Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Polyethylene Glycol"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Endoscopy
Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice
Dae Hyung Woo, Kyeong Ok Kim, Da Eun Jeong, Yoon Jeong Nam, Si Hyung Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Tae Nyeun Kim
Intest Res 2018;16(2):293-298.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.293
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Inadequate bowel preparation can result in prolonged procedure time and increased missed lesion and complication rates. This prospective study aimed to evaluate bowel preparation quality and identify the predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation in actual clinical practice.

Methods

We included 399 patients who underwent colonoscopy between June 2015 and July 2016. Using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale, we defined a score ≤2 as adequate preparation and a score >2 as inadequate preparation.

Results

Mean patient age was 58.38±12.97 years; 60.6% were male. Indications for colonoscopy included screening (69.7%) and surveillance after polyp removal (21.3%). A split-dose regimen was prescribed to 55.4% of patients. The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Overall, the median time between the last bowel preparation agent dose and start of colonoscopy was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); that of the adequate group was 5.0 hours (range, 1.5–16.0 hours); and that of the inadequate group was 5 hours (range, 2–23 hours). The mean bowel preparation scale score of the ascending colon (1.94±0.25) was significantly higher than that of other colon segments. On multivariate analysis, elderly age, history of cerebrovascular disease, history of gastrectomy or appendectomy, and total preparation solution uptake <2 L were the independent predictors of inadequate bowel preparation.

Conclusions

The inadequate bowel preparation rate was 28.1%. Risk factors included elderly age and history of cerebrovascular disease or abdominal surgery. Patients with these risk factors require special care and education.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An Examination of Factors Affecting Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis
    Meng Yu, Bin Cao, Hongyun Wei, Keyu Ren, Shanwei Rong, Min Li
    AJN, American Journal of Nursing.2026; 126(2): e1.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer
    Joo Hye Song, Eun Ran Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2024; 39(4): 547.     CrossRef
  • A study on the related influencing factors of the quality of bowel preparation and the compliance of middle-aged and elderly patients for colonoscopy
    Shanshan Chen, Tingting Zhang, Saie Zhu, Yi Zhou
    Current Medical Research and Opinion.2024; 40(9): 1545.     CrossRef
  • Performance of Computer-Aided Detection and Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Colonoscopy Outcomes
    Dalton A. Norwood, Shyam Thakkar, Amanda Cartee, Fayez Sarkis, Tatiana Torres-Herman, Eleazar E. Montalvan-Sanchez, Kirk Russ, Patricia Ajayi-Fox, Anam Hameed, Ramzi Mulki, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Douglas R. Morgan, Shajan Peter
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(10): 3681.     CrossRef
  • Optimization of colonoscopy quality: Comprehensive review of the literature and future perspectives
    Wen‐Feng Hsu, Han‐Mo Chiu
    Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 35(7): 822.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors Associated with Painful Colonoscopy and Prolonged Cecal Intubation Time in Female Patients
    Yasuhiko Hamada, Kyosuke Tanaka, Yohei Ikenoyama, Noriyuki Horiki, Junya Tsuboi, Reiko Yamada, Misaki Nakamura, Hayato Nakagawa
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(3): 168.     CrossRef
  • The effect of educational compilation through video tutorials and visual AIDS on the quality of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy
    Jahanbakhsh Amirarsalani, Leyla Alilu, Masoumeh Hemmati-Maslakpak, Javad Rasouli
    AFMN Biomedicine.2023; 40(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • A predictive model for early death in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study
    Qi Wang, Kexin Shen, Bingyuan Fei, Hai Luo, Ruiqi Li, Zeming Wang, Mengqiang Wei, Zhongshi Xie
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Regression and Random Forest Machine Learning Have Limited Performance in Predicting Bowel Preparation in Veteran Population
    Jacob E. Kurlander, Akbar K. Waljee, Stacy B. Menees, Rachel Lipson, Alex N. Kokaly, Andrew J. Read, Karmel S. Shehadeh, Amy Cohn, Sameer D. Saini
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(7): 2827.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
    Su Bee Park, Jae Myung Cha
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 332.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study
    Kyeong Ok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Yoo Jin Lee, Hyun Seok Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Yun Jin Chung, Byung Ik Jang, Sung Kook Kim, Chang Heon Yang
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2022; 16(11): 1706.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Commercial Bowel Preparations in Ambulatory Patients Presenting for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Carol A. Burke, Niyati Gupta, Mounir Ibrahim, John McMichael, Gareth Morris-Stiff, Amit Bhatt, John Vargo, Maged Rizk, Michael B. Rothberg
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(6): 2059.     CrossRef
  • Quality Improvement of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopies: A Study of Hospital Team Resource Management in Taiwan
    Chen-Shuan Chung, Chih-Ming Lin, Ming-Shu Chen
    Quality Management in Health Care.2021; 30(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients are at high risk for colorectal neoplasia: a case control study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim
    Intestinal Research.2021; 19(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • How to Choose the Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colonoscopy
    Ji Eun Na, Eun Ran Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2021; 44(4): 122.     CrossRef
  • Factors related to Bowel Cleanliness of Colonoscopy Examinees
    Yohan Lee, Haejung Lee
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2021; 33(6): 545.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of bowel-cleansing efficacy of split-dose and same-day dose bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy in patients with gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Chang Hyun Kim, Jin-Jo Kim, Seung-Man Park
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(10): 4413.     CrossRef
  • Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non‐inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid
    Sun Hwa Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Kyunga Kim, Tae Jun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 600.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286.     CrossRef
  • Educational virtual reality videos in improving bowel preparation quality and satisfaction of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Yi Zhao, Feng Xie, Xiaoyin Bai, Aiming Yang, Dong Wu
    BMJ Open.2019; 9(8): e029483.     CrossRef
  • Impact of diet restriction on bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Seung-Joo Nam, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Jae Min Lee, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12645.     CrossRef
  • 8,475 View
  • 97 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Anaphylactic Shock Caused by Ingestion of Polyethylene Glycol
Sun Hee Lee, Jae Myung Cha, Joung Il Lee, Kwang Ro Joo, Hyun Phil Shin, Il Hyun Baek, Jung Won Jeon, Jun Uk Lim, Jung Lok Lee, Hyae Min Lee, Young-Hak Cho
Intest Res 2015;13(1):90-94.   Published online January 29, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.1.90
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader

Colonoscopy is the current standard method for evaluation of the colon. The diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colonic cleansing and preparation. Generally, all these preparations have been demonstrated to be safe for use in healthy individuals without significant comorbid conditions. Based on safety and efficacy concerns, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is most commonly utilized as a bowel preparation solution for colonoscopy. Adverse events in patients receiving PEG are mostly clinically non-significant. However, fatal adverse events rarely have been shown to occur in the few individuals who experience vomiting or aspiration. Anaphylactic shock associated with ingestion of PEG electrolyte solution is an extremely rare fatal complication, and reported mainly in Western countries. Here, we report the first case of anaphylactic shock following the ingestion of PEG solution in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • NMR Assessment of the High Order Structure of Biological Therapeutics in Erythrocytes Provides a Tool for Drug Delivery Design
    Luis Padilla-Cortés, Giulia Roxana Gheorghita, Francesco Currò, Rebecca Calamandrei, Bianca Susini, Sara Callozzo, Giulia Crivello, Pasquale Russomanno, Enrico Ravera, Linda Cerofolini, Marco Fragai
    Journal of the American Chemical Society.2025; 147(30): 26379.     CrossRef
  • Polyethylene Glycol-induced Hypersensitivity in Adenocarcinoma Patient
    Varunsingh Saggu, Khushboo Tejpal Chavda, Smit P Mistry, Prashantkumar Babubhai Patel
    Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care.2025; 17(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Poly(Ethylene Glycols) to Facilitate Celloidin Removal for Immunohistochemical Studies on Archival Human Brain and Temporal Bone Sections
    David Bächinger, Jennifer T. O’Malley, Morris Wolf, Stephane Bérnhard, M. Charles Liberman, Mark W. Tibbitt, Andreas H. Eckhard
    Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry.2024; 72(7): 419.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylatoxin Complement 5a in Pfizer BNT162b2-Induced Immediate-Type Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions
    Xin Rong Lim, Grace Yin Lai Chan, Justina Wei Lynn Tan, Carol Yee Leng Ng, Choon Guan Chua, Guat Bee Tan, Stephrene Seok Wei Chan, Kiat Hoe Ong, Ying Zhi Tan, Sarah Hui Zhen Tan, Claire Min Li Teo, Samuel Shang Ming Lee, Bernard Yu Hor Thong, Bernard Pui
    Vaccines.2023; 11(6): 1020.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylactic shock induced by polyethylene glycol after bowel preparation for the colorectal cancer surgery: A case report
    Go Woon Park, Nahyeon Park, Jung Cheol Kuk, Eung Jin Shin, Dae Ro Lim
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(23): 5589.     CrossRef
  • Neither iatrogenic nor hereditary cause: A rare case of anaphylaxis to low sorb tubing used for infusions
    Amber Gibson, Muhammad Usman Baig, Sana Mohiuddin, Wafik Zaky
    Pediatric Blood & Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anaphylaxis associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Approach to allergy investigation
    Viktorija Erdeljic Turk
    Clinical Immunology.2021; 227: 108748.     CrossRef
  • Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and relevant adverse reactions
    Eun Hee Chung
    Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease.2021; 9(3): 124.     CrossRef
  • Polyethylene Glycol Immunogenicity: Theoretical, Clinical, and Practical Aspects of Anti-Polyethylene Glycol Antibodies
    Bing-Mae Chen, Tian-Lu Cheng, Steve R. Roffler
    ACS Nano.2021; 15(9): 14022.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylaxis due to macrogol in a laxative solution with a positive basophil activation test
    Nicola Giangrande, Jesús Miguel García-Menaya, Mariana Marcos-Fernández, Carmen Cámara-Hijón, Pedro Bobadilla-González
    Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.2019; 123(3): 302.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylaxis due to polyethylene glycol: A case report
    Tae-Se Kim, Dong-Chull Choi, Byung-Jae Lee
    Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease.2018; 6(5): 274.     CrossRef
  • Hyponatremic Seizures After Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation: The Elderly at Risk
    Arjun Saradna, Shyam Shankar, Parita Soni, Chetana Pendkar, Abhinav Saxena, Yizhak Kupfer, Stephan Kamholz
    American Journal of Therapeutics.2018; 25(6): e779.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylaxis During Intracardiac and Endovascular Implantations: A Multifactorial Problem Involving Kounis Syndrome
    Nicholas G. Kounis, Ioanna Koniari, George Soufras, Grigorios Tsigkas, George Hahalis
    Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.2017; 31(3): 804.     CrossRef
  • “Bowel prep hyponatremia“ – a state of acute water intoxication facilitated by low dietary solute intake: case report and literature review
    Martin Windpessl, Christoph Schwarz, Manfred Wallner
    BMC Nephrology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immediate‐type hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols: a review
    E. Wenande, L. H. Garvey
    Clinical & Experimental Allergy.2016; 46(7): 907.     CrossRef
  • Anaphylaxis to Polyethylene Glycol (Colyte®) in a Patient with Diverticulitis
    So-Hee Lee, Sun Hyuk Hwang, Jin Soo Park, Hae-Sim Park, Yoo Seob Shin
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(10): 1662.     CrossRef
  • Pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies are associated with severe immediate allergic reactions to pegnivacogin, a PEGylated aptamer
    Thomas J. Povsic, Monica G. Lawrence, A. Michael Lincoff, Roxana Mehran, Christopher P. Rusconi, Steven L. Zelenkofske, Zhen Huang, Jeffrey Sailstad, Paul W. Armstrong, P. Gabriel Steg, Christoph Bode, Richard C. Becker, John H. Alexander, N. Franklin Adk
    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.2016; 138(6): 1712.     CrossRef
  • Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Induced Anaphylactic Reaction During Bowel Preparation
    David Gachoka
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2015; 2(1): 216.     CrossRef
  • 16,280 View
  • 67 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability between Same-day Picosulfate and Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial
Mi Seon Kang, Tae Oh Kim, Eun Hee Seo, Da Kyung Jung, Mo Se Kim, Nae Yun Heo, Jong Ha Park, Seung Ha Park, Young Soo Moon
Intest Res 2014;12(1):53-59.   Published online January 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2014.12.1.53
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability between same-day bowel preparation protocols using 2 sachets of Picosulfate and a 4 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy.

Methods

The study had a single-center, prospective, randomized, and investigator-blinded, non-inferiority design. We evaluated bowel preparation quality according to the Ottawa scale, patient tolerability, compliance, incidence of adverse events, sleep quality, and polyp/adenoma detection rate.

Results

Among the 196 patients analyzed (mean age, 55.3 years; 50.3% men), 97 received the same-day regimen of 2 sachets of picosulfate (group A) and 99 received the 4 L split-dose PEG regimen (group B). The Ottawa score of the total colon was 4.05±1.56 in group A and 3.80±1.55 in group B (P=0.255). The proportion of patients having adequate bowel preparation in the same-day picosulfate group (61.5%) was slightly less than the 4 L PEG group (71.3%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.133). Tolerability of the group A regimen was superior to that of the group B regimen (P<0.000). The same-day picosulfate regimen was associated with fewer adverse events, such as abdominal bloating (P=0.037) and better sleep quality (P<0.000).

Conclusions

The same-day picosulfate regimen and the 4 L split-dose PEG regimen had similar efficacy in bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy. However, the same-day picosulfate regimen was easier to administer, produced fewer adverse events, and enabled better sleep quality.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of same‐day preparation with sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate on the day of colonoscopy for bowel preparation: Multicenter, single‐arm, open‐label study
    Hitomi Hori, Nobuaki Ikezawa, Shinwa Tanaka, Chise Ueda, Mizuho Fujisawa, Shinya Hoki, Hiroshi Tanabe, Ryosuke Ishida, Norihiro Okamoto, Hiroshi Takayama, Haruka Miyazaki, Hiroya Sakaguchi, Masato Kinoshita, Hirofumi Abe, Tetsuya Yoshizaki, Makoto Ooi, Ma
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(10): 2151.     CrossRef
  • Comparison Between Same-Day and Split-Dose Preparations with Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate: A Randomized Noninferiority Study
    Chen-Ta Yang, Hsuan-Yuan Huang, Hsu-Heng Yen, Chia-Wei Yang, Yang-Yuan Chen, Siou-Ping Huang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(8): 3964.     CrossRef
  • Efectividad y tolerabilidad de tres tipos de productos de preparación para colonoscopia
    Luis Fernando Roldán Molina, Lina María Roldán Delfino, Sandra Milena León Ramírez, Edilberto Elías Nuñez Cabarcas, Hilda María Pérez Useche, Antonio José Restrepo Peláez, María Adelaida Saffón Abad, Julio Eduardo Zuleta Muñoz, Juan Nicolás Zuluaga Aguila
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2021; 36(3): 334.     CrossRef
  • A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol
    Ki Hwan Kwon, Ji Ae Lee, Yun Jeong Lim, Beom Jae Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Yu Ra Sim, Wonjae Choi, Taehyun Kim, Ji Yoon Kim, Ei Rie Cho, Yoon Tae Jeen, Jong-Jae Park
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(4): 873.     CrossRef
  • A randomized controlled trial on comparison of colon cleansing for colonoscopy bowel preparation using one-day or two-day regimen methods
    Saleh Azadbakht, Morteza Azadbakht, Salehe Azadbakht, Alireza Esmaili, Parisa Rahmani
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2020; 27: 140.     CrossRef
  • Split-dose vs same-day bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nasim Parsa, Eric A Grisham, Courtney J Cockerell, Michelle L Matteson-Kome, Ramakrishna V Bysani, Sami Samiullah, Douglas L Nguyen, Veysel Tahan, Yezaz A Ghouri, Srinivas R Puli, Matthew L Bechtold
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis.2020; 8(6): 461.     CrossRef
  • Split-dose vs same-day bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nasim Parsa, Eric A Grisham, Courtney J Cockerell, Michelle L Matteson-Kome, Ramakrishna V Bysani, Sami Samiullah, Douglas L Nguyen, Veysel Tahan, Yezaz A Ghouri, Srinivas R Puli, Matthew L Bechtold
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis.2020; 8(6): 462.     CrossRef
  • Same-Day Regimen as an Alternative to Split Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Cristina Bucci, Fabiana Zingone, Pietro Schettino, Clelia Marmo, Riccardo Marmo
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kathleen Zawaly, Colin Rumbolt, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, Christine Neilson, Rasheda Rabbani, Ryan Zarychanski, Harminder Singh
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(6): 884.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Myeongsook Seo, Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1518.     CrossRef
  • Same-day Versus Split-dose Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
    Yuan-Lung Cheng, Kuang-Wei Huang, Wei-Chih Liao, Jiing-Chyuan Luo, Keng-Hsin Lan, Chien-Wei Su, Yuan-Jen Wang, Ming-Chih Hou
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2018; 52(5): 392.     CrossRef
  • Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis
    Yaron Niv
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2018; 30(3): 247.     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparations Administered the Morning of Colonoscopy Provide Similar Efficacy to a Split Dose Regimen
    Danny J. Avalos, Fernando J. Castro, Marc J. Zuckerman, Tara Keihanian, Andrew C. Berry, Benjamin Nutter, Daniel A. Sussman
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2018; 52(10): 859.     CrossRef
  • Sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol before elective colonoscopy in outpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rodrigo Silva de Paula Rocha, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Maurício Kazuyoshi Minata, Flávio Hiroshi Ananias Morita, Júlio Cesar Martins Aquino, Elisa Ryoka Baba, Nelson Tomio Miyajima, Eduardo Guimarãe
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 10(12): 422.     CrossRef
  • Low Volume Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Plus Ascorbic Acid, a Valid Alternative to Standard PEG
    Su Hwan Kim, Ji Won Kim
    Gut and Liver.2016; 10(2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Patient Descriptions of Rectal Effluents May Help to Predict the Quality of Bowel Preparation With Photographic Examples
    Hoonsub So, Sun-Jin Boo, Hyungil Seo, Ho-Su Lee, Hyojeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Seungbong Han, Dong-Hoon Yang
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Randomized controlled trial of low-volume bowel preparation agents for colonic bowel preparation: 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate
    Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Gun Kim, Ji Seong Lee, Jin-Oh Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Jun-Hyung Cho, Yong Hun Kim, Joo Young Cho, Joon Seong Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(2): 251.     CrossRef
  • Colon Transit Time May Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation
    Hong Jun Park, Myeong Hun Chae, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jae Woo Kim, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Hee Man Kim, Kyong Joo Lee
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 339.     CrossRef
  • Bowel Preparation, the First Step for a Good Quality Colonoscopy
    Ho-Su Lee, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Intestinal Research.2014; 12(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 7,254 View
  • 56 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP