Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

IMPACT FACTOR

Original Article Comparison of Postoperative Ouality of Life in Ulcerative Colitis According to the Operative Method: Ileostomy versus Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis
Yong Hee Joung , Hyo Jong Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Byoung Wook Lee, Yo Seb Han, Seok Ho Dong, Byung Ho Kim, Young Woon Chang, Joung Il Lee, Rin Chang
Intestinal Research 2003;1(1):39-44. Published online: May 27, 2003
Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
prev next
  • 1,582 Views
  • 22 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Background/Aims
Ileostomy (IL) and ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) are treatment of choice in ulcerative colitis. We investigate the complications and quality of life after operation according to the operative methods. Methods: We analyzed patients experienced total proctocolectomy. We divided them in two groups according to the operation methods. We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes after IL or IPAA group for evaluation quality of life and evaluated the characteristics of patients preoperative and postoperative state retrospectively. Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled this study. IPAA was done at eight of them and IL was done at the six of them. There were no difference in sex, age, frequency of use of immunosuppressive agent, duration of medication of steroid and duration of ulcerative colitis according to the operation methods. Most common indication of operation was medical intractability. Similar incidence of postoperative complication in both operation methods. According to the questionnares for evaluating of quality of life, we compared both operation method. There was no difference. But in IPAA, antidiarrheal medication was more needed. Conclusions: In IL and IPAA, quality of life was improved. There was no difference in quality of life in IL and IPAA. (Intestinal Research 2003;1:39-44)


Intest Res : Intestinal Research
Close layer
TOP