Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Metastasis"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Biology and preclinical models of colorectal cancer metastasis
Yoojeong Seo, Jinho Jang, Jae-Il Park
Received December 9, 2025  Accepted January 5, 2026  Published online March 26, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00315    [Epub ahead of print]
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is the principal cause of CRC-related mortality, yet the biology of mCRC remains only partly understood and challenging to interrogate experimentally. Despite recent progress in mapping recurrent genetic and epigenetic alterations and treatment responses of mCRC, these efforts provide limited insight into how heterogeneous primary tumors breach tissue barriers, survive in circulation, and colonize distant organs. In this review, we summarize current experimental systems for studying mCRC, including genetically engineered mouse models, carcinogen-induced and transplant models, and patient-derived organoid and xenograft platforms, and discuss how each captures or fails to capture key steps of the metastatic cascade and organ-specific microenvironments. We highlight practical obstacles to longitudinal sampling and quantitative readouts of metastatic burden, as well as conceptual gaps in modeling immune and stromal influences. Finally, we outline how emerging approaches, including single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and advances in longitudinal tracking of metastatic burden could be combined into an integrated framework that more faithfully links mechanistic insight to clinical behavior and ultimately to metastasis-specific therapies.
  • 1,284 View
  • 35 Download
Close layer
Original Article
Colorectal neoplasia
Factors associated with the survival of colorectal cancer in Mexico
Carlos Quezada-Gutiérrez, María Teresa Álvarez-Bañuelos, Jaime Morales-Romero, Clara Luz Sampieri, Raúl Enrique Guzmán-García, Evangelina Montes-Villaseñor
Intest Res 2020;18(3):315-324.   Published online May 19, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2019.09179
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a public health problem. In Mexico, there have been no recent studies conducted on survival in terms of this pathology or on the influence of prognostic factors. The study aims to determine the probability of survival in patients with CRC presence of low levels of schooling and a rural population, adjusted for clinical stage and type of treatment.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of 305 patients with CRC treated at State Cancer Center, located in Veracruz-Mexico; the follow-up period of 60 months (2012–2016). The survival probability was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Prognostic factors were determined using hazard ratio (HR) multivariate Cox regression analysis.
Results
Overall survival was 40% at 60 months. Subjects in the age group ≥ 65 years had a low survival rate of 28% (P= 0.026) and an advanced clinical stage of 22% (P< 0.001). Of the patients with bone metastasis, none survived longer than 5 years (P= 0.008). With respect to the unfavorable prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis, a decreased level of schooling was associated with an HR of 7.6 (95% CI, 1.1–54.7), advanced clinical stage was associated with an HR of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2–4.0), and the presence of metastasis had an HR of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1–2.9).
Conclusions
Poor prognostic factors include an advanced clinical stage, the presence of metastasis and a low level of schooling. These findings confirm the importance of screening for early diagnosis, diminishing the barriers to accessing treatment and prospectively monitoring the population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colorectal cancer survival in Mexico: Leveraging a national health insurance database
    Susana Lozano-Esparza, Hugo Rodrigo Sánchez-Blas, Fidel David Huitzil-Meléndez, Mónica Isabel Meneses-Medina, Katherine Van Loon, Michael B. Potter, Alejandro Mohar, Martin Lajous
    Cancer Epidemiology.2025; 94: 102698.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer survival disparities in the five regions of Georgia
    Meng-Han Tsai, Daramola N. Cabral, Caitlyn Grunert, Justin X. Moore, Hong Qin
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(3): e0301027.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    Maria Elena Martinez, Kathleen M. Schmeler, Martin Lajous, Lisa A. Newman
    American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chemo-radiotherapy with 177Lu-PLGA(RGF)-CXCR4L for the targeted treatment of colorectal cancer
    Pedro Cruz-Nova, Brenda Gibbens-Bandala, Alejandra Ancira-Cortez, Gerardo Ramírez-Nava, Clara Santos-Cuevas, Myrna Luna-Gutiérrez, Blanca Ocampo-García
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pan gourmet a base de harina de trigo, linaza y chapulín (Sphenarium purpurascens) como alimento funcional
    P.F Gomez- Galicia, I. Parola-Contreras, Juan Gabriel Báez- González, R. Durán-Lugo
    Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos.2023; 8(1): 379.     CrossRef
  • Correlations between Demographic, Clinical, and Paraclinical Variables and Outcomes in Patients with KRAS-Mutant or KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer—A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary-Level Center in Romania
    Edvina Elena Pîrvu, Emilia Severin, Raluca Ileana Pătru, Irina Niță, Stefania Andreea Toma, Roxana Rodica Macarie, Cristina Elena Cocioabă, Ioana Florescu, Simona Coniac
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(18): 2930.     CrossRef
  • Immune profile by multiplexed immunohistochemistry associated with recurrence after chemoradiation in rectal cancer
    Seung Wook Hong, Seohyun Lee, Yun Jae Kim, Soyeon Ahn, In Ja Park, Seung‐Mo Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong‐Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Suk‐Kyun Yang, Jaeil Kim, Sang‐Yeob Kim, Seung‐Jae Myung
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(3): 542.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-based colorectal polyp histology prediction using narrow-band image-magnifying colonoscopy: a stepping stone for clinical practice
    Ji Young Chang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 699.     CrossRef
  • Education levels and survival in colorectal cancer: is there really an obvious association?
    Bruna Valiati, Rodrigo Oliva Perez, Paulo Gustavo Kotze
    Intestinal Research.2020; 18(3): 247.     CrossRef
  • 10,300 View
  • 186 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Natural Course of an Untreated Metastatic Perirectal Lymph Node After the Endoscopic Resection of a Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor
Sang Hyung Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jung Su Lee, Soyoung Park, Ho-Su Lee, Hyojeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jihun Kim
Intest Res 2015;13(2):175-179.   Published online April 27, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.175
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader

Lymph node metastasis is rare in small (i.e., <10 mm) rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In addition to tumor size, pathological features such as the mitotic or Ki-67 proliferation index are associated with lymph node metastasis in rectal NETs. We recently treated a patient who underwent endoscopic treatment of a small, grade 1 rectal NET that recurred in the form of perirectal lymph node metastasis 7 years later. A 7-mm-sized perirectal lymph node was noted at the time of the initial endoscopic treatment. The same lymph node was found to be slightly enlarged on follow-up and finally confirmed as a metastatic NET. Therefore, the perirectal lymph node metastasis might have been present at the time of the initial diagnosis. However, the growth rate of the lymph node was extremely low, and it took 7 years to increase in size from 7 to 10 mm. NETs with low Ki-67 proliferation index and without mitotic activity may grow extremely slowly even if they are metastatic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-Term Outcomes after the Complete Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter Cohort Study
    Eun Ran Kim, Eui Sun Jeong, Min-Ji Kim, Seong-Jung Kim, Bun Kim, Jae Seung Soh, Jung Ho Kim, Hong Sub Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Jae Hyun Kim
    Gut and Liver.2026; 20(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Recent updates on the endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumor
    Sunghyeok Ryou, Kwangwoo Nam
    Intestinal Research.2026; 24(2): 208.     CrossRef
  • Current status of endoscopic resection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Jian-Ning Liu, Hui Chen, Nian Fang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical application of endoscopic ultrasonography in the management of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Soo-Young Na, Seong Jung Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2023; 12(3): 105.     CrossRef
  • Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10–20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor
    Byung-Soo Park, Sung Hwan Cho, Gyung Mo Son, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Jin Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Hyung Wook Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 17(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic value in small rectal neuroendocrine tumor treated by local excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ho Suk Kang, Mi Jung Kwon, Tae-Hwan Kim, Junhee Han, Young-Su Ju
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2019; 215(11): 152642.     CrossRef
  • Trans‐anal full‐thickness endoscopic resection of a rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm performed with a TEO® (Karl Storz microsurgery device) and laparoscopic indocyanine‐green‐guided lymphatic sampling – a video vignette
    P. Leon, A. Balduzzi, M. Troian, N. de Manzini
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(4): 399.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of endoscopic resection using the band ligation method for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Ju Seung Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Jung Ho Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Dong Kyun Park, Jung Suk An
    Intestinal Research.2016; 14(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • Lymphovascular invasion in more than one-quarter of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Mi Jung Kwon, Ho Suk Kang, Jae Seung Soh, Hyun Lim, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park, Hye-Rim Park, Eun Sook Nam
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(42): 9400.     CrossRef
  • Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos)
    Dong-Hoon Yang, Yangsoon Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 83(5): 1015.     CrossRef
  • Are Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Safe?
    Jae Ho Choi, Jae Myung Cha
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • 9,772 View
  • 57 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP