Letter: Patient Description of Rectal Effluents With Photographic Examples as a Predictive Indicator for the Quality of Bowel Preparation

Hyoun Woo Kang

doi:10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.362

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Intest Res > Volume 13(4); 2015 > Article

Letter to the Editor Letter: Patient Description of Rectal Effluents With Photographic Examples as a Predictive Indicator for the Quality of Bowel Preparation: Hyoun Woo Kang; Intestinal Research 2015;13(4):362-363.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.362
Published online: October 15, 2015

Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

Correspondence to Hyoun Woo Kang, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, 27 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea. Tel: +82-31-961-7128, Fax: +82-31-961-7141, gangmali@naver.com

• Received: August 11, 2015 • Revised: August 13, 2015 • Accepted: August 15, 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

6,259 Views
45 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Full Article

Download PDF

NOTES
REFERENCES

I read with interest the paper by So et al., "Patient descriptions of rectal effluents may help to predict the quality of bowel preparation with photographic examples",1 which showed that photographic example-guided patient descriptions of rectal effluents may predict the quality of bowel preparation.

This article represents an important issue on the quality of bowel preparation. Approximately 25% of colonoscopies performed are considered to have inadequate preparation,2 3 which results in many adverse consequences including a lower detection rate of adenoma, prolonged cecal intubation time, prolonged withdrawal time, increased costs of colorectal cancer prevention, and increased patient dropout rates from colorectal cancer screening programs.4

Several patient-related and precolonoscopic bowel preparation-related factors are demonstrated to be linked to inadequate bowel preparation (Table 1).4 5 The 2015 guidelines from the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommended that patients who have a medical predicator for inadequate preparation or a history of inadequate preparation should be considered to be prescribed more aggressive preparation.5

Patients with inadequate preparation usually require a repeat examination with more aggressive colonic cleansing, a repetitive endoscope disinfection, and intravenous sedation. These repeated procedures are time- and cost-consuming. Therefore, if patients' descriptions of rectal effluents can predict the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopic examination, this would be a very useful time-saving and cost-saving method. In the case of a prediction of inadequate preparation, these patients may benefit from additional preparation, which may be particularly useful if it can be administered in the endoscopy unit followed by colonoscopy on the same day. Fatima et al.6 reported only a slight agreement between the patients' descriptions of rectal effluent and the bowel preparation quality, but patients reporting rectal effluent as brown liquid or solid have a substantial likelihood of inadequate preparation.

So et al. developed a new scoring method that could describe rectal effluent more objectively and accurately, and evaluated its efficacy in predicting the quality of bowel preparation. They showed that photographic example-guided patient descriptions of rectal effluents showed a statistically significant association with the quality of bowel preparation. I believe this method may be slightly too complex and difficult to apply to the general population. The high drop-out rate (68.1%) in this study may be related to this. (In the text, the reasons for exclusion were not described fully.) Identifying the exact grade of the last three rectal effluents by photographic examples may be difficult, especially in patients with patient-related risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. Matching only the last rectal effluent with photographic examples could have higher accuracy and applicability. In addition, among the photographic examples, the differences between B and C and the description of D (liquid with small amount of feces) are ambiguous. The development of a more easily applicable classification of rectal effluent using photographic examples is needed.

I think that the specificity is more important than the sensitivity in a predictive factor for suboptimal preparation. If the cutoff value is determined as 4, most subjects would get additional bowel preparation, which is not cost-effective.

Interestingly, they found that the presence of diverticula was an independent predictive factor for suboptimal quality. A further, large scale study to identify the associations between diverticulosis and bowel preparation quality will be warranted. Old age, obesity, and physical inactivity are known to be risk factors for both colonic diverticulosis and inadequate bowel preparation. The consideration of these confounding factors will be very important in these studies. In addition, the location and number of diverticula may be important and an interesting factor, as authors mentioned.

In conclusion, So et al. provide a new surrogate indicator in predicting the quality of bowel preparation, but modification is needed in order to correctly predict the status of bowel preparation and to make it more easily applicable.

NOTES

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

REFERENCES

1. So H, Boo SJ, Seo H, et al. Patient descriptions of rectal effluents may help to predict the quality of bowel preparation with photographic examples. Intest Res 2015;13:153–159.PMID: 25932000.Article PubMed PMC
2. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76–79.PMID: 12838225.Article PubMed
3. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378–384.PMID: 15758907.Article PubMed
4. Cohen LB. Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015;25:183–197.PMID: 25839681.Article PubMed
5. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Saltzman JR, Cash BD, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:781–794.PMID: 25595062.Article PubMed
6. Fatima H, Johnson CS, Rex DK. Patients' description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:1244–1252.PMID: 20362286.Article PubMed

Table 1

Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation

Patient related factors	Bowel preparation related factors
Age	Failure to adequately follow preparation instruction
Male gender	Later colonoscopy starting time
Obesity	High-fiber diet the day prior to colonoscopy
Hospitalized status	Administration of the entire preparation the night before the colonoscopy
Constipation
Various medical conditions
Neurologic conditions (stroke, Parkinson, dementia, spinal cord injury)
Impaired motility
Prior gastrointestinal surgical resection
Diabetes mellitus, Cirrhosis,
Medication use
Narcotics, tricyclic antidepressants
Reduced health literacy
Lower patient activation

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Author's Reply
Hoonsub So, Seungbong Han, Dong-Hoon Yang
Intestinal Research.2015; 13(4): 364. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Letter: Patient Description of Rectal Effluents With Photographic Examples as a Predictive Indicator for the Quality of Bowel Preparation

Intest Res. 2015;13(4):362-363. Published online October 15, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.4.362

XML Download

Letter: Patient Description of Rectal Effluents With Photographic Examples as a Predictive Indicator for the Quality of Bowel Preparation

Table 1

Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation

Patient related factors	Bowel preparation related factors
Age	Failure to adequately follow preparation instruction
Male gender	Later colonoscopy starting time
Obesity	High-fiber diet the day prior to colonoscopy
Hospitalized status	Administration of the entire preparation the night before the colonoscopy
Constipation
Various medical conditions
Neurologic conditions (stroke, Parkinson, dementia, spinal cord injury)
Impaired motility
Prior gastrointestinal surgical resection
Diabetes mellitus, Cirrhosis,
Medication use
Narcotics, tricyclic antidepressants
Reduced health literacy
Lower patient activation

Table 1 Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation