Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Intest Res : Intestinal Research

Search
Advanced Search
IMPACT FACTOR
mobile search button mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Intest Res > Volume 15(2); 2017 > Article
Review Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease
Fumihito Hirai
Intestinal Research 2017;15(2):166-173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.166
Published online: April 27, 2017

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to: Fumihito Hirai, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1, Zokumyoin, Chikushino, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan. Tel: +81-92-921-1011, Fax: 81-92-929-2630, fuhirai@cis.fukuoka-u.ac.jp
• Received: December 29, 2016   • Revised: December 31, 2016   • Accepted: January 2, 2017

© Copyright 2017. Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 9,410 Views
  • 110 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 30 Crossref
  • 35 Scopus
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • The therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD) has been raised to the achievement of mucosal healing. Although effective treatments that target cytokines and other molecules has been widely used for CD, intestinal strictures are still a major cause of surgery. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is known to be an effective and safe intervention for intestinal strictures in CD. Since frequent intestinal resection often results in short bowel syndrome and can decrease the quality of life, EBD can help avoid surgery. EBD with a conventional colonoscope for Crohn's strictures of the colon and ileo-colonic anastomosis has established efficacy and safety. In addition, EBD using balloon-assisted enteroscopy has recently been applied for small bowel Crohn's strictures. Although the evidence is not strong, EBD may become an alternative to surgery in small bowel strictures in CD. EBD and other new methods such as self-expanding stent implantation for Crohn's strictures may be useful and safe; however, it is important to address several issues regarding these interventions and to establish a protocol for combined therapies.
  • Keywords: Endoscopic balloon dilation; Crohn disease; Colorectal stricture; Ileo-colonic anastomotic stricture; Small bowel stricture
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory digestive disease with a long-term course that is usually progressive, disabling, and relapsing, and most patients with CD undergo intestinal surgery during their lifetime.12 Effective therapy with immunomodulators and anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody have the potential to change the natural course of CD. Actually, a large cohort study suggested that effective medical treatment has reduced the number of surgeries being performed for CD.3 On the other hand, intestinal strictures are still the main reason for surgeries such as intestinal resection and strictureplasty, which are performed to relieve stricture-related symptoms or ileus. Surgery is, however, not a basic treatment modality, and relapse at the anastomotic site is often a problem in CD.45 Surgery sometimes lead to stricture recurrence, with the need for repeat surgery, and frequent surgery can lead to short bowel syndrome.6 Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is an alternative to surgery for strictures secondary to CD. This endoscopic treatment is mainly indicated for Crohn's strictures of the gastric outlet, duodenum, colon and, ileo-colonic anastomosis.789101112131415161718192021222324 Many reports concluded that EBD is effective and safe, and its use can avoid surgery. Moreover, balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), including double-balloon enteroscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy have been widely used for diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of small bowel diseases.2526 Since BAE enables us to perform EBD for small bowel strictures in patients with CD, the indications for EBD in CD have increased.2728293031323334 Hence, it is important for gastroenterologists to know the current status and future direction of EBD for Crohn's strictures. This article reviews the literature on EBD performed using the traditional approach to strictures of the colon and ileo-colonic anastomosis, in addition to that on recent approaches to small bowel strictures using BAE.
1. Dilation Technique
Two different EBD dilation catheters are used for gastrointestinal strictures: an over-the-wire balloon catheter and a through-the-scope balloon catheter. Through-the-scope balloon catheters tend to be selected for almost all EBD procedures because of their simplicity and safety. The length of the balloons for inflation is about 5 cm; therefore, stenoses 5 cm or longer are considered unsuitable for EBD. Moreover, intestinal strictures with deep ulcers and fistulous complications are contraindication for EBD. The dilation procedure is performed with monitoring of the pressure of the inflated balloon using a dilator under X-ray guidance. The maximum dilation diameter is selected at the discretion of the operating endoscopist. Table 1 shows a summary of published studies (only those that included 15 cases or more) on EBD using conventional colonoscopy in CD patients.89101112131415161718192021222324 In these 17 published studies, five used a maximum dilation diameter of 18 mm, eight used 20 mm, and four used 25 mm. Lower dilation pressure was thought to be a risk factor for earlier redilation in two studies.1116 On the other hand, Gustavsson et al.20 suggested that larger maximum dilation diameter (25 mm) in EBD was associated with complications such as perforation and hemorrhage. Therefore, when performing EBD, forcible dilation to achieve a larger dilation diameter or pressure is not recommended, as it could lead to intestinal perforation, and would require surgical intervention. Ideally, we should maximize the less invasive nature of EBD compared to surgery.
2. Short-Term Outcomes and Safety
A number of studies have evaluated the technical success and short-term clinical efficacy of EBD for Crohn's strictures. However, there are no standardized definitions of short-term success of EBD. Some authors simply defined successful dilation as technical response, while others defined successful dilation as disappearance of stenotic symptoms or ability to pass a scope as a technical response. The reported technical response rate ranged from 79% to 100%, whereas that using scope passage as the definition, which is the most obvious outcome, was 56% to 100%. Clinical efficacy was also determined based on the definition used in each study. Most investigators defined clinical efficacy as disappearance of stenotic symptoms, such as abdominal pain, nausea and abdominal boating. Recently, a visual analogue scale (VAS) has been used as a more strict evaluation method for confirmation of symptom relief.30 In published studies, clinical efficacy was achieved in 42% to 90% of patients.
The safety profile of EBD is important as a minimally invasive treatment. Perforation is one of the major concerns during this procedure, because it usually requires emergent surgery. No perforations were reported in four studies,13192123 although the remaining 13 studies reported perforations.891011121415161718202224 The rate of perforation was <10% in all but two studies,914 in which they were observed in 10% and 11% of subjects, respectively. EBD is thus recognized as a safe endoscopic treatment in patients with CD, since the short-term technical and clinical efficacy rates are relatively high and complication rates are low. Therefore, EBD for colorectal and ileo-colonic anastomotic Crohn's strictures may be as good a therapeutic option as surgical intervention, at least for the temporary relief of stenotic symptoms.
3. Long-Term Outcomes
Clinicians who treat CD patients with intestinal strictures should also be concerned about the long-term outcomes of EBD. Although this important outcome is generally assessed on the basis of symptom recurrence and surgery-free survival, in this review, only symptom recurrence was adopted as a criterion to evaluate long-term efficacy. The relapse rate of obstructive symptoms after EBD has been reported to be 24% to 79%. Approximately 60% of published studies reported that 50% or more of patients showed signs of relapse after initial EBD. In patients with recurrence of symptoms, redilation or surgical intervention should be performed. According to a meta-analysis that summarized 25 studies, including 1,089 patients and 2,664 dilations, the proportion of patients who required further dilation at 1, 2, and 5 years of follow-up was 31.6%, 25.9%, and 1.7%, respectively.35 Overall, the cumulative proportion of patients requiring further dilation over 5 years was 80.6%. Although EBD enables avoidance of surgery, the need for frequent redilation is a burden for both clinicians and patients. Hence, further information on patients who are likely to develop recurrence of symptoms is desirable. In fact, several studies have analyzed the predictors of redilation or surgery after EBD. Using stepwise logistic regression in a systematic review, Hassan et al.36 pointed out that stricture length of 4 cm or more was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.16–13.8; P<0.028). On the other hand, other factors, such as the nature of strictures (naïve vs. postsurgical, active CD vs. inactive CD lesion), scope passage after EBD, and the method of graded dilation were not associated with treatment outcome.3536 Smoking is thought to be a risk factor for surgery after EBD.37 Thus, careful follow-up after EBD is needed for patients with risk factors.
4. Methods for More Effective and Safe EBD
Several reports described methods for more effective and safe EBD. Steroid injection into the stricture site after EBD was reported as a useful method for enhancing efficacy.3839 However, East et al.40 concluded that this method did not reduce the time to redilation after EBD of Crohn's ileo-colonic anastomotic strictures. Hence, further analysis including a large randomized controlled trial is essential to confirm the utility of steroid injection after EBD.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation is thought to be useful for the safe and smooth performance of EBD. CO2 insufflation is associated with rapid absorption resulting in less gas retention, which results in less pain during and after endoscopic treatment.414243 As EBD can be time-consuming, CO2 insufflation is more likely to have good short-term outcomes than air insufflation.44
EBD using BAE for small bowel strictures is almost the same as EBD for colorectal and ileo-colonic strictures in terms of procedure and technique. However, special insertion techniques for deeper portions of the small intestine in BAE are necessary. Moreover, the proper insertion route should be determined according to the results of small bowel imaging. In addition, there are some technical difficulties, compared to EBD performed with a conventional colonoscope. For instance, it is not easy to stabilize the tip of the scope and to maintain a good visual field because of the limited space available, severe angulation, and adhesion in the small intestine. Therefore, EBD for small bowel strictures in CD is still challenging, although reports regarding this endoscopic intervention have recently increased, mainly from Japan (Table 2).2728293031323334 According to published studies, maximum dilation diameter for strictures of the small intestine varied from 15 mm to 20 mm which is relatively small compared to EBD for colorectal and ileo-colonic strictures. It is speculated that the reasons for the small dilation diameter are more severe strictures and the operator's concerns regarding perforation.
There are also no standardized definitions of short-term success of EBD for small bowel strictures. Despite the cited difficulties, the reported technical success rate is 72% to 100%, which is similar to the results of EBD for colorectal and ileo-colonic strictures. While clinical efficacy was evaluated based on the patient's obstructive symptoms in almost all studies, Despott et al.30 adopted the VAS score for abdominal pain in their evaluation. The clinical success rate was >70% (72%–87%) overall, which is comparable to published data on EBD for colorectal strictures. Perforations occurred in 0% to 10% of subjects in most published studies, although one small cohort reported a perforation rate of 20% (2/10).32 Judging from these results, EBD using BAE for small bowel strictures is equal to EBD using a conventional colonoscope in terms of short-term efficacy and safety.
There is insufficient reliable data on the long-term outcomes of the procedure for small bowel strictures, because the observation periods were very short, as shown in Table 2. However, in two studies that investigated the long-term outcomes of EBD for small bowel strictures, the average observation period after initial EBD was more than 3 years.3334 Hirai et al.33 reported that the cumulative surgery-free rate in 65 subjects was 79% and 73% at 2 and 3 years, respectively. However, the cumulative redilation-free rate in their analysis was 64% and 47% at 2 and 3 years. This rate was similar to the results reported in previous studies evaluating EBD for colonic and ileo-colonic anastomosis. Therefore, the need for frequent redilation seems to be an issue with EBD regardless of the target stricture site. According to a recent study published by Sunada et al.,34 the cumulative surgery-free rate after initial EBD for small bowel strictures in CD was 87.3% at 1 year and 78.1% at 3 years. Even though the cumulative surgery-free rate was similar to that in the study by Hirai et al.,33 they included patients with fistulas as subjects, and the presence of a fistula was significantly associated with the need for surgical intervention (hazard ratio, 5.50; 95% CI, 2.16–14.0; P=0.01). Hence, for small bowel strictures with fistula, EBD should be considered only in patients who are likely to benefit (e.g., for completion of important life events) from postponement of surgery.
The tendency for CD patients to have multiple small bowel strictures is one of the limitations of EBD using BAE. In fact, the proportion of patients with multiple small bowel strictures was high in published studies. Although the therapeutic strategy for this situation is not established, in my opinion, in the absence of exclusion criteria such as fistulas, EBD can be attempted before performing surgery (Fig. 1). Further strict analysis will be needed for confirmation of efficacy of EBD for multiple small bowel strictures.
The disease behavior of CD has changed over time, with most patients having a stricturing type or a penetrating type.4546 In particular, since patients with ileal type CD tend to have small bowel strictures, performing EBD using BAE would be more meaningful to improve their quality of life. However, as described above, there is only limited evidence regarding the utility of this endoscopic intervention in patients with small bowel strictures. Further studies confirming the efficacy and safety of this procedure are desirable. In fact, a nationwide, multicenter, open-label, prospective cohort study is now ongoing in Japan. According to the results of interim analysis in this study, the short-term success rate using VAS score as an indicator was 69%, and no perforations were reported.47 The results also indicated equal efficacy and safety compared to published studies. The full data of this study will be published in the near future.
Many issues should be addressed regarding EBD in CD. First, it is difficult to state whether EBD or surgery is best for release of intestinal strictures. Direct comparison between these two interventions is not easy, due to the differences in invasiveness and the goal of each treatment. Surgical interventions are superior to EBD in terms of certainty. According to a small retrospective cohort study, the proportion of patients who required any reintervention during follow-up was significantly lower in the surgical group than in the EBD group (OR, 5.62; 95% CI, 1.66–19.01; P=0.005).48 However, surgical interventions are inferior to EBD in terms of both the invasiveness and relapse at the anastomotic site. Strictureplasty has been performed for intestinal strictures in CD as a small bowel-saving strategy.49505152 Although the postoperative recurrence rate after strictureplasty is comparable to that of surgical resection, clinicians should also pay attention to the risk of malignancy in the preserved bowel. Since the performance of a randomized controlled study to compare EBD and surgical intervention is extremely difficult, gastroenterologists need to select an intervention method for intestinal strictures in CD by considering various factors (e.g., patients background, status of stricture, disease activity, length of small intestine, and so on) on a case by case basis.
The basic treatments for CD are not endoscopic or surgical interventions but medical therapies to control disease activity and improve quality of life. There are many effective medical treatments for CD, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor α antibody and immunomodulators. Additional candidates for treatments of CD will emerge in the future. Ideally, a combination of EBD and these effective medical treatments should be used for CD patients with intestinal strictures.
New endoscopic treatment modalities for Crohn's strictures such as the use of self-expanding metallic stents5354 and needle-knife treatment55 have been reported. Implantation of metallic stents has mainly been used for patients with malignant gastrointestinal strictures because these enable improved food intake without surgery. As EBD has the limitation of loss of long-term efficacy, stents have been used for Crohn's strictures in several institutions. However, there are some disadvantages, such as inflammatory reactions to a foreign body, recurrent stricture due to mucosal growth into the stent, and perforation or hemorrhage with self-expansion. Therefore, further large-scale studies to confirm the efficacy and safety of stenting are needed. Needle-knife treatment is a limited option for Crohn's stricture. With only a few case reports,5556 its efficacy is still uncertain and safety is questionable. Further experience is necessary in order to apply this intervention in CD patients with intestinal strictures.

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

  • 1. Harper PH, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. The long-term outcome in Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:174–179.PMID: 3829859.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Munkholm P, Langholz E, Davidsen M, Binder V. Disease activity courses in a regional cohort of Crohn's disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30:699–706.PMID: 7481535.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Rungoe C, Langholz E, Andersson M, et al. Changes in medical treatment and surgery rates in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide cohort study 1979-2011. Gut 2014;63:1607–1616.PMID: 24056767.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G. Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Ann Surg 2000;231:38–45.PMID: 10636100.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Hellers G. Crohn's disease in Stockholm county 1955-1974: a study of epidemiology, results of surgical treatment and long-term prognosis. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1979;490:1–84.PMID: 293116.PubMed
  • 6. Poggioli G, Pierangeli F, Laureti S, Ugolini F. Review article: indication and type of surgery in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16(Suppl 4): 59–64.Article
  • 7. Matsui T, Hatakeyama S, Ikeda K, Yao T, Takenaka K, Sakurai T. Long-term outcome of endoscopic balloon dilation in obstructive gastroduodenal Crohn's disease. Endoscopy 1997;29:640–645.PMID: 9360875.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 8. Blomberg B, Rolny P, Järnerot G. Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic strictures in Crohn's disease. Endoscopy 1991;23:195–198.PMID: 1915133.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 9. Couckuyt H, Gevers AM, Coremans G, Hiele M, Rutgeerts P. Efficacy and safety of hydrostatic balloon dilatation of ileocolonic Crohn's strictures: a prospective longterm analysis. Gut 1995;36:577–580.PMID: 7737567.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 10. Matsui T, Ikeda K, Tsuda S, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic balloon dilation in obstructive gastrointestinal Crohn's disease: a prospective long-term study. Diagn Ther Endosc 2000;6:67–75.PMID: 18493528.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 11. Sabaté JM, Villarejo J, Bouhnik Y, et al. Hydrostatic balloon dilatation of Crohn's strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18:409–413.PMID: 12940926.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, Hayward CM, Shah SG, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Colonoscopic balloon dilation of Crohn's strictures: a review of long-term outcomes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:485–488.PMID: 12702904.PubMed
  • 13. Morini S, Hassan C, Lorenzetti R, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic pneumatic dilatation in Crohn's disease. Dig Liver Dis 2003;35:893–897.PMID: 14703886.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Singh VV, Draganov P, Valentine J. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of symptomatic upper and lower gastrointestinal Crohn's disease strictures. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:284–290.PMID: 15758621.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Nomura E, Takagi S, Kikuchi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49(10 Suppl): S59–S67.PMID: 17106817.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Ferlitsch A, Reinisch W, Püspök A, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of Crohn's disease strictures. Endoscopy 2006;38:483–487.PMID: 16767583.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 17. Thienpont C, D'Hoore A, Vermeire S, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic dilatation in patients with Crohn's disease is not affected by disease activity or medical therapy. Gut 2010;59:320–324.PMID: 19840991.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Mueller T, Rieder B, Bechtner G, Pfeiffer A. The response of Crohn's strictures to endoscopic balloon dilation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:634–639.PMID: 20047581.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Scimeca D, Mocciaro F, Cottone M, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of symptomatic intestinal Crohn's disease strictures. Dig Liver Dis 2011;43:121–125.PMID: 20561831.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Gustavsson A, Magnuson A, Blomberg B, Andersson M, Halfvarson J, Tysk C. Endoscopic dilation is an efficacious and safe treatment of intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:151–158.PMID: 22612326.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Nanda K, Courtney W, Keegan D, et al. Prolonged avoidance of repeat surgery with endoscopic balloon dilatation of anastomotic strictures in Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013;7:474–480.PMID: 22898397.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Endo K, Takahashi S, Shiga H, Kakuta Y, Kinouchi Y, Shimosegawa T. Short and long-term outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilatation for Crohn's disease strictures. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:86–91.PMID: 23326167.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 23. Bhalme M, Sarkar S, Lal S, Bodger K, Baker R, Willert RP. Endoscopic balloon dilatation of Crohn's disease strictures: results from a large United Kingdom series. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:265–270.PMID: 24374876.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Atreja A, Aggarwal A, Dwivedi S, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic dilation for primary and anastomotic Crohn's disease strictures. J Crohns Colitis 2014;8:392–400.PMID: 24189349.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 25. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:1010–1016.PMID: 15551254.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Yamamoto H, Yano T, Ohmiya N, et al. Double-balloon endoscopy is safe and effective for the diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: prospective multicenter study carried out by expert and non-expert endoscopists in Japan. Dig Endosc 2015;27:331–337.PMID: 25180488.ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Fukumoto A, Tanaka S, Yamamoto H, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel stricture by double balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66(3 Suppl): S108–S112.PMID: 17709019.ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Pohl J, May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of push-and-pull enteroscopy for symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease strictures. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;19:529–534.PMID: 17556897.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Ohmiya N, Arakawa D, Nakamura M, et al. Small-bowel obstruction: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and fluoroscopic enteroclysis, and the outcome of enteroscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:84–93.PMID: 19111689.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Despott EJ, Gupta A, Burling D, et al. Effective dilation of small-bowel strictures by double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with symptomatic Crohn's disease (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1030–1036.PMID: 19640518.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Hirai F, Beppu T, Sou S, Seki T, Yao K, Matsui T. Endoscopic balloon dilatation using double-balloon endoscopy is a useful and safe treatment for small intestinal strictures in Crohn's disease. Dig Endosc 2010;22:200–204.PMID: 20642609.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Gill RS, Kaffes AJ. Small bowel stricture characterization and outcomes of dilatation by double-balloon enteroscopy: a single-centre experience. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014;7:108–114.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 33. Hirai F, Beppu T, Takatsu N, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic balloon dilation for small bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease. Dig Endosc 2014;26:545–551.PMID: 24528293.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Sunada K, Shinozaki S, Nagayama M, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with small intestinal strictures secondary to Crohn's disease after double-balloon endoscopy-assisted balloon dilation. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016;22:380–386.PMID: 26535767.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Morar PS, Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic balloon dilatation for Crohn's disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;42:1137–1148.PMID: 26358739.ArticlePubMed
  • 36. Hassan C, Zullo A, De Francesco V, et al. Systematic review: endoscopic dilatation in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:1457–1464.PMID: 17903236.ArticlePubMed
  • 37. Gustavsson A, Magnuson A, Blomberg B, Andersson M, Halfvarson J, Tysk C. Smoking is a risk factor for recurrence of intestinal stricture after endoscopic dilation in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;37:430–437.PMID: 23205619.ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Brooker JC, Beckett CG, Saunders BP, Benson MJ. Long-acting steroid injection after endoscopic dilation of anastomotic Crohn's strictures may improve the outcome: a retrospective case series. Endoscopy 2003;35:333–337.PMID: 12664391.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 39. Di Nardo G, Oliva S, Passariello M, et al. Intralesional steroid injection after endoscopic balloon dilation in pediatric Crohn's disease with stricture: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:1201–1208.PMID: 20951986.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. East JE, Brooker JC, Rutter MD, Saunders BP. A pilot study of intrastricture steroid versus placebo injection after balloon dilatation of Crohn's strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:1065–1069.PMID: 17627903.ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Hirai F, Beppu T, Nishimura T, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation compared with air insufflation in double-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:743–749.PMID: 21237455.ArticlePubMed
  • 42. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35:1145–1154.PMID: 22452652.ArticlePubMed
  • 43. Lenz P, Meister T, Manno M, et al. CO2 insufflation during single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2014;46:53–58.PMID: 24353124.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 44. Hirai F, Matsui T, Yao K, Sou S, Seki T. Efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in endoscopic balloon dilation therapy by using double balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66(3 Suppl): S26–S29.PMID: 17709025.ArticlePubMed
  • 45. Cosnes J, Cattan S, Blain A, et al. Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2002;8:244–250.PMID: 12131607.ArticlePubMed
  • 46. Sato Y, Matsui T, Yano Y, et al. Long-term course of Crohn's disease in Japan: incidence of complications, cumulative rate of initial surgery, and risk factors at diagnosis for initial surgery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1713–1719.PMID: 26094852.ArticlePubMed
  • 47. Hirai F. Efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation for small bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of Asian Organization for Crohn's & Colitis; 2016 July 7-9; Kyoto, Japan.
  • 48. Greener T, Shapiro R, Klang E, et al. Clinical outcomes of surgery versus endoscopic balloon dilation for stricturing Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58:1151–1157.PMID: 26544812.ArticlePubMed
  • 49. Yamamoto T, Keighley MR. Long-term results of strictureplasty for ileocolonic anastomotic recurrence in Crohn's disease. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3:555–560.PMID: 10482715.ArticlePubMed
  • 50. Sampietro GM, Cristaldi M, Maconi G, et al. A prospective, longitudinal study of nonconventional strictureplasty in Crohn's disease. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:8–20.PMID: 15217622.ArticlePubMed
  • 51. Futami K, Arima S. Role of strictureplasty in surgical treatment of Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol 2005;40(Suppl 16): 35–39.PMID: 15902962.ArticlePubMed
  • 52. Yamamoto T, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP. Safety and efficacy of strictureplasty for Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1968–1986.PMID: 17762967.ArticlePubMed
  • 53. Attar A, Maunoury V, Vahedi K, et al. Safety and efficacy of extractible self-expandable metal stents in the treatment of Crohn's disease intestinal strictures: a prospective pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:1849–1854.PMID: 22161935.ArticlePubMed
  • 54. Loras C, Pérez-Roldan F, Gornals JB, et al. Endoscopic treatment with self-expanding metal stents for Crohn's disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:833–839.PMID: 22966851.ArticlePubMed
  • 55. Kerkhof M, Dewint P, Koch AD, van der Woude CJ. Endoscopic needle-knife treatment of refractory ileo-ascending anastomotic stricture. Endoscopy 2013;45(Suppl 2): E57–E58.PMID: 23526517.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 56. Shen B, Lian L, Kiran RP, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment of ileal pouch strictures. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:2527–2535.PMID: 21351202.ArticlePubMed
Fig. 1

(A) Double-contrast small bowel enterography showed multiple intestinal strictures (arrows) in the ileum. (B) Endoscopic findings of the most severe small bowel stricture. (C) Endoscopic findings during inflation of through-the-scope balloon catheter. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) could be performed for all small bowel strictures. (D) Small bowel stricture markedly improved after EBD. Although two additional EBD sessions were needed, clinical efficacy (defined as no stenotic symptoms and no need for surgery) has been maintained for 5 years after the initial EBD.

ir-15-166-g001.jpg
Table 1

Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Colorectal Stricture in CD

ir-15-166-i001.jpg
Author (year) No. of patients Anastomotic stricture (%) Maximum dilation diameter (mm) Scope passing (%) Technical response (%) Clinical responsea (%) Perforation (%) Observation period (mo) Symptom recurrence (%)
Blomberg et al. (1991)8 27 100 25 100 100 67 7 19 33
Couckuyt et al. (1995)9 55 62 20 73 85 60 11 34 62
Matsui et al. (2000)10 31 31 25 NA 86 86 2 37 55
Sabaté et al. (2003)11 38 68 25 56 84 53 9 60 63
Thomas-Gibson et al. (2003)12 59 90 18 74 81 NA 2 29 41
Morini et al. (2003)13 43 67 18 70 79 42 0 NA NA
Singh et al. (2005)14 17 41 20 96 100 76 10 18 76
Nomura et al. (2006)15 16 44 20 94 94 81 6 20 69
Ferlitsch et al. (2006)16 46 59 20 NA 85 57 4 21 62
Thienpont et al. (2010)17 138 84 18 97 97 76 4 70 56
Mueller et al. (2010)18 55 23 18 95 95 76 2 44 24
Scimeca et al. (2011)19 37 90 20 NA 84 89 0 26 76
Gustavsson et al. (2012)20 178 80 25 NA 89 77 6 84b NA
Nanda et al. (2013)21 31 74 18 100 100 90 0 46 79
Endo et al. (2013)22 30 36 20 94 94 NA 7 26 NA
Bhalme et al. (2014)23 79 57 20 96 96 NA 0 27 63
Atreja et al. (2014)24 128 48 20 83 83 NA 2 33 NA

aAccording to definition based on each study.

bAvailable only in patients from the primary catchment area.

NA, not available.

Table 2

Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Using Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Small Bowel Stricture in CD

ir-15-166-i002.jpg
Author (year) No. of CD patients Maximum dilation diameter (mm) Technical success (%) Clinical efficacya (%) Perforation (%) Observation period (mo) Symptom recurrence (%)
Fukumoto et al. (2007)27 23 NA NA 74b 0 12 26b
Pohl et al. (2007)28 10 16.5 NA 80 0 NA NA
Ohmiya et al. (2009)29 16 20 96 NA NA NA 31b
Despott et al. (2009)30 11 20 73 73 9 21 25
Hirai et al. (2010)31 25 18 72 72 0 11 22
Gill and Kaffes (2014)32 10 16.5 100 80 20 NA NA
Hirai et al. (2014)33 65 20 80 80 2 40 37
Sunada et al. (2016)34 85 15 NA 87 5 42 NA

aAccording to definition based on each study.

bData from patients with CD only.

NA, not available.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Safety and effectiveness of additional triamcinolone acetonide with endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: A pilot study
      Rintaro Moroi, Kotaro Nochioka, Satoshi Miyata, Hideya Iwaki, Hirofumi Chiba, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
      DEN Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Endoscopic radial incision and cutting using balloonassisted enteroscopy for small intestinal stenosis related to Crohn’s disease: a pilot study
      Rintaro Moroi, Kotaro Nochioka, Satoshi Miyata, Hideya Iwaki, Hirofumi Chiba, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
      Intestinal Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Enteroscopic Balloon Dilation in Small Bowel Stricturing Crohn’s Disease: Long‐Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Surgery in a Single‐Center Prospective Observational Study
      Sung Noh Hong, Ji Eun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, Young‐Ho Kim
      United European Gastroenterology Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Short-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a national analysis
      Russyan Mark Mabeza, Amulya Vadlakonda, Nikhil Chervu, Shayan Ebrahimian, Sara Sakowitz, Amy Yetasook, Peyman Benharash
      Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases.2024; 20(2): 146.     CrossRef
    • Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Stricturotomy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
      Fouad Jaber, Laith Numan, Mohammed Ayyad, Mohamed Abuelazm, Muhammad Imran, Majd M. AlBarakat, Aya M. Aboutaleb, Ubaid Khan, Saqr Alsakarneh, Mohammad Bilal
      Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(11): 4152.     CrossRef
    • Advanced Techniques in Therapeutic and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colonoscopy
      Alexander Worix, Rajesh N. Keswani
      Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2024; 53(4): 587.     CrossRef
    • Clinical Practice and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Crohn’s Disease–Related Strictures: A Nationwide Claim Database Analysis in Japan
      Rintaro Moroi, Kunio Tarasawa, Hiroshi Nagai, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Shin Hamada, Yoichi Kakuta, Kiyohide Fushimi, Kenji Fujimori, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune, Eiji Sakai
      Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Endoskopische und chirurgische Behandlung intestinaler Stenosen im Zusammenhang mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen
      Tabea Pfister, Jonas Zbinden, Benjamin Misselwitz, Emanuel Burri, Florian Rieder, Lukas Brügger, Reiner Wiest
      Schweizer Gastroenterologie.2024; 5(4): 103.     CrossRef
    • Factors associated with the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatation of symptomatic strictures in Crohn’s disease: a retrospective cohort study
      Pierre Dandoy, Edouard Louis, Pierrette Gast, Maxime Poncin, Laurence Seidel, Jean-Philippe Loly
      Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(6): 671.     CrossRef
    • Approach to Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Pediatric Stricturing Crohn Disease: A Position Paper of the Endoscopy Special Interest Group of ESPGHAN
      Oren Ledder, Matjaž Homan, Raoul Furlano, Alexandra Papadopoulou, Salvatore Oliva, Jorge Amil Dias, Luigi Dall’oglio, Simona Faraci, Priya Narula, Dominique Schluckebier, Bruno Hauser, Andreia Nita, Claudio Romano, Christos Tzivinikos, Patrick Bontems, Mi
      Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition.2023; 76(6): 799.     CrossRef
    • Anastomotic Configuration and Temporary Diverting Ileostomy Do Not Increase Risk of Anastomotic Stricture in Postoperative Crohn's Disease
      Salam P. Bachour, Muhammad Z. Khan, Ravi S. Shah, Abel Joseph, Hareem Syed, Adel Hajj Ali, Florian Rieder, Stefan D. Holubar, Edward L. Barnes, Jordan Axelrad, Miguel Regueiro, Benjamin L. Cohen, Benjamin H. Click
      American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2212.     CrossRef
    • Novel deformable self-assembled magnetic anastomosis ring for endoscopic treatment of colonic stenosis via natural orifice
      Miao-Miao Zhang, Guang-Bin Zhao, Han-Zhi Zhang, Shu-Qin Xu, Ai-Hua Shi, Jian-Qi Mao, Jing-Ci Gai, Yu-Han Zhang, Jia Ma, Yun Li, Yi Lyu, Xiao-Peng Yan
      World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(33): 5005.     CrossRef
    • Magnetic compression anastomosis for sigmoid stenosis treatment: A case report
      Miao-Miao Zhang, Yi Gao, Xiao-Yang Ren, Huan-Chen Sha, Yi Lyu, Fang-Fang Dong, Xiao-Peng Yan
      World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(12): 745.     CrossRef
    • A Phase II Clinical Trial to Study the Safety of Triamcinolone after Endoscopic Radial Incision and Cutting Dilatation for Benign Stenosis of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract: A Study Protocol
      RINTARO MOROI, HISASHI SHIGA, KOTARO NOCHIOKA, HIROFUMI CHIBA, YUSUKE SHIMOYAMA, MOTOYUKI ONODERA, TAKEO NAITO, MASAKI TOSA, YOICHI KAKUTA, YUICHIRO SATO, SHOICHI KAYABA, SEICHI TAKAHASHI, SATOSHI MIYATA, YOSHITAKA KINOUCHI, ATSUSHI MASAMUNE
      The Kurume Medical Journal.2023; 70(1.2): 53.     CrossRef
    • Usefulness of Fluoroscopy for Endoscopic Balloon Dilation of Crohn’s Disease-Related Strictures
      Hyun Seok Lee, Michael V. Chiorean, Elisa Boden, James Lord, Shayan Irani, Richard Kozarek, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross
      Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(4): 1295.     CrossRef
    • Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation for intestinal strictures in patients with Crohn's disease during maintenance treatment with anti‐tumor necrosis factor alpha antibodies
      Teruyuki Takeda, Masahiro Kishi, Noritaka Takatsu, Yasumichi Takada, Tsuyoshi Beppu, Masaki Miyaoka, Takashi Hisabe, Toshiharu Ueki, Hisatomi Arima, Fumihito Hirai, Kenshi Yao
      Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 517.     CrossRef
    • A pilot study investigating the safety and feasibility of endoscopic dilation using a radial incision and cutting technique for benign strictures of the small intestine: a study protocol
      Rintaro Moroi, Hisashi Shiga, Kotaro Nochioka, Yusuke Shimoyama, Masatake Kuroha, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
      Pilot and Feasibility Studies.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign stenosis of the lower gastrointestinal tract: An investigation of novel endoscopic treatment in multicenter trial
      Rintaro Moroi, Hisashi Shiga, Kotaro Nochioka, Hirofumi Chiba, Yusuke Shimoyama, Masatake Kuroha, Masaki Tosa, Yoichi Kakuta, Shoichi Kayaba, Seiichi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Atsushi Masamune
      Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(8): 1554.     CrossRef
    • Guidelines for endoscopic balloon dilation in treating Crohn's disease‐associated small intestinal strictures (supplement to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enteroscopy)
      Hironori Yamamoto, Tomonori Yano, Akihiro Araki, Motohiro Esaki, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Naoki Ohmiya, Shiro Oka, Hiroshi Nakase, Shigeki Bamba, Fumihito Hirai, Naoki Hosoe, Tomoki Matsuda, Keigo Mitsui, Kenji Watanabe, Haruhiko Ogata, Shinichi Katsuki, Takayuki M
      Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(7): 1278.     CrossRef
    • Managing Stricturing Crohn's Disease: Resect? Strictureplasty? Dilate?
      Lea Lowenfeld, Fabrizio Michelassi
      Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2021; 31(8): 881.     CrossRef
    • Crohn’s disease at radiological imaging: focus on techniques and intestinal tract
      Giuseppe Cicero, Silvio Mazziotti
      Intestinal Research.2021; 19(4): 365.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of the endoscopic treatment with topical prednisolone administration for intestinal strictures in Crohn’s disease
      Yaroslav Feleshtynskiy, Anna Mylianovska, Volodymyr Pirogovsky, Olena Dyadyk
      Polish Journal of Surgery.2021; 94(1): 28.     CrossRef
    • Objective evaluation for treat to target in Crohn’s disease
      Kento Takenaka, Yoshio Kitazume, Toshimitsu Fujii, Kiichiro Tsuchiya, Mamoru Watanabe, Kazuo Ohtsuka
      Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 55(6): 579.     CrossRef
    • Strictures in Crohn’s Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment
      Mattia Crespi, Pietro Dulbecco, Antonella De Ceglie, Massimo Conio
      Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2020; 65(7): 1904.     CrossRef
    • A Novel Capsule Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease
      Teppei Omori, Takayuki Matsumoto, Toshifumi Hara, Harutaka Kambayashi, Shun Murasugi, Ayumi Ito, Maria Yonezawa, Shinichi Nakamura, Katsutoshi Tokushige
      Crohn's & Colitis 360.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Correlation between age of onset and gastrointestinal stenosis in hospitalized patients with Crohn's disease
      Shan-Bing Yang, Shu-Wen Du, Ji-Heng Wang
      World Journal of Clinical Cases.2020; 8(13): 2769.     CrossRef
    • Strictures in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
      Jason Reinglas, Talat Bessissow
      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2019; 29(3): 549.     CrossRef
    • Endoscopic management of Crohn’s strictures
      Talat Bessissow, Jason Reinglas, Achuthan Aruljothy, Peter L Lakatos, Gert Van Assche
      World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(17): 1859.     CrossRef
    • Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Crohn’s Disease-Associated Strictures
      Thomas Klag, Jan Wehkamp, Martin Goetz
      Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(5): 429.     CrossRef
    • Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: advances in disease management
      Elizabeth A. Scoville, David A. Schwartz
      Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 86(6): 952.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease
      Intest Res. 2017;15(2):166-173.   Published online April 27, 2017
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.166
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    Related articles
    Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease
    Image
    Fig. 1 (A) Double-contrast small bowel enterography showed multiple intestinal strictures (arrows) in the ileum. (B) Endoscopic findings of the most severe small bowel stricture. (C) Endoscopic findings during inflation of through-the-scope balloon catheter. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) could be performed for all small bowel strictures. (D) Small bowel stricture markedly improved after EBD. Although two additional EBD sessions were needed, clinical efficacy (defined as no stenotic symptoms and no need for surgery) has been maintained for 5 years after the initial EBD.

    Fig. 1

    Current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn's disease

    Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Colorectal Stricture in CD

    Author (year)No. of patientsAnastomotic stricture (%)Maximum dilation diameter (mm)Scope passing (%)Technical response (%)Clinical responsea (%)Perforation (%)Observation period (mo)Symptom recurrence (%)
    Blomberg et al. (1991)827100251001006771933
    Couckuyt et al. (1995)9556220738560113462
    Matsui et al. (2000)10313125NA868623755
    Sabaté et al. (2003)1138682556845396063
    Thomas-Gibson et al. (2003)125990187481NA22941
    Morini et al. (2003)134367187079420NANA
    Singh et al. (2005)141741209610076101876
    Nomura et al. (2006)1516442094948162069
    Ferlitsch et al. (2006)16465920NA855742162
    Thienpont et al. (2010)17138841897977647056
    Mueller et al. (2010)1855231895957624424
    Scimeca et al. (2011)19379020NA848902676
    Gustavsson et al. (2012)201788025NA8977684bNA
    Nanda et al. (2013)213174181001009004679
    Endo et al. (2013)223036209494NA726NA
    Bhalme et al. (2014)237957209696NA02763
    Atreja et al. (2014)2412848208383NA233NA

    aAccording to definition based on each study.

    bAvailable only in patients from the primary catchment area.

    NA, not available.

    Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Using Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Small Bowel Stricture in CD

    Author (year)No. of CD patientsMaximum dilation diameter (mm)Technical success (%)Clinical efficacya (%)Perforation (%)Observation period (mo)Symptom recurrence (%)
    Fukumoto et al. (2007)2723NANA74b01226b
    Pohl et al. (2007)281016.5NA800NANA
    Ohmiya et al. (2009)29162096NANANA31b
    Despott et al. (2009)301120737392125
    Hirai et al. (2010)312518727201122
    Gill and Kaffes (2014)321016.51008020NANA
    Hirai et al. (2014)336520808024037
    Sunada et al. (2016)348515NA87542NA

    aAccording to definition based on each study.

    bData from patients with CD only.

    NA, not available.
    Table 1 Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Colorectal Stricture in CD

    aAccording to definition based on each study.

    bAvailable only in patients from the primary catchment area.

    NA, not available.

    Table 2 Summary of Published Studies on Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Using Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Small Bowel Stricture in CD

    aAccording to definition based on each study.

    bData from patients with CD only.

    NA, not available.

    Table 1

    Table 2

    Intest Res : Intestinal Research
    © Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases.
    Close layer
    TOP