluoroscopy for Endoscopic Balloon Dilation of Crohn’s Disease-Related Strictures
    Hyun Seok Lee, Michael V. Chiorean, Elisa Boden, James Lord, Shayan Irani, Richard Kozarek, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(4): 1295.     CrossRef
  • Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation for intestinal strictures in patients with Crohn's disease during maintenance treatment with anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha antibodies
    Teruyuki Takeda, Masahiro Kishi, Noritaka Takatsu, Yasumichi Takada, Tsuyoshi Beppu, Masaki Miyaoka, Takashi Hisabe, Toshiharu Ueki, Hisatomi Arima, Fumihito Hirai, Kenshi Yao
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 517.     CrossRef
  • A pilot study investigating the safety and feasibility of endoscopic dilation using a radial incision and cutting technique for benign strictures of the small intestine: a study protocol
    Rintaro Moroi, Hisashi Shiga, Kotaro Nochioka, Yusuke Shimoyama, Masatake Kuroha, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: An investigation of novel endoscopic treatment in multicenter trial
    Rintaro Moroi, Hisashi Shiga, Kotaro Nochioka, Hirofumi Chiba, Yusuke Shimoyama, Masatake Kuroha, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(8): 1554.     CrossRef
  • Guidelines for endoscopic balloon dilation in treating Crohn's disease‐associated small intestinal strictures (supplement to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enteroscopy)
    Hironori Yamamoto, Tomonori Yano, Akihiro Araki, Motohiro Esaki, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Naoki Ohmiya, Shiro Oka, Hiroshi Nakase, Shigeki Bamba, Fumihito Hirai, Naoki Hosoe, Tomoki Matsuda, Keigo Mitsui, Kenji Watanabe, Haruhiko Ogata, Shinichi Katsuki, Takayuki M
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(7): 1278.     CrossRef
  • Managing Stricturing Crohn's Disease: Resect? Strictureplasty? Dilate?
    Lea Lowenfeld, Fabrizio Michelassi
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2021; 31(8): 881.     CrossRef
  • Crohn’s disease at radiological imaging: focus on techniques and intestinal tract
    Giuseppe Cicero, Silvio Mazziotti
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(4): 365.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the endoscopic treatment with topical prednisolone administration for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease
    Yaroslav Feleshtynskiy, Anna Mylianovska, Volodymyr Pirogovsky, Olena Dyadyk
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2021; 94(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Objective evaluation for treat to target in Crohn’s disease
    Kento Takenaka, Yoshio Kitazume, Toshimitsu Fujii, Kiichiro Tsuchiya, Mamoru Watanabe, Kazuo Ohtsuka
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 55(6): 579.     CrossRef
  • Strictures in Crohn’s Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment
    Mattia Crespi, Pietro Dulbecco, Antonella De Ceglie, Massimo Conio
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(7): 1904.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Capsule Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease
    Teppei Omori, Takayuki Matsumoto, Toshifumi Hara, Harutaka Kambayashi, Shun Murasugi, Ayumi Ito, Maria Yonezawa, Shinichi Nakamura, Katsutoshi Tokushige
    Crohn's & Colitis 360.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation between age of onset and gastrointestinal stenosis in hospitalized patients with Crohn's disease
    Shan-Bing Yang, Shu-Wen Du, Ji-Heng Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(13): 2769.     CrossRef
  • Strictures in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
    Jason Reinglas, Talat Bessissow
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2019; 29(3): 549.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic management of Crohn’s strictures
    Talat Bessissow, Jason Reinglas, Achuthan Aruljothy, Peter L Lakatos, Gert Van Assche
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(17): 1859.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Crohn’s Disease-Associated Strictures
    Thomas Klag, Jan Wehkamp, Martin Goetz
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(5): 429.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: advances in disease management
    Elizabeth A. Scoville, David A. Schwartz
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 86(6): 952.     CrossRef
  • 12,917 View
  • 117 Download
  • 31 Web of Science
  • 32 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase as a marker in colon carcinogenesis: analysis of the prostaglandin pathway in human colonic tissue
Dong-Hoon Yang, Yeon-Mi Ryu, Sun-Mi Lee, Jin-Yong Jeong, Soon Man Yoon, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Suk-Kyun Yang, Seung-Jae Myung
Intest Res 2017;15(1):75-82.   Published online January 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.75
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGEs-1) regulate prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) expression and are involved in colon carcinogenesis. We investigated the expression of PGE2 and its regulating genes in sporadic human colon tumors and matched normal tissues.

Methods

Twenty colonic adenomas and 27 colonic adenocarcinomas were evaluated. COX-2 and 15-PGDH expression was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression of PGE2 and mPGEs-1 was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting, respectively.

Results

The expression of COX-2, mPGEs-1, and PGE2 did not differ between the adenomas and matched distant normal tissues. 15-PGDH expression was lower in adenomas than in the matched normal colonic tissues (P<0.001). In adenocarcinomas, mPGEs-1 and PGE2 expression was significantly higher (P<0.001 and P=0.020, respectively), and COX-2 expression did not differ from that in normal tissues (P=0.207). 15-PGDH expression was significantly lower in the normal colonic mucosa from adenocarcinoma patients than in the normal mucosa from adenoma patients (P=0.018).

Conclusions

Early inactivation of 15-PGDH, followed by activation of COX-2 and mPGEs-1, contributes to PGE2 production, leading to colon carcinogenesis. 15-PGDH might be a novel candidate marker for early detection of field defects in colon carcinogenesis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Plant-derived extracts or compounds for Helicobacter-associated gastritis: a systematic review of their anti-Helicobacter activity and anti-inflammatory effect in animal experiments
    Danni Chen, Wenlai Wang, Xiangyun Chen, Ning Liang, Jiawang Li, Wei Ding, Hongrui Zhang, Zhen Yang, Hongxia Zhao, Zhenhong Liu
    Chinese Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 for chemoprevention of inflammation-associated intestinal carcinogenesis: An update
    Kyung-Soo Chun, Eun-Hee Kim, Do-Hee Kim, Na-Young Song, Wonki Kim, Hye-Kyung Na, Young-Joon Surh
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2024; 228: 116259.     CrossRef
  • Dietary intake of walnut prevented Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric cancer through rejuvenation of chronic atrophic gastritis
    Jong Min Park, Young Min Han, Yong Jin Park, Ki Baik Hahm
    Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition.2021; 68(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Targets in Precision Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer: An Update from Pre-Clinical to Clinical Trials
    Nagendra S. Yarla, Venkateshwar Madka, Gopal Pathuri, Chinthalapally V. Rao
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(24): 9609.     CrossRef
  • A glance at…antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties of dietary cobalt
    Michael J. Glade, Michael M. Meguid
    Nutrition.2018; 46: 62.     CrossRef
  • The prostanoid pathway contains potential prognostic markers for glioblastoma
    Alexandros Theodoros Panagopoulos, Renata Nascimento Gomes, Fernando Gonçalves Almeida, Felipe da Costa Souza, José Carlos Esteves Veiga, Anna Nicolaou, Alison Colquhoun
    Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators.2018; 137: 52.     CrossRef
  • 7,371 View
  • 57 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Crohn's disease with ankylosing spondylitis in an adolescent patient who had undergone long ileo-colonic anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease as an infant
Ha Yeon Kim, Tae Wook Kim
Intest Res 2017;15(1):133-137.   Published online January 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.133
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, idiopathic, inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. In rare cases, CD has been associated with Hirschsprung's disease (HD); however, the underlying pathophysiology of this and other comorbidities is not yet fully understood. In this report, we describe the case of a 17-year-old patient who was diagnosed with both CD and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), having undergone a long ileo-colonic anastomosis to treat HD at 12 months of age. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of CD combined with AS in a patient with HD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Frequency and Characteristics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pediatric Patients with Hirschsprung's Disease: A Case-Control Study
    Naghi Dara, Niloofar Ziba, Leily Mohajerzadeh, Yasaman Zarinfar, Arshia Dara, Amirhossein Hosseini, Saleheh Tajalli, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, Mohammadreza Esmaeili Dooki, Mahmoud Hajipour, Farid Imanzadeh
    Gastroenterology & Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Crohn’s disease in patients with Hirschsprung disease and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: A review
    Victoria A. Glushkova, Aleksey V. Podkamenev, Tatyana V. Gabrusskaya
    Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care.2024; 14(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • Transcriptome profiling of intact bowel wall reveals that PDE1A and SEMA3D are possible markers with roles in enteric smooth muscle apoptosis, proliferative disorders, and dysautonomia in Crohn’s disease
    Yun Yang, Lin Xia, Wenming Yang, Ziqiang Wang, Wenjian Meng, Mingming Zhang, Qin Ma, Junhe Gou, Junjian Wang, Ye Shu, Xiaoting Wu
    Frontiers in Genetics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A unicentric cross-sectional observational study on chronic intestinal inflammation in total colonic aganglionosis: beware of an underestimated condition
    M Erculiani, F Poluzzi, G Mottadelli, E Felici, Novi ML, M Caraccia, A Grandi, S Casella, L Giacometti, G Montobbio, I Ceccherini, E Di Marco, C Bonaretti, R Biassoni, M Squillario, A Pietrantoni, V Villanacci, A Pini Prato
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics and validation of diagnosis in individuals with Hirschsprung disease and inflammatory bowel disease
    Anna Löf Granström, Jonas F Ludvigsson, Tomas Wester
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2021; 56(10): 1799.     CrossRef
  • Crohn-Like Colitis in a Young Boy With Hirschsprung Disease
    Alessandra Verde, Angelina Grammegna, Emma Petrone, Augusto Mastrominico, Daniele De Brasi, Claudia Mandato, Giusy Ranucci, Maria Simona Sabbatino, Michelina Sibilio, Paolo Quitadamo
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2021; 27(9): e112.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory bowel disease in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    H. Nakamura, T. Lim, P. Puri
    Pediatric Surgery International.2018; 34(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Increased Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Population‐based Cohort Study of Patients With Hirschsprung Disease
    Anna Löf Granström, Leila Amin, Henrik Arnell, Tomas Wester
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2018; 66(3): 398.     CrossRef
  • 7,310 View
  • 70 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Original Articles
Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?
Jung Lok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hye Min Lee, Jung Won Jeon, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee, Dong Il Park
Intest Res 2017;15(1):109-117.   Published online January 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Western surveillance strategies cannot be directly adapted to the Korean population. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of metachronous neoplasia and the optimal surveillance interval in the Korean population.

Methods

Clinical and pathological data from index colonoscopy performed between June 2006 and July 2008 and who had surveillance colonoscopies up to May 2015 were compared between low- and high-risk adenoma (LRA and HRA) groups. The 3- and 5-year cumulative risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia in both groups were compared.

Results

Among 895 eligible patients, surveillance colonoscopy was performed in 399 (44.6%). Most (83.3%) patients with LRA had a surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years and 70.2% of patients with HRA had a surveillance colonoscopy within 3 years. The cumulative risk of metachronous advanced adenoma was 3.2% within 5 years in the LRA group and only 1.7% within 3 years in the HRA group. The risk of metachronous neoplasia was similar between the surveillance interval of <5 and ≥5 years in the LRA group; however, it was slightly higher at surveillance interval of ≥3 than <3 years in the HRA group (9.4% vs. 2.4%). In multivariate analysis, age and the ≥3-year surveillance interval were significant independent risk factors for metachronous advanced adenoma (P=0.024 and P=0.030, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients had a surveillance colonoscopy before the recommended guidelines despite a low risk of metachronous neoplasia. However, the risk of metachronous advanced adenoma was increased in elderly patients and those with a ≥3-year surveillance interval.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasia after the resection of proximal versus distal adenomas
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Youngwoo Kim, Dong Il Park
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study
    Amanda J. Cross, Emma C. Robbins, Kevin Pack, Iain Stenson, Matthew D. Rutter, Andrew M. Veitch, Brian P. Saunders, Stephen W. Duffy, Kate Wooldrage
    Endoscopy.2022; 54(10): 948.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Risk of Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with Sporadic Adenomas Aged < 50 Versus ≥ 50 years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Chan Hyuk Park
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 120.     CrossRef
  • British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines
    Matthew D Rutter, James East, Colin J Rees, Neil Cripps, James Docherty, Sunil Dolwani, Philip V Kaye, Kevin J Monahan, Marco R Novelli, Andrew Plumb, Brian P Saunders, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Damian J M Tolan, Sophie Whyte, Stewart Bonnington, Alison Scope,
    Gut.2020; 69(2): 201.     CrossRef
  • Urine-NMR metabolomics for screening of advanced colorectal adenoma and early stage colorectal cancer
    Eun Ran Kim, Hyuk Nam Kwon, Hoonsik Nam, Jae J. Kim, Sunghyouk Park, Young-Ho Kim
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of the Cumulative Incidences of Metachronous Colorectal Adenoma and Cancer According to the Initial FindingsAmong Colonoscopically Followed-up Patients
    Seiji Kimura, Masanori Tanaka, Shinsaku Fukuda
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2019; 72(6): 395.     CrossRef
  • Impact of obesity and metabolic abnormalities on the risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in men
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(9): 1504.     CrossRef
  • Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years
    Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 88(4): 715.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the Key for Emerging Issues of Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice
    Moon Joo Hwang, Kyeong Ok Kim, A Lim Kim, Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Tae Nyeun Kim
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 475.     CrossRef
  • Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening
    Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha, Yoon Tae Jeen
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • 8,004 View
  • 61 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea
Jung Min Lee, Yu Jin Kang, Eun Soo Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Kyung Sik Park, Kwang Bum Cho, Seong Woo Jeon, Min Kyu Jung, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Young Kim, Jin Tae Jung, Byung Ik Jang, Kyeong Ok Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Chang Hun Yang
Intest Res 2016;14(4):351-357.   Published online October 17, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.4.351
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Establishment of a colonoscopy reporting system is a prerequisite to determining and improving quality. This study aimed to investigate colonoscopists' opinions and the actual situation of a colonoscopy reporting system in a clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea and to assess the factors predictive of an inadequate reporting system.

Methods

Physicians who performed colonoscopies in the Daegu-Gyeongbuk province of Korea and were registered with the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) were interviewed via mail about colonoscopy reporting systems using a standardized questionnaire.

Results

Of 181 endoscopists invited to participate, 125 responded to the questionnaires (response rate, 69%). Most responders were internists (105/125, 84%) and worked in primary clinics (88/125, 70.4%). Seventy-one specialists (56.8%) held board certifications for endoscopy from the KSGE. A median of 20 colonoscopies (interquartile range, 10–47) was performed per month. Although 88.8% of responders agreed that a colonoscopy reporting system is necessary, only 18.4% (23/125) had achieved the optimal reporting system level recommended by the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. One-third of endoscopists replied that they did not use a reporting document for the main reasons of "too busy" and "inconvenience." Non-endoscopy specialists and primary care centers were independent predictive factors for failure to use a colonoscopy reporting system.

Conclusions

The quality of colonoscopy reporting systems varies widely and is considerably suboptimal in actual clinical practice settings in southeastern Korea, indicating considerable room for quality improvements in this field.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association of Poor Differentiation or Positive Vertical Margin with Residual Disease in Patients with Subsequent Colectomy after Complete Macroscopic Endoscopic Resection of Early Colorectal Cancer
    Ki Ju Kim, Hyun Seok Lee, Seong Woo Jeon, Sun Jin, Sang Won Lee
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Derivation and validation of a risk scoring model to predict advanced colorectal neoplasm in adults of all ages
    Hyo‐Joon Yang, Sungkyoung Choi, Soo‐Kyung Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Taesung Park, Ji Yeon Kim, Dong Il Park
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(7): 1328.     CrossRef
  • Screening strategy for colorectal cancer according to risk
    Dong Soo Han
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2017; 60(11): 893.     CrossRef
  • 8,583 View
  • 37 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected colorectal cancers that arose from sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas
Ji Yeon Seo, Seung Ho Choi, Jaeyoung Chun, Changhyun Lee, Ji Min Choi, Eun Hyo Jin, Sung Wook Hwang, Jong Pil Im, Sang Gyun Kim, Joo Sung Kim
Intest Res 2016;14(3):270-279.   Published online June 27, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.3.270
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenomas or traditional serrated adenomas are still unknown. The aims of this study were to verify the characteristics and outcomes of endoscopically resected early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps.

Methods

Among patients who received endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers from 2008 to 2011, cancers with documented pre-existing lesions were included. They were classified as adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma, or traditional serrated adenoma according to the baseline lesions. Clinical characteristics, pathologic diagnosis, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

Overall, 208 colorectal cancers detected from 198 patients were included: 198 with adenoma, five with sessile serrated adenoma, and five with traditional serrated adenoma. The sessile serrated adenoma group had a higher prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (40.0% vs. 25.8%, P<0.001) than the adenoma group. During follow-up, local recurrence did not occur after endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancers developed from serrated polyps. In contrast, two cases of metachronous recurrence were detected within a short follow-up period.

Conclusions

Cautious observation and early endoscopic resection are recommended when colorectal cancer from serrated polyp is suspected. Colorectal cancers from serrated polyp can be treated successfully with endoscopy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association of lifestyle and dietary preferences with precancerous serrated polyps: a hospital-based case-control study in Guangzhou, China
    Shaoyu Cheng, Liji Chen, Shujun Liu, Haiyan Zhang, Cailing Zhong, Tianwen Liu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Small sessile serrated polyps might not be at a higher risk for future advanced neoplasia than low-risk adenomas or polyp-free groups
    Eun Hyo Jin, Ji Yeon Seo, Jung Ho Bae, Jooyoung Lee, Ji Min Choi, Yoo Min Han, Joo Hyun Lim
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • The incidence and risk factors of sessile serrated adenomas in left side colon cancer patients after curative surgery
    Myung Hee Kim, Hee Seok Moon, In Sun Kwon, Ju Seok Kim, Sun Hyung Kang, Jae Kyu Sung, Eaum Seok Lee, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    Medicine.2020; 99(29): e20799.     CrossRef
  • Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program
    Jung Ho Bae, Changhyun Lee, Hae Yeon Kang, Min-Sun Kwak, Eun Young Doo, Ji Yeon Seo, Ji Hyun Song, Sun Young Yang, Jong In Yang, Seon Hee Lim, Jeong Yoon Yim, Joo Hyun Lim, Goh Eun Chung, Su Jin Chung, Eun Hyo Jin, Boram Park, Joo Sung Kim
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(12): 2479.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with sessile serrated adenoma
    Sung Jae Park, Hyuk Yoon, In Sub Jung, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Na Young Kim, Dong Ho Lee
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(1): 134.     CrossRef
  • Surveillance colonoscopy in patients with sessile serrated adenoma
    Ji Hyung Nam, Hyoun Woo Kang
    Intestinal Research.2018; 16(3): 502.     CrossRef
  • Identification of risk factors for sessile and traditional serrated adenomas of the colon by using big data analysis
    Jeung Hui Pyo, Sang Yun Ha, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Hee Jung Son, Kyoung‐Mee Kim, Hyeseung Kim, Kyunga Kim, Jee Eun Kim, Yoon‐Ho Choi, Young‐Ho Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(5): 1039.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Resection of Cecal Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A KASID Multicenter Study
    Eun Mi Song, Hyo-Joon Yang, Hyun Jung Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Hyun Gun Kim, Yunho Jung, Chang Mo Moon, Byung Chang Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2017; 62(11): 3138.     CrossRef
  • Is colorectal cancer screening necessary before 50 years of age?
    Yoon Suk Jung
    Intestinal Research.2017; 15(4): 550.     CrossRef
  • Derivation and validation of a risk scoring model to predict advanced colorectal neoplasm in adults of all ages
    Hyo‐Joon Yang, Sungkyoung Choi, Soo‐Kyung Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Kyu Yong Choi, Taesung Park, Ji Yeon Kim, Dong Il Park
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2017; 32(7): 1328.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy
    Jeonghun Lee, Sung Won Park, You Sun Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Hyun Sung, Pil Hun Song, Won Jae Yoon, Jeong Seop Moon
    Medicine.2017; 96(27): e7468.     CrossRef
  • 8,262 View
  • 58 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of the efficacy of disinfectants in automated endoscope reprocessors for colonoscopes: tertiary amine compound (Sencron2®) versus ortho-phthalaldehyde (Cidex®OPA)
Hyun Il Seo, Dae Sung Lee, Eun Mi Yoon, Min-Jung Kwon, Hyosoon Park, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Chong Il Sohn, Dong Il Park
Intest Res 2016;14(2):178-182.   Published online April 27, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.2.178
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

To prevent the transmission of pathogens by endoscopes, following established reprocessing guidelines is critical. An ideal reprocessing step is simple, fast, and inexpensive. Here, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of two disinfectants, a tertiary amine compound (TAC) and ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA).

Methods

A total of 100 colonoscopes were randomly reprocessed using two same automated endoscope reprocessors, according to disinfectant. The exposure time was 10 minutes for 0.55% OPA (Cidex® OPA, Johnson & Johnson) and 5 minutes for 4% TAC (Sencron2®, Bab Gencel Pharma & Chemical Ind. Co.). Three culture samples were obtained from each colonoscope after reprocessing.

Results

A total of nine samples were positive among the 300 culture samples. The positive culture rate was not statistically different between the two groups (4% for OPA and 2% for TAC, P=0.501). There were no incidents related to safety during the study period.

Conclusions

TAC was non-inferior in terms of reprocessing efficacy to OPA and was safe to use. Therefore, TAC seems to be a good alternative disinfectant with a relatively short exposure time and is also less expensive than OPA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • What doesn’t kill biofilm, makes them stronger: critical methodological considerations for endoscope reprocessing
    R. Kanaujia, A. Sharma, M. Biswal, V. Singh
    Journal of Hospital Infection.2025; 156: 135.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis, Characterization and Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity of Orthophtaldehyde Nanoflowers
    Gülten CAN SEZGİN, Nilay ILDİZ
    Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science.2023; 9(2): 245.     CrossRef
  • A Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Analysis of Upper Aerodigestive Endoscopy Contamination: Is Flexible Laryngoscopy Different?
    Roy Jiang, David A. Kasle, Faisal Alzahrani, Nikita Kohli, Michael Z. Lerner
    The Laryngoscope.2021; 131(3): 598.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical and Spectrometric Study of Reactivity of Orthophthalaldehyde with Hydroxylamine: Mechanistic Considerations
    Joël Donkeng‐Dazie, Jiří Urban, Jiří Ludvík
    ChemistrySelect.2021; 6(20): 4881.     CrossRef
  • Reactivity of orthophthalaldehyde with aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic primary diamines: Electrochemical study and mechanistic considerations
    Joël Donkeng Dazie, Alan Liška, Jiří Urban, Jiří Ludvík
    Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry.2018; 821: 131.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Peracetic Acid (EndoPA®) for Disinfection of Endoscopes
    Ji Min Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Dae Bum Kim, Se Eun Go, Sungwoo Ko, Yoongoo Kang, Solim Hong
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 71(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Planarity of substituted pyrrole and furan rings in (3R*, 1′S*, 3′R*)-3-(1′-tert-butylamino-1′H, 3′ H-benzo[c]furan-3′-yl)-2-tert-butyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[c]pyrrol-1-one
    Joel Donkeng Dazie, Alan Liška, Jiří Ludvík, Jan Fábry, Michal Dušek, Václav Eigner
    Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials.2017; 232(6): 441.     CrossRef
  • 9,724 View
  • 56 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Do we need colonoscopy verification in patients with fundic gland polyp?
Hee Sook Lee, Younjeong Choi, Ja Young Jung, Young-Jun Sung, Dong Won Ahn, Ji Bong Jeong, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Seong-Joon Koh, Ji Won Kim
Intest Res 2016;14(2):172-177.   Published online April 27, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.2.172
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in subjects with fundic gland polyps (FGPs) and the relationship between FGPs and colorectal neoplasia in Korea.

Methods

We analyzed 128 consecutive patients with FPGs who underwent colonoscopy between January 2009 and December 2013. For each case, age- (±5 years) and sex-matched controls were identified from among patients with hyperplastic polyps, gastric neoplasms, and healthy controls. Clinical characteristics were reviewed from medical records, colonoscopic findings, pathologic findings, and computed tomography images. The outcome was evaluated by comparison of advanced colonic neoplasia detection rates.

Results

Of the 128 patients, seven (5.1%) had colon cancers and seven (5.1%) had advanced adenomas. A case-control study revealed that the odds of detecting a colorectal cancer was 3.8 times greater in patients with FGPs than in the age- and sex-matched healthy controls (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–13.24; P =0.04) and 4.1 times greater in patients with FGPs than in healthy controls over 50 years of age (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.16–14.45; P =0.04). Among patients with FGPs over 50 years old, male sex (OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.23–18.94; P =0.02), and age (OR, 9.90; 95% CI, 1.21–81.08; P =0.03) were associated with an increased prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms.

Conclusions

The yield of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer patients with FGPs was substantially higher than that in average-risk subjects. Colonoscopy verification is warranted in patients with FGPs, especially in those 50 years of age or older.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current Guidelines and Advances in the Management of Fundic Gland Polyps
    Majed Ali, Lynn Srour, Mustapha Bitar, Karam Karam, Ihab I. El Hajj, Elias Fiani
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2025; 40(6): 1374.     CrossRef
  • Cold snare polypectomy for fundic gland polyps
    Chi‐Hung Chen, Jen‐Chieh Huang, Jeng‐Shiann Shin
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2022; 9(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Clinical features of fundic gland polyps and their correlation with colorectal tumors
    Xue-Mei Yang, Hong Xu
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2020; 28(20): 1036.     CrossRef
  • Parietalzellhypertrophie und Drüsenkörperzysten
    M. Venerito, A. Canbay, M. Vieth
    Der Gastroenterologe.2018; 13(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • 8,531 View
  • 44 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Refractory pseudomembranous colitis that was treated successfully with colonoscopic fecal microbial transplantation
Jun Young Shin, Eun Jung Ko, Seung Ho Lee, Jong Bum Shin, Shin Il Kim, Kye Sook Kwon, Hyung Gil Kim, Yong Woon Shin, Byoung Wook Bang
Intest Res 2016;14(1):83-88.   Published online January 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.1.83
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) is a nosocomial and opportunistic infection caused by Clostridium difficile. PMC is related to the use of antibiotics leading to intestinal dysbiosis and an overgrowth of C. difficile. Metronidazole or vancomycin is considered to be the standard therapy for the management of PMC. However, PMC has a 15%–30% recurrence rate and can be refractory to standard treatments, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Here we describe a patient who experienced refractory PMC who was treated with fecal microbiota transplantation. A 69-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with consistent abdominal pain and diarrhea, which had been present for 5 months. She was diagnosed with PMC by colonoscopy and tested positive for C. difficile toxin. Even though she took metronidazole for 10 days, followed by vancomycin for 4 weeks, her symptoms did not improve. Because of her recurrent and refractory symptoms, we decided to perform fecal microbiota transplantation. Fifty grams of fresh feces from a donor were obtained on the day of the procedure, mixed with 500 mL of normal saline, and then filtered. The filtered solution was administered to the patient's colon using a colonoscope. After the procedure, her symptoms rapidly improved and a follow-up colonoscopy showed that the PMC had resolved without recurrence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Fecal microbiota transplantation: present and future
    Ra Ri Cha, Irene Sonu
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(3): 352.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Fulminant Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Combined Medical and Surgical Case Series
    Ellen J Spartz, Mina Estafanos, Reema Mallick, Wolfganag Gaertner, Victor Vakayil, Cyrus Jahansouz, Rishav Aggarwal, Sayeed Ikramuddin, Alexander Khoruts, James V Harmon
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clearance of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms under Multiple Comorbidities: A Prospective Comparative Trial
    Jongbeom Shin, Jung-Hwan Lee, Soo-Hyun Park, Boram Cha, Kye Sook Kwon, Hyungkil Kim, Yong Woon Shin
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(10): 2404.     CrossRef
  • The evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation vs vancomycin in a Clostridioides difficile infection model
    Qiaomai Xu, Shumeng Zhang, Jiazheng Quan, Zhengjie Wu, Silan Gu, Yunbo Chen, Beiwen Zheng, Longxian Lv, Lanjuan Li
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.2022; 106(19-20): 6689.     CrossRef
  • The gut microbiota and gut disease
    Sasha R. Fehily, Chamara Basnayake, Emily K. Wright, Michael A. Kamm
    Internal Medicine Journal.2021; 51(10): 1594.     CrossRef
  • RecurrentClostridium difficileInfection: Risk Factors, Treatment, and Prevention
    Jung Hoon Song, You Sun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Clostridium difficile in Asia: Opportunities for One Health Management
    Deirdre A. Collins, Thomas V. Riley
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease.2018; 4(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Current challenges in the treatment of severe Clostridium difficile infection: early treatment potential of fecal microbiota transplantation
    Yvette H. van Beurden, Max Nieuwdorp, Pablo J. E. J. van de Berg, Chris J. J. Mulder, Abraham Goorhuis
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2017; 10(4): 373.     CrossRef
  • Fecal microbiota transplant in severe and severe-complicatedClostridium difficile: A promising treatment approach
    Monika Fischer, Brian Sipe, Yao-Wen Cheng, Emmalee Phelps, Nicholas Rogers, Sashidhar Sagi, Matthew Bohm, Huiping Xu, Zain Kassam
    Gut Microbes.2017; 8(3): 289.     CrossRef
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Refractory and RecurrentClostridium difficileInfection: A Case Series of Nine Patients
    Byoung Wook Bang, Jin-Seok Park, Hyung Kil Kim, Yong Woon Shin, Kye Sook Kwon, Hea Yoon Kwon, Ji Hyeon Baek, Jin-Soo Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 69(4): 226.     CrossRef
  • 9,234 View
  • 51 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Colon Transit Time May Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation
Hong Jun Park, Myeong Hun Chae, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae Woo Kim, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Hee Man Kim, Kyong Joo Lee
Intest Res 2015;13(4):339-345.   Published online October 15, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.339
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

We evaluated whether colonic transit time (CTT) can predict the degree of bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation undergoing scheduled colonoscopy in order to assist in the development of better bowel preparation strategies for these patients.

Methods

We analyzed the records of 160 patients with chronic constipation from March 2007 to November 2012. We enrolled patients who had undergone a CTT test followed by colonoscopy. We defined patients with a CTT ≥30 hours as the slow transit time (STT) group, and patients with a CTT <30 hours as the normal transit time (NTT) group. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores were compared between the STT and NTT groups.

Results

Of 160 patients with chronic constipation, 82 (51%) were included in the STT group and 78 (49%) were included in the NTT group. Patients with a BBPS score of <6 were more prevalent in the STT group than in the NTT group (31.7% vs. 10.3%, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that slow CTT was an independent predictor of inadequate bowel preparation (odds ratio, 0.261; 95% confidence interval, 0.107-0.634; P=0.003). The best CTT cut-off value for predicting inadequate bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation was 37 hours, as determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve: 0.676, specificity: 0.735, sensitivity: 0.643).

Conclusions

Patients with chronic constipation and a CTT >30 hours were at risk for inadequate bowel preparation. CTT measured prior to colonoscopy could be useful for developing individualized strategies for bowel preparation in patients with slow CTT, as these patients are likely to have inadequate bowel preparation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation
    Kyung Ho Song, Young Sin Cho, Jeong Eun Shin, Hye-Kyung Jung, Seon-Young Park, Seung Joo Kang, Jung-Wook Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Chul Lim, Hee Sun Park, Seong-Jung Kim, Ra Ri Cha, Ki Bae Bang, Chang Seok Bang, Sung Kyun Yim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Bong Hyeon Kye,
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 85(3): 319.     CrossRef
  • Advanced intestinal regulation improves bowel preparation quality in patients with constipation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Liang Ding, JinNan Duan, Tao Yang, ChaoQiong Jin, Jun Luo, Ahuo Ma
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting cecal intubation time during colonoscopy
    Ke Wang, Wen-Tao Xu, Wen-Jing Kou, Xing-Shun Qi
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2023; 31(3): 105.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature
    Endrit Shahini, Emanuele Sinagra, Alessandro Vitello, Rocco Ranaldo, Antonella Contaldo, Antonio Facciorusso, Marcello Maida
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(11): 1685.     CrossRef
  • The effect of kiwi berry (Actinidia arguta) on preventing and alleviating loperamide-induced constipation
    Jiyue Zhang, Dongnan Li, Qilin Tian, Yumeng Ding, Hanqian Jiang, Guang Xin, Shunchang Cheng, Siyi Tang, Chenyu Jin, Jinlong Tian, Bin Li
    Food Innovation and Advances.2023; 2(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review of Exercise Therapy for Bowel Preparation
    Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Ramoo Vimala, Ping Lei Chui, Ida Normiha Hilmi
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2023; 46(5): 393.     CrossRef
  • 2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation
    Young Sin Cho, Yoo Jin Lee, Jeong Eun Shin, Hye-Kyung Jung, Seon-Young Park, Seung Joo Kang, Kyung Ho Song, Jung-Wook Kim, Hyun Chul Lim, Hee Sun Park, Seong-Jung Kim, Ra Ri Cha, Ki Bae Bang, Chang Seok Bang, Sung Kyun Yim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Bong Hyeon Kye,
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2023; 29(3): 271.     CrossRef
  • Taking a Long and Hard Look at Quality Predictors of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Yunho Jung
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(11): 4069.     CrossRef
  • Factors Influencing the Quality of Intestinal Preparation before Colonoscopy in Special Population
    瑶 童
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(11): 17129.     CrossRef
  • Rectal Evacuation Disorders are Associated With Poor Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation
    Mythili P. Pathipati, Casey J. Silvernale, Kenneth G. Barshop, Jasmine B. Ha, James M. Richter, Kyle D. Staller
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(5): 438.     CrossRef
  • Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non‐inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid
    Sun Hwa Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Kyunga Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 600.     CrossRef
  • Modelling characteristics of inadequate bowel preparations for colonoscopy
    Scott L. Cornella, Brian J. Wentworth, Charles Orton, Bethany J. Horton, Steven M. Powell
    GastroHep.2020; 2(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Personal Bowel Habits as a Predictive Factor for Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Observational Study
    Namyoung Paik, Eun Ran Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(2): 169.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Inadequate Bowel Preparation Using Total and Segmental Colon Transit Time in Patients with Chronic Constipation: Some Different Outcomes
    Chunying Zhai, Qiyang Huang, Ningli Chai, Wengang Zhang, Enqiang Linghu
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gut microbiota alterations from different Lactobacillus probiotic-fermented yoghurt treatments in slow-transit constipation
    Chen-Jian Liu, Xiao-Dan Tang, Jie Yu, Hai-Yan Zhang, Xiao-Ran Li
    Journal of Functional Foods.2017; 38: 110.     CrossRef
  • The management of ‘hard-to-prepare’ colonoscopy patients
    Daniele Mandolesi, Leonardo Frazzoni, Franco Bazzoli, Lorenzo Fuccio
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2017; 11(8): 731.     CrossRef
  • Bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Theodor Voiosu, Andrei Voiosu, Radu Voiosu
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2016; 32(5): 385.     CrossRef
  • 11,288 View
  • 56 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP