Intest Res Search

CLOSE


Intest Res > Volume 9(3); 2011 > Article
Intestinal Research 2011;9(3):211-216.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2011.9.3.211    Published online December 30, 2011.
Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Large Laterally Spreading Tumor: Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Sang Goo Kang, Suck-Ho Lee, Seung Kyu Chung, Jae Min Shin, Seong Ran Jeon, Tae Hee Lee, Hyun Gun Kim, Jin Oh Kim
Department of Internal Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Korea
크기가 큰 측방발육형종양의 치료 전략: 분할점막절제술 혹은 점막하박리술
강상구, 이석호, 정승규, 신재민, 전성란, 이태희, 김현건, 김진오
순천향대학교 의과대학 천안병원, 서울병원 내과학교실
Abstract
Background/Aims
The therapeutic strategy between endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between EPMR and ESD in patients with large LST. Methods: From July 2006 to September 2010, 106 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for large (>20 mm) LSTs were included in our retrospective analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients and tumors were not different between two groups except for location (EPMR-right colon, ESD-rectum). The en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate were significantly higher in the ESD group than those in the EPMR group (EPMR vs. ESD, 53.5% vs. 88.6, P<0.01, 45.1% vs. 71.4%, P=0.01, respectively). However, total procedure time was significantly shorter in the EPMR group (21.3 min vs. 44.4 min, P<0.01). Furthermore, the rates of complication including perforation and bleeding were significantly lower in the EPMR group than those in the ESD group (perforation, 1.4% vs. 11.4%, P=0.02; bleeding, 4.2% vs. 17.1%, P=0.03, respectively). During 19.9 months of follow-up, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence (1.5% vs. 3.2%). Non-granular, pseudo-depressed type (LST-PD) showed a significantly higher presence of adenocarcinoma and deeper submucosal invasion than other types of LSTs. Conclusions: The therapeutic strategy for choosing between EPMR and ESD for large LST lesions should be determined based on the macroscopic findings of their subtype. En bloc resection with ESD should be applied to LST-PDs due to their higher rate of submucosal invasion. (Intest Res 2011;9:211-216)
Key Words: Colon, Laterally Spreading Tumor, Endoscopic Resection
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 2,198 View
  • 16 Download
We recommend


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Room 310, Lotte Gold Rose II, 31 Seolleung-ro 86-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06193, Korea
Tel: +82-2-957-6145    Fax: +82-2-957-6146    E-mail: thekasid@irjournal.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next