Biomarker dynamics during infliximab salvage for acute severe ulcerative colitis: C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio and CRP-albumin ratio are useful in predicting colectomy

Danny Con; Bridgette Andrew; Steven Nicolaides; Daniel R van Langenberg; Abhinav Vasudevan

doi:10.5217/ir.2020.00146

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Intest Res > Volume 20(1); 2022 > Article

Original Article Biomarker dynamics during infliximab salvage for acute severe ulcerative colitis: C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio and CRP-albumin ratio are useful in predicting colectomy: Danny Con^1,, Bridgette Andrew¹, Steven Nicolaides¹, Daniel R van Langenberg^1,2, Abhinav Vasudevan^1,2; Intestinal Research 2022;20(1):101-113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2020.00146
Published online: March 12, 2021

¹Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia

²Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to Danny Con, Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill Hospital, 8 Arnold St, Box Hill Melbourne, Victoria 3128, Australia. Tel: +61-3-8804-9999, Fax: +61-3-9839-6733, E-mail: dannycon302@gmail.com

• Received: November 9, 2020 • Revised: January 4, 2021 • Accepted: January 22, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

7,429 Views
348 Download
25 Web of Science
23 Crossref
21 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
NOTES
Supplementary Material
REFERENCES

Abstract

Background/Aims
The residual risk of colectomy after infliximab salvage in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is required to inform the need for subsequent maintenance biologic therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the dynamic response of common serum biomarkers to infliximab salvage and assess their utility in predicting subsequent colectomy.
Methods
A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on all patients who received infliximab salvage for steroid-refractory ASUC between January 1, 2010, and July 31, 2019. Biomarkers were assessed on admission and days 1 and 3 post infliximab, and included C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-ratio (CAR), CRP-lymphocyte-ratio (CLR), platelet-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR).
Results
Of 94 patients (median age, 35 years; 67% of male), 20% required colectomy at 12 months. Biomarkers on day 3 post-infliximab best differentiated nonresponders, who had higher CRP, lower albumin and lower lymphocyte count (each P < 0.05). Day 3 predictive performance (area under the curve) for 12-month colectomy was best for CAR (0.871) and CLR (0.874), which were similar to Lindgren (0.829; P > 0.05) but superior to Mayo (0.726), partial Mayo (0.719), PLR (0.719), Ho index (0.714), NLR (0.675), Travis score (0.657) and endoscopic Mayo (0.609) (each P < 0.05). A day 3 CAR cutoff of 0.47 mg/g had 79% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 94% negative predictive value (NPV) to predict colectomy; while a day 3 CLR cutoff of 6.0 mg/10⁹ had 84% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 96% NPV.
Conclusions
CAR and CLR measured on day 3 post infliximab salvage for steroid-refractory ASUC represent simple and routinely performed biomarkers that appear to be strong predictors of colectomy. Prospective studies are required to confirm the utility of these predictive scores.
Keywords: Inflammatory bowel disease; Precision medicine; Kinetics

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that is characterized by frequent flares, hospitalizations, surgery and psychological morbidity [1,2]. Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a severe exacerbation of UC that warrants intravenous corticosteroids and may require emergency colectomy [3]. Corticosteroid failure necessitates salvage therapy with infliximab or ciclosporin which have demonstrated good short term efficacy [4-7]. However longer term prognosis after medical salvage remains guarded, where up to 50% of patients still proceed to colectomy in the absence of maintenance biologic therapy [8-10]. Conversely, a proportion of patients may have an initial period of significant symptoms, but develop only mild symptoms or even remission in the subsequent 10 years of their disease course [11].

To date, the ability to distinguish individuals who require maintenance infliximab following salvage therapy from those who could be continued on conventional therapy, such as immunomodulators, has not been established. The ability to accurately predict response to infliximab salvage and the subsequent risk of colectomy is crucial in order to decide the most appropriate maintenance therapy, which is an important concept in modern precision medicine [12,13]. Moreover, the optimal timing and dosing regimen of infliximab salvage is subject to ongoing research [14], therefore a predictive score for infliximab failure early in the presentation might facilitate timely decisions for potential dose escalation, additional line medical salvage, or early colectomy [15,16].

Biomarkers are increasingly recognized to play a crucial role in precision medicine, and useful biomarkers to aid in clinical prediction are needed [17,18]. We hypothesize that an improved understanding of the dynamics of biomarkers during infliximab salvage is crucial to identify candidate predictors of response, as well as to determine ideal cutoffs, which may change over time. The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin ratio (CAR) after infliximab salvage has been identified as a potential predictor of colectomy [15], yet the optimal timing of measurements and the utility of serial measurements require further evaluation. Recently, novel biomarkers such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to predict mucosal healing in UC after infliximab [19,20] but their utility in ASUC has not been studied. Additionally, the CRP-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) has been studied in other clinical settings, but not in UC [21].

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the dynamic response of serum biomarkers in responders compared with nonresponders to infliximab salvage during steroid-refractory ASUC, and to determine their utility in predicting the need for colectomy at 12 months following the initial presentation. The secondary aim was to determine the utility of these biomarkers in predicting early colectomy by 1 month.

METHODS

1. Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary health network comprising 3 acute hospitals in Australia. All patients who presented with steroid-refractory ASUC who received infliximab salvage between January 1, 2010 and July 31, 2019 were followed up for 12 months to determine rates and timing of colectomy. The dynamics and predictive performance for colectomy of common biomarkers during ASUC were assessed. The study was approved by the Eastern Health Office of Research and Ethics (approval No. QA20-107), where the requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study.

2. Patient Selection

The hospital pharmacy database provided automatic records for all infliximab prescriptions dispensed to patients admitted to the gastroenterology unit during the study period. Electronic medical records were manually reviewed to determine the indication for infliximab and check for selection criteria. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, hospitalized with steroid-refractory ASUC (defined as 6 or more bloody stools with any of: temperature > 37.8°C, pulse > 90 beats/min, CRP > 30 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 30 mm/hr or hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL on day 3 of intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg [4 times a day] as per Truelove and Witt’s criteria [4]); received salvage infliximab (1–3 doses at 5–10 mg/kg per dose). Patients were excluded if they were on maintenance biologic therapy at baseline, or if they received sequential salvage therapy with cyclosporine then infliximab.

3. Data Collection

Hospital electronic medical records were reviewed to collect data. Endoscopy was performed in all patients during hospitalization prior to salvage therapy. Subsequent maintenance therapy and colectomy rates up to 12 months post ASUC were recorded. Serum biomarkers (CRP, albumin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets) were uniformly collected on admission (prior to intravenous corticosteroids) and on days 1 and 3 post salvage. Comparator scores included Ho (Edinburgh index [22]), Travis (Oxford index [23]), Lindgren (Sweden index [24]) and Mayo-related scores, which were each calculated on day 1 and 3 post salvage (Supplementary Table 1). Endoscopy was performed in all patients on or shortly after admission, prior to infliximab. Partial Mayo scores were calculated retrospectively by the study investigators with the physician global assessment being based on interpretation of the inpatient notes completed at the time of hospitalization. Complete Mayo score used the partial Mayo calculated on days 1 and 3 with the endoscopic subscore calculated on index endoscopy and the Mayo subscore was documented at the time of the procedure by the endoscopist. Colonic dilatation was recorded based on abdominal X-ray on day 1 and day 3 post infliximab salvage. Stool Clostridioides difficile toxin A assay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) was performed in all patients. Fecal calprotectin was not analyzed given they were not routinely performed at our centers during ASUC events.

4. Statistical Analysis

Nonparametric continuous variables were expressed as medians with interquartile range (IQR). The association of biomarkers and their ratios with colectomy over time were assessed in 2 ways: comparison of distributions using the Mann-Whitney U (rank-sum) test and Spearman rank correlation rho for nonparametric data.

The utility of biomarker ratios in predicting colectomy as a binary outcome variable was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed at different cutoff values. The optimal cutoff was chosen as the maximum Youden statistic (defined as sensitivity+specificity–1). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) for colectomy. In the multivariable logistic regression models, biomarker ratios were controlled for all variables significantly associated with colectomy on univariable analysis. For the primary aim of analyzing 12-month colectomy, 2 multivariable models were developed: (1) using the entire cohort; (2) using the sub-cohort of patients who avoided colectomy at index admission, and additionally adjusting for cumulative infliximab dose received as well as type of maintenance therapy. For the secondary aim, a third multivariable model was developed using 1-month colectomy as the outcome.

Complete clinical data (stool count, partial Mayo score and colonic dilatation) was available for 100% of patients on day 1 post infliximab salvage. For 8 patients (9%) who were discharged prior to day 3 due to clinical improvement post salvage, single imputation using last-observation-carried-forward was used for clinical data. For missing biomarker data on day 1 (1% for CRP and full blood count; 4% for albumin) and day 3 post salvage (11% for CRP and full blood count; 14% for albumin), multiple imputation was used to estimate their distributions. For this analysis, missing data were assumed to be missing at random and estimated assuming the multivariate normal distribution (after log transformation of CRP and lymphocyte count to correct skewness). The imputation procedure was repeated 10 times to generate the final distribution.

As sensitivity analysis, predictive performance was evaluated when using only patients with complete data for the respective biomarker ratio. Due to the long study period, a second sensitivity analysis was conducted by assessing predictive performance in patients who entered the study on or after 2016, and in patients who entered the study prior to 2016. Additional post-hoc exploratory analyses included assessing the predictive utility of the difference and ratio of CAR and CLR from day 1 to day 3 post salvage.

All analysis was performed in Stata/IC 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). A two-sided P < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 94 steroid-refractory ASUC patients who received infliximab salvage were included (Table 1). A flowchart of the patient identification process is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Median age was 35 years (IQR, 26–53 years) and 63 patients (67%) were male. Median disease duration was 1 year (IQR, 0–5 years). The majority of patients had either left sided (45%) or extensive colitis (47%) prior to ASUC. Six percent had prior exposure to infliximab and 2% had prior intestinal surgery. Initial dose of infliximab received was 5 mg/kg in 85% and 10 mg/kg in 15% of patients.

2. Outcomes

Of 94 patients, 19 (20%) required colectomy by 12 months (10 proceeded to colectomy during index admission). Univariable predictors of 12-month colectomy included older age (OR, 1.03 per year; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06; P = 0.035), shorter disease duration ≤ 3 years (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.2–24.9; P = 0.032) and baseline steroid requirement (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4–11.6; P = 0.009). There was no significant association with baseline aminosalicylate or immunomodulator requirement, current/previous smoking, prior intestinal surgery, prior infliximab exposure, initial infliximab dose received (10 mg/kg vs. 5 mg/kg) or sex (Supplementary Table 2). Although not statistically significant, there was a numerically higher rate of colectomy in patients with E2 (8/42, 19%) and E3 extent (11/44, 25%) compared to patients with E1 extent (0/8, 0%), with corresponding ORs of 5.4 (95% CI, 0.3–108.6) for E2 versus E1, and 8.0 (95% CI, 0.4–159.7) for E3 versus E1.

When considering only the patients who avoided index colectomy (defined as colectomy during index admission; n = 84), greater cumulative infliximab dose was protective for 12-month colectomy (OR, 0.3 per 5 mg/kg; P = 0.010), where the median cumulative dose received was 15 mg/kg (IQR, 10–15; range, 5–30). In this sub-cohort, 50% were maintained with immunomodulator monotherapy, 35% were maintained with infliximab and immunomodulator combination therapy and 15% were maintained with aminosalicylates only. The 12-month colectomy rate in patients who avoided index colectomy was 31% in patients on aminosalicylates only, 10% in patients on immunomodulator monotherapy and 3% in patients on dual therapy. Compared to patients maintained on aminosalicylates alone, the corresponding ORs for avoiding colectomy were 4.2 (P = 0.07) in the immunomodulator group and 12.4 (P = 0.033) in the combination therapy group.

3. Biomarker Dynamics during ASUC

1) C-Reactive Protein

Correlations with colectomy at 12 months are given in Table 2, while differences in biomarker levels are given in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 3. There was no significant difference in CRP at baseline between patients who required or avoided colectomy (median 65 mg/L vs. 46 mg/L, P = 0.14). CRP fell over time in both groups, but the rate of decline was greatest in patients who avoided colectomy. From baseline to day 1, CRP fell by a median of 43% in the colectomy group compared to 80% in the non-colectomy group (P = 0.004). From day 1 to day 3, CRP fell by a median of 16% and 51% respectively (P = 0.024). This resulted in higher CRPs in the colectomy group on both day 1 (median 32 mg/L vs. 11 mg/L, P < 0.001) and day 3 (median 27 mg/L vs. 5 mg/L, P < 0.001) post salvage therapy. The corresponding rank correlations between CRP and 12-month colectomy were moderate on day 1 (ρ = 0.408, P < 0.001) and day 3 (ρ = 0.480, P < 0.001).

2) Albumin

Baseline albumin was lower in patients requiring 12-month colectomy (27 g/L vs. 32 g/L, P = 0.025). In all patients, albumin fell from baseline to day 1 post salvage, but did not significantly change from day 1 to day 3. The change was similar in both groups from baseline to day 1 (median reduction 14% vs. 12%, P = 0.56) and day 1 to day 3 (median 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.96). Concordantly, albumin remained lower in patients who required colectomy on day 1 (median 21 g/L vs. 27 g/L, P = 0.003) and day 3 (median 23 g/L vs. 28 g/L, P < 0.001) compared to patients who avoided colectomy. The corresponding negative rank correlations between albumin and 12-month colectomy were weak at baseline (ρ = –0.232, P = 0.025) and weak-to-moderate on days 1 (ρ = –0.317, P = 0.002) and 3 (ρ = –0.369, P < 0.001).

3) Lymphocyte Count

There was a numerically lower lymphocyte count on admission in patients requiring 12-month colectomy, however this did not reach statistical significance (median vs. 1.0 × 10⁹/L vs. 1.5 × 10⁹/L, P = 0.06). Lymphocyte count did not substantially change over time in patients who required 12-month colectomy (median 1.0, 1.3, and 1.3 × 10⁹/L on admission, day 1, and day 3 respectively, each comparison P > 0.05), while in patients who avoided 12-month colectomy, lymphocyte count increased at each time point (median 1.5 × 10⁹/L at baseline to 1.8 × 10⁹/L on day 1, P = 0.045 and up to 2.8 × 10⁹/L on day 3 post salvage, P < 0.001). From baseline, the corresponding percentage increases by day 3 were 17% for 12-month colectomy patients and 96% for noncolectomy patients. This resulted in a significantly lower lymphocyte count on day 3 in patients who required 12-month colectomy compared to patients who avoided colectomy (median vs. 1.3 × 10⁹/L vs. 2.8 × 10⁹/L, P = 0.001). The corresponding rank correlation of day 3 lymphocyte count was weak-to-moderate with 12-month colectomy (ρ = –0.361, P < 0.001).

4) Neutrophil and Platelet Count

Both neutrophil count and platelet count were similar between patients requiring and avoiding 12-month colectomy at all time points and did not significantly change between time points. There were no significant correlations with colectomy at any time point.

5) Biomarker Ratios

Each biomarker ratio decreased over time (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 4). From day 1 to day 3 post infliximab salvage, CAR decreased from a median of 0.52 mg/g (IQR, 0.23–1.29) to 0.30 mg/g (IQR, 0.09–0.68) (P = 0.004); CLR decreased from a median of 9.09 mg/10⁹ (IQR, 3.00–20.77) to 2.75 mg/10⁹ (IQR, 0.98–10.00) (P < 0.001); PLR decreased from a median of 225.2 (IQR, 140.0–335.4) to 147.0 (IQR, 103.2–254.0) (P = 0.004) and NLR decreased from a median of 5.05 (IQR, 2.72–7.57) to 3.15 (IQR, 1.99–5.38) (P = 0.004).

4. Utility of Biomarker Ratios in Predicting Colectomy

1) Correlations

Overall, correlations with 12-month colectomy were strongest on day 3 post salvage for all biomarkers (Table 2). On day 3, both CAR and CLR had a moderately positive rank correlation with colectomy (ρ = 0.516 and ρ = 0.518 respectively, each P < 0.001). PLR had a weak-to-moderate correlation with colectomy (ρ = 0.325, P = 0.003) while NLR had a weak correlation (ρ = 0.253, P = 0.020). There was no significant correlation with CAR at baseline with colectomy (ρ = 0.183, P = 0.08) and a weak correlation with CLR at baseline and colectomy (ρ = 0.229, P = 0.026).

2) Predictive Performance

Day 3 CAR and CLR demonstrated the highest predictive performance (AUC) for 12-month colectomy (0.871, 0.874 respectively) (Table 3). Day 3 CAR and CLR were superior to day 3 NLR and PLR, which both had fair predictive performance (0.672, 0.707 respectively, each P < 0.05). Predictive properties at various thresholds are given in Supplementary Table 5. When considering the sub-cohort of patients who avoided index colectomy, day 3 CAR and CLR maintained high AUC for 12-month colectomy (0.810 and 0.818 respectively), while day 3 NLR and PLR maintained low-fair AUCs (0.653 vs. 0.642 respectively).

3) Optimal Cutoff Values

To predict 12-month colectomy, the optimal cutoff by Youden index for CAR on day 3 was 0.47 mg/g (sensitivity 79%, specificity 80%, PPV 50%, NPV 94%), while the optimal cutoff for CLR on day 3 was 6.0 mg/10⁹ (sensitivity 84%, specificity 84%, PPV 57%, NPV 96%). When applied to the sub-cohort of patients who avoided index colectomy, the predictive properties for 12-month colectomy of day 3 CAR > 0.47 mg/g were: sensitivity 67%, specificity 80%, PPV 29%, NPV 95%, while the properties of day 3 CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ were: sensitivity 78%, specificity 84%, PPV 37%, NPV 97%. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates after stratifying by CAR > 0.47 mg/g and CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ are shown in Fig. 3, where the difference in survival curves were significant using either biomarker ratio (both P < 0.001 by log-rank test).

CAR > 0.47 mg/g occurred in 32% of patients and was independently associated with 12-month colectomy (unadjusted OR 15.0, P < 0.001; adjusted OR 13.6, P = 0.002), while CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ occurred in 30% of patients and was also independently associated with 12-month colectomy (unadjusted OR 28.0, P < 0.001; adjusted OR 20.9, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 2). Amongst the patients who avoided index colectomy (Supplementary Table 6), CAR > 0.47 mg/g predicted 12-month colectomy on unadjusted analysis (OR, 8.0; P = 0.006), but did not reach significance after multivariable adjustment (OR, 4.7; P = 0.12). However, CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ predicted 12-month colectomy on unadjusted (OR, 18.4; P = 0.001) and multivariable analysis (OR, 6.8; P = 0.032). Using day 3 CLR, high risk compared to low-risk patients who avoided index colectomy had an increased residual 12-month colectomy risk regardless of whether they were maintained on a biologic (n = 29, 20% vs. 0%, P = 0.026) or not (n = 55, 44% vs. 3%, P = 0.001). Using day 3 CAR, high risk compared to low-risk patients who avoided index colectomy had an increased residual 12-month colectomy risk regardless of whether they were maintained on a biologic (n = 29, 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.011) or not (n = 55, 29% vs. 8%, P = 0.036).

When considering 1-month colectomy, day 3 CAR > 0.47 mg/g had 90% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 30% PPV and 98% NPV, while day 3 CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ had 90% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 32% PPV 32% and 98% NPV. Both CAR > 0.47 mg/g colectomy (unadjusted OR 27.0, P = 0.002; adjusted OR 22.0, P = 0.022) and CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹ (unadjusted OR 30.8, P = 0.002; adjusted OR 15.9, P = 0.012) were independently associated with 1-month colectomy (Supplementary Table 7).

4) Sensitivity Analysis

CAR and CLR performed similarly in predicting colectomy in patients with complete data (Supplementary Table 8). CAR performed similarly in patients who entered the study after or before 2016 for both 12- and 1-month colectomy. However, CLR appeared to perform better for both 12- and 1-month colectomy in patients who entered the study on or after 2016 (n = 49; AUC 0.936, 0.989 respectively) compared to before 2016 (n = 45; AUC 0.834, 0.850 respectively).

The indices also performed similar in predicting colectomy after excluding 8 patients with mild endoscopic disease and/or E1 proctitis during ASUC. CAR predicted 12- and 1-month colectomy with AUC 0.872, 0.905 respectively, while CLR had AUC 0.878 and 0.907 respectively.

We further explored the utility of the rate of decline of CAR and CLR in predicting outcomes. The predictive performances of the absolute differences in CAR (AUC, 0.566) and CLR (AUC, 0.611) from day 1 to day 3 were only fair. The predictive performance of the ratios of day 3 and day 1 values for CAR (AUC, 0.677) and CLR (AUC, 0.700) were moderate.

5) Comparison with Existing Scores

Overall, scores performed better when calculated on day 3 (Table 3). To predict 12-month colectomy (AUC), CLR (0.874) and CAR (0.871) had numerically higher but statistically nonsignificant predictive performance compared to the Lindgren score (0.829) (each P > 0.05). However, CAR and CLR were significantly better than day 3 Mayo (0.726), partial Mayo (0.719), PLR (0.719), Ho index (0.714), NLR (0.675), Travis score (0.657) and admission endoscopic Mayo subscore (0.609) (each P < 0.05). To predict 12-month colectomy amongst patients who avoided index colectomy, the respective day 3 predictive performances were: CLR (0.818), CAR (0.810), Lindgren (0.752), NLR (0.653), PLR (0.642), Mayo score (0.594), partial Mayo score (0.590), Travis index (0.587), Ho index (0.542) and admission endoscopic Mayo subscore (0.523).

To predict colectomy by 1 month (AUC), CAR (0.908) and CLR (0.907) performed best, with numerically higher but not statistically significantly different AUCs compared to Lindgren (0.884), Ho (0.860), Mayo (0.831) and partial Mayo scores (0.821) (each P > 0.05). However, CAR and CLR were significantly better than day 3 PLR (0.785), Travis score (0.711), NLR (0.684) and admission Mayo endoscopic subscore (0.685) (each P < 0.05).

The previously established Lindgren cutoff of 8.0 [12,25] classified 21% of patients as high risk and had 58% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 55% PPV, 89% NPV for 12-month colectomy, and 70% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 35% PPV, 96% NPV for 1-month colectomy. Using a less stringent cutoff of 6.7, which classified 30% of patients as high risk (the distribution that corresponds to the optimal cutoffs identified for CAR and CLR), the Lindgren score had 63% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 43% PPV, 89% NPV for 12-month colectomy, and 70% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 25% PPV and 95% NPV for 1-month colectomy.

DISCUSSION

Biomarkers have the potential to predict outcomes and tailor therapeutic options to the individual, which are core components of modern IBD management algorithms and precision medicine [17,26]. Our study has highlighted the difference in biomarker dynamics between patients who required and avoided colectomy and demonstrated the potential utility of CAR and CLR early in the treatment course (day 3 post salvage) in predicting infliximab failure. With the expansion of efficacious treatments such as newer biologic therapies and small molecule inhibitors [27-30], the ability to predict disease trajectory in ASUC should inform treatment choice—for example, a patient who is likely to require longer term colectomy despite infliximab salvage may warrant more proactive optimization of maintenance therapy with a biologic agent (a top-down approach), while patients with a lower risk of colectomy may only require conventional therapy [31-33]. Although the ability to continue biologic therapy in all patients may appear attractive, a careful risk-benefit assessment should be made given such a strategy introduces an additional risk of infections and may not be cost-effective [34,35]. Our study further stresses the importance of discovering an optimal management algorithm after ASUC, as the risk of colectomy in our study appeared to be dependent on the type of maintenance therapy received.

This study has demonstrated that the utility of biomarker ratios is predicated by the early dynamics of the constituent biomarkers after infliximab salvage. CRP falls in most patients following infliximab, but the fall is attenuated in patients who proceed to colectomy. Even if such patients avoid an early colectomy, there is still a higher likelihood of longer-term colectomy, so clinicians need to remain vigilant in such patients and have a low threshold to continue aggressive medical therapy. Lymphocyte count rises in most patients shortly after salvage therapy yet appears to remain static in patients who fail infliximab. The association between elevated CRP and both steroid and infliximab failure has been demonstrated previously and is expected [15,23]. An association between lymphocyte count is much less understood, although our results support a recent study which showed that lymphocytosis occurs after anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and may be associated with treatment response [36]. In other disease entities, anti-TNF therapy purportedly impairs marginalization of lymphocytes to the site of inflammation as part of its mechanism of action, thereby causing a transient increase in circulating lymphocytes [37]. Although subject to replication in other IBD cohorts, the lack of a transient lymphocytosis after infliximab may thus suggest ongoing lymphocyte marginalization to the inflamed gut and hence portend infliximab failure.

As expected, serum albumin remained lower across all time points in patients who failed infliximab. The association with hypoalbuminemia and infliximab failure has been attributed to increased colonic infliximab clearance with the former [38,39]. Indeed, a higher baseline clearance and lower serum concentrations of infliximab have been shown to predict treatment failure and colectomy [16,40]. A suppressed albumin is also reflective of the systemic inflammatory burden and is a known poor prognostic marker in multiple disease entities. Surprisingly, although a higher platelet count has been associated with steroid failure in ASUC [23], there was no association with infliximab failure in our study. Although we have shown that platelet count and neutrophil count were not useful as acute phase reactants, their suppression later in the treatment course might be useful to indicate a response to therapy and predict mucosal healing [19].

These data emphasize that the timing of biomarker measurement is crucial. Not only did biomarkers perform better when calculated on day 3 than on day 1, biomarkers and their ratios were shown to change over time, so cutoffs derived from optimizing sensitivity and specificity will change depending on which day the tests are performed. A previous study that showed an optimal CAR cutoff for 0.37 unfortunately did not specify the timing of the measurements [15]. The optimal cutoffs identified in our cohort were CAR > 0.47 mg/g and CLR > 6.0 mg/10⁹, which both applied to just under a third of patients in this study. Using either of the ratios, the probability of requiring colectomy by 12 months in patients identified as high risk was 50%–57% (or 29%–37% in those who avoided index colectomy), and in over two-thirds of patients identified as low risk, the probability of requiring colectomy was only 4%–6% (or 3%–5% correspondingly). CLR seemed to provide the best risk stratification: using day 3 CLR, low-risk patients not on biologic maintenance only had a 3% probability of requiring colectomy, compared to high-risk patients on biologic maintenance (20%) and high-risk patients not on biologic (44%). CLR therefore had substantial utility in identifying patients likely to fail infliximab, independent of other variables associated with colectomy such as age, baseline steroid requirement and type of maintenance therapy used following ASUC as shown by our multiple regression analysis.

In addition to guiding the choice of maintenance therapy, predictive scores may also guide optimal salvage therapy in ASUC, which remains an area of ongoing research. Observational studies have suggested a possible improved outcome with accelerated infliximab dosing [41], although this remains contentious and has yet to be confirmed in a randomized trial [14,42]. The use of a predictive score calculation on day 3 post infliximab salvage may therefore be useful in deciding whether the patient is likely to respond to therapy, require further (potentially intensified) medical therapy or require surgical intervention. The ability to quantify the risk of having a poor response can also better facilitate shared decision making between patients and clinicians [43]. However, before these scores can be applied in clinical care, prospective controlled validation is required, specifically by demonstrating an improved outcome with the incorporation of biomarker-guided decision making in ASUC management algorithms.

This study has also validated and compared existing indices in predicting colectomy during index admission for ASUC after infliximab salvage. The Lindgren score and Ho index were originally derived to predict steroid failure, while the Mayo-related scores reflect general disease severity, but it is unsurprising that they also predict short term outcomes after infliximab given they incorporate clinical findings and reflect the immediate clinical response. However, it is notable that, with the exception of the Lindgren score, objective biomarkers such as CAR and CLR are superior in predicting longer term infliximab failure. Additionally, the CAR and CLR were superior to the initial endoscopic Mayo subscore and subsequent Mayo scores, which are normally considered important indicators of disease severity [44]. The objectivity, and therefore reliability of biomarkers makes them a more appealing candidate as predictive scores. Yet the continued relatively strong performance of the Lindgren score and the correlation between stool count and colectomy suggests the inclusion of clinical markers in prediction scores may still be useful.

The predominant limitation of this study is the retrospective design and therefore it is subject to information bias due to misclassification. A small proportion of data were missing however the risk of bias was mitigated by the use of multiple imputation for biomarker data. Also, though most patients received standard infliximab dosing (5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6), this was not consistent and was at the discretion of the treating clinician. The strong association with CRP and early colectomy is confounded by auto-correlation, where the early CRP trend is used as part of the subjective decision-making process by surgeons for index colectomy. However, early CRP is not used for decisions regarding later colectomy (the focus of this study) beyond index admission at our institution. Additionally, a small proportion of patients had mild disease on endoscopy which may suggest an alternative cause may have been contributing to their ongoing symptoms. Fecal calprotectin was not routinely performed at our centers and therefore could not be analyzed. Endoscopy was performed on admission prior to infliximab and not routinely following salvage treatment, therefore we could not investigate the utility of endoscopic findings immediately post infliximab. The lack of long term clinical, biomarker and endoscopic outcome data represents a limitation to this study, where ideally these alternate endpoints would be studied in addition to 12-month colectomy. Further, biomarker calculations later during the disease course (such as at week 6 post infliximab) may provide additional predictive value, however these were not uniformly tested in all patients and therefore could not be analyzed in this study. The study may not have been powered to identify additional independent predictors of colectomy in multivariable analyses, however this was not a primary focus. The study was performed at a single health service which may limit its external validity. Further, this study was observational and therefore the utility of the predictive scores evaluated is only speculative, and confirmatory controlled studies are required to prove their usefulness in ASUC management algorithms.

In conclusion, in this large series of patients presenting with steroid-refractory ASUC, simple and routinely performed biochemistry in the biomarker ratios CAR and CLR calculated on day 3 post infliximab salvage show significant promise in predicting infliximab failure and need for longer term colectomy by 12 months. Thus, biomarkers have the potential to aid in decision making for the optimal maintenance strategy after infliximab salvage. These biomarkers are advantageous because they are simple to calculate, widely available, objective and exhibit dynamics that align well with current mechanistic understandings of anti-TNF therapy and the rapidly changing nature of ASUC. Furthermore, CAR and CLR had superior predictive performance for 12-month colectomy compared with the Mayo score, partial Mayo score, Ho index and Travis score, while the Lindgren score performed similarly. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the utility of incorporating predictive scores in current ASUC management algorithms.

NOTES

Funding Source

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest

Vasudevan A has received financial support to attend educational meetings from Ferring. van Langenberg DR has served as a speaker and/or received travel support from Takeda, Ferring and Shire. He has consultancy agreements with Abbvie, Janssen and Pfizer. He received research funding grants for investigator-driven studies from Ferring, Shire and AbbVie. For the remaining authors, there are no relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: Con D, van Langenberg DR, Vasudevan A. Formal analysis: Con D. Investigation: Con D, Andrew B, Nicolaides S. Writing - original draft: Con D. Writing - review & editing: Con D, Nicolaides S, van Langenberg DR, Vasudevan A. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at the Intestinal Research website (https://www.irjournal.org).

Supplementary Table 1. Definitions Used for Existing Severity Scores in ASUC

ir-2020-00146-suppl1.pdf

Supplementary Table 2. Estimated Odds Ratio and Confidence Intervals for 12-Month Colectomy (n=94) on Univariable Analysis as well as 2 Multivariable Models Separately Including Day 3 CAR and CLR Respectively

ir-2020-00146-suppl2.pdf

Supplementary Table 3. Biomarker Values in Patients Who Proceeded to Colectomy Compared to Patients Who Avoided Colectomy by 12 Months, Taken at Baseline, Day 1 Post Infliximab Salvage and Day 3 Post Infliximab Salvage

ir-2020-00146-suppl3.pdf

Supplementary Table 4. Biomarker Ratios in Patients Who Proceeded to Colectomy Compared to Patients Who Avoided Colectomy by 12 Months, Calculated at Baseline (on Admission), Day 1 Post Infliximab Salvage and Day 3 Post Infliximab Salvage

ir-2020-00146-suppl4.pdf

Supplementary Table 5. Diagnostic Properties of CAR and CLR on Day 3 Post Salvage, Using Outcomes of 12-Month Colectomy and 1-Month Colectomy

ir-2020-00146-suppl5.pdf

Supplementary Table 6. Estimated Odds Ratio and Confidence Intervals for 12-Month Colectomy in Patients Who Avoided Index Colectomy (n=84), on Univariable Analysis as well as 2 Multivariable Models Separately Including Day 3 CAR and CLR Respectively

ir-2020-00146-suppl6.pdf

Supplementary Table 7. Estimated Odds Ratio and Confidence Intervals for 1-Month Colectomy (n=94) on Univariable Analysis as well as 2 Multivariable Models Separately Including Day 3 CAR and CLR Respectively

ir-2020-00146-suppl7.pdf

Supplementary Table 8. Predictive Performance for Colectomy by 12 Months and by 1 Month Given as AUC with Confidence Intervals, Using Complete Data Only

ir-2020-00146-suppl8.pdf

Supplementary Fig. 1. Flowchart of participant identification process. ASUC, acute severe ulcerative colitis.

ir-2020-00146-suppl9.pdf

Fig. 1.

Distribution (median, IQR, range) of biomarkers at baseline, day 1 post infliximab salvage and day 3 post infliximab salvage. (A) CRP; (B) albumin; (C) neutrophil count; (D) CRP on a logarithmic scale; (E) platelet count; (F) lymphocyte count. Values given for patients who avoided colectomy (

) or proceeded to colectomy (

) by 12 months. ^aSignificant differences. IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Fig. 2.

Distribution (median, IQR, range) of predictive scores calculated at baseline (on admission), day 1 post infliximab salvage and day 3 post infliximab salvage. (A) Platelet-lymphocyte ratio; (B) neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; (C) CRP-albumin ratio; and (D) CRP-lymphocyte ratio. Values are given for patients who avoided colectomy (

) or proceeded to colectomy (

) by 12 months. Each graph is displayed using a logarithmic Y-axis. ^aSignificant differences. IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier estimates for colectomy-free survival for patients who received salvage infliximab for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis. Kaplan-Meier curves according to risk group stratified by: (A) day 3 CAR at 0.47 mg/g; (B) day 3 CLR at 6.0 mg/10⁹. CRP, C-reactive protein; CAR, CRP-albumin ratio; CLR, CRP-lymphocyte ratio.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Who Received Salvage Infliximab for Steroid-Refractory ASUC

Characteristics	Value (n = 94)
Age (yr)	35 (26–53)
Male sex	63 (67)
Disease duration (yr)	1 (0–5)
Baseline disease extent
E1 (proctitis)	8 (8)
E2 (left sided)	42 (45)
E3 (extensive)	44 (47)
Smoking history
Nonsmoker	72 (76)
Ex-smoker	11 (12)
Current smoker	11 (12)
Charlson comorbidity index
0	64 (68)
1	11 (12)
2	7 (7)
≥3	12 (13)
Baseline medications
Azathioprine ± allopurinol	21 (22)
Mercaptopurine ± allopurinol	5 (5)
Methotrexate	3 (3)
Aminosalicylates	57 (61)
Corticosteroids	30 (32)
Previous treatments
Biologics	6 (6)
Abdominal surgery^a	2 (2)
Mayo endoscopic score during ASUC
Mild	4 (4)
Moderate	36 (38)
Severe	54 (58)
Disease extent during ASUC^b
E1 (proctitis)	5 (5)
≥ E2 (left sided or extensive)	89 (95)

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

^a Abdominal surgeries included: right hemicolectomy for cecal volvulus 8 months prior to acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) in 1 patient; anterior resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with subsequent anastomotic restoration 2 years prior in another patient. Both patients were subsequently diagnosed with extensive (E3) ulcerative colitis, before presenting with ASUC.

^b Endoscopy most commonly performed only up to level of sigmoid colon due to perforation risk.

Table 2.

Spearman Rank Correlations ρ between Biomarkers and Stool Count on Admission, Day 1 and Day 3 Post Salvage, with Colectomy within 12 Months

Biomarkers	Timing	ρ	P-value
CRP (mg/L)	Admission (n = 94)	0.153	0.140
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.408	< 0.001
	Day 3 (n = 84)	0.480	< 0.001
Albumin (g/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.232	0.025
	Day 1 (n = 90)	–0.317	0.002
	Day 3 (n = 81)	–0.368	0.001
Lymphocytes (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.196	0.060
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.178	0.090
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.361	0.001
Neutrophils (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.060	0.570
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.124	0.240
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.210	0.060
Platelets (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	0.046	0.660
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.054	0.610
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.051	0.640
Stool count	Day 1 (n = 94)	0.099	0.340
Stool count	Day 3 (n = 94)	0.270	0.009
CRP-albumin ratio (mg/g)	Admission (n = 94)	0.183	0.080
	Day 1 (n = 90)	0.437	< 0.001
	Day3 (n = 81)	0.516	< 0.001
CRP-lymphocyte ratio (mg/10⁹)	Admission (n = 94)	0.229	0.026
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.396	< 0.001
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.518	< 0.001
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio	Admission (n = 94)	0.100	0.340
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.027	0.790
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.253	0.020
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio	Admission (n = 94)	0.242	0.019
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.148	0.160
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.325	0.003

CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 3.

Predictive Performance for Colectomy by 12 Months Given as AUC with Confidence Intervals

Predictor	All patients (n=94)		Patients who avoided index colectomy (n=84)
Predictor	AUC	95% CI	AUC	95% CI
CRP-albumin ratio (mg/g)
Day 1	0.805	0.706–0.904	0.736	0.596–0.875
Day 3	0.871	0.787–0.955	0.810	0.673–0.946
CRP-lymphocyte ratio (mg/10⁹)
Day 1	0.785	0.675–0.894	0.742	0.579–0.905
Day 3	0.874	0.776–0.972	0.818	0.656–0.980
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
Day 1	0.483	0.329–0.637	0.497	0.320–0.674
Day 3	0.675	0.538–0.813	0.653	0.473–0.834
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio
Day 1	0.606	0.460–0.753	0.630	0.419–0.840
Day 3	0.719	0.584–0.855	0.641	0.449–0.834
Partial Mayo score
Day 1	0.614	0.468–0.760	0.601	0.428–0.775
Day 3	0.719	0.588–0.850	0.589	0.369–0.809
Mayo endoscopic subscore
Admission	0.609	0.460–0.722	0.523	0.349–0.697
Mayo score
Day 1	0.638	0.497–0.780	0.603	0.420–0.785
Day 3	0.726	0.599–0.853	0.594	0.386–0.802
Ho (Edinburgh) index
Day 1	0.707	0.589–0.825	0.621	0.461–0.780
Day 3	0.714	0.578–0.850	0.542	0.326–0.759
Lindgren (Sweden) score
Day 1	0.697	0.544–0.849	0.655	0.460–0.850
Day 3	0.829	0.721–0.937	0.752	0.568–0.936
Travis (Oxford) index
Day 1	0.683	0.560–0.806	0.587	0.418–0.755
Day 3	0.657	0.534–0.780	0.587	0.418–0.755

Distribution of missing data was estimated using multiple imputations.

AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein.

REFERENCES

1. Seah D, De Cruz P. Review article: the practical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016;43:482–513.Article PubMed
2. Jackson BD, Con D, De Cruz P. Design considerations for an eHealth decision support tool in inflammatory bowel disease self-management. Intern Med J 2018;48:674–681.Article PubMed
3. Fukuda T, Naganuma M, Kanai T. Current new challenges in the management of ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 2019;17:36–44.Article PubMed PMC
4. Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J 1955;2:1041–1048.PubMed PMC
5. Levy LC, Coburn ES, Choi S, Holubar SD. The management of the hospitalized ulcerative colitis patient: the medical-surgical conundrum. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2020;36:265–276.Article PubMed
6. Verdon C, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. Management of acute severe colitis in the era of biologicals and small molecules. J Clin Med 2019;8:2169.Article PubMed PMC
7. Oh SJ, Shin GY, Soh H, et al. Long-term outcomes of infliximab in a real-world multicenter cohort of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 2021;19:323–331.Article
8. Aratari A, Papi C, Clemente V, et al. Colectomy rate in acute severe ulcerative colitis in the infliximab era. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:821–826.Article PubMed
9. Gustavsson A, Järnerot G, Hertervig E, et al. Clinical trial: colectomy after rescue therapy in ulcerative colitis: 3-year follow-up of the Swedish-Danish controlled infliximab study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;32:984–989.Article PubMed
10. Laharie D, Bourreille A, Branche J, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with steroid-refractory acute severe UC treated with ciclosporin or infliximab. Gut 2018;67:237–243.Article PubMed
11. Solberg IC, Lygren I, Jahnsen J, et al. Clinical course during the first 10 years of ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based inception cohort (IBSEN Study). Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:431–440.Article PubMed
12. Bernardo S, Fernandes SR, Gonçalves AR, et al. Predicting the course of disease in hospitalized patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25:541–546.Article PubMed
13. Denson LA, Curran M, McGovern DP, et al. Challenges in IBD research: precision medicine. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25(Suppl 2): S31–S39.Article PubMed
14. Li Wai Suen CF, Choy MC, De Cruz P. Letter: infliximab induction regimens in steroid-refractory acute severe colitis-a propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020;51:665–666.Article PubMed
15. Choy MC, Seah D, Gorelik A, et al. Predicting response after infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:1347–1352.Article PubMed
16. Battat R, Hemperly A, Truong S, et al. Baseline clearance of infliximab is associated with requirement for colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:511–518.Article
17. Honig G, Heller C, Hurtado-Lorenzo A. Defining the path forward for biomarkers to address unmet needs in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;26:1451–1462.Article PubMed PMC
18. Porter AC, Aubrecht J, Birch C, et al. Biomarkers of Crohn’s disease to support the development of new therapeutic interventions. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;26:1498–1508.Article PubMed PMC
19. Bertani L, Rossari F, Barberio B, et al. Novel prognostic biomarkers of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNF: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;26:1579–1587.Article PubMed
20. Jeong Y, Jeon SR, Kim HG, et al. The role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 2021;19:62–70.Article PubMed
21. Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2020;272:342–351.Article PubMed
22. Ho GT, Mowat C, Goddard CJ, et al. Predicting the outcome of severe ulcerative colitis: development of a novel risk score to aid early selection of patients for second-line medical therapy or surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:1079–1087.Article PubMed
23. Travis SP, Farrant JM, Ricketts C, et al. Predicting outcome in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut 1996;38:905–910.Article PubMed PMC
24. Lindgren SC, Flood LM, Kilander AF, Löfberg R, Persson TB, Sjödahl RI. Early predictors of glucocorticosteroid treatment failure in severe and moderately severe attacks of ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;10:831–835.Article PubMed
25. Järnerot G, Hertervig E, Friis-Liby I, et al. Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterology 2005;128:1805–1811.Article PubMed
26. Con D, Parthasarathy N, Bishara M, et al. Development of a simple, serum biomarker-based model predictive of the need for early biologic therapy in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2021;15:583–593.Article
27. Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1201–1214.Article PubMed
28. Sands BE, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV Jr, et al. Vedolizumab versus adalimumab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1215–1226.Article PubMed
29. Deepak P, Alayo QA, Khatiwada A, et al. Safety of tofacitinib in a real-world cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:1592–1601.Article
30. Hibi T, Kamae I, Pinton P, et al. Efficacy of biologic therapies for biologic-naïve Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a network meta-analysis. Intest Res 2021;19:53–61.Article PubMed
31. Kotwani P, Terdiman J, Lewin S. Tofacitinib for rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a real-world experience. J Crohns Colitis 2020;14:1026–1028.Article PubMed
32. Weisshof R, Ollech JE, El Jurdi K, et al. Ciclosporin therapy after infliximab failure in hospitalized patients with acute severe colitis is effective and safe. J Crohns Colitis 2019;13:1105–1110.Article PubMed PMC
33. Seah D, Choy MC, Gorelik A, et al. Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:226–231.Article PubMed
34. Vasudevan A, Arachchi A, Scanlon C, Greenhalgh J, Van Langenberg DR. A comparison of long-term healthcare utilization and costs in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis receiving infliximab versus early colectomy. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2019;10:2040622319825595.Article PubMed PMC
35. Jackson B, Con D, Ma R, Gorelik A, Liew D, De Cruz P. Health care costs associated with Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease care. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017;52:851–856.Article PubMed
36. Soufleris K, Kafalis N, Charalampidis M, et al. P426 Lympocytosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with anti-TNFa agents: is it significant? J Crohns Colitis 2019;13(Suppl_1): S322.Article
37. Aeberli D, Seitz M, Jüni P, Villiger PM. Increase of peripheral CXCR3 positive T lymphocytes upon treatment of RA patients with TNF-alpha inhibitors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:172–175.Article PubMed
38. Fasanmade AA, Adedokun OJ, Olson A, Strauss R, Davis HM. Serum albumin concentration: a predictive factor of infliximab pharmacokinetics and clinical response in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010;48:297–308.Article PubMed
39. Syal G, Robbins L, Kashani A, et al. Hypoalbuminemia and bandemia predict failure of infliximab rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci 2021;66:199–205.Article PubMed
40. Beswick L, Rosella O, Rosella G, et al. Exploration of predictive biomarkers of early infliximab response in acute severe colitis: a prospective pilot study. J Crohns Colitis 2018;12:289–297.Article PubMed
41. Sebastian S, Myers S, Argyriou K, et al. Infliximab induction regimens in steroid-refractory acute severe colitis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019;50:675–683.Article PubMed
42. Nalagatla N, Falloon K, Tran G, et al. Effect of accelerated infliximab induction on short- and long-term outcomes of acute severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective multicenter study and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:502–509.Article PubMed
43. Con D, Jackson B, Gray K, De Cruz P. eHealth for inflammatory bowel disease self-management: the patient perspective. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017;52:973–980.Article PubMed
44. Dubinsky MC. Reviewing treatments and outcomes in the evolving landscape of ulcerative colitis. Postgrad Med 2017;129:538–553.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Christopher F D Li Wai Suen, Dean Seah, Matthew C Choy, Peter De Cruz
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2024; 30(8): 1389. CrossRef
Unresolved challenges in acute severe ulcerative colitis
Sudheer K. Vuyyuru, Vipul Jairath
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(1): 9. CrossRef
Ischemia-modified albumin: a novel blood marker of endoscopic mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease
Seung Bum Lee, Hyun-Ki Kim, Sang Hyuk Park, Ji-Hun Lim, Sang Hyoung Park
Intestinal Research.2024; 22(1): 75. CrossRef
Medical treatment selection and outcomes for hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis as defined by the Japanese criteria
Makoto Naganuma, Naohiro Nakamura, Reiko Kunisaki, Katsuyoshi Matsuoka, Shojiro Yamamoto, Ami Kawamoto, Daisuke Saito, Taku Kobayashi, Kosaku Nanki, Kazuyuki Narimatsu, Hisashi Shiga, Motohiro Esaki, Shinichiro Yoshioka, Shingo Kato, Masayuki Saruta, Shin
Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 59(4): 302. CrossRef
Which biomarkers best reflect the degree of inflammation in Crohn’s disease?
Jihye Park
Intestinal Research.2024; 22(1): 1. CrossRef
Acute severe ulcerative colitis management: unanswered questions and latest insights
Pauline Rivière, Christopher Li Wai Suen, María Chaparro, Peter De Cruz, Antonino Spinelli, David Laharie
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2024; 9(3): 251. CrossRef
Predictors of adverse outcomes of steroids in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (systematic review and meta-analyses)
A. F. Mingazov, O. I. Sushkov, B. R. Kalanov, T. A. Baranova, S. I. Achkasov
Koloproktologia.2024; 23(1): 172. CrossRef
Exploring the Role of GDF-15 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Controlled Study Comparing Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis with Non-Inflammatory Controls
Ondřej Kučerka, Marie Blahutová, Vít Kosek, Petra Mináriková, Jan M. Horáček, Petr Urbánek, Martin Malý
Metabolites.2024; 14(4): 185. CrossRef
Clinical utility of C‐reactive protein‐to‐albumin ratio in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Anke L Nguyen, Claudia Brick, David Liu, David J Gibson, Peter R Gibson, Miles P Sparrow
JGH Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Predicting Outcome after Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Contemporary Review and Areas for Future Research
Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Olga Maria Nardone, Vipul Jairath
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4509. CrossRef
Fecal, Blood, and Urinary Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Sarah Bencardino, Ferdinando D’Amico, Alessandra Zilli, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Mariangela Allocca, Gionata Fiorino, Silvio Danese, Federica Furfaro
Journal of Translational Gastroenterology.2024; 2(2): 61. CrossRef
Nutrition, Nutritional Status, Micronutrients Deficiency, and Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Marco Valvano, Annalisa Capannolo, Nicola Cesaro, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Stefano Fabiani, Sara Frassino, Sabrina Monaco, Marco Magistroni, Angelo Viscido, Giovanni Latella
Nutrients.2023; 15(17): 3824. CrossRef
In Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Patients Who Receive Rescue Therapy, Prior Maintenance Therapy and Day 3 C-Reactive Protein After Rescue Therapy Are Associated With 12-Month Colectomy Risk
Jared A Sninsky, Ana-Maria Staicu, Edward L Barnes
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic review: Scores used to predict outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis
Maia Kayal, Hadar Meringer, Lily Martin, Jean Frederic Colombel
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2023; 58(10): 974. CrossRef
Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein-to-bilirubin ratio in patients with ulcerative colitis
Xijing Huang, Ya Liu, Zhou Zhou, Yan Pan, Yinghui Zhang, Caiping Gao, Chong He
Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the diagnostic and prognostic value of the C-reactive protein/lymphocyte ratio for dilated cardiomyopathy based on a real-world study
Bin Qi, Zhi-Jie Yang, Nan Huang, Wen-Bo Zheng, Chun Gui
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Novel Utility of Leucine-Rich Alpha-2-Glycoprotein as a Biomarker in Ulcerative Colitis: A Predictor of Endoscopic Remission Independent of Symptoms
Tomoyuki Hayashi, Kazuya Kitamura, Masaaki Usami, Masaki Miyazawa, Masaki Nishitani, Akihiro Dejima, Makoto Yamamoto, Shotaro Kawase, Masaya Funaki, Noriaki Orita, Hidetoshi Nakagawa, Koki Morita, Noriho Iida, Akihiro Seki, Kouki Nio, Hidenori Kido, Hideo
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2023; 8(4): 133. CrossRef
Current and emerging biomarkers for ulcerative colitis
Jan K. Nowak, Rahul Kalla, Jack Satsangi
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.2023; 23(12): 1107. CrossRef
Effect of disease duration on the association between C-reactive protein-albumin ratio and endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis
Shinya Furukawa, Sen Yagi, Kana Shiraishi, Teruki Miyake, Kazuhiro Tange, Yu Hashimoto, Shogo Kitahata, Tomoe Kawamura, Tomoyuki Ninomiya, Kenichirou Mori, Seiyuu Suzuki, Naozumi Shibata, Hidehiro Murakami, Katsuhisa Ohashi, Aki Hasebe, Hideomi Tomida, Ya
BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Inflammatory Indexes for Assessing the Severity and Disease Progression of Ulcerative Colitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Hanyang Lin, Zhaohui Bai, Qiong Wu, Guiyang Chu, Yongguo Zhang, Xiaozhong Guo, Xingshun Qi
Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical outcomes and predictors of response for adalimumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a KASID prospective multicenter cohort study
Seung Yong Shin, Soo Jung Park, Young Kim, Jong Pil Im, Hyo Jong Kim, Kang-Moon Lee, Ji Won Kim, Sung-Ae Jung, Jun Lee, Sang-Bum Kang, Sung Jae Shin, Eun Sun Kim, You Sun Kim, Tae Oh Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Dong Il Park, Hyung Kil Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Young-Ho Ki
Intestinal Research.2022; 20(3): 350. CrossRef
Does C-reactive protein to serum Albumin Ratio correlate with diabEtic nephropathy in patients with Type 2 dIabetes MEllitus? The CARE TIME study
Satilmis Bilgin, Ozge Kurtkulagi, Burcin Meryem Atak Tel, Tuba Taslamacioglu Duman, Gizem Kahveci, Atiqa Khalid, Gulali Aktas
Primary Care Diabetes.2021; 15(6): 1071. CrossRef
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio: A Systematic Scoping Review
Blake O. Langley, Sara E. Guedry, Joshua Z. Goldenberg, Douglas A. Hanes, Jennifer A. Beardsley, Jennifer Joan Ryan
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(18): 4219. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Biomarker dynamics during infliximab salvage for acute severe ulcerative colitis: C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio and CRP-albumin ratio are useful in predicting colectomy

Intest Res. 2022;20(1):101-113. Published online March 12, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2020.00146

XML Download

Figure

Biomarker dynamics during infliximab salvage for acute severe ulcerative colitis: C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio and CRP-albumin ratio are useful in predicting colectomy

Fig. 1. Distribution (median, IQR, range) of biomarkers at baseline, day 1 post infliximab salvage and day 3 post infliximab salvage. (A) CRP; (B) albumin; (C) neutrophil count; (D) CRP on a logarithmic scale; (E) platelet count; (F) lymphocyte count. Values given for patients who avoided colectomy () or proceeded to colectomy () by 12 months. aSignificant differences. IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Fig. 2. Distribution (median, IQR, range) of predictive scores calculated at baseline (on admission), day 1 post infliximab salvage and day 3 post infliximab salvage. (A) Platelet-lymphocyte ratio; (B) neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; (C) CRP-albumin ratio; and (D) CRP-lymphocyte ratio. Values are given for patients who avoided colectomy () or proceeded to colectomy () by 12 months. Each graph is displayed using a logarithmic Y-axis. aSignificant differences. IQR, interquartile range; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier estimates for colectomy-free survival for patients who received salvage infliximab for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis. Kaplan-Meier curves according to risk group stratified by: (A) day 3 CAR at 0.47 mg/g; (B) day 3 CLR at 6.0 mg/109. CRP, C-reactive protein; CAR, CRP-albumin ratio; CLR, CRP-lymphocyte ratio.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Biomarker dynamics during infliximab salvage for acute severe ulcerative colitis: C-reactive protein (CRP)-lymphocyte ratio and CRP-albumin ratio are useful in predicting colectomy

Characteristics	Value (n = 94)
Age (yr)	35 (26–53)
Male sex	63 (67)
Disease duration (yr)	1 (0–5)
Baseline disease extent
E1 (proctitis)	8 (8)
E2 (left sided)	42 (45)
E3 (extensive)	44 (47)
Smoking history
Nonsmoker	72 (76)
Ex-smoker	11 (12)
Current smoker	11 (12)
Charlson comorbidity index
0	64 (68)
1	11 (12)
2	7 (7)
≥3	12 (13)
Baseline medications
Azathioprine ± allopurinol	21 (22)
Mercaptopurine ± allopurinol	5 (5)
Methotrexate	3 (3)
Aminosalicylates	57 (61)
Corticosteroids	30 (32)
Previous treatments
Biologics	6 (6)
Abdominal surgery^a	2 (2)
Mayo endoscopic score during ASUC
Mild	4 (4)
Moderate	36 (38)
Severe	54 (58)
Disease extent during ASUC^b
E1 (proctitis)	5 (5)
≥ E2 (left sided or extensive)	89 (95)

Biomarkers	Timing	ρ	P-value
CRP (mg/L)	Admission (n = 94)	0.153	0.140
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.408	< 0.001
	Day 3 (n = 84)	0.480	< 0.001
Albumin (g/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.232	0.025
	Day 1 (n = 90)	–0.317	0.002
	Day 3 (n = 81)	–0.368	0.001
Lymphocytes (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.196	0.060
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.178	0.090
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.361	0.001
Neutrophils (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	–0.060	0.570
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.124	0.240
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.210	0.060
Platelets (10⁹/L)	Admission (n = 94)	0.046	0.660
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.054	0.610
	Day 3 (n = 84)	–0.051	0.640
Stool count	Day 1 (n = 94)	0.099	0.340
Stool count	Day 3 (n = 94)	0.270	0.009
CRP-albumin ratio (mg/g)	Admission (n = 94)	0.183	0.080
	Day 1 (n = 90)	0.437	< 0.001
	Day3 (n = 81)	0.516	< 0.001
CRP-lymphocyte ratio (mg/10⁹)	Admission (n = 94)	0.229	0.026
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.396	< 0.001
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.518	< 0.001
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio	Admission (n = 94)	0.100	0.340
	Day 1 (n = 93)	–0.027	0.790
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.253	0.020
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio	Admission (n = 94)	0.242	0.019
	Day 1 (n = 93)	0.148	0.160
	Day3 (n = 84)	0.325	0.003

Predictor	All patients (n=94)		Patients who avoided index colectomy (n=84)
Predictor	AUC	95% CI	AUC	95% CI
CRP-albumin ratio (mg/g)
Day 1	0.805	0.706–0.904	0.736	0.596–0.875
Day 3	0.871	0.787–0.955	0.810	0.673–0.946
CRP-lymphocyte ratio (mg/10⁹)
Day 1	0.785	0.675–0.894	0.742	0.579–0.905
Day 3	0.874	0.776–0.972	0.818	0.656–0.980
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
Day 1	0.483	0.329–0.637	0.497	0.320–0.674
Day 3	0.675	0.538–0.813	0.653	0.473–0.834
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio
Day 1	0.606	0.460–0.753	0.630	0.419–0.840
Day 3	0.719	0.584–0.855	0.641	0.449–0.834
Partial Mayo score
Day 1	0.614	0.468–0.760	0.601	0.428–0.775
Day 3	0.719	0.588–0.850	0.589	0.369–0.809
Mayo endoscopic subscore
Admission	0.609	0.460–0.722	0.523	0.349–0.697
Mayo score
Day 1	0.638	0.497–0.780	0.603	0.420–0.785
Day 3	0.726	0.599–0.853	0.594	0.386–0.802
Ho (Edinburgh) index
Day 1	0.707	0.589–0.825	0.621	0.461–0.780
Day 3	0.714	0.578–0.850	0.542	0.326–0.759
Lindgren (Sweden) score
Day 1	0.697	0.544–0.849	0.655	0.460–0.850
Day 3	0.829	0.721–0.937	0.752	0.568–0.936
Travis (Oxford) index
Day 1	0.683	0.560–0.806	0.587	0.418–0.755
Day 3	0.657	0.534–0.780	0.587	0.418–0.755

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients Who Received Salvage Infliximab for Steroid-Refractory ASUC

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

Abdominal surgeries included: right hemicolectomy for cecal volvulus 8 months prior to acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) in 1 patient; anterior resection for sigmoid diverticulitis with subsequent anastomotic restoration 2 years prior in another patient. Both patients were subsequently diagnosed with extensive (E3) ulcerative colitis, before presenting with ASUC.

Endoscopy most commonly performed only up to level of sigmoid colon due to perforation risk.

Table 2. Spearman Rank Correlations ρ between Biomarkers and Stool Count on Admission, Day 1 and Day 3 Post Salvage, with Colectomy within 12 Months

CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 3. Predictive Performance for Colectomy by 12 Months Given as AUC with Confidence Intervals

Distribution of missing data was estimated using multiple imputations.

AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein.