Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Rectum"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Colorectal neoplasia
A survey of current practices in post-polypectomy surveillance in Korea
Jeongseok Kim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Min Seob Kwak, Su Young Kim, Seong Jung Kim, Hyun Gun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Mo Moon, Dae Seong Myung, Dong Hoon Baek, Shin Ju Oh, Hyun Jung Lee, Ji Young Lee, Yunho Jung, Jaeyoung Chun, Dong-Hoon Yang, on behalf of the Intestinal Tumor Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)
Intest Res 2024;22(2):186-207.   Published online April 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2023.00109
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background/Aims
We investigated the clinical practice patterns of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance among Korean endoscopists.
Methods
In a web-based survey conducted between September and November 2021, participants were asked about their preferred surveillance intervals and the patient age at which surveillance was discontinued. Adherence to the recent guidelines of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) was also analyzed.
Results
In total, 196 endoscopists completed the survey. The most preferred first surveillance intervals were: a 5-year interval after the removal of 1–2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm; a 3-year interval after the removal of 3–10 tubular adenomas < 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, ≤ 20 hyperplastic polyps < 10 mm, 1–4 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) < 10 mm, hyperplastic polyps or SSLs ≥ 10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas; and a 1-year interval after the removal of adenomas with highgrade dysplasia, >10 adenomas, 5–10 SSLs, and SSLs with dysplasia. In piecemeal resections of large polyps ( > 20 mm), surveillance colonoscopy was mostly preferred after 1 year for adenomas and 6 months for SSLs. The mean USMSTF guideline adherence rate was 30.7%. The largest proportion of respondents (40.8%–55.1%) discontinued the surveillance at the patient age of 80–84 years.
Conclusions
A significant discrepancy was observed between the preferred post-polypectomy surveillance intervals and recent international guidelines. Individualized measures are required to increase adherence to the guidelines.
  • 1,637 View
  • 71 Download
Close layer
Usefulness of endoscopic resection using the band ligation method for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
Ju Seung Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Jung Ho Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Dong Kyun Park, Jung Suk An
Intest Res 2016;14(2):164-171.   Published online April 27, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2016.14.2.164
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are among the most common of gastrointestinal NETs. Due to recent advances in endoscopy, various methods of complete endoscopic resection have been introduced for small (≤10 mm) rectal NETs. However, there is a debate about the optimal treatment for rectal NETs. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic resection using pneumoband and elastic band (ER-BL) for rectal NETs smaller than 10 mm in diameter.

Methods

A total of 55 patients who were diagnosed with rectal NET from January 2004 to December 2011 at Gil Medical Center were analyzed retrospectively. Sixteen patients underwent ER-BL. For comparison, 39 patients underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Results

There was a markedly lower deep margin positive rate for ER-BL than for conventional EMR (6% [1/16] vs. 46% [18/39], P=0.029). Four patients who underwent conventional EMR experienced perforation or bleeding. However, they recovered within a few days. On the other hand, patients whounderwent endoscopic resection using a pneumoband did not experience any complications. In multivariate analysis, ER-BL (P=0.021) was independently associated with complete resection.

Conclusions

ER-BL is an effective endoscopic treatment with regards to deep margin resection for rectal NET smaller than 10 mm.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Jie Chen, Jianfang Ye, Xiong Zheng, Jianyong Chen
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(3): 301.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤ 10 mm
    Roberta Elisa Rossi, Maria Terrin, Silvia Carrara, Roberta Maselli, Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi, Silvia Uccella, Andrea Gerardo Antonio Lania, Alessandro Zerbi, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(14): 1484.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Seung Wook Hong, Dong-Hoon Yang, Yoo Jin Lee, Dong Hoon Baek, Jaeyoung Chun, Hyun Gun Kim, Sung Joo Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Dae-Seong Myung
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Advantages of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device compared to conventional EMR and ESD
    Yuki Kamigaichi, Ken Yamashita, Shiro Oka, Hirosato Tamari, Yasutsugu Shimohara, Tomoyuki Nishimura, Katsuaki Inagaki, Yuki Okamoto, Hidenori Tanaka, Ryo Yuge, Yuji Urabe, Koji Arihiro, Shinji Tanaka
    DEN Open.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Children
    David S. Vitale, Kelly Wang, Laith H. Jamil, Kenneth H. Park, Quin Y. Liu
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2022; 74(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Current advances in management, treatment, and surveillance
    Camilla Gallo, Roberta Elisa Rossi, Federica Cavalcoli, Federico Barbaro, Ivo Boškoski, Pietro Invernizzi, Sara Massironi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(11): 1123.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos)
    Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Dae Kyung Sohn, Hee Jin Chang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 91(5): 1164.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Results of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with a Ligation Device for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Ai Fujimoto, Motoki Sasaki, Osamu Goto, Tadateru Maehata, Yasutoshi Ochiai, Motohiko Kato, Atsushi Nakayama, Teppei Akimoto, Jyunko Kuramoto, Yuichiro Hayashi, Kaori Kameyama, Naohisa Yahagi
    Internal Medicine.2019; 58(6): 773.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal resection with an endoscopic variceal ligation device for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Masahide Ebi, Shoko Nakagawa, Yoshiharu Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro Tamura, Shinya Izawa, Yasutaka Hijikata, Takaya Shimura, Yasushi Funaki, Naotaka Ogasawara, Makoto Sasaki, Takashi Joh, Kunio Kasugai
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(12): 1703.     CrossRef
  • Neuroendocrine neoplasms of rectum: A management update
    Emilio Bertani, Davide Ravizza, Massimo Milione, Sara Massironi, Chiara Maria Grana, Dario Zerini, Alessandra Nella Piccioli, Giuseppe Spinoglio, Nicola Fazio
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2018; 66: 45.     CrossRef
  • 6,108 View
  • 55 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Case Reports
Removal of Rectal Foreign Bodies Using Tenaculum Forceps Under Endoscopic Assistance
Keun Joon Lim, Joon Sung Kim, Boo Gyoung Kim, Sung Min Park, Jeong-Seon Ji, Byung-Wook Kim, Hwang Choi
Intest Res 2015;13(4):355-359.   Published online October 15, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.355
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

The incidence of rectal foreign bodies is increasing by the day, though not as common as that of upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Various methods for removal of foreign bodies have been reported. Removal during endoscopy using endoscopic devices is simple and safe, but if the foreign body is too large to be removed by this method, other methods are required. We report two cases of rectal foreign body removal by a relatively simple and inexpensive technique. A 42-year-old man with a vibrator in the rectum was admitted due to inability to remove it by himself and various endoscopic methods failed. Finally, the vibrator was removed successfully by using tenaculum forceps under endoscopic assistance. Similarly, a 59-year-old man with a carrot in the rectum was admitted. The carrot was removed easily by using the same method as that in the previous case. The use of tenaculum forceps under endoscopic guidance may be a useful method for removal of rectal foreign bodies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Characteristics and Outcomes Associated With Emergent Rectal Foreign Body Management: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
    Eric Frendt, Momin Masroor, Arman Saied, Arianna Neeki, Santana Youssoffi, Aldin Malkoc, Fanglong Dong, Louis Tran, Rodney Borger, David T Wong, Michael Neeki
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of unusual rectal foreign body – Case report and literature review
    Ana Elisa de Landa Moraes Teixeira Grossi, Juan Eduardo Rios Rodriguez, Alexia Aina de Freitas Sousa, Danielle Alcântara Barbosa Machado, Victor Vinícius Monteiro Lins de Albuquerque, Frank Pinheiro Pessoa Coelho de Macedo
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 94: 107051.     CrossRef
  • Novel Bedside Utilization of Foley Catheter in the Emergent Removal of Colorectal Foreign Body: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Terry Lefcourt, Andrew Ku, Leo Issagholian, Arianna S Neeki, Milton Retamozo, Fanglong Dong, Michael M Neeki
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopy-assisted Removal of a Large Rectal Foreign Body by the Valsalva Maneuver
    Min Young Son, Seun Ja Park, Won Moon, Gyu Man Oh, Moo In Park, Sung Eun Kim, Jae Hyun Kim, Kyoungwon Jung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 76(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Rectal Foreign Body Removal in the Emergency Department: A Case Report
    Samuel Nesemann, Kimberly Hubbard, Mehdi Siddiqui, William Fernandez
    Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine.2020; 4(3): 450.     CrossRef
  • Pfählungsverletzungen und rektale Fremdkörper
    M. Roblick, S. Farke
    coloproctology.2019; 41(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Pfählungsverletzungen und rektale Fremdkörper
    M. Roblick, S. Farke
    Notfall + Rettungsmedizin.2019; 22(5): 449.     CrossRef
  • New endoscopic technique for retrieval of large colonic foreign bodies and an endoscopy-oriented review of the literature
    Alberto Tringali, Giulia Bonato, Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Massimiliano Mutignani
    BMJ Case Reports.2018; : bcr-2018-226348.     CrossRef
  • Rectal Foreign Body of Eggplant Treated Successfully by Endoscopic Transanal Removal
    Hiroo Sei, Toshihiko Tomita, Keisuke Nakai, Kumiko Nakamura, Akio Tamura, Yoshio Ohda, Tadayuki Oshima, Hirokazu Fukui, Jiro Watari, Hiroto Miwa
    Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2018; 12(1): 189.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: a 10-year single-center experience
    Pia Kokemohr, Lars Haeder, Fabian Joachim Frömling, Peter Landwehr, Joachim Jähne
    Innovative Surgical Sciences.2017; 2(2): 89.     CrossRef
  • Successful Transanal Removal of a Rectal Foreign Body by Abdominal Compression under Endoscopic and X-Ray Fluoroscopic Observation: A Case Report
    Hironobu Mikami, Norihisa Ishimura, Akihiko Oka, Ichiro Moriyama, Takafumi Yuki, Kousaku Kawashima, Shuichi Sato, Shunji Ishihara, Yoshikazu Kinoshita
    Case Reports in Gastroenterology.2016; 10(3): 646.     CrossRef
  • 5,672 View
  • 55 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Natural Course of an Untreated Metastatic Perirectal Lymph Node After the Endoscopic Resection of a Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor
Sang Hyung Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jung Su Lee, Soyoung Park, Ho-Su Lee, Hyojeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jihun Kim
Intest Res 2015;13(2):175-179.   Published online April 27, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.175
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader

Lymph node metastasis is rare in small (i.e., <10 mm) rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In addition to tumor size, pathological features such as the mitotic or Ki-67 proliferation index are associated with lymph node metastasis in rectal NETs. We recently treated a patient who underwent endoscopic treatment of a small, grade 1 rectal NET that recurred in the form of perirectal lymph node metastasis 7 years later. A 7-mm-sized perirectal lymph node was noted at the time of the initial endoscopic treatment. The same lymph node was found to be slightly enlarged on follow-up and finally confirmed as a metastatic NET. Therefore, the perirectal lymph node metastasis might have been present at the time of the initial diagnosis. However, the growth rate of the lymph node was extremely low, and it took 7 years to increase in size from 7 to 10 mm. NETs with low Ki-67 proliferation index and without mitotic activity may grow extremely slowly even if they are metastatic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical application of endoscopic ultrasonography in the management of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Soo-Young Na, Seong Jung Kim, Hyoun Woo Kang
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2023; 12(3): 105.     CrossRef
  • Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10–20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor
    Byung-Soo Park, Sung Hwan Cho, Gyung Mo Son, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Jin Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Hyung Wook Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 17(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic value in small rectal neuroendocrine tumor treated by local excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ho Suk Kang, Mi Jung Kwon, Tae-Hwan Kim, Junhee Han, Young-Su Ju
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2019; 215(11): 152642.     CrossRef
  • Trans‐anal full‐thickness endoscopic resection of a rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm performed with a TEO® (Karl Storz microsurgery device) and laparoscopic indocyanine‐green‐guided lymphatic sampling – a video vignette
    P. Leon, A. Balduzzi, M. Troian, N. de Manzini
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(4): 399.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of endoscopic resection using the band ligation method for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Ju Seung Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Jung Ho Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Dong Kyun Park, Jung Suk An
    Intestinal Research.2016; 14(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • Lymphovascular invasion in more than one-quarter of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Mi Jung Kwon, Ho Suk Kang, Jae Seung Soh, Hyun Lim, Jong Hyeok Kim, Choong Kee Park, Hye-Rim Park, Eun Sook Nam
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(42): 9400.     CrossRef
  • Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos)
    Dong-Hoon Yang, Yangsoon Park, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 83(5): 1015.     CrossRef
  • Are Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Safe?
    Jae Ho Choi, Jae Myung Cha
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • 6,814 View
  • 49 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
The Clinical Usefulness of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy for Rectal and Perirectal Lesions
Jae Seung Soh, Ho-Su Lee, Seohyun Lee, Jungho Bae, Hyo Jeong Lee, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Kyung-Jo Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Intest Res 2015;13(2):135-144.   Published online April 27, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.135
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReader
<b>Background/Aims</b><br/>

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and/or biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) have been used to diagnose subepithelial tumors (SETs) and extraluminal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Our group previously reported the usefulness of EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions. This study reports our expanded experience with EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions in terms of diagnostic accuracy and safety. We also included our new experience with EUS-FNB using the recently introduced ProCore needle.

Methods

From April 2009 to March 2014, EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions was performed in 30 consecutive patients. We evaluated EUS-FNA/B performance by comparing histological diagnoses with final results. We also investigated factors affecting diagnostic accuracy.

Results

Among 10 patients with SETs, EUS-FNA/B specimen results revealed a gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 4 patients and malignant lymphoma in 1 patient. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B was 50% for SETs (5/10). Among 20 patients with non-SET lesions, 8 patients were diagnosed with malignant disease and 7 were diagnosed with benign disease based on both EUS-FNA/B and the final results. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B for non-SET lesions was 75% (15/20). The size of lesions was the only factor related to diagnostic accuracy (P=0.027). Two complications of mild fever and asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum occurred after EUS-FNA/B.

Conclusions

The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA/B for rectal and perirectal lesions was 67% (20/30). EUS-FNA/B is a clinically useful method for cytological and histological diagnoses of rectal and perirectal lesions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colonoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Using a Curvilinear Array Transducer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Spencer Cheng, Sergio E. Matuguma, Guilherme H. P. de Oliveira, Gustavo L.R. Silva, Henrique Cheng, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Mauricio K Minata
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(2): e80.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)
    Francesco Maione, Alessia Chini, Marco Milone, Nicola Gennarelli, Michele Manigrasso, Rosa Maione, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Pagano, Francesca Paola Tropeano, Gaetano Luglio, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(5): 771.     CrossRef
  • Long-term experience with percutaneous biopsies of pelvic lesions using CT guidance
    Petr Hoffmann, Michal Balik, Martina Hoffmannova, Jiri Spacek, Jiri Vanasek, Adam Rezac, Petr Dvorak
    Science Progress.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions
    Nobu Nishioka, Takeshi Ogura, Yoshitaka Kurisu, Miyuki Imanishi, Saori Onda, Wataru Takagi, Tatsushi Sano, Atsushi Okuda, Akira Miyano, Mio Amano, Kazuhide Higuchi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(10): 4125.     CrossRef
  • Concise review on the comparative efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration vs core biopsy in pancreatic masses, upper and lower gastrointestinal submucosal tumors
    Tawfik Khoury, Wisam Sbeit, Nicholas Ludvik, Divya Nadella, Alex Wiles, Caitlin Marshall, Manoj Kumar, Gilad Shapira, Alan Schumann, Meir Mizrahi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 10(10): 267.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of extra-rectal lesions
    J. Lim, S. A. Norton, N. A. Wong, M. G. Thomas
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(5): 393.     CrossRef
  • Application of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Gastrointestinal Disease
    Eun Young Kim
    Intestinal Research.2015; 13(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Mimicking a Symptomatic Rectal Submucosal Tumor
    Seung Wook Hong, Jaeyoung Chun, Kyu Joo Park, Cheol Kwak, Joo Sung Kim
    Soonchunhyang Medical Science.2015; 21(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • 6,498 View
  • 66 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP